Topic: Analysis and list of top big blocks shills (XT #REKT ignorers) - page 45. (Read 46564 times)

I'm not going to argue further with yet another brain-damaged BIP101 supporter, as you most certainly are.

Relevant quote from #bitcoin-assets today http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=12-01-2016#1368164

See also: http://qntra.net/2015/01/the-hard-fork-missile-crisis/

Good luck with your scamcoin.

I supposse you are serious with this.

It's very strange. If I look at this thread and at all other threads my picture is exactly the opposite.

^^Saurian Mind Control Gas kicking in.

That's very true, yes, but the interesting phenomena we are witnessing here is that one side of the argument are seemingly completely closed to any new input. Surely many are mindless followers who still watch MSM (i.e. people with a need to be told what to do who go with initial impressions of what feels best and then listen only to confirmatory sources, because they have unknowingly lost the ability to think for themselves), of course, but some seem far too sophisticated in their understanding and writing. Your "Confirmed Gavinista" is reflective of this closed mindset.


That's a premature assumption you're making. Obviously it should be discussed, and is being discussed. The point is the observation that one side, or at least the most visible posters of one side, amazingly do not accept new input at all, and just keep reiterating the same false arguments ad nauseum.

Are you operating under the assumption that the "bad guys" are sitting idly by while decentralization undoes their millennia-old consolidation of centralized control over resources? Or do you not even believe there are any "bad guys" and that everything is as the MSM says?


You must be joking. The strongest statists among the core devs are the big-blockers! Gavin, Hearn, Garzik, etc. Do some research before you make ridiculous assumptions.

Sure, 'cause no one can freely disagree with an excellent mind such as yours.

Which part of "with Jews, you lose" don't you get?
Go ahead, keep thinking you're so clever, keep getting brainwashed in Jew schools by insidious Jew books full of Jew lies. Oh, you really pierced the veil now, bro, you really got a handle on The Truth!

Stay glued to those lying pages, while fake Orgone Trucks sit right outside your window, chemtrailing air into poisonous Mind Control Gas.
Sheep.

It is not possible to do any kind of test on test net, because the most important thing we want to observe from a change is its economical impact or its value (if bitcoin worth 0, no one cares about how brilliant its technology is, and it will be useless), this can only be done on live traffic

But because bitcoin is the only meaningful cryptocurrency with enough serious traffic, you can only run the test on bitcoin live traffic, which means you have to reach consensus first. A hard fork is inflation and will kill bitcoin's biggest promise of limited supply and will crash its value, thus will not be accepted by any rational participant

So I think the best test is first let 1MB block fill up, and see what happens, how many people complain and how is each one impacted. If there is no real serious impact or people find work around for their problem, then 1MB can stay for a while. If there are some serious issues popping up, then it proves that 1MB is not enough, so you can raise the limit and everyone is convinced

However, if you start to test with a large block size before 1MB limit was reached, then you would never have the chance to test 1MB full block at later time, and if 1MB is really a brilliant and agile solution, you just forever missed the chance to test it

So because he was Jewish and/or pro-Communist he had nothing interesting to say and therefore the term "Orwellian" that we have adopted from "1984" should not be used? Great logic bro.


I'd say the most effective way to expose (not so much "oppose") him is to assemble the strongest evidence and construct a clear case that showcases how improbably it is that he is just a regular clueless follower/fanboy.

I actually applaud him for dragging Orwell into this.

I also seem to remember an episode of QI where Alan Davis used a similar defence against Stephen Fry.

Alan: Everyone said Einstein was a nutter at first, you know
Stephen: They said that about a lot of nutters as well

Go back sucking up on Coinbase//MIT popsicle.

The sooner you and your masters fork off tho, the better for bitcoin.

Ok, so what you took from what I wrote was that you should start quoting fascist dictators?

[facepalm]

You people are wasting your time arguing with Veritas. He will continue with his nonsense no matter how many times you counter his "arguments". The most effective way to oppose him would be to hire a similar person to follow and reply to all his posts.

I don't understand why these huge block shills don't try to persuade the chinese miners with their populist propaganda. Let's say they dumb down 90% of us and we go with their populism - still XT/UL/Classic/Hugeblock/Moonfork would need support from the miners to fork off. So why the efforts present here on this forum?

George Orwell (Real name: Eric Arthur Blair[stein]) is a Jew. Orwell has often visited Communist meetings and was pro-Stalin. https://shadowmasterminds.wordpress.com/george-orwell-a-jew/
And I ain't too sure about you, either.

"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini.



The poor kid apparently studied "political philosophy"





Evidence provided with this nonsense spam spewing bot looped into interacting with one of the biggest troll in here (lampnotchop or something)

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13521447
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13521944
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13521442

So your idea of the block size limit is the technology, but technology can be very different for different parts of the world, you can not expect everywhere in the world have 1GB fiber. Besides, there is the great firewall of China. Just try to open some chinese website like tudou.com or youku.com you will see how slow it is. If most of the cheap electricity and chip manufacturing exists in china, then other miners are limited by the chinese connection speed. A larger block in western will just make it orphaned more frequently by the chinese miners since they have higher hash power and you don't have enough time to broadcast your block to them before they mined their next block

The purpose of this thread was/is to assemble the evidence.


... and join the human race.

Just because it is appropriate for the bitcoin foundation (an institution) to run a full node doesn't mean
every individual user has to...which was the whole point of Satoshi's SPV...So yeah, it IS nonsense.

It's about coffee, free beer and airplanes.

It's not nonsense at all. I sense a redditard. http://therealbitcoin.org/ml/btc-dev/2015-December/000184.html

I have no issues with SPV wallets in general. It is possible to use one that verifies off your own personal server.