Wall of text
- Alexander
I won't counter your points as it's getting tiring. I pointed out some concerns in my original post, you wrote a quite eloquent reply addressing everything BUT the main concern. That concern was the matter of recourse, accountability and security for the community in general. Please don't insult me by implying that I am trying to get cheap aircoins by spreading misinformation. As anyone can read in my posts I am not posting false facts or accusations but concerns and my experiences in general. Yes you appear to know your stuff and for all purposes it looks like you will act as you intend to. I mentioned, twice I believe, that I don't think you are malicious in intent (at least not now). I believe you have every intention of going forward with the plan. If I made it seem like a personal attack on you then I apologize. It is only because I feel so strongly about the crypto community that I want it to succeed.
What I think you are failing to realize, which I do find ironic (given your enlightened nature when it comes to the cryptocurrency world) is why I brought up my concerns and continued to do so even after your response. Things were "all fine for awhile" as you put it because I put the matter down hoping that you or your team would step up and volunteer a solution. You did not and continued on like nothing was or is wrong with this whole picture. Hence my continued posting. I spread my time very thinly over the forums so if you don't see me posting here every day it is not because "everything is fine". Saying "if you don't like it you can go somewhere else" is a cop out and you know it.
You have failed to see that you are providing the cryptocurrency community a disservice.
In fact you are a negative influence on the community in general.Even if you are not malicious, which again I don't believe you are,
you are teaching people that it is ok to trust anonymous people with large sums of money on their word, with no recourse should things go wrong.A lot of the people blindly supporting this project are new to the community or don't know any better. You are teaching them that a centralized manipulative authority is ok. You are also teaching them that it is also ok this authority is run by anonymous people with no oversight or legal framework.
Lets say you are true to your word,
indefinitely. What about the next project that comes along, using your model? What if they say "it worked for aircoin so it will work for us as well!", people mine and invest in it. Then what if the developers of
that coin turn out to be malicious and dump the coin, killing it and ruining everyones investment of time and money. There would then be some ownness on you, for helping to legitimize a system where these actions can flourish with no recourse.
This is not why we created cryptocurrencies. Believe it or not, they werent just created for everyone to "get rich quick". They were created to solve real-world problems with the financial system and trust-based systems in general. Cryptocurrencies were created as a trustless means of commerce.
These are problems that you are not alleviating but exacerbating.
For someone who wrote a whole paper on the problems with the cryptocurrency community in general I would think that this concern would and should be shared by you. But I guess when you stand to make a lot of money from it, those concerns are not convenient are they? It is also not convenient for anyone else to have those concerns.
Lastly you haven't even told people how much you are going to pay yourself out of this "investment fund". So you will just decide that yourself at a later date I guess?
If the fund is worth 10 million then why not pay yourself 200k a year, hell, lets just make it 300k to be fair
What happens if the people don't like how much you decide to pay yourself?
Fun fact: because you can pay yourself out of the undefined profits listed on a third party exchange (that no one but yourself will have access to) we won't even know how much you end up paying yourself! We will have to take your word.Progress!