Author

Topic: Analysis - page 208. (Read 941563 times)

legendary
Activity: 938
Merit: 1013
February 14, 2015, 01:06:46 PM
Probably there will be next attack on long term resistance (260-270)


member
Activity: 75
Merit: 10
February 11, 2015, 07:25:07 PM
Please note! If Current daily candle will be shooting star - there is a high chance price will revisit $100

ewwwww, it looks like this is gonna happen

buckle up and be a player  Cool
legendary
Activity: 1304
Merit: 1015
February 07, 2015, 04:03:14 PM
Should see big moves lower over the next week... might seem random, it's not.    It's just me unloading Tongue

Buy high, sell low?  Or did you get in under $220?
full member
Activity: 218
Merit: 100
February 07, 2015, 05:43:40 AM
Actually we won't be in uncharted waters unless we fall under $69.  The fall from $32 to about $2 was approximately a 94% drop in value.  To do the same since the 2013 November peak, we'd have to drop under $69.  If Bitcoin were to drop that low, I would imagine it would be bought back up with the same/or greater force and speed.  IMHO, prices that low are a fantasy with all the venture capital and infrastructure being built.  However, this IS bitcoin.  Anything can happen.  With that said, we are probably just as likely to hit $400 next week as we are to hit $69. 

If we go below $69, there will be deathly silence in this forum.  Grin
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
I got Satoshi's avatar!
February 07, 2015, 02:41:12 AM

Bulkowski on the 'shooting star':

Quote
Day traders that I know depend on the shooting star more often than I think they should, but my statistics are based on the daily charts, not intra day ones. I found that the shooting star candle acts as a bearish reversal 59% of the time. I consider that "near random" performance.

http://thepatternsite.com/ShootingStar.html

But that's his result for traditional markets. Possible that in BTC, shooting star is a better predictor.

This is not bearish reversal, though, as we didnt leave bear market in the first place. It could be merely continuation signal for existing trend.
Looks like there could be a 2 line shooting star forming on the 1day chart on finex... bullish  Smiley
hero member
Activity: 509
Merit: 564
"In Us We Trust"
February 06, 2015, 09:37:37 PM
Should see big moves lower over the next week... might seem random, it's not.    It's just me unloading Tongue
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000
Enabling the maximal migration
February 03, 2015, 01:22:53 PM
Awaiting current thoughts from the Master...  Smiley

Pretty much nothing to say until we go over 350 or under 160.
legendary
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1040
February 03, 2015, 01:01:00 PM
Awaiting current thoughts from the Master...  Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1035
February 02, 2015, 04:52:11 AM
So when do we acknowledge that this bear market is worse than 2011?

We're in uncharted waters.

 Sad

I'd say this bearmarket is officialy worse then 2011 bearmarket when we go sub 130 with no signs of recovery or sub 100

So $1200 ---> to $100 or 91% drop is worse than $32 ---> 2 or a 94% drop?

Or $100 value is < $2 value?

Is this what you are saying?

The 2011 bear market only lasted like 6 months though, this has lasted 14-15 months, thats why.
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1070
February 02, 2015, 12:04:32 AM
So when do we acknowledge that this bear market is worse than 2011?

We're in uncharted waters.

 Sad

I'd say this bearmarket is officialy worse then 2011 bearmarket when we go sub 130 with no signs of recovery or sub 100

So $1200 ---> to $100 or 91% drop is worse than $32 ---> 2 or a 94% drop?

Or $100 value is < $2 value?

Is this what you are saying?
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 506
February 01, 2015, 05:25:41 PM

Bulkowski on the 'shooting star':

Quote
Day traders that I know depend on the shooting star more often than I think they should, but my statistics are based on the daily charts, not intra day ones. I found that the shooting star candle acts as a bearish reversal 59% of the time. I consider that "near random" performance.

http://thepatternsite.com/ShootingStar.html

But that's his result for traditional markets. Possible that in BTC, shooting star is a better predictor.

This is not bearish reversal, though, as we didnt leave bear market in the first place. It could be merely continuation signal for existing trend.
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 506
February 01, 2015, 04:13:53 PM
Could this be valid count? Too soon?



EDIT: Upper line is not random, its based on MasterLuc bearish trendline, that was unbroken since december 2013.
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
January 29, 2015, 04:27:29 PM
Actually we won't be in uncharted waters unless we fall under $69.  The fall from $32 to about $2 was approximately a 94% drop in value.  To do the same since the 2013 November peak, we'd have to drop under $69.  If Bitcoin drops that low, I would imagine it would be bought back up with the same/or greater force and speed.

You're in that regard, I was thinking about the length of this bear market. In July 2011, bubble popped and then found its bottom in 6 months. Another 6 months later there was a decent recovery from the lows. Its been over a year and we still dont know if we have found the bottom.

It could also mean that the next bull market could be that much more spectacular with the spring coiling so tight for so long
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
January 29, 2015, 03:22:17 PM
Actually we won't be in uncharted waters unless we fall under $69.  The fall from $32 to about $2 was approximately a 94% drop in value.  To do the same since the 2013 November peak, we'd have to drop under $69.  If Bitcoin drops that low, I would imagine it would be bought back up with the same/or greater force and speed.

You're in that regard, I was thinking about the length of this bear market. In July 2011, bubble popped and then found its bottom in 6 months. Another 6 months later there was a decent recovery from the lows. Its been over a year and we still dont know if we have found the bottom.

No kidding. These are hard times. Nobody knows what will happen next.
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
January 29, 2015, 02:44:26 PM
Actually we won't be in uncharted waters unless we fall under $69.  The fall from $32 to about $2 was approximately a 94% drop in value.  To do the same since the 2013 November peak, we'd have to drop under $69.  If Bitcoin were to drop that low, I would imagine it would be bought back up with the same/or greater force and speed.  IMHO, prices that low are a fantasy with all the venture capital and infrastructure being built.  However, this IS bitcoin.  Anything can happen.  With that said, we are probably just as likely to hit $400 next week as we are to hit $69. 
legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1035
January 29, 2015, 02:30:13 PM
I'd say this bearmarket is officialy worse then 2011 bearmarket when we go sub 130 with no signs of recovery or sub 100
hero member
Activity: 509
Merit: 564
"In Us We Trust"
January 29, 2015, 02:14:27 PM
You should use log scale, this is linear scale.

Nah, well I think the biggest problem is with him using the candlesticks to draw the lines. Those are just outliers that don't tell us much in my opinion. Things will get interesting as soon we've crossed most people's resistance lines!

They're not outliers. Smiley
legendary
Activity: 3108
Merit: 1531
yes
January 28, 2015, 09:17:45 PM
Looks like there is kinda h&s pattern since Jan 21 with a target around $170. Somebody illustrate pls

confirmed?

We would want to see a bounce from 230 to 250 and head lower again.
full member
Activity: 144
Merit: 100
January 28, 2015, 06:36:15 PM
Looks like there is kinda h&s pattern since Jan 21 with a target around $170. Somebody illustrate pls

confirmed?
full member
Activity: 239
Merit: 100
January 28, 2015, 01:04:05 PM
Looks like there is kinda h&s pattern since Jan 21 with a target around $170. Somebody illustrate pls
Like this?



or this?



(or are both wrong lol)

Either case would also mean overlap with Jan 15 234 top soon confirming the spike was C rather than III. Although I think 170 bottom is too high in that case, ~130 (or lower) seems more plausible from EW fib ratios.
Jump to: