Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] [BBL] BitBlock-World's first X15 coin|Bittrex|Poloniex|Mandatory Update - page 46. (Read 82727 times)

legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240

looks good to me, you're just quite slow, here's mine:

as you see, it sometimes takes long time - i assume because of the whirlpool algo which really slows things down

how many peers? your pool connect

Over 40 conns to the wallet and currently about 20 workers
sr. member
Activity: 260
Merit: 250
Guys are the Hashrates displayed @ https://bbl.suprnova.cc correct ? For me and my CPU miners it looks good, I'm not sure about the others though.

Thanks for testing, it seems everything runs smoothly now, blocks are being found, hash is steady.. !

thx

Looks good for me, first time i can see my real hashrate for this coin. Sometimes worker appear not active, but i think that"s just when a block is found on network.

That's why i'm trying to always stay on your pool Wink

GG ocminer (like always)

My workers arent showing on supernova? Hashes submitted, but not getting any accepts.

I pick the minerd submit by shadow on the first page
And this is what i put in my bat

@echo off
minerd.exe -a bitblock -o stratum+tcp://bbl.suprnova.cc:3663 -u yourworkername -p yourpass
pause

like ocminer said, ensure you have some yay in your minerd window

What is yay?
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240
ok, supernova front end is updating now.

and yes it's slow, but i'm running about 5 of them  Wink

or would it be better to run less instances with more cores?


I am writing a digitalocean guide after i finished work, this should help speed things up a bit
sr. member
Activity: 728
Merit: 251

looks good to me, you're just quite slow, here's mine:

as you see, it sometimes takes long time - i assume because of the whirlpool algo which really slows things down

how many nodes? your pool connect
sr. member
Activity: 304
Merit: 250
ok, supernova front end is updating now.

and yes it's slow, but i'm running about 5 of them  Wink

or would it be better to run less instances with more cores?
sr. member
Activity: 728
Merit: 251
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240


looks good to me, you're just quite slow, here's mine:



as you see, it sometimes takes long time - i assume because of the whirlpool algo which really slows things down
legendary
Activity: 938
Merit: 1001


Ah.. ur getting 6kh/s ?

That will take probably about 20 minutes a share or so maybe
legendary
Activity: 938
Merit: 1001
not getting any Yay's there either. Using a dual XEON on a cloud server. could there be something wrong with my compile?

Try adding in -D or -DP at the end, and see what it is saying your target difficulty is

If its too high, then it will rarely submit shares. Although, my Xeon Processor takes about 3-4 minutes per share at times.
sr. member
Activity: 304
Merit: 250
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240
Guys are the Hashrates displayed @ https://bbl.suprnova.cc correct ? For me and my CPU miners it looks good, I'm not sure about the others though.

Thanks for testing, it seems everything runs smoothly now, blocks are being found, hash is steady.. !

thx

Looks good for me, first time i can see my real hashrate for this coin. Sometimes worker appear not active, but i think that"s just when a block is found on network.

That's why i'm trying to always stay on your pool Wink

GG ocminer (like always)

My workers arent showing on supernova? Hashes submitted, but not getting any accepts.

Are you getting any "Yay!!!" ?

no Yay's no Boo's.

Compiled the miner myself in Ubuntu.
./minerd -a bitblock -o stratum+tcp://bbl.suprnova.cc:3663 -u username.1 -p x

what cpu and how long is the miner running now ?

try hashharder and see if it works there, you don't need to reg there so a check is really quick

not getting any Yay's there either. Using a dual XEON on a cloud server. could there be something wrong with my compile?

I'm currently not 100% sure whats the reason for that, but sometimes it takes about 3-4 mins to get a accepted share, even on a i7 3k

diff on x15 is much higher than on x13, whirlpool, one of the additional algos, is not really the cpu friendliest algo as it is quite "hard" to hash, it is just a speculation but i'm thinking this "throttles" things down a bit, a other "normal" algo like fugue etc. would be more easy to hash..

But .. As soon as GPU Miners are out, this is no problem any more..

sr. member
Activity: 304
Merit: 250
Guys are the Hashrates displayed @ https://bbl.suprnova.cc correct ? For me and my CPU miners it looks good, I'm not sure about the others though.

Thanks for testing, it seems everything runs smoothly now, blocks are being found, hash is steady.. !

thx

Looks good for me, first time i can see my real hashrate for this coin. Sometimes worker appear not active, but i think that"s just when a block is found on network.

That's why i'm trying to always stay on your pool Wink

GG ocminer (like always)

My workers arent showing on supernova? Hashes submitted, but not getting any accepts.

Are you getting any "Yay!!!" ?

no Yay's no Boo's.

Compiled the miner myself in Ubuntu.
./minerd -a bitblock -o stratum+tcp://bbl.suprnova.cc:3663 -u username.1 -p x

what cpu and how long is the miner running now ?

try hashharder and see if it works there, you don't need to reg there so a check is really quick

not getting any Yay's there either. Using a dual XEON on a cloud server. could there be something wrong with my compile?
hero member
Activity: 1036
Merit: 531
Guys are the Hashrates displayed @ https://bbl.suprnova.cc correct ? For me and my CPU miners it looks good, I'm not sure about the others though.

Thanks for testing, it seems everything runs smoothly now, blocks are being found, hash is steady.. !

thx

Looks good for me, first time i can see my real hashrate for this coin. Sometimes worker appear not active, but i think that"s just when a block is found on network.

That's why i'm trying to always stay on your pool Wink

GG ocminer (like always)

My workers arent showing on supernova? Hashes submitted, but not getting any accepts.

I pick the minerd submit by shadow on the first page
And this is what i put in my bat

@echo off
minerd.exe -a bitblock -o stratum+tcp://bbl.suprnova.cc:3663 -u yourworkername -p yourpass
pause

like ocminer said, ensure you have some yay in your minerd window
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240
Guys are the Hashrates displayed @ https://bbl.suprnova.cc correct ? For me and my CPU miners it looks good, I'm not sure about the others though.

Thanks for testing, it seems everything runs smoothly now, blocks are being found, hash is steady.. !

thx

Looks good for me, first time i can see my real hashrate for this coin. Sometimes worker appear not active, but i think that"s just when a block is found on network.

That's why i'm trying to always stay on your pool Wink

GG ocminer (like always)

My workers arent showing on supernova? Hashes submitted, but not getting any accepts.

Are you getting any "Yay!!!" ?

no Yay's no Boo's.

Compiled the miner myself in Ubuntu.
./minerd -a bitblock -o stratum+tcp://bbl.suprnova.cc:3663 -u username.1 -p x

what cpu and how long is the miner running now ?

try hashharder and see if it works there, you don't need to reg there so a check is really quick
sr. member
Activity: 304
Merit: 250
Guys are the Hashrates displayed @ https://bbl.suprnova.cc correct ? For me and my CPU miners it looks good, I'm not sure about the others though.

Thanks for testing, it seems everything runs smoothly now, blocks are being found, hash is steady.. !

thx

Looks good for me, first time i can see my real hashrate for this coin. Sometimes worker appear not active, but i think that"s just when a block is found on network.

That's why i'm trying to always stay on your pool Wink

GG ocminer (like always)

My workers arent showing on supernova? Hashes submitted, but not getting any accepts.

Are you getting any "Yay!!!" ?

no Yay's no Boo's.

Compiled the miner myself in Ubuntu.
./minerd -a bitblock -o stratum+tcp://bbl.suprnova.cc:3663 -u username.1 -p x
legendary
Activity: 938
Merit: 1001
question for guys using HashHarder:

Do you use workernames if you are using more than one PC? like -u bitblockaddress.1 and -u bitblockaddress.2 ?

or does all your workers just use -u bitblockaddress -p anything ?

If you wish to do this, generate a different payout address for each worker.
legendary
Activity: 938
Merit: 1001
Can anybody test this two miners?
https://www.dropbox.com/s/33f4p00vf0m951j/miners_corei7.rar

minerd-corei7.exe - same as i shared before (https://www.dropbox.com/s/hnleulsps90opt9/miner.rar)
minerd-corei7-avx.exe - new with AVS2 support

I putted run files with --benchmark option in archive.


i will test it
hash doesn't change


Make sure you remove the --benchmark!!! Very Important
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240
Guys are the Hashrates displayed @ https://bbl.suprnova.cc correct ? For me and my CPU miners it looks good, I'm not sure about the others though.

Thanks for testing, it seems everything runs smoothly now, blocks are being found, hash is steady.. !

thx

Looks good for me, first time i can see my real hashrate for this coin. Sometimes worker appear not active, but i think that"s just when a block is found on network.

That's why i'm trying to always stay on your pool Wink

GG ocminer (like always)

My workers arent showing on supernova? Hashes submitted, but not getting any accepts.

Are you getting any "Yay!!!" ?
sr. member
Activity: 304
Merit: 250
Guys are the Hashrates displayed @ https://bbl.suprnova.cc correct ? For me and my CPU miners it looks good, I'm not sure about the others though.

Thanks for testing, it seems everything runs smoothly now, blocks are being found, hash is steady.. !

thx

Looks good for me, first time i can see my real hashrate for this coin. Sometimes worker appear not active, but i think that"s just when a block is found on network.

That's why i'm trying to always stay on your pool Wink

GG ocminer (like always)

My workers arent showing on supernova? Hashes submitted, but not getting any accepts.
legendary
Activity: 938
Merit: 1001
http://www.hashharder.com/x15/bitblock - still finding blocks

OCMiner - are you using the standard difficulty settings and multipliers for X11, because I found those to be too low?
Pages:
Jump to: