Topic: [AMD] New AMD RX Graphics Cards of 2019 - RX 5700 / XT, RX 600 - page 19. (Read 23318 times)
Something while no one is going to release a miner for RX 5700
Got the asus rx5700 xt today so hope there will be a miner soon;)
Ordered one 5700XT for testing. Devs you have some days for update your miners 
It seems,
5700 come swith Micron D9WCW MT61K256M32JE-14:A they are specified to run at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps GDDR6 effective).
5700xt comes with Samsung K4Z80325BC-HC14 : they are specified to run at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps GDDR6 effective) too.
waiting for results with optimised kernels...
5700 come swith Micron D9WCW MT61K256M32JE-14:A they are specified to run at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps GDDR6 effective).
5700xt comes with Samsung K4Z80325BC-HC14 : they are specified to run at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps GDDR6 effective) too.
waiting for results with optimised kernels...
Thanks for that info, interesting.
they probably did it on purpose to keep miners at bay until gamers buy them 
)
)Going on that logic then they will change that everytime they release a new gpu hehe, dont think that is the case but who really knows.
The recap of my 2.5h stream can be found here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1j5WM29ECPk
Tonights stream I will share what I got back from AMD
Tonights stream I will share what I got back from AMD
It seems,
5700 come swith Micron D9WCW MT61K256M32JE-14:A they are specified to run at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps GDDR6 effective).
5700xt comes with Samsung K4Z80325BC-HC14 : they are specified to run at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps GDDR6 effective) too.
waiting for results with optimised kernels...
5700 come swith Micron D9WCW MT61K256M32JE-14:A they are specified to run at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps GDDR6 effective).
5700xt comes with Samsung K4Z80325BC-HC14 : they are specified to run at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps GDDR6 effective) too.
waiting for results with optimised kernels...
Can't test mining when dev don't have the cards to update their mining softwares. It's RDNA, not CGN anymore.
Understandable...but i'd expect at some level openCL hardware abstraction would be able to hide
hardware and do it in unoptimized way...maybe those 4MH/s someone mentioned are
measured that way, but sounds way too slow
Based on reviews though the OpenCL compiler seems to have major issues so that could be part of the problem. (they probably did it on purpose to keep miners at bay until gamers buy them
)or they realized "shit... they don't mine. Better reduce the price so gamers buy them"
Can't test mining when dev don't have the cards to update their mining softwares. It's RDNA, not CGN anymore.
Understandable...but i'd expect at some level openCL hardware abstraction would be able to hide
hardware and do it in unoptimized way...maybe those 4MH/s someone mentioned are
measured that way, but sounds way too slow
Someone just has to compile the open source ethminer under new RDNA compiler. Even with no updates Wave64 code should be able to run nearly twice as fast on RDNA...ill see if I have some time to post a compiled binary later. No reason why these wouldn't run 40+ MH with unoptimized code/timings.
Based on reviews though the OpenCL compiler seems to have major issues so that could be part of the problem. (they probably did it on purpose to keep miners at bay until gamers buy them
) So few tests of new AMD graphics cards 
https://www.cowcotland.com/articles/2749-4/test-amd-radeon-rx-5700-xt.html
No mining tested there
Or here
http://www.pcekspert.com/clanak/amd-radeon-rx-5700-xt-rx-5700-recenzija/
test for mining Can't test mining when dev don't have the cards to update their mining softwares. It's RDNA, not CGN anymore.
Understandable...but i'd expect at some level openCL hardware abstraction would be able to hide
hardware and do it in unoptimized way...maybe those 4MH/s someone mentioned are
measured that way, but sounds way too slow
So few tests of new AMD graphics cards
https://www.cowcotland.com/articles/2749-4/test-amd-radeon-rx-5700-xt.html
No mining tested there
Or here
http://www.pcekspert.com/clanak/amd-radeon-rx-5700-xt-rx-5700-recenzija/
Can't test mining when dev don't have the cards to update their mining softwares. It's RDNA, not CGN anymore.
So few tests of new AMD graphics cards
https://www.cowcotland.com/articles/2749-4/test-amd-radeon-rx-5700-xt.html
No mining tested there
Or here
http://www.pcekspert.com/clanak/amd-radeon-rx-5700-xt-rx-5700-recenzija/
So few tests of new AMD graphics cards
https://www.cowcotland.com/articles/2749-4/test-amd-radeon-rx-5700-xt.html
So few tests of new AMD graphics cards
Thank you for the informative topic. AMD group is in an advancement as I understand. Nvidia must be careful. Especially these days when the indication of bull market sprouting everywhere.
just got my 5700XT up and running with 19.7.1 drivers.
The only thing working and not correctly are:
Phoenix 4.2c ethash @ 4Mhash
Lolminer 0.8.3 Equihash192 @0.671 hash
Lolminer 0.8.3 Equihash144 @0.202 hash
so... yeah nothing else works.
i guess once everyone starts updating their software to work with navi, then we should start getting some real results.
The only thing working and not correctly are:
Phoenix 4.2c ethash @ 4Mhash
Lolminer 0.8.3 Equihash192 @0.671 hash
Lolminer 0.8.3 Equihash144 @0.202 hash
so... yeah nothing else works.
i guess once everyone starts updating their software to work with navi, then we should start getting some real results.
Have you tried ethminer? It should have a fallback opencl kernel for cards that it doesn't have a binary kernel for. It won't be as fast as a properly tuned kernel, but it would be an interesting data point.
ethminer isn't recognizing it under opencl. I tried the --cl-only flag.
Well that's a bummer.
If it's not too much effort, could you post what ethminer outputs and also the output of running clinfo on the machine with the 5700xt?
just got my 5700XT up and running with 19.7.1 drivers.
The only thing working and not correctly are:
Phoenix 4.2c ethash @ 4Mhash
Lolminer 0.8.3 Equihash192 @0.671 hash
Lolminer 0.8.3 Equihash144 @0.202 hash
so... yeah nothing else works.
i guess once everyone starts updating their software to work with navi, then we should start getting some real results.
The only thing working and not correctly are:
Phoenix 4.2c ethash @ 4Mhash
Lolminer 0.8.3 Equihash192 @0.671 hash
Lolminer 0.8.3 Equihash144 @0.202 hash
so... yeah nothing else works.
i guess once everyone starts updating their software to work with navi, then we should start getting some real results.
Any idea which kernel is PhoenixMiner using? Have you tried with flag
Code:
-clKernel 0
clKernel
clKernel 0 gives @4Mhash also.
just got my 5700XT up and running with 19.7.1 drivers.
The only thing working and not correctly are:
Phoenix 4.2c ethash @ 4Mhash
Lolminer 0.8.3 Equihash192 @0.671 hash
Lolminer 0.8.3 Equihash144 @0.202 hash
so... yeah nothing else works.
i guess once everyone starts updating their software to work with navi, then we should start getting some real results.
The only thing working and not correctly are:
Phoenix 4.2c ethash @ 4Mhash
Lolminer 0.8.3 Equihash192 @0.671 hash
Lolminer 0.8.3 Equihash144 @0.202 hash
so... yeah nothing else works.
i guess once everyone starts updating their software to work with navi, then we should start getting some real results.
Have you tried ethminer? It should have a fallback opencl kernel for cards that it doesn't have a binary kernel for. It won't be as fast as a properly tuned kernel, but it would be an interesting data point.
ethminer isn't recognizing it under opencl. I tried the --cl-only flag.
just got my 5700XT up and running with 19.7.1 drivers.
The only thing working and not correctly are:
Phoenix 4.2c ethash @ 4Mhash
Lolminer 0.8.3 Equihash192 @0.671 hash
Lolminer 0.8.3 Equihash144 @0.202 hash
so... yeah nothing else works.
i guess once everyone starts updating their software to work with navi, then we should start getting some real results.
The only thing working and not correctly are:
Phoenix 4.2c ethash @ 4Mhash
Lolminer 0.8.3 Equihash192 @0.671 hash
Lolminer 0.8.3 Equihash144 @0.202 hash
so... yeah nothing else works.
i guess once everyone starts updating their software to work with navi, then we should start getting some real results.
Any idea which kernel is PhoenixMiner using? Have you tried with flag
Code:
-clKernel 0
clKernel
just got my 5700XT up and running with 19.7.1 drivers.
The only thing working and not correctly are:
Phoenix 4.2c ethash @ 4Mhash
Lolminer 0.8.3 Equihash192 @0.671 hash
Lolminer 0.8.3 Equihash144 @0.202 hash
so... yeah nothing else works.
i guess once everyone starts updating their software to work with navi, then we should start getting some real results.
The only thing working and not correctly are:
Phoenix 4.2c ethash @ 4Mhash
Lolminer 0.8.3 Equihash192 @0.671 hash
Lolminer 0.8.3 Equihash144 @0.202 hash
so... yeah nothing else works.
i guess once everyone starts updating their software to work with navi, then we should start getting some real results.
Have you tried ethminer? It should have a fallback opencl kernel for cards that it doesn't have a binary kernel for. It won't be as fast as a properly tuned kernel, but it would be an interesting data point.
just got my 5700XT up and running with 19.7.1 drivers.
The only thing working and not correctly are:
Phoenix 4.2c ethash @ 4Mhash
Lolminer 0.8.3 Equihash192 @0.671 hash
Lolminer 0.8.3 Equihash144 @0.202 hash
so... yeah nothing else works.
i guess once everyone starts updating their software to work with navi, then we should start getting some real results.
The only thing working and not correctly are:
Phoenix 4.2c ethash @ 4Mhash
Lolminer 0.8.3 Equihash192 @0.671 hash
Lolminer 0.8.3 Equihash144 @0.202 hash
so... yeah nothing else works.
i guess once everyone starts updating their software to work with navi, then we should start getting some real results.
it seems that RDNA is a new architecture, nothing to do with GCN that all previous AMD gpu are based . need a miner with new kernel for navi
Jump to: