I reckon Siacoin is embracing Asics and so does Decred. Why is this? What do they see that the rest do not?
In the case of Siacoin, it was the devs starting a company to sell ASICs, a clear conflict of interest.
I haven't followed Decred.
Regardless of the shadiness demonstrated by the Sia devs (which reduces their credibility on the matter in my view significantly, even if they may happen to be right), there is certainly a pro-ASIC point of view that is not without merit.
You might want to review this discussion https://github.com/monero-project/monero/issues/3387 (BTW, This is a Monero issue. Please do not spam discussion of AEON there.)
I'm mostly neutral but if the community wants to change PoW then its fine with me. My mild bias is to continue tracking whatever Monero does and minimize code changes and also the possibility that AEON could be attacked by reject Monero ASICs.
In my semi-literate opinion on the subject at hand I believe that asics are the antithesis of what AEON is about. I'm not fond of asics in general, but I don't completely hate them either. They have a place, but not with AEON (or any similar crypto coins).