Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] [BSV] [Bitcoin SV] Original Satoshi Vision - page 72. (Read 226573 times)

sr. member
Activity: 1176
Merit: 297
Bitcoin © Maximalist
How Facebook Could Adopt Bitcoin SV (BSV)
https://youtu.be/nj8Yr8ghOn0

People who understand BITCOIN and PoW properly are VERY RARE
https://youtu.be/Q6VWJw6SdjQ
legendary
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1688
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
The fact that CSW submitted for copyright something that has been in the public domain for years (the bitcoin whitepaper)

Whatever gives you the idea that the Bitcoin white paper is public domain?

He didn't say it "is" public domain, he said its been in the public domain, because nobody was too big of an ass to attempt to copyright it until Craig came along.

How convenient for the next public display of ignorance to come so quickly. Copyright is established the instant a work is affixed in tangible form. That copyright exists fully independent if any registration thereof. Absent any explicit delegation of rights to the public at large by its creator, the Bitcoin white paper is not public domain.

Your willful persistence in confusing 2 different terms does not alter the fact that Craig is a fraud. You're like a medium-grade scammer who gets caught in a scam and then attempts to shift attention to an argument around something else. The fact remains: Satoshi intended bitcoin to be freely-distibutable, available to all, and Craig is attempting to subvert that ethos by copyrighting and patenting anything he can get his greedy little hands on, all the while claiming he is Satoshi. You have to be either very stupid or very dishonest to not see what's going on by now.

That’s rather rich. I’m not the one with a demonstrated confusion between patents and compyrights, nor between public domain and non public domain items.

The initial protocol is indeed free for anyone to use. While I understand at least some of the arguments for abolishing all IP law, under the current dominant system of the world, people’s inventions are their own, should they choose to patent them. Near as I am aware, nChain is not making patent claim to any fundamental bit of the initial Bitcoin protocol. They are making patent claims to other innovations running atop the Bitcoin protocol. And in the world in which we live, that is a perfectly legitimate thing to do.

Exactly what is the nature of your compliant? Describe to me one patent of nChain’s that has you most up in arms, and describe to me exactly how you think it violates some element of fair play. If you can.
sr. member
Activity: 1176
Merit: 297
Bitcoin © Maximalist

Oh no now BTC miners invading
https://sv.coin.dance/blocks/thisweek

hv_
legendary
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1055
Clean Code and Scale
PoW is to make ppl rich who really work.
Gotcha. POW wasn't created to make people rich though. Just shows your state of mind when it comes to these things. Doesn't matter if it's crap or awesome tech, as long as you can make money from it. Now I know why you support this. You fit right in with Craig.


Only work makes u rich. Dunno what s wrong with that.

And BSV is Original BitCoin

sr. member
Activity: 686
Merit: 320
PoW is to make ppl rich who really work.
Gotcha. POW wasn't created to make people rich though. Just shows your state of mind when it comes to these things. Doesn't matter if it's crap or awesome tech, as long as you can make money from it. Now I know why you support this. You fit right in with Craig.
sr. member
Activity: 1176
Merit: 297
Bitcoin © Maximalist
Fact Satoshi did not want Wikileaks to use Bitcoin
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.26999
hv_
legendary
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1055
Clean Code and Scale

Because big blocks are more profitable?

And there you have it. They don't care about cryto currency, they're only in it for profit. After having watched the video the other day of Craig, I was left with the feeling that he is exactly the same way. All he seems to care about is getting in bed with the banks, corporations and the like just so he can get rich and nothing more.

PoW is to make ppl rich who really work.

Comunism does not help anyhow to secure Bitcoin open system.

Good u asked but incentives keep Bitcoin running for 10 y.
Without it would be rekt after few years

Capitalism works
sr. member
Activity: 686
Merit: 320

Because big blocks are more profitable?

And there you have it. They don't care about cryto currency, they're only in it for profit. After having watched the video the other day of Craig, I was left with the feeling that he is exactly the same way. All he seems to care about is getting in bed with the banks, corporations and the like just so he can get rich and nothing more.
hv_
legendary
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1055
Clean Code and Scale
BSV devs getting it

https://twitter.com/barackomaba/status/1189696037130293249?s=21

And ask if u think github is ur measure of value

 Cheesy
sr. member
Activity: 1176
Merit: 297
Bitcoin © Maximalist

New record on STN 1.8 Million transaction block (358Mb)
https://stn.satoshi.io/block-height/3053
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1823
...........

Plus I don't know what kind of disease I'll catch for going in here. I got lost looking for Decred's ANN. Haha.


To late, the disease got you here, cure no, deal with it, the thread will accommodate your bit of PoW


Good luck. Bitcoin shall always be the dominant SHA256 cryptocurrency. The design-decisions made will, WILL cause your miners, and any forks' miners to come back to Bitcoin.

Why?
sr. member
Activity: 1176
Merit: 297
Bitcoin © Maximalist
legendary
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1688
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
The fact that CSW submitted for copyright something that has been in the public domain for years (the bitcoin whitepaper)

Whatever gives you the idea that the Bitcoin white paper is public domain?

Your level of passion here, jbreher, surely deserves some passionate eye rolling too, no?

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/10/02/08/19190292-7528083-image-m-153_1570001194043.jpg

Whatevs, dude or dudette. Fact is that xrtrlaev’s so-called ‘fact’ is unmitigated bullshit. Of course, pretty much nobody in this space understands any aspect of IP law whatsoever, so I guess I should not be surprised.

Incidentally, what value do you think you have added to this branch of the thread?



The fact that CSW submitted for copyright something that has been in the public domain for years (the bitcoin whitepaper)

Whatever gives you the idea that the Bitcoin white paper is public domain?

He didn't say it "is" public domain, he said its been in the public domain, because nobody was too big of an ass to attempt to copyright it until Craig came along.

How convenient for the next public display of ignorance to come so quickly. Copyright is established the instant a work is affixed in tangible form. That copyright exists fully independent if any registration thereof. Absent any explicit delegation of rights to the public at large by its creator, the Bitcoin white paper is not public domain.
jr. member
Activity: 53
Merit: 6
The lengths people on this thread to defame people in the BSV community really shows fear. Very bullish on BSV, transaction volume now exceeding BTC on a daily basis!!!!

Facts don’t lie..

Sv.coin.dance

Bsv more profitable to mine and transact. Fact.
Fear is real, activity in thread in recent time proves that.
No such thing as bad publicity.

Wrong ! No fear here whatsoever.

Simply presenting hard facts to prove that CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.

This is the response we are undertaking in regards to BSV continually claiming to be original Bitcoin (BTC).

CSW has provided no proof to the community here or elsewhere, hard evidence exists to the contrary.

The  #faketoshi  fraud  TIMELINE
- https://seekingsatoshi.weebly.com/mylegacykit.html
- https://seekingsatoshi.weebly.com/ponsdeserres.html
- https://seekingsatoshi.weebly.com/jimmy007forsure.html

SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper
- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/scam-bitcoin-sv-bsv-fake-team-member-and-plagiarized-white-paper-5149062

This will continue until you recognize and acknowledge the above. Look at the despicable actions of the people you are supporting.

By supporting BSV you are complicit in the attempt to 'hijack' the original Bitcoin (BTC) project, are you not?

Mate you’ve wasted hours with the same character arguments against Craig that have no relevance to bitcoin Sv. Look at your posts, you’re clearly heavily invested in making sure bitcoin Sv does not succeed. You need better arguments. You are scared.
full member
Activity: 626
Merit: 234
The lengths people on this thread to defame people in the BSV community really shows fear. Very bullish on BSV, transaction volume now exceeding BTC on a daily basis!!!!

Facts don’t lie..

Sv.coin.dance

Bsv more profitable to mine and transact. Fact.
Fear is real, activity in thread in recent time proves that.
No such thing as bad publicity.
That's the way it is

CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.
mua-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha
nobody cares your mantra

CSW & Ayre are real men with iron balls unlike you womanlike trolls


sr. member
Activity: 1176
Merit: 297
Bitcoin © Maximalist
The lengths people on this thread to defame people in the BSV community really shows fear. Very bullish on BSV, transaction volume now exceeding BTC on a daily basis!!!!

Facts don’t lie..

Sv.coin.dance

Bsv more profitable to mine and transact. Fact.
Fear is real, activity in thread in recent time proves that.
No such thing as bad publicity.
jr. member
Activity: 53
Merit: 6
The lengths people on this thread to defame people in the BSV community really shows fear. Very bullish on BSV, transaction volume now exceeding BTC on a daily basis!!!!

Facts don’t lie..

Sv.coin.dance

Bsv more profitable to mine and transact. Fact.
full member
Activity: 626
Merit: 234
Which of them are sounds better:

bitcoinsvtalk.org
bsvtalk.org
originalbitcointalk.org
satoshivisiontalk.org
iamsatoshitalk.org


Please, vote
sr. member
Activity: 1176
Merit: 297
Bitcoin © Maximalist
German gov is about to get it - btc LN - rekt!


> *German Bundestag: Bitcoin (BTC) is counterfeit money!*

>On Monday , the German Bundestag announced that Bitcoin and other "on-the-market crypto-tokens" are not fulfilling the classical functions of money and are therefore counterfeit money. These classic functions are:
>
>    Exchange and payment
>    Store of value
>    computer unit
>
> Crypto currencies would not be good as a means of exchange and payment since the transaction volume handled with crypto-tokens is very small compared to national currencies such as the euro or the dollar, according to the logic.
>
> As a store of value, the currencies would not be suitable because they were exposed to strong price fluctuations. But above all, the criticism refers to Libra:
>
> "From the point of view of the Federal Government, it must be ensured that stable coins do not establish themselves as an alternative to state currencies and thus call into question the existing monetary system."
>
> Recently, the finance ministry under Olaf Scholz expressed concern that anonymised cryptocurrencies in the Darknet are on the rise. Especially before the Privacy Coin Monero (XMR) was warned. This could develop on the dark sides of the Internet to a "real alternative to Bitcoin". The ministry also fears that so far not anonymous coins could get a greater anonymity built.

https://www.coinkurier.de/deutscher-bundestag-bitcoin-btc-ist-falschgeld/

The very same applies to BSV.

Roll Eyes
BSV immutable data storage/sharing/transmitting plus smart contracts and and and.......
hv_
legendary
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1055
Clean Code and Scale
German gov is about to get it - btc LN - rekt!


> *German Bundestag: Bitcoin (BTC) is counterfeit money!*

>On Monday , the German Bundestag announced that Bitcoin and other "on-the-market crypto-tokens" are not fulfilling the classical functions of money and are therefore counterfeit money. These classic functions are:
>
>    Exchange and payment
>    Store of value
>    computer unit
>
> Crypto currencies would not be good as a means of exchange and payment since the transaction volume handled with crypto-tokens is very small compared to national currencies such as the euro or the dollar, according to the logic.
>
> As a store of value, the currencies would not be suitable because they were exposed to strong price fluctuations. But above all, the criticism refers to Libra:
>
> "From the point of view of the Federal Government, it must be ensured that stable coins do not establish themselves as an alternative to state currencies and thus call into question the existing monetary system."
>
> Recently, the finance ministry under Olaf Scholz expressed concern that anonymised cryptocurrencies in the Darknet are on the rise. Especially before the Privacy Coin Monero (XMR) was warned. This could develop on the dark sides of the Internet to a "real alternative to Bitcoin". The ministry also fears that so far not anonymous coins could get a greater anonymity built.

https://www.coinkurier.de/deutscher-bundestag-bitcoin-btc-ist-falschgeld/
Pages:
Jump to: