Topic: [ANN] Blacknet | IBO for BlackCoin | New code | PoS | No ICO - page 5. (Read 2510308 times)

Open source is off topic in this thread because we aim for free software.


Water is an acid.


https://github.com/CoinBlack/p2pool-blackcoin


Repeat: we do not work in private. Post publicitly what you want Blacknet to be modified four.

We have no private blockchains at all ...

When I say private, I mean we are self funded, self reliant, self organized AND we need some developers for some internal (ie NOT open source) products to be built FOR the CWI EcoSystem, which is our platform for the community. If you believe that a mix of private/closed source code as well as open sourced code cannot exist together, then you haven't seen what we do. Which is fair, because we don't publicize the backend systems we build.

If you want to help, great. If you want to continue working on this (and other) projects but still talk about the need to pay for things, and 'live', then what else can I say but join us

I am happy either way, as I have been around long enough to see good projects die because of misaligned philosophies. I am not saying you or this project is, but I requested the (supposedly) open sourced code for the pool systems when BlackCoin was mined MANY years ago (I was one of the largest miners), and the request was not even looked at. I was ignored back then, and now CWI is one of the only standing systems that has continued to grow WITHOUT external influences and income, WITHOUT ripping people off. BLK was massive back then, and BlackNet can be now. But when self sufficiency does not equal costs, then projects die.

You are talented in many ways, So I approached you in good faith with development potential. You have the right to refuse or accept or even ignore like I was exposed to those many years ago. All I am saying is that if you wish to put your coding experience to use in a different environment (or even a modified BlackNet), then please PM. If not, it is all good mate. I will always be watching in the background. Unless I drop dead of course

#crysx

We are working on a scalable blockchain platform for whatever you want.
Whatever you want does not imply free as beer.
Also we do not work in private and do not permit private blockchains.

We can always chat ...

We are a private enterprise, so don't do everything in the open. We would like your services on an open and closed source scenario, depending on what you want to do.



#crysx

You are always welcome to work with us ...

If you decide to expand your work area.

, rat4, the random generator

You are always welcome to work with us ...

If you decide to expand your work area.

#crysx

Was this forum already renamed to bitcoinjokes 嗎？


They 可以 re-view subSTRATA's re-putation and re-evaluate whether is worthy trust by default。

He also has to give a shit ...

If he doesn't, then a negative won't mean one iota of a difference. Those who know who he is, know he has been around a long time, and he creates good work. Those who don't, can always learn from his history. Those who are only in it for the money (which the vast majority are unfortunately), won't give two shits about his negative list, as long as he helps them make more money to line their pockets.

All in all, unless people ACTUALLY do research, they won't know who the good guys are, regardless of negative points against them.

#crysx

The main problem to outline there is lack of trust really, so yea one negative from a long time ago but any measure with less data becomes unreliable.   Its not like rat4 proved this record of distrust, its one guy saying I vote negative on my experience.  I dont know the story but unfortunately the trust system is a bit of a game like anything else on this forum or life even, not to be taken literally perfectly accurate as obviously its not.

I dont know about that particular incident but might be best to somehow raise trust generally by being part of that section of the forum.  I'm guilty of that myself as I dont especially lend or borrow money or buy goods too much, if I had I'd have better trust.  I'd be the same person though, the game is the game.

Hello, the last Weekend a check this and yes the warning is correct. I think rat4 can contact subSTRATA to remove his negativ trust, rat4 is not a scammer, than all OK!

https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/substrata-68036

Or rat4 can try to set subSTRATA  on his distrust list .

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/loycevs-beginners-guide-to-correct-use-of-the-trust-system-5191802

Hello, ok i will look at this in the next time.


The most important thing is Health, the BLN also have alredy a Roadmap?

may the force be with you

That can work mate ...

But we are a little far off from GeneForking at the moment. Better you just work with us at CWI

#crysx

Necessity to fork DNA, because life in a human body demands ability to talk, is depressing rat4 again.

Rat's latest update is slowing down

Glad to see new POS4.0 come out.  Like the UI design.

Nice to see a discord server as its very easy to follow.  I'm admin on a few different servers, not big just few dozen people but I can mod casually if you want to add me.   Just removing junk or anything extreme if thats the case the more people around the better I presume.

If you don't sign in Bitcointalk
Open this thread and you will see

Hello, you should know where that is with bad status. Or is it the rat4 trust? Otherwise you wouldn't see any status here?

when i ask a exchange to list BLN
they reply me “Your project didn't pass our screening and also you it has bad feedback on Bitcointalk forum.”
have any one know how to change this theme state