CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.
1. CSW is co-author of early Bitcoin. Satoshi is just pseudonym2. BSV is Original Bitcoin, because current Bitcoin is not accords to early Bitcoin Principes
Topic: [ANN] [BSV] [Bitcoin SV] Original Satoshi Vision - page 75. (Read 226361 times)
2. BSV is Original Bitcoin, because current Bitcoin is not accords to early Bitcoin Principes
CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.
CSW is co-author of Bitcoin and BSV is Original Bitcoin.
BSV - is Original Bitcoin.
In this topic, complete freedom of speech and anarchy
That's why BSV is Original Bitcoin (Satoshi Vision)
In this topic, complete freedom of speech and anarchy
That's why BSV is Original Bitcoin (Satoshi Vision)
"You can not patent code. You can only patent an invention which is implemented in your code. An invention is a new and unique way of doing something. Most of all, it must be something nobody did before. If anyone used the same technique which you describe in your patent, that's called prior art and invalidates your patent. So trying to get a patent on something somebody else invented and implemented in code would be futile. ..."
No shit. Relevance?
Did you somehow forget your dev is crypto's biggest patent troll?
Apparently being a fraud and a conman wasn't low enough for him.
On a frozen, locked down protocol design, there is no dev needed
Telling ppl to trust into devs is the fraud,
BitCoin is fine, complete and functional as delivered
BSV is compliant and honest with that.
No ppl needed in such, only trolls do name calling and circlejerk proof of crap to sell their bags
hero member
Activity: 2660
Merit: 651
Want top-notch marketing for your project, Hire me
Hey world I pass over this wire in a gust of wind between two chemo session and I see that there is still as much degenerated bulb around here! the level of some discussion is gigantic childish! what a waste of time, which could be used to study or make love to your wife... ha I forgot others are already doing it for you...
Keep the time !
Quote
Source: https://np.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/dlvokv/how_i_lost_4_btc_on_lightning_network/?user_id=50219676261
Four Bitcoins have been ‘lost’ on the Lightning network due a user force-closing a channel using an older invalid state.
Reddit user ZipoTm posted a thread entitled “How I lost 4BTC on the Lightning Network” where he detailed a conversation with support who said the Bitcoin was irretrievable.
“Yes, if you force close using an older invalid state, they can take the money while it’s time locked if their node is online,” they wrote to the aggrieved user.
“Wow… looks like I lost 4BTC because my LND wasn’t synchronised, that’s weird.” ZipoTM replied.
“You have already closed all your channels with an older state? That’s it, the money is gone,” the support reiterated.
Oliver Knight
@KnightCoinRivet
Lightning network seems to be going well. https://np.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/dlvokv/how_i_lost_4_btc_on_lightning_network/ …#Layer0
15
12:49 PM - Oct 23, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
See Oliver Knight's other Tweets
The Lightning network has been touted as the solution to Bitcoin’s scaling dilemma for the past two years, with advocates claiming that all Bitcoin transactions will one day take place on the super-fast Lightning network, which would legitimise Bitcoin as a viable payment method.
However, examples like this highlight that the network is far from ready and that users should proceed with caution while development is still in a relatively early phase.
Volume on the Lightning Network has been fairly disappointing. According to 1ML, there are just 10,249 nodes and 35,419 channels on the Lightning Network – far less than what was expected ahead of its launch last year.
Four Bitcoins have been ‘lost’ on the Lightning network due a user force-closing a channel using an older invalid state.
Reddit user ZipoTm posted a thread entitled “How I lost 4BTC on the Lightning Network” where he detailed a conversation with support who said the Bitcoin was irretrievable.
“Yes, if you force close using an older invalid state, they can take the money while it’s time locked if their node is online,” they wrote to the aggrieved user.
“Wow… looks like I lost 4BTC because my LND wasn’t synchronised, that’s weird.” ZipoTM replied.
“You have already closed all your channels with an older state? That’s it, the money is gone,” the support reiterated.
Oliver Knight
@KnightCoinRivet
Lightning network seems to be going well. https://np.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/dlvokv/how_i_lost_4_btc_on_lightning_network/ …#Layer0
15
12:49 PM - Oct 23, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
See Oliver Knight's other Tweets
The Lightning network has been touted as the solution to Bitcoin’s scaling dilemma for the past two years, with advocates claiming that all Bitcoin transactions will one day take place on the super-fast Lightning network, which would legitimise Bitcoin as a viable payment method.
However, examples like this highlight that the network is far from ready and that users should proceed with caution while development is still in a relatively early phase.
Volume on the Lightning Network has been fairly disappointing. According to 1ML, there are just 10,249 nodes and 35,419 channels on the Lightning Network – far less than what was expected ahead of its launch last year.
BTC it's not always good! I prefer BSV at least the Devs know how to handle
CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.
Bitcoin SV $133.51 +21.33%Any questions? Who is a real Bitcoin now? Thats' right: BSV - Original Bitcoin. Satoshi Vision
WHO'S THE BOSS NOW:
https://youtu.be/dQSZRGWwPXg?t=138
Hey look! It's gained over 10x as much as BSV, therefore it's a better coin!
"You can not patent code. You can only patent an invention which is implemented in your code. An invention is a new and unique way of doing something. Most of all, it must be something nobody did before. If anyone used the same technique which you describe in your patent, that's called prior art and invalidates your patent. So trying to get a patent on something somebody else invented and implemented in code would be futile. ..."
No shit. Relevance?
Fxtroll does proof of trash post.
I wonder how such do survive these days.
I wonder how such do survive these days.
"If You Don’t Cannibalize Yourself, Someone Else Will"
Steve Jobs
Cool, so that's what the Bitcoin forks are doing right?Steve Jobs
Entire crypto scams are about it.
BSV still the true DNA and lots of things are protected by nChains patents.
So try to complete against original BitCoin, but choose a different name like Litecoin did, btc could be called SegwitCoin, that s fine
CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.
Bitcoin SV $133.51 +21.33%Any questions? Who is a real Bitcoin now? Thats' right: BSV - Original Bitcoin. Satoshi Vision
WHO'S THE BOSS NOW:
https://youtu.be/dQSZRGWwPXg?t=138
BitCoin forks
Then why does the BSV protocol contain changes made by Peter Wuille, Greg Maxwell and Amaury Sechet?
Unfuckening is still on the road map. Be assured that all that stupid crap will go away, cause it's not Bitcoin and got into by dumb ppl and their communism
Good you asked
Have transacted on both BTC and BSV chains, both work fine.
We are in uncharted territory, nobody knows what's going to happen in the next year/ 10 year.
It's always wise to spread risk.
We are in uncharted territory, nobody knows what's going to happen in the next year/ 10 year.
It's always wise to spread risk.
"If You Don’t Cannibalize Yourself, Someone Else Will"
Steve Jobs
Cool, so that's what the Bitcoin forks are doing right?Steve Jobs
BitCoin forks
"If You Don’t Cannibalize Yourself, Someone Else Will"
Steve Jobs
Cool, so that's what the Bitcoin forks are doing right?Steve Jobs
The forks are contingent on the premise that there is a consensus to do or fix something that larger portion of the community fails to condone. Forks had been taking place in all coins long before this discussion even started. There is a lot of cookies we can get from forking, for example, mark the beginning of a new milestone in adoption or development. I have made a plea to fork Do_zzze, namely add another round of fat around the outer edge of a butthole.
"If You Don’t Cannibalize Yourself, Someone Else Will"
Steve Jobs
Steve Jobs
Wow - we got attracted the biggest FXTroll into the house of BSV Posts - yey
Thankfully I have no need to sink to the abhorrent level of all of those involved with BSV.
Not even trolling you! Simply posting facts, which are clear as day.
CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.
...
"Have a nice life!" - CSW
Just all wrong
BSV is best possible Bitcoin
CSW is and was always best guess to be Satoshi
I agree about: 100% does not exist
Wow - we got attracted the biggest FXTroll into the house of BSV Posts - yey
Why would that be?
Wow - we got attracted the biggest FXTroll into the house of BSV Posts - yey
BSV Team - Are community of honesty peoples, supporters, volunteers, coders etc.
BSV is not only CSW & Ayre.
Don't touch BSV, trolls. Send all your claims to CSW
Theymos, sorry please if something offended you
BSV is not only CSW & Ayre.
Don't touch BSV, trolls. Send all your claims to CSW
Theymos, sorry please if something offended you
BSV Team
Stop hijacking Bitcoin.
All forks have the right to life. This is accords with the philosophy of decentralisationCSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.
We are better than old bitcoin. We are Original Bitcoin
THEYMOS! PLEASE SORRY US!
We are not responsible for CSW actions. But we are so sorry for it. Very big sorry for it.
Theymos, please sorry for CSW words if you can. Please protect us from these BlackPR trolls (nudildah etc)
Fight with real scam, not with us.
Modest gift for you: Bitcoin SV $116.83 +20.25%
We are not responsible for CSW actions. But we are so sorry for it. Very big sorry for it.
Theymos, please sorry for CSW words if you can. Please protect us from these BlackPR trolls (nudildah etc)
Fight with real scam, not with us.
Modest gift for you: Bitcoin SV $116.83 +20.25%
Jump to: