Topic: All about bounty payments and its effect to the project - page 4. (Read 2094 times)
the amount of bounty does not exceed 1% of the total amount of coins, in most cases. Even if all the merchant hunters sell tokens, it will not have much impact. if it's a quality item, it will respond quickly, in a few days.
legendary
Activity: 2072
Merit: 2012
Marketing Campaign Manager |Telegram ID- @LT_Mouse
It's your wrong thoughts, bounty hunters aren't promised not to sell, in fact, no one is promised. Everyone can do whatever they wish, no bounty hunter is guilty. You are blaming bounty hunters, imagine, no bounty hunters sells, who would dump then, you investors of course and who will be the loser? It's bounty hunters.
I was once an investor had few gains to some ICO/crowdsale but made many losses so I decided to stop participating in ICO instead I do bounties and buy it thru exchanges from bounty hunters dumping it.
I know for a fact that most of you know this situation and are guilty of it, price tends to tank due to bounty hunters selling their share of tokens for cheap. I think its better to pay hunters in eth or other alts rather than risking the price of their token or coin in that way they could also help their investors and boost confidence to their future and their project. Well for me a falling price is a mark of a failing project "ICO's"
I also believe that the ico is currently not profitable for investment. And at the same time the market has a lot of one-day projects. This means that confidence in such projects has dropped significantly. I also went to bounty hunter. But i don`t want to promote one-day projects. At the same time new projects appear daily and they need to be properly filtered.I know for a fact that most of you know this situation and are guilty of it, price tends to tank due to bounty hunters selling their share of tokens for cheap. I think its better to pay hunters in eth or other alts rather than risking the price of their token or coin in that way they could also help their investors and boost confidence to their future and their project. Well for me a falling price is a mark of a failing project "ICO's"
To avoid falling prices on exchange, projects need to create a system gradual transfer of tokens for bounty hunters so that they gradually sell these tokens.
But the project itself should be promising and very often communicate with the audience.
Though falling price mark can be attributed to a failing project, I do wonder why people mostly blame bounty hunters for dumping while in the real essence, only 1-5% of token distribution is allocated for bounty. Investors dump and bounty hunters also dump when both see price falling. we should consider that 1-5% of token distribution out of 100% is not enough to cause fall in price and to make bounty managers and investors really understand this, project managers should decide to pay in ETH and still observe if they won't see great dumping of tokens. people should refrain from blaming bounty hunters and face the reality.
It is undeniable that bounty hunters dump, but before that, there are some set of people who also dump, but that it is still not clear whether investors or those who partner with the project team are the ones that dump tokens and cause the dump from the beginning.
Therefore, bounty hunters should not be blamed for dumping their tokens, because a good project will not be affected any any dump from them.
Therefore, bounty hunters should not be blamed for dumping their tokens, because a good project will not be affected any any dump from them.
Bounty hunter sale their token low price. They sale all time low price their token. It never bring any effect of this project. Payment of bounty hunter of ETH. Its a very good idea.
But no one will now pay in eth , the project will simply be at a loss , it is better to pay in tokens as it is profitable for the project , and in General the ico is not in the best spirit I was once an investor had few gains to some ICO/crowdsale but made many losses so I decided to stop participating in ICO instead I do bounties and buy it thru exchanges from bounty hunters dumping it.
I know for a fact that most of you know this situation and are guilty of it, price tends to tank due to bounty hunters selling their share of tokens for cheap. I think its better to pay hunters in eth or other alts rather than risking the price of their token or coin in that way they could also help their investors and boost confidence to their future and their project. Well for me a falling price is a mark of a failing project "ICO's"
I know for a fact that most of you know this situation and are guilty of it, price tends to tank due to bounty hunters selling their share of tokens for cheap. I think its better to pay hunters in eth or other alts rather than risking the price of their token or coin in that way they could also help their investors and boost confidence to their future and their project. Well for me a falling price is a mark of a failing project "ICO's"
The problem is the companies ahave been collecting much less ETH than they used to, so they don't have ETH to spare on bounties. They gotta pay with tokens and this is probably unavoidable.
I agree with you definitely. Since bounty hunters are working to be paid, paying them in Ethereum or Bitcoin is a better way to prevent them from dumping the tokens given to them. On the part of bounty hunters too, they will not have to wait for a long while before they can exchange the tokens.
