The fact that many .. weak coins are listed higher than multi $bill,established ,big dev team/communities coins,says it all.
Noobies will be burnt if they follow these shit ratings weiss has created.
(prob see pumps on almost all B coins...then weiss will change ratings and the B will become C and dump on the noobs..
at the same time the C rated coins will be moved around causing even more confusin...well done)
https://weisscryptocurrencyratings.com/ratings/thank-your-for-feedback-heres-our-response-130
Why don’t we give Bitcoin an A? Actually, thanks to Bitcoins strong adoption, brand, and security, it does merit an A … but only on our Fundamental Index.
Problem: That’s just one of our four major metrics. Meanwhile, Bitcoin falls short in two other important areas: Our Risk Index, reflecting extreme price volatility and our Technology Index, reflecting Bitcoin’s weaknesses in governance, energy consumption and scalability. As soon as the metrics on these improve, an upgrade for Bitcoin is likely.
examples from other important areas...
reflecting extreme price volatility ...the top alts are far less volatile than the lower ones...but still. steem,eos,ada got B
Technology Index, here they seem to have favoured smart contracts...what about what xrp,str have done? what about pos coins? lots of other great tech innovation on other coins.
weaknesses in governance, so they think a coin needs a dev team for governance?..imo better.governance comes from bigger communities
energy consumption..why did they pos coins or hybrid pos not get higher if this is a measure?
scalability - BCH scales better than btc
these are not questions to you tek btw lol..its just my thoughts..i got loads more on why i disagree..but who cares they can do what they want.