Topic: [AMD] New AMD RX Graphics Cards of 2019 - RX 5700 / XT, RX 600 - page 17. (Read 23318 times)
Actually the 5700xt is pretty good compared to what could offer in the past vega or even rx 590 x gtx 1070, both failed attempt, amd has now succeeded with 5700xt but to say is close to rtx 2080 is spreading misinformation around. 5700xt a little bit better than the rtx 2070 and 20% slower than the rtx 2080.
soooo many lies here... do AMD ppz can`t stand the truth
RX5700 is very bad card with ~200w power usage on par with rtx2060 super deal with it!
and monero 1400h/s speed is for 6x5700 cards NOT ONE CARD!!!! FFS
stop the FUD
RX5700 is very bad card with ~200w power usage on par with rtx2060 super deal with it!
and monero 1400h/s speed is for 6x5700 cards NOT ONE CARD!!!! FFS
stop the FUD
Definition of FUD being competing emotional claims without any supporting evidence. Word from the devs is the tools are broke, so any hashrate claims (whether high or low) are currently nonsense, unless you've got your own dev team.
Thanks for adding a well researched and beautifully punctuated counterpoint.
Depends on how much power it’s using to get this FPS
About 250W which is not too much above default consumption:
https://www.tomshw.de/2019/07/11/ungefesselt-radeon-rx-5700-xt-auf-ueber-22-ghz-uebertaktet-break-the-limits-mit-den-neuen-softpowerplaytables-fuer-die-rx-5700-und-rx-5700-xt/2/
soooo many lies here... do AMD ppz can`t stand the truth
RX5700 is very bad card with ~200w power usage on par with rtx2060 super deal with it!
and monero 1400h/s speed is for 6x5700 cards NOT ONE CARD!!!! FFS
stop the FUD
RX5700 is very bad card with ~200w power usage on par with rtx2060 super deal with it!
and monero 1400h/s speed is for 6x5700 cards NOT ONE CARD!!!! FFS
stop the FUD
5700XR is very good card almost on par with 2080 , but for half the price
Depends on how much power it’s using to get this FPS
soooo many lies here... do AMD ppz can`t stand the truth
RX5700 is very bad card with ~200w power usage on par with rtx2060 super deal with it!
and monero 1400h/s speed is for 6x5700 cards NOT ONE CARD!!!! FFS
stop the FUD
RX5700 is very bad card with ~200w power usage on par with rtx2060 super deal with it!
and monero 1400h/s speed is for 6x5700 cards NOT ONE CARD!!!! FFS
stop the FUD
5700XR is very good card almost on par with 2080 , but for half the price
soooo many lies here... do AMD ppz can`t stand the truth
RX5700 is very bad card with ~200w power usage on par with rtx2060 super deal with it!
and monero 1400h/s speed is for 6x5700 cards NOT ONE CARD!!!! FFS
stop the FUD
RX5700 is very bad card with ~200w power usage on par with rtx2060 super deal with it!
and monero 1400h/s speed is for 6x5700 cards NOT ONE CARD!!!! FFS
stop the FUD
nanominer v1.5.1
@Grumpy-Dwarf Grumpy-Dwarf released this 18 hours ago
Added Ethash binaries for AMD Radeon RX 5700 and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT cards. Performance is awful but maybe it will boost with next driver update.
https://github.com/nanopool/nanominer/releases
tests?
@Grumpy-Dwarf Grumpy-Dwarf released this 18 hours ago
Added Ethash binaries for AMD Radeon RX 5700 and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT cards. Performance is awful but maybe it will boost with next driver update.
https://github.com/nanopool/nanominer/releases
tests?
Gigabyte RX5700
Cryptonight-GPU (Ryo)
1290 h/s stock
1400 h/s OC 1786mhz core
150W (GPUz)
which miner?
nanominer v1.5.1
@Grumpy-Dwarf Grumpy-Dwarf released this 18 hours ago
Added Ethash binaries for AMD Radeon RX 5700 and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT cards. Performance is awful but maybe it will boost with next driver update.
https://github.com/nanopool/nanominer/releases
tests?
@Grumpy-Dwarf Grumpy-Dwarf released this 18 hours ago
Added Ethash binaries for AMD Radeon RX 5700 and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT cards. Performance is awful but maybe it will boost with next driver update.
https://github.com/nanopool/nanominer/releases
tests?
I got "No GPU devices were detected" error with Nanominer. Claymore's Dual Miner and PhoenixMiner can detect the card, so I don't know what's the problem with Nanominer. Btw I think that "awful" means ~3-4MH/s for Ethash mining with RX 5700, so the same what I can get using the other softwares.
I hope that the above mentioned developers will update their miner soon - but it won't be easy because this is a totally new architecture.
Hi guys,
well, i'm also waiting for a miner...
meanwhile, I have a Brute Force software, that uses both Memory and Core intensively, and just for you to have an idea of the XR5700XT performance relative to other cards:
- RX470 - 35.5 to 41.6 MKeys/s
- GTX1050ti - ~27 MKeys/s
- GTX1060 - ~48 MKeys/s
- GTX1070ti - ~78 MKeys/s
- RX5700XT - 158 to 161 MKeys/s (YES, THAT'S A LOT for a 400$ Card!)
I Don't know if it's the new Architecture, but i was SHOCKED when I compiled the code and got it Runnig...
so, and i know this things are not linear, we have a factor of x3.87 compared to the RX470...
extrapolating to ETH:
RX470 - 30 to 32MH/s (mine does 33.2 MH/s
)
RX5700XT - 116.1 to 123.84 MH/s
take this calculations with 'a full gram' of salt!
well, i'm also waiting for a miner...
meanwhile, I have a Brute Force software, that uses both Memory and Core intensively, and just for you to have an idea of the XR5700XT performance relative to other cards:
- RX470 - 35.5 to 41.6 MKeys/s
- GTX1050ti - ~27 MKeys/s
- GTX1060 - ~48 MKeys/s
- GTX1070ti - ~78 MKeys/s
- RX5700XT - 158 to 161 MKeys/s (YES, THAT'S A LOT for a 400$ Card!)
I Don't know if it's the new Architecture, but i was SHOCKED when I compiled the code and got it Runnig...
so, and i know this things are not linear, we have a factor of x3.87 compared to the RX470...
extrapolating to ETH:
RX470 - 30 to 32MH/s (mine does 33.2 MH/s
)RX5700XT - 116.1 to 123.84 MH/s
take this calculations with 'a full gram' of salt!
Before everyone starts buying out your local Bestbuy: Brute force is EXACTLY what is sounds like. I'm no fancy bit city AMD low level engineer, but as mining goes we are also looking at quite a few other factors that extrapolate fairly badly with a straight brute force test. That said, awesome work, and I'm sure the new AMD cards are gonna be pretty killer. I seriously doubt that a 5700 XT will push EThash higher than a Radeon VII for many reasons, but I look forward to be proven wrong.
My semi-educated guess is that the 5700 XT will land around 1080ti performance based on memory bandwidth, and chipset (as a wild median). Outperform 1080/1080ti (2070) in general, but otherwise not break the laws of progressive performance except perhaps in some cases.
Remember (and I'm trying real hard not to bash AMD here), AMD do make great 'on paper' hardware. But driver and utilization wise, they have literally never over-performed.
nanominer v1.5.1
@Grumpy-Dwarf Grumpy-Dwarf released this 18 hours ago
Added Ethash binaries for AMD Radeon RX 5700 and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT cards. Performance is awful but maybe it will boost with next driver update.
https://github.com/nanopool/nanominer/releases
tests?
@Grumpy-Dwarf Grumpy-Dwarf released this 18 hours ago
Added Ethash binaries for AMD Radeon RX 5700 and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT cards. Performance is awful but maybe it will boost with next driver update.
https://github.com/nanopool/nanominer/releases
tests?
Gigabyte RX5700
Cryptonight-GPU (Ryo)
1290 h/s stock
1400 h/s OC 1786mhz core
150W (GPUz)
which miner?
