Pages:
Author

Topic: Alt possibilities for 4 high rank accounts - page 3. (Read 1403 times)

member
Activity: 99
Merit: 28
I love Bitcoin
Based on the OP investigation, we cannot claim these accounts as alts.
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1228
They may be alt, but we can't do anything [tag them] except cheat the campaign and you can prove it with other findings like wallet connections, social media and more.

At this point the findings are quite important considering they are high ranking members, but it looks like you failed to get the attention of many people here to reveal them.

Pay attention to the screenshot numbers, very neatly arranged in each account. What is the percentage chance that they are alts in your opinion?
It's a bit suspicious actually, but I think it's still weak enough to draw conclusions without any other supporting evidence. If you have other evidence you can reveal it in a dedicated thread as some have suggested.

legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1208
Once a man, twice a child!
OP, it's more likely that your account is an alt too. We know it's almost impracticable for a newbie account to know how to hunt down alts when they haven't even got used to navigating the forum. With just seven posts to your credit you're already acting detective. How credible is that? Anyway, your suspicion of them being alts isn't concrete enough if what you've got on them is posting style coincidence. You've to provide strong and veritable evidence like wallet address connections and other formats used in the Known Alts of Any-one thread.
hero member
Activity: 2590
Merit: 650
Want top-notch marketing for your project, Hire me
If you want to accuse any user of using alt to abuse the merit system you'll need to provide a piece of strong evidence which i believe will be far more than posting style because people from the always have the same posting style and recommend by the above user.
I will advise you to post your claim in the Known Alts of any-one thread
hero member
Activity: 1400
Merit: 655
Bitcoin is achievement
I think you would have posted this to the thread were users who is noted to commit crime of  cheating in bounty are posted, below are the link

Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2022 Q2) this link was render to you before by Bitcoin_Arena, so think this your finding will get more traffic or attention through this specific place

legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 2017
I've been looking at their profiles and it doesn't seem so clear to me that Lantind is alt of the other two. Then, it is true that Republikcoin, bestcoins1 and Davian144 have given some merits to each other but the rest of the merits have been spread a lot among other members. So I don't see any merit abuse, and there is from theymos saying that the only relevant thing you should red tag regarding this would be for having bought or sold merit, which is hard to prove. Or something like that, I don't remember exactly but I can't find the quote just by googling.

I'm in DT and it doesn't seem worth even a neutral tag to me, unless they admit it. Davian144 and Lantind already have a relevant neutral tag for spammers.

Even if they were alts, they are part of different signature campaings, so they don't break the rules either.
copper member
Activity: 1960
Merit: 1638
Top Crypto Casino
They might be alts, which according to the forum rules is allowed. So, I don't think any DT member may tag the accounts on grounds that they are just alt accounts posting in gambling section or exchanging merits {at least in the past, accounts engaged in merit abuse have not been tagged}
But if you have any good proof showing that they for example cheated in signature campaigns, contests, involved in trust manipulations etc., Now might be the right time to add that.
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 25
I have very basic suspicions about 4 high ranking accounts after watching their activity for a long time in one of the threads on the gambling board.

Here's a list of accounts:

I noticed the posting styles of these 4 accounts had the same thing in common when posting image, and it made me think they were owned by the same person. They are Indonesian users based on the language used in the posting history and if they are alt then they have also abused the merit system based on their merit transaction history.

I need some input and maybe some more valid proof from yours to determine if they are alt or not as every image they upload have have identical serial numbers at the end which is usually just a sequence of screenshot numbers on the same device. This is evidence from their last 5 image posts.

All quotes taken in one thread: Motosport General discussion tread --- Formula1, MotoGP, WTCC, ETCC, DTM.....




Pay attention to the screenshot numbers, very neatly arranged in each account. What is the percentage chance that they are alts in your opinion?
Pages:
Jump to: