Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] [BSV] [Bitcoin SV] Original Satoshi Vision - page 75. (Read 226573 times)

legendary
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1688
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
"You can not patent code. You can only patent an invention which is implemented in your code. An invention is a new and unique way of doing something. Most of all, it must be something nobody did before. If anyone used the same technique which you describe in your patent, that's called prior art and invalidates your patent. So trying to get a patent on something somebody else invented and implemented in code would be futile. ..."

No shit. Relevance?

Did you somehow forget your dev is crypto's biggest patent troll?

While I am unsure on the matter, I think nChain has the largest portfolio of patents in the crypto currency and Blockchain space. Not knowing your definition of "patent troll" -- not exactly a dictionary term -- I really have no way to respond to your question.

Incidentally, the title of 'your dev' is a complete non-sequitur, seeing as 'dev' is pretty universally applied to 'the peeps who write the code'. An activity that CSW (am I safe in assuming it is him to which you refer?) pays others to do. And, of course, that whole 'your' thing.
 
Though whatever the outcome of that little sidebar, it sheds exactly zero light upon the questionable relevance of the quoted tirade by BitcoinFX.

Try again? Or let BitcoinFX speak for him/herself?



"You can not patent code. You can only patent an invention which is implemented in your code. An invention is a new and unique way of doing something. Most of all, it must be something nobody did before. If anyone used the same technique which you describe in your patent, that's called prior art and invalidates your patent. So trying to get a patent on something somebody else invented and implemented in code would be futile. ..."

No shit. Relevance?

Did you somehow forget your dev is crypto's biggest patent troll?

Apparently being a fraud and a conman wasn't low enough for him.

This ^

- https://github.com/bitcoin-sv/bitcoin-sv/blob/master/LICENSE

"Open BSV License
Copyright (c) 2019 Bitcoin Association

Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:

1 - The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
2 - The Software, and any software that is derived from the Software or parts thereof,
can only be used on the Bitcoin SV blockchains. The Bitcoin SV blockchains are defined,
for purposes of this license, as the Bitcoin blockchain containing block height #556767
with the hash "000000000000000001d956714215d96ffc00e0afda4cd0a96c96f8d802b1662b"
and
the test blockchains that are supported by the un-modified Software.

THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN
THE SOFTWARE.



Version 0.1.1 of the Bitcoin SV software, and prior versions of software upon which it was based,
were licensed under the MIT License, which is included below.

The MIT License (MIT)

Copyright (c) 2009-2010 Satoshi Nakamoto
Copyright (c) 2009-2015 Bitcoin Developers
Copyright (c) 2009-2017 The Bitcoin Core developers
Copyright (c) 2017 The Bitcoin ABC developers
Copyright (c) 2018 Bitcoin Association

Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:

The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
all copies or substantial portions of the Software.

THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN
THE SOFTWARE."


...

Which came first the chicken or the egg ?

CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.

It's time to BUILD, a solid legal case against BSV. - SWIM

...

- https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/07/blockstream-commits-patent-nonaggression

...

Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon (5/8) Movie CLIP - Invincible Sword Goddess (2000) HD
- https://youtu.be/X5SaZ8EmSpw *Satire*

Cheesy

You fail to establish any relevancy for your spouting. You also seem to have a rather flawed understanding of IP law. Lesson one: patents and copyrights are two completely different things.

Exactly what point do you think you are making by quoting the Open BSV License?
full member
Activity: 626
Merit: 234
In this topic, complete freedom of speech and anarchy

Except for the 303 comments you have deleted  Cheesy

Might as well just keep deleting them dude. Theymos isn't going to close my thread, but you can delete my comments from this one.
Because rights and freedoms should only be for normal peoples. Not for trolls like you
hv_
legendary
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1055
Clean Code and Scale
In this topic, complete freedom of speech and anarchy

Except for the 303 comments you have deleted  Cheesy

Might as well just keep deleting them dude. Theymos isn't going to close my thread, but you can delete my comments from this one.

U wanna have some overview about how many ( not only of mine) posts got deleted by just arguing pro on chain scaling and against introducing technical debt like Segshit or 'privacy features' into the original protocol?

Many sane legends have left this place also because of censorship




Did you somehow forget your dev is crypto's biggest patent troll?

Apparently being a fraud and a conman wasn't low enough for him.

On a frozen, locked down protocol design, there is no dev needed

That's funny. Just yesterday you said there was still work to be done in "unfuckening" the protocol. Sounds like you're gonna need a dev for that.

Telling ppl to trust into devs is the fraud,

Especially if its your dev.

Slowly u might get that, sure there is refactoring needed
 
Most due to the shit that got injected by devs having no clue what BitCoin was designed to do.

But all such things are cleaning and scaling tasks, so that after Genesis release we have TCP/IP like state of protocol stability, and all BSV apps will be smoothly running after for many years
without any fear of getting 'deved out of functioning' by insanity
sr. member
Activity: 686
Merit: 320
Bitcoin is not accords to early Bitcoin Principes
Neither is Bitcoin SV which is born out right from the posts from Satoshi on this very forum.
full member
Activity: 626
Merit: 234
CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.
1. CSW is co-author of early Bitcoin. Satoshi is just pseudonym

2. BSV is Original Bitcoin, because current Bitcoin is not accords to early Bitcoin Principes
full member
Activity: 626
Merit: 234
CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.
CSW is co-author of Bitcoin and BSV is Original Bitcoin.
full member
Activity: 626
Merit: 234
BSV - is Original Bitcoin.

In this topic, complete freedom of speech and anarchy

That's why BSV is Original Bitcoin (Satoshi Vision)
hv_
legendary
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1055
Clean Code and Scale
"You can not patent code. You can only patent an invention which is implemented in your code. An invention is a new and unique way of doing something. Most of all, it must be something nobody did before. If anyone used the same technique which you describe in your patent, that's called prior art and invalidates your patent. So trying to get a patent on something somebody else invented and implemented in code would be futile. ..."

No shit. Relevance?

Did you somehow forget your dev is crypto's biggest patent troll?

Apparently being a fraud and a conman wasn't low enough for him.

On a frozen, locked down protocol design, there is no dev needed

Telling ppl to trust into devs is the fraud,
 

BitCoin is fine, complete and functional as delivered

BSV is compliant and honest with that.

No ppl needed in such, only trolls do name calling and circlejerk proof of crap to sell their bags

hero member
Activity: 2786
Merit: 657
Want top-notch marketing for your project, Hire me



Hey world I pass over this wire in a gust of wind between two chemo session and I see that there is still as much degenerated bulb around here! the level of some discussion is gigantic childish! what a waste of time, which could be used to study or make love to your wife... ha I forgot others are already doing it for you...


Keep the time !



Quote
Source: https://np.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/dlvokv/how_i_lost_4_btc_on_lightning_network/?user_id=50219676261

Four Bitcoins have been ‘lost’ on the Lightning network due a user force-closing a channel using an older invalid state.

Reddit user ZipoTm posted a thread entitled “How I lost 4BTC on the Lightning Network” where he detailed a conversation with support who said the Bitcoin was irretrievable.

“Yes, if you force close using an older invalid state, they can take the money while it’s time locked if their node is online,” they wrote to the aggrieved user.

“Wow… looks like I lost 4BTC because my LND wasn’t synchronised, that’s weird.” ZipoTM replied.

“You have already closed all your channels with an older state? That’s it, the money is gone,” the support reiterated.


Oliver Knight
@KnightCoinRivet
Lightning network seems to be going well. https://np.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/dlvokv/how_i_lost_4_btc_on_lightning_network/ …#Layer0

15
12:49 PM - Oct 23, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
See Oliver Knight's other Tweets
The Lightning network has been touted as the solution to Bitcoin’s scaling dilemma for the past two years, with advocates claiming that all Bitcoin transactions will one day take place on the super-fast Lightning network, which would legitimise Bitcoin as a viable payment method.

However, examples like this highlight that the network is far from ready and that users should proceed with caution while development is still in a relatively early phase.

Volume on the Lightning Network has been fairly disappointing. According to 1ML, there are just 10,249 nodes and 35,419 channels on the Lightning Network – far less than what was expected ahead of its launch last year.




BTC it's not always good! I prefer BSV at least the Devs know how to handle Roll Eyes




I guess that's because you're an alt account used by the team or you're just naive and don't know that Craig and teams stemming coin from BCH which legitimate make BSV shitcoin of Bitcoincrash. In fact, this is the reason why the OP of this thread ignore the statement made by nutildah

CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.
Bitcoin SV $133.51  +21.33%

Any questions? Who is a real Bitcoin now? Thats' right: BSV - Original Bitcoin. Satoshi Vision

WHO'S THE BOSS NOW:
https://youtu.be/dQSZRGWwPXg?t=138
Cryptonex $1,610.68  +310.87%

Hey look! It's gained over 10x as much as BSV, therefore it's a better coin!
Guys, don't brag with them cause some or later the coin will quench off the market. Mind you, the current spot claimed by the coin belong to some altcoin before.
legendary
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1688
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
"You can not patent code. You can only patent an invention which is implemented in your code. An invention is a new and unique way of doing something. Most of all, it must be something nobody did before. If anyone used the same technique which you describe in your patent, that's called prior art and invalidates your patent. So trying to get a patent on something somebody else invented and implemented in code would be futile. ..."

No shit. Relevance?
hv_
legendary
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1055
Clean Code and Scale
Fxtroll does proof of trash post.

I wonder how such do survive these days.

 Angry
hv_
legendary
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1055
Clean Code and Scale
"If You Don’t Cannibalize Yourself, Someone Else Will"

Steve Jobs
Cool, so that's what the Bitcoin forks are doing right?

Entire crypto scams are about it.

BSV still the true DNA and lots of things are protected by nChains patents.

So try to complete against original BitCoin, but choose a different name like Litecoin did, btc could be called SegwitCoin, that s fine
full member
Activity: 626
Merit: 234
CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.
Bitcoin SV $133.51  +21.33%

Any questions? Who is a real Bitcoin now? Thats' right: BSV - Original Bitcoin. Satoshi Vision

WHO'S THE BOSS NOW:
https://youtu.be/dQSZRGWwPXg?t=138
hv_
legendary
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1055
Clean Code and Scale
BitCoin forks


Then why does the BSV protocol contain changes made by Peter Wuille, Greg Maxwell and Amaury Sechet?

Unfuckening is still on the road map. Be assured that all that stupid crap will go away, cause it's not Bitcoin and got into by dumb ppl and their communism

Good you asked
copper member
Activity: 37
Merit: 23
Have transacted on both BTC and BSV chains, both work fine.
We are in uncharted territory, nobody knows what's going to happen in the next year/ 10 year.
It's always wise to spread risk.
sr. member
Activity: 1176
Merit: 297
Bitcoin © Maximalist
"If You Don’t Cannibalize Yourself, Someone Else Will"

Steve Jobs
Cool, so that's what the Bitcoin forks are doing right?

BitCoin forks
member
Activity: 237
Merit: 10
"If You Don’t Cannibalize Yourself, Someone Else Will"

Steve Jobs
Cool, so that's what the Bitcoin forks are doing right?

The forks are contingent on the premise that there is a consensus to do or fix something that larger portion of the community fails to condone. Forks had been taking place in all coins long before this discussion even started. There is a lot of cookies we can get from forking, for example, mark the beginning of a new milestone in adoption or development. I have made a plea to fork Do_zzze, namely add another round of fat around the outer edge of a butthole.
hv_
legendary
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1055
Clean Code and Scale
"If You Don’t Cannibalize Yourself, Someone Else Will"

Steve Jobs
hv_
legendary
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1055
Clean Code and Scale
Wow - we got attracted the biggest FXTroll into the house of BSV Posts  - yey

 Grin

Thankfully I have no need to sink to the abhorrent level of all of those involved with BSV.

Not even trolling you! Simply posting facts, which are clear as day.

CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.

...

"Have a nice life!" - CSW

Just all wrong

BSV is best possible Bitcoin

CSW is and was always best guess to be Satoshi

I agree about: 100% does not exist
sr. member
Activity: 1176
Merit: 297
Bitcoin © Maximalist
Wow - we got attracted the biggest FXTroll into the house of BSV Posts  - yey

 Grin

Why would that be?
Pages:
Jump to: