It is censorship because if you don't allow someone to say a bad thing about AMP even though this bad thing is true, than you are censoring. That is exactly why these people on youtube are being censored. They are spreading videos telling the truth which is not convenient for the 1 % so now the 1 % are censoring them. Exactly what you are proposing here. You are a dictator.
Steemit works just fine like that, good content is upvoted, bad content is downvoted. It's not dictatorship, the community decides what is acceptable and what is not. So a similar model would look good.
But the trolls on this thread have really gone crazy, I think some basic moderation is needed.
It is clearly you don't know me because you wouldn't say something as stupid. I have many things I am bad at but in math I am very strong. I always use to have high scores on math at university. On algebra most of the students I studied with failed the exam, but I almost had maximum score. You have no idea what you are talking about, lol. I have a PhD in control engineering. Control engineering is all about math. That's why I am calling your bullshit. Your math doesn't add up. Your ROI calculation was phoney and I already explained you why. The explanation is about to follow again ...
I have a BS in economics.
Here are the reasons why your ROI claim is a big joke:
- Today BTC and ETH are up both 4 %. You can't say that your hypothetical ROI is 8 % because they went both up at the same time. In your absurd calculation you ignore this timing factor. I already explained you this but apparently you still didn't manage to understand it.
- I have once been in BTC, ETH, Ripple, ETC, Dash, Bitcoin Cash, Litecoin, Neo, Stratis, Waves, Zcash, Amp, Nav, PIVX, Monaco, Stellar, Monero, ... Following your insane claims I can now say that my hypothetical ROI could have been 1.000.000.000.000.000.0000.000 %. The only thing you needed to do is to buy and sell at the perfect moments. No shit, Sherlock, that's actually the most difficult part. Every trader has ever been in coins that went up massively. The difficult part here is to know when to buy and when to sell. Your hypothetical ROI is worthless. You can only make ROI claims if you reveal when to buy and when to sell. Everyone in crypto has this a high ROI according to your phoney ROI calculation, lol.
No the fact that trades happen simultaneously requiring the same capital absolutely don't draw down my performance.
They are 2 different random variables, and I have guessed them both, so I deserve the credit for that.
How do you trade them? Well,there is a thing called leverage. You can put in 2 positions with 1 asset as collateral.
Or you can borrow money. Or you can pledge as collateral one of your inactive or low risk assets unrelated to the 2 trades, in order to borrow to cover the 2nd trade, while the first trade you put from your active balance.
There are many practical ways how you can do it.
But again I am saying this that since it's a theoretical performance, I still deserve the credit for it, since I predicted each one of them.
I don't remember to call you a loser but if I died than it probably was in the heat of the moment. I am glad you are up 150 %. That's very nice profit. But in crypto that is not a spectacular gain. But you behave like if you are the most enlighting crypto investor and everyone should follow your advise and those that do will experience the biggest gains one can ever expect and that you will make everyone rich. Chill lol. First get rich yourself and then start making promises to other. As for now, be humble. Your gains are this high because you are in crypto. If you go to the normal stock market you will not make the same gains. And in crypto 150 % is less than average, nothing spectacular.
I doubt, most people who make like 100000% with an ETH ico, or things like that, they either got lucky, but they can't sustain that profit ,and most certainly they will lose it, since they have a gambler mentality and a gambler strategy, not a calm, rational, and performance based investment strategy.
People who make now say 1000%, could easily lose it back in the future if they invest in the same things all over again without any solid reason. Since most of those investments had negative expentancy, they just got lucky with it.
I try to look for positive expectancy situations.
