From Galia in telegram
https://t.me/bancorThe zero hedge article employs clears bias in presenting what could otherwise be a reasonable debate, ie "is this a good idea?" Or "why are prices behaving in way X or Y". Instead, he clearly names and attributes dissenters (one who's inner capitalist is just dumfounded by the idea of a different model) and for supporters, writes the following:
"In defending Bancor, one adviser had the temerity to argue that consumers don’t understand how exchanges work, and that Bancor’s concept is somehow more straightforward, which is an obviously absurd thing to say."
He claims Emin's "thoughtful" analysis is met by a "glib" statement from the company who cynically uses his Tezos advisory as a reason to discredit his claims (never once mentioned by us and totally unrelated to the reasons to discredit his claims, which we clearly outlined in an available rebuttal.)
At the end he states, not as opinion or quote, that the tech is "non existent" - meanwhile the smart token smart contract processes millions in conversions for all to see on our website and blockchain.
A very humbling reminder of the state of affairs in which we are all operating. Trust us to stay strong and focused on the work (including better messaging strategies), as we trust you to support and stand up for what you believe in, from knowledge, not blind faith. We welcome questions and hope we can set a better standard for dialogue and support of innovation in our space.