Topic: [ANN] Bitcoin Cash - Pro on-chain scaling - Cheaper fees - page 861. (Read 704821 times)
I Love SegWit.
This is getting too much of a drama for me after so much anticipation and capitulations for a coin fork, within hours it is still yet to be categorized as fully successful trying to bring the entire "cryptosphere" down, if BCC becomes the best chain then so be it but at the moment its not looking like a very good thing!
block - 478560 0x20000000 ViaBTC `M/ViaBTC/Hello World!/4s"~
Hmm funny I did some experiments with that Bitcoin Clash Daemon but it seems the oversize Block doesn't get accepted on the abc daemon as well...
2017-08-01 18:29:27 ERROR: TestBlockValidity: Consensus::CheckBlock: bad-txns-oversize, Coinbase check failed (txid 1f5132b4722a9dec48092f6b9490594df3676cd0c6322f6ceb0c1812cbb851b2) (code 16)
Who's coding that thing ? Roger himself ?
Do not worry it is well tested or at least i was told so by experts here 2017-08-01 18:29:27 ERROR: TestBlockValidity: Consensus::CheckBlock: bad-txns-oversize, Coinbase check failed (txid 1f5132b4722a9dec48092f6b9490594df3676cd0c6322f6ceb0c1812cbb851b2) (code 16)
Who's coding that thing ? Roger himself ?
Hmm I tried to get testnet up with the new blocksize but it seems there's still the old rules in place..
Yeah.. looks decently coded ^^
UP:
https://github.com/Bitcoin-ABC/bitcoin-abc/issues/36
Actually they do have a PRIVATE test net and you need permission to join
Hmm funny I did some experiments with that Bitcoin Clash Daemon but it seems the oversize Block doesn't get accepted on the abc daemon as well...
2017-08-01 18:29:27 ERROR: TestBlockValidity: Consensus::CheckBlock: bad-txns-oversize, Coinbase check failed (txid 1f5132b4722a9dec48092f6b9490594df3676cd0c6322f6ceb0c1812cbb851b2) (code 16)
Who's coding that thing ? Roger himself ?
Do not worry it is well tested or at least i was told so by experts here 2017-08-01 18:29:27 ERROR: TestBlockValidity: Consensus::CheckBlock: bad-txns-oversize, Coinbase check failed (txid 1f5132b4722a9dec48092f6b9490594df3676cd0c6322f6ceb0c1812cbb851b2) (code 16)
Who's coding that thing ? Roger himself ?
Hmm I tried to get testnet up with the new blocksize but it seems there's still the old rules in place..
Yeah.. looks decently coded ^^
Hmm funny I did some experiments with that Bitcoin Clash Daemon but it seems the oversize Block doesn't get accepted on the abc daemon as well...
2017-08-01 18:29:27 ERROR: TestBlockValidity: Consensus::CheckBlock: bad-txns-oversize, Coinbase check failed (txid 1f5132b4722a9dec48092f6b9490594df3676cd0c6322f6ceb0c1812cbb851b2) (code 16)
Who's coding that thing ? Roger himself ?
Do not worry it is well tested or at least i was told so by experts here 2017-08-01 18:29:27 ERROR: TestBlockValidity: Consensus::CheckBlock: bad-txns-oversize, Coinbase check failed (txid 1f5132b4722a9dec48092f6b9490594df3676cd0c6322f6ceb0c1812cbb851b2) (code 16)
Who's coding that thing ? Roger himself ?
Hmm funny I did some experiments with that Bitcoin Clash Daemon but it seems the oversize Block doesn't get accepted on the abc daemon as well...
2017-08-01 18:29:27 ERROR: TestBlockValidity: Consensus::CheckBlock: bad-txns-oversize, Coinbase check failed (txid 1f5132b4722a9dec48092f6b9490594df3676cd0c6322f6ceb0c1812cbb851b2) (code 16)
Who's coding that thing ? Roger himself ?
2017-08-01 18:29:27 ERROR: TestBlockValidity: Consensus::CheckBlock: bad-txns-oversize, Coinbase check failed (txid 1f5132b4722a9dec48092f6b9490594df3676cd0c6322f6ceb0c1812cbb851b2) (code 16)
Who's coding that thing ? Roger himself ?
Saw this on another thread:
THE FUN PART:
Bcc forked at wrong block. No full mempool.
That means their code is faulty and will continue to fork
or they did some offline trick to make "orphan" to continue their own chain.
Trick or fail, that can be only solved after their first block.
Is that true?
Quote
Quote
BCH Mempool is 1.6Mbytes, so it's over the 1M threshold to trigger the fork when the block is found.
THE FUN PART:
Bcc forked at wrong block. No full mempool.
That means their code is faulty and will continue to fork
or they did some offline trick to make "orphan" to continue their own chain.
Trick or fail, that can be only solved after their first block.
Is that true?
_M*/ViaBTC/Welcome to the world, Shuya Yang!/q30c
Hmm funny I did some experiments with that Bitcoin Clash Daemon but it seems the oversize Block doesn't get accepted on the abc daemon as well...
2017-08-01 18:29:27 ERROR: TestBlockValidity: Consensus::CheckBlock: bad-txns-oversize, Coinbase check failed (txid 1f5132b4722a9dec48092f6b9490594df3676cd0c6322f6ceb0c1812cbb851b2) (code 16)
Who's coding that thing ? Roger himself ?
2017-08-01 18:29:27 ERROR: TestBlockValidity: Consensus::CheckBlock: bad-txns-oversize, Coinbase check failed (txid 1f5132b4722a9dec48092f6b9490594df3676cd0c6322f6ceb0c1812cbb851b2) (code 16)
Who's coding that thing ? Roger himself ?
looks like there is a block with almost 7K transactions
000000000000000000651ef99cb9fcbe0dadde1d424bd9f15ff20136191a5eec
478559
000000000000000000651ef99cb9fcbe0dadde1d424bd9f15ff20136191a5eec
478559
did it just mined a block out ?
http://blockdozer.com/insight/block/000000000000000000651ef99cb9fcbe0dadde1d424bd9f15ff20136191a5eec
http://blockdozer.com/insight/block/000000000000000000651ef99cb9fcbe0dadde1d424bd9f15ff20136191a5eec
Atlast they mined block after waiting of hours. Did not expected it will take this much time.
and coin desk leading title is:
Bitcoin Is Forking, But Bitcoin Cash Hasn't Been Created Yet
WTF is forking with something which does not exist
Yeah it should be paid article to keep you warm while waiting the first block to come..
did it just mined a block out ?
http://blockdozer.com/insight/block/000000000000000000651ef99cb9fcbe0dadde1d424bd9f15ff20136191a5eec
http://blockdozer.com/insight/block/000000000000000000651ef99cb9fcbe0dadde1d424bd9f15ff20136191a5eec
Atlast they mined block after waiting of hours. Did not expected it will take this much time.
i tell you bro , while you hold btc , all of them have party on altcoin pump and get much profit , while you sitting and waiting for bitcoin cash crap that not worth at all ,
First Block has been found
did it just mined a block out ?
http://blockdozer.com/insight/block/000000000000000000651ef99cb9fcbe0dadde1d424bd9f15ff20136191a5eec
http://blockdozer.com/insight/block/000000000000000000651ef99cb9fcbe0dadde1d424bd9f15ff20136191a5eec
Read more carefully what i wrote, bro. You misunderstood me. I entered a private key of an empty wallet(after sending my btc's to safe address) into a third party client.
I do have access to my btc's with new unknown to a third party address. I just didnt get my bcc's
That is not by rules of the game bro
you need to give them your private key "BEFORE" not after . I know that it is free money but when you give them 0 FREE BTC that is what exactly you get in return 0 of the free CRAP!!!DO NOT DO IT BRO!!!
Forget about the crap .....
Read more carefully what i wrote, bro. You misunderstood me. I entered a private key of an empty wallet(after sending my btc's to safe address) into a third party client.
I do have access to my btc's with new unknown to a third party address. I just didnt get my bcc's
That is not by rules of the game bro
you need to give them your private key "BEFORE" not after . I know that it is free money but when you give them 0 FREE BTC that is what exactly you get in return 0 of the free CRAP!!!DO NOT DO IT BRO!!!
Forget about the crap .....
Jump to: