Topic: [ANN] [2GIVE] / New Mobile Wallet Available from SATOWALLET.COM - page 4. (Read 99266 times)

hello guys i have just downloaded the wallet and theres 0 connections. how to fix this? thanks

POW is our "Compete for block rewards" option in the wallet.  The only thing it can "mine" for is the 1% TXFEE included in SEND transactions.

Looking at the block explorer the network is now up to nearly 99% POS transactions.

Strength in Numbers Foundation (SNF) is planning another "air drop" soon as it continues to move holdings to the "trust" wallet Give2SNF*

-dvd

dev, congratulations to become Legendary and i have a question - is POW mining still work ? i have no rewards about a month
thanks

We are pleased to announce a NEW partnership with the GLOBAL IDEAGIST incubator platform which has over 50,000 members world wide.

In the coming weeks we will be converting their internal "GIST" points system to run on 2GIVE!!

If you're an entrepreneur or have a good idea you should create an account, form a team and start earning 2GIVE "GIST" coins on ideagist.com today!

[img">https://ideagist.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/IdeaGist-logo-1.png[/img]]https://ideagist.com/



More news coming soon!

-dvd

ok, the wallet does not seem to have very good error handling for forks. The default seed node (DNSSeed) that the linux client chooses is running off of a fork it seems. this fork has somewhere in the region of 60k-70k blocks. the real chain has about 135k blocks at the moment.

When the client first connects it does so to the wrong fork. As soon as it then picks up one of the nodes on the correct fork, it downloads a block and does a coredump because of bad DB integrity I think. Either way, a workaround is to run the linux client daemon with the -seednode switch and to set the max number of connections to 1. This way you can specify a seednode from the correct chain and force it to download all the blocks from the correct chain.

I will have to fiddle on the code and see if some better error handling can be stuck in to deal with this situation. A coredump is no way to deal with a forked chain!

At least for now, people can run the linux daemon or qt wallet if they want to.

The wallet does seem to have some bugs though and coredumps every now and then. I will work on this and post a stable version when it is ready

I have compiled a QT wallet for ubuntu 16 for those who are interrested.

For this Communities Information - 2GIVE is going to be listed free of charge on https://emblemvault.com/ 's DEX, due to be released very soon.

https://coinscribble.com/emblem-vault-announces-support-for-more-than-500-cryptocurrencies/2085/releases/34/

https://github.com/DecentricCorp/coininfoplus/blob/master/lib/alts.js

for more information have a look at our Bitcointalk page https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/anncoval-circuits-of-value-emblem-vault-1652345

Thanks for your thoughtful comments and analysis of 2GIVE.

One of the other things we're particularly proud to have is our "automatic garbage collection" that when a send is performed the wallet will actually try and grab 20% more coins than necessary to complete the send instead of doing a "best fit" that all the other wallets use.

This has the effect of "defragmenting" the chain over time as smaller unspent outputs are bundled up in the "change" transaction.

-dvd

I too am one of those core wallet users that like to burn whole unspent outputs however after encountering 1% of the remaining balance as a Charity Fee using coin control I opted to let the wallet decide and was intrigued to see how the wallet gathers unspent outputs from the smallest amounts while rolling-up change towards the main address and of course glad to see the flat 1% against just the spent amount. So for mainstream users I agree coin-control is a non-starter but having a view of coins in the wallet I find useful.

Looking sharp!   Submitted to get it listed on coinmarketcap.com and they will once we get at least $1,000 in daily volume -- looks like a good trend!

-dvd

A respectable buy wall is building for 2Give Coin at FreiExchange.com. Come check us out and do some trading.

Also, come join our friendly community on our Telegram channel at https://t.me/freiexchange.

Thanks.

   Having tested this 100 TIME s, check the little box please && enter your main address (or any address 2 send the coins)

// once done, it will calculate the right input for many tx's && can show a link to prove it {if} much wow is needed
// only the "custom change address" needs to Bit LINK 2 fix the GUI bug

 

Check 1 box in a world of NEED 4 many 2 check or the program WILL not even calculate  

// so true on the (coin control warranty option), technically the users check the boxes && are what we called options in software (will improve)  

## once you have seen all to many a web pages && with so many toolbars it covers half the users screen, you have seen the software world of OPTIONS

We don't warranty use of "coin control" and it will likely be removed from future wallets.

-dvd

this is not true for sure. When I wanted to send several inputs into the 1, I saw a problem with the transaction fee and charity fee too. I was able to send only much smaller amount than sum of inputs lowered by your 1% calculations. There is no other coin wallet with these kind of unclear calculations and I have to say that I run several 10s different coins in my system. It is not possible to calculate exact fee if there is another fee too (charity fee at 4,5+% according the calculations of my wallet when I want to send tx right now). So sending the exact amount is possible but user has to have anough coins in the wallet because it is not possible to spend only 1 whole input or whole wallet thanks to these unclear calculations (1% + 4++%). There will always be something smaller left on the sender wallet. Why do not you want to add clear calculation direct into the GIVE section of your wallet?
check this, I selected 2 inputs on my wallet and lowered by the 1% of tx fee and the result is:

EXTRACT FEE FROM AMOUNT could be the best solution for people who really want to spend whole inputs or just want to move whole balance from 1 wallet to another and a bit for people who just want to sent the amount without bothering with calculations outside the wallet. People could see the tx sum cleared by all fees in the field AFTER FEE as it should be in case of clear fees calculation by wallet.

once again, I know that this is not a problem when sending much less than my balance - there is enough for both fees in the wallet and user really do not have to think about the fee percentage and the change. This only complicates the situation when user want to spend whole input / to join several inputs into 1 or move whole balance from the wallet.

I think you're confused.  2GIVE is based on Peercoin which is based on Bitcoin.  There are no "so many problems" -- that's just false.

You are the FIRST person out of thousands of wallet users who has asked to have the fee taken FROM the sent amount which in our research is confusing for people who receive it.

Our model is SUPERIOR for sending specific amounts and the TXFEE of 1% which is socialized by the wallet manages expectations for both SENDER and RECEIVER and in fact is required for operating with cryptocurrency kiosks like Vault Logic.

We do not care about "other purses" -- 2GIVE is already available for transactions on kiosks and THAT is something your other coins can not claim.

I can only conclude that you are trying to send the entire contents of your wallet and are getting frustrated because you are unwilling or unable to calculate the 1% transaction fee.

If you have 100 coins in your wallet you can only send 99.   If you want to send 100 coins you'll need 101 coins in your wallet.

Think of it this way:  You do not ask your shopkeeper to deduct the tax amount from the total bill.

-dvd

How do I add this option to my Windows wallet?
Why only with this purse are so many problems? 

With the purses of other coins, there were no problems ... they are all made according to the same principle.

Thank you for the feature request -- the "extract fee" from amount is probably not a high priority as the feedback we received from users is that paying bills required the exact amount to be sent.

Furthermore we have been doing testing with a number of crypto-currency kiosks which DEMAND a user send the EXACT amount requested on screen.

We believe that the trend in the future will be to pay fee's in addition to the amount sent.

As for the LINUX wallet we already have a command line version working (our seed nodes are LINUX and have been running non-stop since day one) -- we recently announced our plans to support the Raspberry Pi system which will including a QT user interface.  Perhaps we will get a desktop wallet for INTEL out of the process as well!

-dvd

need to add "extract fee from amount" option
and when linux wallet ?

Friend!
I can not get the balance out of my wallet!
I wrote the problem above, even took 10 coins and did not translate anyway.
For 2 months, only 9 coins were mined.