I was thinking its for nanominer.. .but i'm getting "could not find binary for gfx1010 device" for cnr, so maybe not for nanominer.
nanominer v1.5.1
@Grumpy-Dwarf Grumpy-Dwarf released this 18 hours ago
Added Ethash binaries for AMD Radeon RX 5700 and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT cards. Performance is awful but maybe it will boost with next driver update.
https://github.com/nanopool/nanominer/releases
tests?
@Grumpy-Dwarf Grumpy-Dwarf released this 18 hours ago
Added Ethash binaries for AMD Radeon RX 5700 and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT cards. Performance is awful but maybe it will boost with next driver update.
https://github.com/nanopool/nanominer/releases
tests?
Gigabyte RX5700
Cryptonight-GPU (Ryo)
1290 h/s stock
1400 h/s OC 1786mhz core
150W (GPUz)
which miner?
nanominer v1.5.1
@Grumpy-Dwarf Grumpy-Dwarf released this 18 hours ago
Added Ethash binaries for AMD Radeon RX 5700 and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT cards. Performance is awful but maybe it will boost with next driver update.
https://github.com/nanopool/nanominer/releases
tests?
@Grumpy-Dwarf Grumpy-Dwarf released this 18 hours ago
Added Ethash binaries for AMD Radeon RX 5700 and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT cards. Performance is awful but maybe it will boost with next driver update.
https://github.com/nanopool/nanominer/releases
tests?
Gigabyte RX5700
Cryptonight-GPU (Ryo)
1290 h/s stock
1400 h/s OC 1786mhz core
150W (GPUz)
It seems 5700XT OpenCL score falls between 2080 and 2080TI:
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Powerful-system-sporting-AMD-s-Radeon-RX-5700-XT-racks-up-colossal-OpenCL-score-on-Geekbench.426956.0.html
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Powerful-system-sporting-AMD-s-Radeon-RX-5700-XT-racks-up-colossal-OpenCL-score-on-Geekbench.426956.0.html
Subbing - really sad to see this new arch having trouble getting off the ground..
Its AMD's openCL compiler...its totally bugged for the new arch. Im sure the ASM guys already have working kernels that are probably super fast but obviously wont put anything public for a while.
I hope when the non-reference models are out we will have working miners.
Subbing - really sad to see this new arch having trouble getting off the ground..
That is true for pcie 3.0 and below but im talking about the newest 4.0 as it has a different power requirement and there are reports of it not working at lower speeds with some bios. it's something that needs to be fleshed out over time.
I didn't know that 4.0 is not backward compatible... that's bad. PCI-E 4 isn't compatible with current GPU risers. Some people have been able to mess with BIOS and get them working by changing them to pcie 3.0 speeds, but not all mobos work like this. So plug the GPUs directly into the mobo 16x Slot to utilize it and even then you wont see any mining improvements.
PCI-E are backward compatible so you can run cards even on 1.1. Which lot of miners did on older mobos to get 6 and more cards running back then. Every mining mobo and most of the newer mobos have option to set PCI-E version.That is true for pcie 3.0 and below but im talking about the newest 4.0 as it has a different power requirement and there are reports of it not working at lower speeds with some bios. it's something that needs to be fleshed out over time.
PCI-E 4 isn't compatible with current GPU risers. Some people have been able to mess with BIOS and get them working by changing them to pcie 3.0 speeds, but not all mobos work like this. So plug the GPUs directly into the mobo 16x Slot to utilize it and even then you wont see any mining improvements.
PCI-E are backward compatible so you can run cards even on 1.1. Which lot of miners did on older mobos to get 6 and more cards running back then. Every mining mobo and most of the newer mobos have option to set PCI-E version. Don't forget, these are PCI-E 4.0 cards, thats twice as fast loading DAG into card memory
(need X570 chipset and Ryzen 3xxx processor, though)
(need X570 chipset and Ryzen 3xxx processor, though)
PCI-E 4 isn't compatible with current GPU risers. Some people have been able to mess with BIOS and get them working by changing them to pcie 3.0 speeds, but not all mobos work like this. So plug the GPUs directly into the mobo 16x Slot to utilize it and even then you wont see any mining improvements.
Jump to: