Topic: [ANN] [banned mixer] - Bitcoin Mixer | BTC Tumbler | Anonymous | NO LOGS | NO JS (Read 786 times)

The Clearnet version loads quite well, the .Onion is a little slower at first. The site definitely shows a lot of improvement now, great work.

Hello, Sorry for the inconvenience. It was due to restrictive rules. Now you can access.

Clearnet: https://www.[banned mixer]
Tor Mirror: http://[banned mixer]

I am being blocked to access the clearnet on pretty much every IP address I try, even the ones I am very sure have nothing to do with abusing your site. Wow, good job, Cloudflare!


Also, both Tor mirrors, Old and new can not be found

New Tor mirror: http://[banned mixer]

I base my statements on their own information. In case you missed it:

I'll note this only once, but you did this many times before. Throwing around wild assumptions (including, but not limited to) users' motives, makes you look very unprofessional. Let's stick to hard facts.

I like to warn other users about services that may cause them issues (frozen coins, ...) and / or harm Bitcoin.

Thanks for being open-minded and at least considering changes / a separate system!

There are many very legitimate reasons for mixing; mostly centered around privacy. For instance, mixing allows you to get sender privacy. If you send someone BTC without mixing, they can see from whom you got those funds and how you spend the rest of your funds.

there are various reasons why people want to mix their Bitcoin, but the average I know, they mix their Bitcoin just to hide their wealth. maybe the country is very strict toward the people for their wealth so that situation they won't government know what they have.

There is a risk in every action, nothing is perfect. Maybe this imperfection is material for evaluation next, as I know it's not easy to make it clear in what customers want.

Hello and good luck with your service.

But what does this really mean? I understand I giving you coins and you giving me another coins back with a fee of 4%.
But why would somebody want to mix their bitcoins? What if the coins I get is in bad standing? How can you see that you only accepting "clean" coins and not "bad" coins?
The only coins I own is coins I bought myself from an P2P exchange. Should I mix them? And if yes, why? It only giving me less BTC. Why is your BTC better then mine?
I paid for my coins with money I earned myself. How did you get your coins?

I understand that people that have stole BTC don't want to show that this BTC was going to a wallet they can be traced to, but for what other reasons? and how can I be sure I got "clean" BTC?
I am sure its a lot of other reasons, I don't try to be negative, but I don't really understand this service. My feeling is that you buying an imagine that your coins now is clean and fresh and not a real service.
But I'm sure I'm wrong, and that's why I'm asking so I can understand.

Don't misunderstand me, I am all for privacy. I am just asking what do I actually get here and how can I be so sure I get what I pay for and not just an imagine and less BTC?

Is there a real benefit for mixers?
There is not I guess because it's already known that you had this balance before and unless you proof it's gone you would still pay taxes for it.

I think that mixers is only good for other reasons but not the so promoted idea of tax runaway.

What makes you think your government will think Bitcoins coming from a mixer are better than your own Bitcoins?

That's because it's impossible.

I think we have a new ''expert'' here who knows everything about account farming and mixing bitcoin  
That is probably the reason why he is a newbie account registered in forum few months ago and his only activity was in Mixing Services section.
Nobody in the right mind (except you) will defend and trust new mixer that showed up recently...but I understand that being an alt-account is something natural in you.

Let me give you some your own medicine.
If you don't like other people posts about this subject simple don't read them and don't comment on them  

Problem is that there is no universal standard for ''clean'' coins.
Your version of clean, might not be the same as my version of clean, and both of them might not be the same as government version of clean coins.

As long as it's stated clearly enough for any curious user to see, I personally think there's value in having some mixers that "clean" coins while having others that don't. It should be up to the user to choose — sure it's probably 100% best for privacy if the mixer is well known and doesn't "clean" coins, but there are certainly situations where the user 100% needs to not receive his own coins back.

I think we can all agree that it doesn't matter where a Bitcoin was before it was in your wallet, but your employer or government certainly might not understand that yet, and it's unfortunate, but sometimes you have to play in the bounds of the rules in which you live. As long as it's made clear, I think there's no huge need to change that feature of Thormixer.

Your point of view about Bitcoin's fungibility is interesting, I cannot deny that it seems a necessity for you and other users. I will definitely go through your thread to give my opinion when I have time.

You have made me think of an option that fits what you have transmitted to me, thank you for this. And maybe build something without a scoring system as an option for all those users who want to use it. I cannot deny that many other users prefer the scoring system, but I think it would be a good idea to implement what you mention as an option and let each user decide.

Says who? There is no consensus about what "clean" or "dirty" means. There are companies that sell this idea for a profit, and it's in their interest to convince people like you that their services have value. They don't even share their criteria. What if you discover after accepting it that a "clean" coin was used for bad things nobody knew about at the time? You can never be absolutely sure what happened in the past.
The "taint" BS is an attack on Bitcoin's fungibility, which means any Bitcoin user should oppose this as it's a threat to everything Bitcoin stands for. Bitcoin can't exist if some coins are worth less than others.
Start analyzing the history of dollar bills, and you'll find cocaine on almost all of them. Try to refuse them at a bank, and demand clean bills. See what happens.

Ok And that's how this mixer works and all the ones I named above, don't try to confuse users. What bothers you is coins with dark history being removed. I don't think you are interested in mixing bitcoins, I think you are interested in farming post like the previous user. You are also trying to confuse the users and it seems very serious to me that you are trying to make them believe that it is a technical or privacy problem when in reality it is your personal matter.


Now I have to say that it is true that you are lying and it is beginning to be repetitive. You don't know what the source of this mixer's coins is, and you don't know how the Scoring system you mention works, you just have a slight idea and are making assumptions. I think you have felt bad that your list is known to be impartial and that you omit to include other services that you know well and use this same system for years.

You confuse morality with a security or privacy issue. If you don't like something, don't use it, but don't tell others it's a problem just because you don't like it.

By the way I don't see any of the mixers mentioned yet in your list. Do you have time to spam here but I understand that making your list truthful is secondary to you. And I sincerely believe that you are already spamming this thread. Although after seeing your history of comments I see that it is something you do normally.

That's neither the idea of mixing (1), nor is it how this mixer operates (2).

(1) Mixing usually refers to exchanging 'coins' (UTXOs.. let's call them coins) for other coins that are not linked to the ones you put into the mixer. A common use case for this: a certain Bitcoin transaction links a coin to your identity, e.g. by getting paid for a signature campaign. Both the sender (campaign manager) as well as potentially other users (in case that a public spreadsheet exists or people apply publicly with a Bitcoin address) now know this coin belongs to a certain forum user. By mixing this coin, someone can exchange this 'linked' coin for another, (or multiple smaller) unrelated coins of similar total value.

A mixer's job is not to exchange 'dirty' coins for 'clean' coins, at least if we assume that these terms refer to a coin (not) having been used for illegal activities.

(2) This mixer does absolutely not take 'Bitcoin from any source' like you claim, and that's the big issue here. It subjectively discriminates between coins and reserves the right to reject you from mixing. This makes them an unreliable business partner at the very least.

Again, that's not what Thormixer aims to do - in fact, they deny you access to the service if your coins have a 'dark history' - whatever that even means, since there is no definition of this, anywhere.

Then, please do help me make the list more complete. Add those mixers along with a link to the source (ToS, FAQ, anything official) proving that they don't accept all coins equally, as a reply. I will check and add them to OP.

Sorry, strawman. We claim it's bad for privacy, not for security. I hope it's easy to understand why we claim that. If not, read the starting post of [Blacklist] of unreliable, 'taint proclaiming' Bitcoin services / exchanges again.

I am not advertising for a mixer right now, but even if I would, I'd only advertise / promote ones that align with the principles of Bitcoin and my own privacy standards.
There is no particular reason I 'picked out' Thormixer, it just popped up in this board when I visited it again after a while.
You can believe me or not; facts are facts though and in this case, it is a fact that Thormixer's policies don't align with Bitcoin core values.

That is a bold assumption and absolutely incorrect. Actually, it's defamation.

I have never done any paid (positive or negative) review of anything. Instead, so far I did 2 reviews of devices that I paid full price for, out of my own pocket. I also chose not to provide an affiliate code, to make my reviews and recommendations completely unbiased.

Another (much more likely, don't you think?) explanation: people have limited time in a day and as we are not paid by anyone to review all Bitcoin services in existence, we can only focus on one or two things at a time, have a thorough look at them and move on.
Not that I need to prove this to anyone, but just to show that we already criticized other products before:

• Wasabi Wallet: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/wasabi-blacklisting-update-open-letter-24-questions-discussion-thread-5405325
• Ledger Nano X: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ledger-nano-x-battery-pandemic-5358741
• Ledger Nano S: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/why-i-wouldnt-buy-ledger-nano-s-ever-again-5370521
• Ledger Nano S Plus: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ledger-nano-s-plus-5376279
• ColdCard: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.57911569
• Lightning Labs / LND: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/lightning-labs-lnd-associated-with-wef-5386437

I have to break a lance in favor of these guys since I see your interventions in this thread a bit unfair. They didn't ignore your post, as I see they replied to you and the user n0nce, who refer to the same thread that he owns. So I assume you both have similar personal interests. The scoring system will seem bad to you, but not to other users, since you deliver any bitcoin from any source and in exchange you receive a clean one with which you will not have problems anywhere. I understand that this bothers you, but it is not fooling anyone as you try to make it appear.

Here it is blatantly noticeable that it is you who is trying to confuse users about the service. Users receive clean bitcoins with no Dark history, which is what the users want. That is not aligned with your way of thinking. I understand that this is what bothers you, but it is not something negative in my opinion, quite the opposite.

After reviewing this list and its comments, I have to say it seems very strange to me that this is the first mixer that you include. Missing from that list are many services that uses the same system.

And the most important thing is that I think you tries to make everyone believe that selecting coins is bad for users security and it is not true.

The answers they have given to all users seem correct to me, they have been informative and polite throughout, Except for the comments of user n0nce who blatantly has a strange and intriguing interest in this thread. and I have to say that reading the answer he has given you has been fun and not annoying.

Also, I see that you repeat the same thing over and over again in your post, although they have already answered you regarding how it works. What inclines me to think that you have a hidden interest in harming this particular service.
I see that you are a legendary member, I understand that post farming is something natural in you.

I could not omit the fact that both you and the user n0nce participate in marketing campaigns for other services similar to this one, it can be seen in your signatures. And right now, you have the same advertising active in your firm. I want to say that you are users who are paid to make positive reviews and I suppose also negative ones, that would solve why there is no mixer except this one on your list.

This explains why you ignored my post:
You're attacking Bitcoin's fungibility while trying to use it to make your service look good. That's like misleading users who don't understand the basics of fungibility.

---

---

The way a service responds to criticism tells you a lot about how they operate. In your case, it doesn't look good.

---

---

That's cute. Here's the opinion of Bitcointalk's Administrator:

As I have been able to read on their website, they don't do the mix process on their server, its a plus point, since these data will not be available to any third party.

Well, there are no mixers that don't use Cloudflare or a third-party service like Incapsula, Cloudbric or DDOS-GUARD... In other words, any provider has access to the data that you mention.

Many mixers, "almost all" have been using cloudflare for years, and the others use third-party services such as DDOS-GUARD, which amounts to the same thing, since they perform the same function. In that case there would be no solution for what you propose.

As for Cloudflare, it has strict policies on the privacy of its users. In general, Cloudflare affirms that it respects the privacy of user data and does not sell or share personal information with third parties, and has demonstrated this on many occasions, including in media cases.

However, it is important to note that no online service can guarantee absolute data security, and this applies to cloudflare, Incapsula as well as Cloudbric or DDOS-GUARD. All of them must follow the applicable laws and regulations in the jurisdictions where they operate. In this case, the user is the one who decides what to do and what extra measures to take when using these services, which are all the same in my opinion.

Not sure that you understand the severity of the issue of casually 'temporarily using Cloudflare'.
Not using JavaScript or not keeping logs is pointless, if users' traffic, i.e. plaintext transaction information is literally decrypted and cached on Cloudflare servers. It threatens the whole concept of your service as a mixing site.

Hello again, I already said in the thread that I'm going to use cloudflare temporarily (only difference since launch and it's temporary). The site works perfectly, it doesn't keep logs and it doesn't use JavaScript. You send any bitcoins and it returns clean coins to you

You can use TOR if you prefer: Tor Mirror: http://amwnnncglaw27kfomeiszq4eltwkktnkdzjg6kbtjwb2w3zgysatjead.onion
Or Clearnet: https://www.[banned mixer]

/].

If it's a typo, why do you continue calling TLS (which you are indeed using), SSL? To me, it still seems you are mixing terms up, but I agree that this is a subjective opinion and I cannot prove it as a fact. It's just the most likely explanation for me.

Are 'unstable' and 'starting to utilize Cloudflare' the same thing to you? For me, this qualifies as breaking promises. Websites don't automatically fall back to Cloudflare when they get unstable, if it has not been actively installed and configured by the operator.
You could just as well take the whole webpage offline, fix your bugs and bring it back, all without setting up Cloudflare, which you yourself state is a privacy issue.

Why is it not offline if it's not operational?

Just quoting your own words:

So this somewhat confirms my assumption that you're not typo'ing but using some terms interchangeably when they're in fact not really interchangeable. But this is all relatively unimportant to me; the important bit is the fungibility / 'UTXO scoring' issue.

It's not complete, that is true. I warmly welcome you to add more taint proclaiming services as a reply in that thread, so I can add them to OP.

With all due respect, I am a humble poster. I think my threads already get lots of visibility; much more than I could ever have hoped for, and I am very grateful that other people get value out of what I post.

It is unreasonable to ask someone to maintain a complete list of such services; hence why I cannot feasibly make a whitelist (of fungibility promoters), but have to create a blacklist instead, that displays who actively pushes for BTC taint and against fungibility.

As it is a blacklist, I do find it useful as a first indicator for users who want to quickly check whether a service that they're considering using, has already been 'community-flagged' as a taint promoter. It does not guarantee that any website not on the list is 'safe', though, as stated in OP:

Like I wrote before, please feel free to add more services who openly state that they 'filter' or 'score' UTXOs based on blockchain analysis. This would benefit everyone.

I understand  that it haven't been easy but it isn't really nice that you guys are starting up with alot of issues and I think you should keep the thread active and also take your time to put yourself and when you're back, it will be best that you get some users to help test what you have to offer through testnets.

Welcome and you should also know that  criticism is onething you must receive especially  when  introducing something new and has to do with money, don't feel bad and I see you're doing well with answering the questions and I already see some new changes and it seems you guys also took out time to attend to almost all the complains listed and I love the improvements.
Kudos.

The term JavaScript appears 4 times in this Bitcointalk thread and 5 times on the web. Java just one. Thanks to your understanding of technology for correcting this typo.


I have not broken any promise, you have omitted my last post:


Once again I don't know where you get that data from, do a certificate test before speaking.

SSL Report: www.[banned mixer]
Protocols
TLS 1.3   Yes
TLS 1.2   Yes




First, it is a blacklist in your opinion, for other people it would be a whitelist so thanks for including me.

Your list is opaque. If you are going to include me in your Blacklist Whitelist for Scoring, you should include more mixers (much older) from this forum. But Why aren't they on your list if you already know them?  I guess all you wanted is a link to your thread to give you visibility. And I recommend you include in your opaque and unreliable list all the mixers that uses scoring. Until you do, your whitelist is worthless.

Next time, Please wait until a website is not under maintenance to analyze it, so as not to confuse users as you say.

---

No, but US and EU users should be aware of the laws of their countries, this text is just a reminder of how the panorama is.  Even so, you are right and I still have to modify it a bit, give me time.

Sure we are going to see things like that and more, but not here


No, your transactions will not be blocked.

---

Hello, thanks you guys for your support, it is true that we have been online for a month and that some problems have arisen that have been solved and I am still working to try to improve this service.

Are you aware of the fact that Java is not an abbreviation for JavaScript? You seem to use the terms interchangeably. May make users mistrust your understanding of technology.

Not a good look; breaking big promises so quickly. How fast will you break your other promises, then? What if you need to suddenly activate JavaScript 'for technical reasons'? Or if you 'technically' need to start storing logs?


The latest version of SSL is deprecated for 8 years now. I really hope you are using at least TLS v1.2 in 2023. Also, this encryption goes out of the window if you use Cloudflare. Again raises questions about the level of understanding and / or attention to detail of the service operator.

Lastly, since you are a taint proclaiming service, I had to add you to my [Blacklist] of unreliable, 'taint proclaiming' Bitcoin services / exchanges. The reasons why, are posted in that thread.

It is nice knowing you are working and trying to fix up things properly to avert unforseen circumstances which are not a good thing. Atleast this shows how serious you are in delivering Services to your clients.
Working on improvement is better than ignoring improvement just to cover up mistakes.

Hello, I know. Unforeseen events are normal when you start something. I am working on the web to improve the service and some parts will be unstable some days. Don't worry, it will be online again soon. Be patient please. Thanks.

You're down again, both versions - with clearnet showing the error "SSL handshake failed". Maybe you should first find reliable hosting + properly configure everything necessary and only then try to deal with this kind of business

I'm glad you're back online and hope you also took some  time to get some things mentioned by the members above fixed as I think all suggestions was for the growth of your work.
Cheers.

No problem, it's online.

I confirm that, I was trying to try this service and I was not able to acess to server IP, perhaps they tried to modify some pages or stopped providing the service completely.
Good thing this service has been discontinued, the concept of clean and dark coins makes some bitcoin more valuable which is something that should not happen in any currency, mixing service is supposed to promote these concepts not never allow coins with a dark history.

I expect that the provider of this service links his mixer to several CEXs accounts using APIs and it has been banned, it is closer to what BetterCallRaul.it Domain Scam confirmed was did

I confirm that the site is offline (both versions). Maybe OP decided to fix some things, and maybe he realized that the mixer isn't something that just can work like that. Luckily, the choice of mixers is more than good, one more or less does not mean too much.

It looks like the site is now offline, both the clearnet and Tor Mirror. Someone please confirm, who knows? It could just be me.
OP had also been online a couple of days back but no update from him whatsoever regarding the status of the service or past issues raised

~snip~
Edited on request as it was temporary.

---

It would be nice if you have an official bitcoin address too on the website. It's easier to verify a bitcoin address instead of a PGP key. Not everyone wants to go trough the long hassle of verifying PGP key.

This is what you get when a website copies their Terms from other sites. Nothing new, I've seen it before.

Thanks for your timely response

While reading through the disclaimer, which are also your terms of service. I have some questions. Let me first quote part of the disclaimer.

This is a first one for me, honestly. Are you trying to imply that users from the US or any country in the EU are not allowed to use your platform?

Are we going to see a Bitcoin Mixer performing KYC in the future to ascertain if a person is not from the US or EU? 


Seriously, I even don't know to pick and leave out. This is way too strict for a mixer. For example, what if a received payment made directly from a gambling company for a service I offered them. Are you going to block such transactions on grounds that they originate from a gambling site?

A mixer that promotes the taint BS and tells you Bitcoin isn't fungible? That's a first the second after Wasabi!

Allow me to quote myself on the subject of "taint":

Did I understand correctly, the fee for your service is 4% + 0.0007 BTC?


What happens to coins with a dark history that does not pass your test?

Hello blue Snow... answering your questions:

1 - Dark theme is on the way. For now enjoy the light.
2 - We recommend Nord because it is outside of the Five-, Nine-, 14 Eyes alliances. but use what you want.
3 - Good idea, thanks for the appreciation. You can also send an email.
4 - Yes, the minimum is 0.003 BTC. May change in the future.
5 - No trial at the moment, It may be implemented.

Now looks like this: Support 24x7: support@[banned mixer], [email protected], Profil Message or Ann Thread

Cheers.

Hi Royse777 and thanks for the offer, talk to you soon.

Thanks for being here Bitcoin_Arena. Fortunately we don't trust Cloudflare, or any other cloud-based solutions. Find out why

With DDoS Protection.

Hi dkbit98. The platform runs a scoring procedure for each incoming coin so to check its reliability and purchase it for its reserves. The service liaises with crypto stock exchanges and controls the money inflow around the clock – if the algorithm detects a shortfall it blasts notification messages to investors and quickly tops up the reserves. Coins with dark history are never let in. Money that has passed the scoring goes to transit (intermediary) wallets (there is a dedicated wallet for each investor) and is used to make clients’ transactions untraceable. The algorithm carries out multi-layered cleansing that achieves a clean track record for your coins. Aforementioned investors are independent traders with accounts at crypto stock exchanges who sell their output transactions to us.

Welcome to the forum,

1. I'm just exploring your site and don't find a button which I can switch to a dark theme, because your site looks shiny in my eye.
2. are you affiliated with nordvpn?, because I find it on the download VPN link on your home page.
3. On 24x7 Support link, better to put direct link to your Profil Message, or Ann Thread to make it faster if have a problem.
4. I don't know for you guys, but for me, 0.003 minimum is large enough, I usually use 0.001 for minimum.
5. is there no trial for free-fee mixing?

What does background check for incoming coins mean exactly?
Are you going to reject coins from some sources and return them to sender or not?
Trusting private investors and worldwide centralized exchanges is not good, and based on your website you are doing that and working with them.

I don't believe in complete anonymity with Bitcoin, and I wouldn't pay extra high fees using new websites that promises to provide service like this.
After performing some testing I could say more, but I don't see anything special that stands out from all other Bitcoin mixers available now.

Good to see a new mixing service start off here. You are highly welcome 

Given that You don't use Cloudflare or any other cloud-based solutions which I must say I commend you for, how do you plan on mitigating future DDoS attacks which are inevitable. I know of a service that refused to use a DDoS attack protection for probably similar reasons, but their platform is off most of the time disrupting the smooth running of the service.

It's good to read. The purpose of a mixer should be breaking all possible connections of the output coins that the clients are sending to mix. But unfortunately one of the most used mixer broke that trust and everyone is more careful about choosing their mixer now than before.

Welcome to the forum. You are with the most oldest and crowd-est place in the world of bitcoin. I hope you will have a great journey.

PS: If you need marketing assistance then I can help you. I am currency working with the most successful mixer right now which is Sinbad.io, /en]Yo!Mix Bitcoin Mixer is also working with me. I can take your brand to a competitive level too. Here is my service page: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/available-bitcointalk-campaign-management-signature-bounty-5328445

You are welcome to contact me either via my Telegram @Royse777 or via the forum PM.

Cheers,

Reserved for updates

New Tor mirror: http://[banned mixer]

During challenging periods such as these, where even the tiniest online stores or digital currency platforms monitor each of your transactions, it's crucial to prioritize privacy. After all, safeguarding privacy is an inherent entitlement of every individual and should not be overlooked. Given the nature of the blockchain network, it is possible for almost anyone to trace the flow of your funds or even access the overall balance of your wallet. We perceive this as an intolerable breach of privacy, prompting us to develop [banned mixer] as a solution to tackle this concern.

With www.[banned mixer] you can safely mix your bitcoins with lowest possible fee and maximum privacy.

Clearnet: https://www.[banned mixer]
Tor Mirror: http://[banned mixer]


What is [banned mixer]?
[banned mixer] is a Bitcoin Mixer / BTC Tumbler. Our transfer algorithm selects independent investors and trading platforms, and breaks down your funds in a manner that completely removes a link between input and output transactions. We neither require registration nor store logs. Once the mixing is done and transaction confirmed, the data on processed transactions is deleted. For each mixing request, we issue a digitally signed letter of guarantee, which confirms our obligations to the client.

While mixing BTC, [banned mixer] does not shuffle available funds in one or multiple pots, but exchanges incoming bitcoins with coins purchased from investors / cryptocurrency platforms.


Can I trust you with my Bitcoins?
All users are protected by the platform against accidental errors or deliberate actions, we take protective measures against errors and malicious acts. For every incoming order, we provide a PGP-signed letter of guarantee that confirms the obligations we assume. To check a letter of guarantee, install a PGP client (for example, PGP4Win), import [banned mixer] public key and verify a digital signature.


How does [banned mixer] guarantee my anonymity?
Thormixer do not collect logs or private information. We assure you that we strictly adhere to a no-logs policy and refrain from storing any personal information. Furthermore, our team operates anonymously. The main principle of the platform operation is the provision of funds to end customers from a hundred different investors from various stock exchanges. All info about an order is deleted upon its completion (or when the offer expires). The only remaining trace of our work are the letters of guarantee we give you.

Thormixer works without JavaScript. To increase the level of anonymity, you can use the Tor version.


How long do addresses for funds transfer remain valid?
They remain valid for 7 days. This period is sufficient to address any network issues, delays and human errors that may occur, thus guaranteeing safety of customer's assets. Anyway, in all cases an address lifetime for every request is captured in a letter of guarantee provided by [banned mixer].


How long does it take to cleanse Bitcoins?
The process starts after the first confirmation of your incoming transfer and takes up to 6 hours. The exact delay is chosen randomly in order to resist deanonymization attempts. We have found that a random delay of up to 6 hours is enough to eliminate the risk of volume analysis.


Find answers to all additional questions in FAQ section - https://www.[banned mixer]/#FAQ

NO LOGS - Our service has a zero-logs policy, we don’t store any users personal info.
NO JavaScript - Thormixer works without JavaScript. No JavaScript = No Problems.
NO Analytics - We don't use Google Analytics or search console.
Tor Mirror / Onion - To increase the level of anonymity, use the Tor version.
Bech32 (P2WPKH - P2WSH) Support all types of bitcoin addresses except Taproot (P2TR).
Base58 (P2PKH - P2SH) Support all types of Btc addresses except Taproot (P2TR).
Full Responsive – Desktop, Smartphone and Tablet Friendly.


Make sure you bookmarked our URLs to avoid phishing:

Clearnet: https://www.[banned mixer]
Tor Mirror: http://[banned mixer]
Support 24x7: support@[banned mixer], [email protected], Profil Message or Ann Thread