Projects should create utilities for their tokens that way the price will always be high, blame shouldn't be put on anyone who wish to sell his earned tokens at the current market price. Bounty hunters are working and most have financial needs to meet which they can only do by selling the tokens they earned from promoting an ICO.
Bounty hunter sale their token low price. They sale all time low price their token. It never bring any effect of this project. Payment of bounty hunter of ETH. Its a very good idea.
This depends largely on the project. If the project is really good and has enough financial resources, actually the money for bounty is quite small compared to their capitalization. Many projects still succeed despite paying a lot of rewards for bounty hunters.
it all depends on the team managing the project because they really know the condition of the project itself.for example, the hardcap ICO at this time does not guarantee that the project is successful because of a variety of things so we really have to choose a project that has a good team that can manage the project well even if it does not have large funds.
so big or small prizes don't really affect the success of the project.
I was once an investor had few gains to some ICO/crowdsale but made many losses so I decided to stop participating in ICO instead I do bounties and buy it thru exchanges from bounty hunters dumping it.
I know for a fact that most of you know this situation and are guilty of it, price tends to tank due to bounty hunters selling their share of tokens for cheap. I think its better to pay hunters in eth or other alts rather than risking the price of their token or coin in that way they could also help their investors and boost confidence to their future and their project. Well for me a falling price is a mark of a failing project "ICO's"
If you are going to invest with the mindset of long term holding, then you shouldn't be bothered about the few tokens that will be dumped by bounty hunters. I know for a fact that most of you know this situation and are guilty of it, price tends to tank due to bounty hunters selling their share of tokens for cheap. I think its better to pay hunters in eth or other alts rather than risking the price of their token or coin in that way they could also help their investors and boost confidence to their future and their project. Well for me a falling price is a mark of a failing project "ICO's"
Bounty payments do not have any big influence on the project. Only ICOs with a very weak team management, can allow a price drop after exchange listing. There were so much examples of hunters getting real money, without any price drops after the listing.
Exactly, ICOs are not really potential, not many investors will make ICO quickly dumped when listed on exchange. The number of tokens that bounty hunter receives is very low and is only a part of ICO's price decrease
The problem is not only hunters fault but also project dev. They always want cheap means of getting their token marketed and that is while they choose to pay hunters using token. Some of them do not have enough capital to build a well functional site not to talk about getting promotions. We have seen in the past where project decide to pay hunters in btc just like few ones on the services section but bulk of project prefer token
Bounties are indeed for a project to get succeed but most of the projects were blaming bounty hunters for dumping it,if they dont need dumping they should pay in bitcoins.
Many people think Bounty hunters are dumping the price, but if you look at the allocation of the tokens, you can see that hunters are usually getting less than 5% of the total amount, which do not have a big impact on price. Anyway, the best option for the project is to make payments in BTC or ETH.
Therefore the one who will blame for it,is either the investors and the team behind it because technically they are the one who has a great control to the token due to having a huge allocation for them. I also think that eth and btc must be the primary mode of payment and the team must convert their coin to either btc or eth if they are going to pay participants so that it wont affect the price of their coin too much.
This depends largely on the project. If the project is really good and has enough financial resources, actually the money for bounty is quite small compared to their capitalization. Many projects still succeed despite paying a lot of rewards for bounty hunters.
Many people think Bounty hunters are dumping the price, but if you look at the allocation of the tokens, you can see that hunters are usually getting less than 5% of the total amount, which do not have a big impact on price. Anyway, the best option for the project is to make payments in BTC or ETH.
The effect isn't as bad as most people see it, reason being that most developers usually set funds aside to use in repurchasing the tokens given out. So it doesn't really have an adverse effect as many people think.
Yes in fact ico coins and tokens are undervalued after it gets listed. Only few of the project had succeeded to increase their coins and tokens after exchange.
Bounty payments are relarivyely small.comprelares to other jobs.
Bounty payments are relarivyely small.comprelares to other jobs.
Well, participation in the bounty does not require much experience. After 2017, many people became greedy, they want to earn thousands of dollars from one project, which they chose almost at random in 5 minutes.
We are all hungry. Because many projects offend us and do not give rewards. We have to work hard on the topic of projects that pay at least on paper.
Jump to: