Clearing words
https://mobile.twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1191284725920542720
Topic: [ANN] [BSV] [Bitcoin SV] Original Satoshi Vision - page 71. (Read 226442 times)
Yet again, CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.
Wow, is this suits as a proof?
Quote
You’re about to find out why I created bitcoin and yes I am Satoshi Nakamoto.
It seems that Trump getting through the things
https://mobile.twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/661356334068187136
https://mobile.twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/661356334068187136
This is a tweet from 2015 you douche burglar.
It was even written before Craig started pretending to be Satoshi.
Sure. It had nothing to do with csw.
U just got triggered.
Lol
It seems that Trump getting through the things
https://mobile.twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/661356334068187136
https://mobile.twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/661356334068187136
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.290.0.pdf
Hey BSV cult members, your leader is broke and his sugar daddy Calvin ain't bailing him out.
Welcome to real life.
To claim another one to be broke without proof and during an open case is ok?
How is such not name calling ? Not dumbest trolling ?
So expect going to be sued for such dumb tweets
If such is the btc cult u wanna be in and support
Happy days /s
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.290.0.pdf
Hey BSV cult members, your leader is broke and his sugar daddy Calvin ain't bailing him out.
Welcome to real life.
So the decentralized BSV blockchain technology can finally take center stage and CSW personal drama nearing its end
And just hate and fear troll posts
I love how when someone wants to cover there ears and go la la la la because they don't like what other people are saying they automatically whip out the "hate", "tolls" and "fud" labels. Just because you don't like the facts doesn't change anything. You're free to continue with your cult like mentality and spout off your mantra. You can choose to spread the lies that BSV is the "original vision" even though it's not (neither is bitcoin) if you like but don't expect people to not take issue with the lie. The people who see this for what it is are free to say what they want to about it as well. When you have to resort to things like name calling then you've lost as you prove you can't argue the issues.I do not see facts ^
I say, go out for all kinds of different sources and derive for yourself what true and original Bitcoin is.
Then look at the market what is implemented.
Do not listen to ticker hodlers. They only do classical position talk , I consider trolls.
Nothing about cult, except go the scientific deductive path, not what ppl tell ya.
This includes my stuff here as well. I only point you for the right way I think it is to choose to learn
And if u found it, come in constructive discussions, but let's be honest, we need to separate trolls.
If u see a better approach how to conclude, I m happy to discuss
And just hate and fear troll posts
I love how when someone wants to cover there ears and go la la la la because they don't like what other people are saying they automatically whip out the "hate", "tolls" and "fud" labels. Just because you don't like the facts doesn't change anything. You're free to continue with your cult like mentality and spout off your mantra. You can choose to spread the lies that BSV is the "original vision" even though it's not (neither is bitcoin) if you like but don't expect people to not take issue with the lie. The people who see this for what it is are free to say what they want to about it as well. When you have to resort to things like name calling then you've lost as you prove you can't argue the issues. Code:
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
BSV - is Original Bitcoin. Satoshi Vision
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
3KDJhw9LewyXdfvZ4JQktkTDLfutPbyTxv
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This is hilarious. Are you sure you understand anything about bitcoin at all, or are you a crackhead who's managed to convince themselves they understand anything about bitcoin at all?
You don't know anything
Yep.
Everybody can clearly see the difference between constructive freedom of speech
And just hate and fear troll posts
This thread shows it best
Metanet design is constructive only
Code:
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
BSV - is Original Bitcoin. Satoshi Vision
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
3KDJhw9LewyXdfvZ4JQktkTDLfutPbyTxv
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This is hilarious. Are you sure you understand anything about bitcoin at all, or are you a crackhead who's managed to convince themselves they understand anything about bitcoin at all?
You don't know anything
Capitalism works
You don't want to have control of your own money? You want to delegate that responsibility to third-party entities that are prioritizing profit?What?!
Not sure what u mean, but why isn't capitalism also about control of money?
Socialism is about to share all for 'free' so u don't need money. That already failed badly.
Bitcoin only works because of incentives and competition between miners who must invest permanently into better long term infrastructure to get rewarded by blocks and its coinbase bounty.
Mass of users make this happen, cause Bitcoin has a price > 0
Such is per se open and 'decentralized' enough and pretty nicely aligned to have no central monopoly for long term, cause innovation and competition will break such any time (cause there is a bounty to be earned )
This network can scale by technological improvements to all 'limits' capitalism is allowing.
I see btc - RasPI romantics and troll cave baghodlerism is not Bitcoin as designed ( data centers have been the words of Satoshi!)
But btc devs always tried to make it such 'own romantic shit' to verify, but what? That miners run the capitalist show anyway ?
Rekt
Dont be ignorant or listen to forum trolls ( they do good job for counting triggered bagholders tho)
Learn from different sources
Derive strictly what BitCoin is and what it was
SegWit and all alterations are not BitCoin. Any typ of crap is not doing good. Despite the ticker might be oldest like btc or the name contains Bitcoin
BSV will be the true original unforked Bitcoin after all the refectoring is done. Its getting unfucked from core shit and will work as DESIGNED ON PURPOSE.
Thx to Satoshi
Learn from different sources
Derive strictly what BitCoin is and what it was
SegWit and all alterations are not BitCoin. Any typ of crap is not doing good. Despite the ticker might be oldest like btc or the name contains Bitcoin
BSV will be the true original unforked Bitcoin after all the refectoring is done. Its getting unfucked from core shit and will work as DESIGNED ON PURPOSE.
Thx to Satoshi
A Signed and Verifiable message consists of 3 parts ...
1. The Message
2. The Address being Signed from.
3. The Signature for Verification.
Do you want a complete message? 1. The Message
2. The Address being Signed from.
3. The Signature for Verification.
Everything has its time
Bitcoin SV. Satoshi Vision, Original Bitcoin
Jimmy on the Cheddar tv about true Bitcoin
https://cheddar.com/media/bitcoins-billion-dollar-milestone
https://cheddar.com/media/bitcoins-billion-dollar-milestone
Unwriter about the Bitcoin Cash experiment
https://coingeek.com/the-resolution-of-the-bitcoin-cash-experiment/
And sure BSV works as BitCoin.
So it is Bitcoin
Tickers are just repacable labels and only triggers their bagholders to hate other 'tickers'.
So the get into hating ppl and bitcoin
https://coingeek.com/the-resolution-of-the-bitcoin-cash-experiment/
And sure BSV works as BitCoin.
So it is Bitcoin
Tickers are just repacable labels and only triggers their bagholders to hate other 'tickers'.
So the get into hating ppl and bitcoin
CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.
Still waiting proofs. Wait a minute, who cares, mua-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha 
Wu jihan re-controlled bitmain and BCH now,the opportunity for BSV,or harder for BSV to get more hashrate?
Wu obviously focused more on BCH,Zhan payed more attention to AI chip.
Wu obviously focused more on BCH,Zhan payed more attention to AI chip.
How Facebook Could Adopt Bitcoin SV (BSV)
https://youtu.be/nj8Yr8ghOn0
People who understand BITCOIN and PoW properly are VERY RARE
https://youtu.be/Q6VWJw6SdjQ
https://youtu.be/nj8Yr8ghOn0
People who understand BITCOIN and PoW properly are VERY RARE
https://youtu.be/Q6VWJw6SdjQ
The fact that CSW submitted for copyright something that has been in the public domain for years (the bitcoin whitepaper)
Whatever gives you the idea that the Bitcoin white paper is public domain?
He didn't say it "is" public domain, he said its been in the public domain, because nobody was too big of an ass to attempt to copyright it until Craig came along.
How convenient for the next public display of ignorance to come so quickly. Copyright is established the instant a work is affixed in tangible form. That copyright exists fully independent if any registration thereof. Absent any explicit delegation of rights to the public at large by its creator, the Bitcoin white paper is not public domain.
Your willful persistence in confusing 2 different terms does not alter the fact that Craig is a fraud. You're like a medium-grade scammer who gets caught in a scam and then attempts to shift attention to an argument around something else. The fact remains: Satoshi intended bitcoin to be freely-distibutable, available to all, and Craig is attempting to subvert that ethos by copyrighting and patenting anything he can get his greedy little hands on, all the while claiming he is Satoshi. You have to be either very stupid or very dishonest to not see what's going on by now.
That’s rather rich. I’m not the one with a demonstrated confusion between patents and compyrights, nor between public domain and non public domain items.
The initial protocol is indeed free for anyone to use. While I understand at least some of the arguments for abolishing all IP law, under the current dominant system of the world, people’s inventions are their own, should they choose to patent them. Near as I am aware, nChain is not making patent claim to any fundamental bit of the initial Bitcoin protocol. They are making patent claims to other innovations running atop the Bitcoin protocol. And in the world in which we live, that is a perfectly legitimate thing to do.
Exactly what is the nature of your compliant? Describe to me one patent of nChain’s that has you most up in arms, and describe to me exactly how you think it violates some element of fair play. If you can.
Jump to: