Pages:
Author

Topic: 🔵🔵🔵 [ANN] BitMax.io Transaction Mining & Reverse-Mining ⚡️⚡️⚡️ - page 7. (Read 39356 times)

jr. member
Activity: 242
Merit: 1
I am A Champion for all I care
Bitmax seems to be doing pretty fine now. They seem to have sort out their differences and come to a resolution. I would be looking forward to a better exchange and more cleaner way of doing business.
member
Activity: 728
Merit: 10

Yea,saw that on medium, so i think bitmax is just trying to stay safe, i mean they must have worked hard to gain such reputation and are not in the mood to step down in order to let go the wrongs of anyone, even though deepcloud was once their client and like the saying goes, customers are king but this is a situation that has to deal with financial products, so its tough

But for anything Bitmax have been one of the best transparent project in recent times. I was a bit shock to have them in the mix of the whole deep issues. I'm pretty sure they should be able to come out clean and keep their house in order moving forward.

Bitmax is one of my favourite projects. That's why this touches me so much. I feel the two CEO would have tried to settle things amicably before bringing this to the public.
member
Activity: 728
Merit: 11
DocTailor IEO on Zloadr
Quote from: Ace44
[quote author=Ace44 link=topic=5066589.msg52696380#msg52696380 date=1570568605


I don't get the last part of your statement, i think they both have something to backup their claims, bitmax is the one offering the services here and i feel they seem to know what's best for their brand, hence the removal of deepcloud, i don't think they would have done that if the case was not a pretty serious one, deepcloud is the one on the loosing end here

I agree with you, deepcloud is indeed the one at the loosing end from all indication. I read deepcloud testimony on the issue and the ceo plainly stated that he has been trying to communicate with George, who is the ceo of Bitmax, but to no avail as George has chosen not to reply to his chat.
[/quote]

Well, the CEO of deepcloud should take to social platforms just maybe he can get to the bitmax big  boy. Deepcloud should have try as much as they could in ensuring fair business
[/quote]

I'll suggest that deepcloud should channel their efforts in searching for more partnerships and listing of their tokens in other exchange platform. I just feel there's no point crying over a spilled milk, since the delisting has been made. If they wanted to make amends it should be before the project was delisted. Now that the worst has been done, let them find a way to move on.
[/quote]

You have a point but i believe they are doing this just to get back the confidence of the community by clarifying the issue, like i stated earlier,the damage has already been done, so they need to think more of a semi re-branding plan to get things up and running, the way i see it, there is no resolution happening between the 2 brands and like you stated, is best to look into other exchanges
[/quote]

Well I would agree with you on this slightly but then again if you look closely you'll Bitmax is still very good to go. They should just continue operation where they left off
member
Activity: 672
Merit: 11


I don't get the last part of your statement, i think they both have something to backup their claims, bitmax is the one offering the services here and i feel they seem to know what's best for their brand, hence the removal of deepcloud, i don't think they would have done that if the case was not a pretty serious one, deepcloud is the one on the loosing end here

I agree with you, deepcloud is indeed the one at the loosing end from all indication. I read deepcloud testimony on the issue and the ceo plainly stated that he has been trying to communicate with George, who is the ceo of Bitmax, but to no avail as George has chosen not to reply to his chat.

Well, the CEO of deepcloud should take to social platforms just maybe he can get to the bitmax big  boy. Deepcloud should have try as much as they could in ensuring fair business

I'll suggest that deepcloud should channel their efforts in searching for more partnerships and listing of their tokens in other exchange platform. I just feel there's no point crying over a spilled milk, since the delisting has been made. If they wanted to make amends it should be before the project was delisted. Now that the worst has been done, let them find a way to move on.

You have a point but i believe they are doing this just to get back the confidence of the community by clarifying the issue, like i stated earlier,the damage has already been done, so they need to think more of a semi re-branding plan to get things up and running, the way i see it, there is no resolution happening between the 2 brands and like you stated, is best to look into other exchanges
jr. member
Activity: 242
Merit: 1
I am A Champion for all I care

Yea,saw that on medium, so i think bitmax is just trying to stay safe, i mean they must have worked hard to gain such reputation and are not in the mood to step down in order to let go the wrongs of anyone, even though deepcloud was once their client and like the saying goes, customers are king but this is a situation that has to deal with financial products, so its tough

But for anything Bitmax have been one of the best transparent project in recent times. I was a bit shock to have them in the mix of the whole deep issues. I'm pretty sure they should be able to come out clean and keep their house in order moving forward.
member
Activity: 728
Merit: 11
DocTailor IEO on Zloadr
Bitmax should go back to their strategy, marketing, bring in the old excitement found in Bitmax, the listing, the promotions and all of that. Bitmax was the first exchange project I witnessed do a whole lot for new projects way more than their counterparts.
copper member
Activity: 336
Merit: 5


I don't get the last part of your statement, i think they both have something to backup their claims, bitmax is the one offering the services here and i feel they seem to know what's best for their brand, hence the removal of deepcloud, i don't think they would have done that if the case was not a pretty serious one, deepcloud is the one on the loosing end here

I agree with you, deepcloud is indeed the one at the loosing end from all indication. I read deepcloud testimony on the issue and the ceo plainly stated that he has been trying to communicate with George, who is the ceo of Bitmax, but to no avail as George has chosen not to reply to his chat.

Well, the CEO of deepcloud should take to social platforms just maybe he can get to the bitmax big  boy. Deepcloud should have try as much as they could in ensuring fair business

I'll suggest that deepcloud should channel their efforts in searching for more partnerships and listing of their tokens in other exchange platform. I just feel there's no point crying over a spilled milk, since the delisting has been made. If they wanted to make amends it should be before the project was delisted. Now that the worst has been done, let them find a way to move on.
[/quote

You made a good point, no doubt. I suppose you don't believe that the project could be listed again after been delisted. I personally haven't heard of a project that was delisted from an exchange and later relisted. So it's best for deepcloud to work with other exchanges and strive to avoid issues like this. I believe they must have learnt their lessons with this event.
copper member
Activity: 336
Merit: 3


I don't get the last part of your statement, i think they both have something to backup their claims, bitmax is the one offering the services here and i feel they seem to know what's best for their brand, hence the removal of deepcloud, i don't think they would have done that if the case was not a pretty serious one, deepcloud is the one on the loosing end here

I agree with you, deepcloud is indeed the one at the loosing end from all indication. I read deepcloud testimony on the issue and the ceo plainly stated that he has been trying to communicate with George, who is the ceo of Bitmax, but to no avail as George has chosen not to reply to his chat.

Well, the CEO of deepcloud should take to social platforms just maybe he can get to the bitmax big  boy. Deepcloud should have try as much as they could in ensuring fair business

I'll suggest that deepcloud should channel their efforts in searching for more partnerships and listing of their tokens in other exchange platform. I just feel there's no point crying over a spilled milk, since the delisting has been made. If they wanted to make amends it should be before the project was delisted. Now that the worst has been done, let them find a way to move on.
member
Activity: 672
Merit: 11


I don't get the last part of your statement, i think they both have something to backup their claims, bitmax is the one offering the services here and i feel they seem to know what's best for their brand, hence the removal of deepcloud, i don't think they would have done that if the case was not a pretty serious one, deepcloud is the one on the loosing end here

I agree with you, deepcloud is indeed the one at the loosing end from all indication. I read deepcloud testimony on the issue and the ceo plainly stated that he has been trying to communicate with George, who is the ceo of Bitmax, but to no avail as George has chosen not to reply to his chat.

Well, the CEO of deepcloud should take to social platforms just maybe he can get to the bitmax big  boy. Deepcloud should have try as much as they could in ensuring fair business

Communication is the key here. There is a lack in communication somewhere. I am not happy that this is happening, there should be a way to curb this and avoid the dramas.

There must have been a lot of communication for it to have gotten to this stage, i mean it won't be right for bitmax to just wake up one morning and drop deepcloud out of their exchange, there are rules of engagement and if that doesn't solve the problem, then i wonder what else will, both parties have dropped a lot of information about this
member
Activity: 728
Merit: 10


I don't get the last part of your statement, i think they both have something to backup their claims, bitmax is the one offering the services here and i feel they seem to know what's best for their brand, hence the removal of deepcloud, i don't think they would have done that if the case was not a pretty serious one, deepcloud is the one on the loosing end here

I agree with you, deepcloud is indeed the one at the loosing end from all indication. I read deepcloud testimony on the issue and the ceo plainly stated that he has been trying to communicate with George, who is the ceo of Bitmax, but to no avail as George has chosen not to reply to his chat.

Well, the CEO of deepcloud should take to social platforms just maybe he can get to the bitmax big  boy. Deepcloud should have try as much as they could in ensuring fair business

Communication is the key here. There is a lack in communication somewhere. I am not happy that this is happening, there should be a way to curb this and avoid the dramas.
member
Activity: 672
Merit: 11


I don't get the last part of your statement, i think they both have something to backup their claims, bitmax is the one offering the services here and i feel they seem to know what's best for their brand, hence the removal of deepcloud, i don't think they would have done that if the case was not a pretty serious one, deepcloud is the one on the loosing end here

I agree with you, deepcloud is indeed the one at the loosing end from all indication. I read deepcloud testimony on the issue and the ceo plainly stated that he has been trying to communicate with George, who is the ceo of Bitmax, but to no avail as George has chosen not to reply to his chat.

Yea,saw that on medium, so i think bitmax is just trying to stay safe, i mean they must have worked hard to gain such reputation and are not in the mood to step down in order to let go the wrongs of anyone, even though deepcloud was once their client and like the saying goes, customers are king but this is a situation that has to deal with financial products, so its tough
jr. member
Activity: 574
Merit: 1
when you are fed up transfer your crypto to me


I don't get the last part of your statement, i think they both have something to backup their claims, bitmax is the one offering the services here and i feel they seem to know what's best for their brand, hence the removal of deepcloud, i don't think they would have done that if the case was not a pretty serious one, deepcloud is the one on the loosing end here

I agree with you, deepcloud is indeed the one at the loosing end from all indication. I read deepcloud testimony on the issue and the ceo plainly stated that he has been trying to communicate with George, who is the ceo of Bitmax, but to no avail as George has chosen not to reply to his chat.

Well, the CEO of deepcloud should take to social platforms just maybe he can get to the bitmax big  boy. Deepcloud should have try as much as they could in ensuring fair business
copper member
Activity: 336
Merit: 5


I don't get the last part of your statement, i think they both have something to backup their claims, bitmax is the one offering the services here and i feel they seem to know what's best for their brand, hence the removal of deepcloud, i don't think they would have done that if the case was not a pretty serious one, deepcloud is the one on the loosing end here

I agree with you, deepcloud is indeed the one at the loosing end from all indication. I read deepcloud testimony on the issue and the ceo plainly stated that he has been trying to communicate with George, who is the ceo of Bitmax, but to no avail as George has chosen not to reply to his chat.

On reading the testimony from the both projects, am sceptical on the smooth resolution of this issue. The disagreement between both parties was evident in the article and the content of the article bothers on different perspectives. I can only pray for them to resolve this amicably as the issues has degenerated substantially to make Bitmax delist their tokens.
copper member
Activity: 336
Merit: 3


I don't get the last part of your statement, i think they both have something to backup their claims, bitmax is the one offering the services here and i feel they seem to know what's best for their brand, hence the removal of deepcloud, i don't think they would have done that if the case was not a pretty serious one, deepcloud is the one on the loosing end here

I agree with you, deepcloud is indeed the one at the loosing end from all indication. I read deepcloud testimony on the issue and the ceo plainly stated that he has been trying to communicate with George, who is the ceo of Bitmax, but to no avail as George has chosen not to reply to his chat.
member
Activity: 672
Merit: 11
Cryptocurrency is all about transparency and it’s great to see BitMax keeping to being transparent all the time. I think being transparent as an team is healthy for a cryptocurrency exchange community, and that’s just what BitMax is trying to do right here.

What I understood is there was some tokens supply related miscommunication from deepcloud project? Or what exactly the issue was?

I guess there was a problem with the Deepcloud tokens contract. I’ll expect Deepcloud team to talk about BitMax delisting and resolve the issue with the tokens.
Btw, what happens to people with Deepcloud tokens? Is there a different exchange where Deepcloud is listed?

I guess they would all move their token to deepcloud wallet pending when the issue is resolved and regarding bitmax delisting the team should ensure they tackle the problem squarely before investors start losing interest on the project

In my opinion, investors were already losing interest even before the issue deteriorated into the delisting of their tokens. I only hope that the two teams could settle their differences before from what I've been reading they both have their own side of the story which is not exactly similar.

You seem to know more about deepcloud, i don't see the reason why they should issue out false documentation if they mean well for the community, these are things that create bad reputation for the blochchain community, all i want to see is a healthy community to help the industry grow, its nauseating to keep seeing such stories

For all I know bad name or negative news is not healthy for any known blockchain platform. It kills both faith and confidence with the system. They should work on a mutual resolution and shake hands.
that will never happen based on both of stories have created by bitmax and deep, it looks like both will never try to shake hands for a better solution.

It's really sad to know that deep was only listed on the bitmax but it has delisted.
Investors are a party who has been getting a huge impact caused by this problem and these investors have lost their money in this case.

But in my opinion if both are dishonest platforms.


I don't get the last part of your statement, i think they both have something to backup their claims, bitmax is the one offering the services here and i feel they seem to know what's best for their brand, hence the removal of deepcloud, i don't think they would have done that if the case was not a pretty serious one, deepcloud is the one on the loosing end here
legendary
Activity: 3136
Merit: 1024
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Cryptocurrency is all about transparency and it’s great to see BitMax keeping to being transparent all the time. I think being transparent as an team is healthy for a cryptocurrency exchange community, and that’s just what BitMax is trying to do right here.

What I understood is there was some tokens supply related miscommunication from deepcloud project? Or what exactly the issue was?

I guess there was a problem with the Deepcloud tokens contract. I’ll expect Deepcloud team to talk about BitMax delisting and resolve the issue with the tokens.
Btw, what happens to people with Deepcloud tokens? Is there a different exchange where Deepcloud is listed?

I guess they would all move their token to deepcloud wallet pending when the issue is resolved and regarding bitmax delisting the team should ensure they tackle the problem squarely before investors start losing interest on the project

In my opinion, investors were already losing interest even before the issue deteriorated into the delisting of their tokens. I only hope that the two teams could settle their differences before from what I've been reading they both have their own side of the story which is not exactly similar.

You seem to know more about deepcloud, i don't see the reason why they should issue out false documentation if they mean well for the community, these are things that create bad reputation for the blochchain community, all i want to see is a healthy community to help the industry grow, its nauseating to keep seeing such stories

For all I know bad name or negative news is not healthy for any known blockchain platform. It kills both faith and confidence with the system. They should work on a mutual resolution and shake hands.
that will never happen based on both of stories have created by bitmax and deep, it looks like both will never try to shake hands for a better solution.

It's really sad to know that deep was only listed on the bitmax but it has delisted.
Investors are a party who has been getting a huge impact caused by this problem and these investors have lost their money in this case.

But in my opinion if both are dishonest platforms.
member
Activity: 672
Merit: 11
Cryptocurrency is all about transparency and it’s great to see BitMax keeping to being transparent all the time. I think being transparent as an team is healthy for a cryptocurrency exchange community, and that’s just what BitMax is trying to do right here.

What I understood is there was some tokens supply related miscommunication from deepcloud project? Or what exactly the issue was?

I guess there was a problem with the Deepcloud tokens contract. I’ll expect Deepcloud team to talk about BitMax delisting and resolve the issue with the tokens.
Btw, what happens to people with Deepcloud tokens? Is there a different exchange where Deepcloud is listed?

I guess they would all move their token to deepcloud wallet pending when the issue is resolved and regarding bitmax delisting the team should ensure they tackle the problem squarely before investors start losing interest on the project

In my opinion, investors were already losing interest even before the issue deteriorated into the delisting of their tokens. I only hope that the two teams could settle their differences before from what I've been reading they both have their own side of the story which is not exactly similar.

You seem to know more about deepcloud, i don't see the reason why they should issue out false documentation if they mean well for the community, these are things that create bad reputation for the blochchain community, all i want to see is a healthy community to help the industry grow, its nauseating to keep seeing such stories

For all I know bad name or negative news is not healthy for any known blockchain platform. It kills both faith and confidence with the system. They should work on a mutual resolution and shake hands.

You're right but i do not think there will be any resolution because a lot of damage as already been done, investors must have left the scene and even potential investors must have flee from deepcloud, the position that bitmax is making is quite clear and deepcloud really have to sort themselves out immediately or they risk loosing everything
jr. member
Activity: 242
Merit: 1
I am A Champion for all I care
Cryptocurrency is all about transparency and it’s great to see BitMax keeping to being transparent all the time. I think being transparent as an team is healthy for a cryptocurrency exchange community, and that’s just what BitMax is trying to do right here.

What I understood is there was some tokens supply related miscommunication from deepcloud project? Or what exactly the issue was?

I guess there was a problem with the Deepcloud tokens contract. I’ll expect Deepcloud team to talk about BitMax delisting and resolve the issue with the tokens.
Btw, what happens to people with Deepcloud tokens? Is there a different exchange where Deepcloud is listed?

I guess they would all move their token to deepcloud wallet pending when the issue is resolved and regarding bitmax delisting the team should ensure they tackle the problem squarely before investors start losing interest on the project

In my opinion, investors were already losing interest even before the issue deteriorated into the delisting of their tokens. I only hope that the two teams could settle their differences before from what I've been reading they both have their own side of the story which is not exactly similar.

You seem to know more about deepcloud, i don't see the reason why they should issue out false documentation if they mean well for the community, these are things that create bad reputation for the blochchain community, all i want to see is a healthy community to help the industry grow, its nauseating to keep seeing such stories

For all I know bad name or negative news is not healthy for any known blockchain platform. It kills both faith and confidence with the system. They should work on a mutual resolution and shake hands.
member
Activity: 728
Merit: 11
DocTailor IEO on Zloadr
It's been quite some time I heard about Bitmax new moves and new listing. I miss the genius and activities of George Cao. What's been happening with Bitmax of late?
member
Activity: 672
Merit: 11
Cryptocurrency is all about transparency and it’s great to see BitMax keeping to being transparent all the time. I think being transparent as an team is healthy for a cryptocurrency exchange community, and that’s just what BitMax is trying to do right here.

What I understood is there was some tokens supply related miscommunication from deepcloud project? Or what exactly the issue was?

I guess there was a problem with the Deepcloud tokens contract. I’ll expect Deepcloud team to talk about BitMax delisting and resolve the issue with the tokens.
Btw, what happens to people with Deepcloud tokens? Is there a different exchange where Deepcloud is listed?

I guess they would all move their token to deepcloud wallet pending when the issue is resolved and regarding bitmax delisting the team should ensure they tackle the problem squarely before investors start losing interest on the project

In my opinion, investors were already losing interest even before the issue deteriorated into the delisting of their tokens. I only hope that the two teams could settle their differences before from what I've been reading they both have their own side of the story which is not exactly similar.

You seem to know more about deepcloud, i don't see the reason why they should issue out false documentation if they mean well for the community, these are things that create bad reputation for the blochchain community, all i want to see is a healthy community to help the industry grow, its nauseating to keep seeing such stories
Pages:
Jump to: