Hi chris.
Unfortunately nothing at all. Tajcoin and another useless one, 0 marketcap
Siacoin uses blake2s, but the header is different, so he need to merge the changes into the sia coin code.
http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/siacoin/
Topic: [ANN] ccminer 2.3 - opensource - GPL (tpruvot) - page 109. (Read 500113 times)
Hi chris.
Unfortunately nothing at all. Tajcoin and another useless one, 0 marketcap
Siacoin uses blake2s, but the header is different, so he need to merge the changes into the sia coin code.
http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/siacoin/
First happy NY to all the Cuda miners out there.
I gotta say WOW just WOW on the blake2s tweeks with ccminer 1.8.4.
Feels like one bought a brand new Nvidia.
Great stuff @Epsylon3 just awesome. Since there arent many blake2s coins out there i am kinda honoured that the algo was included in the optimizations with the latest release.
Sent you a beer and burger tip just now. Not much but its from the heart. Have a great 2k17. Keep the faith and CryptoOn.
Cheers from Slovenia.
I gotta say WOW just WOW on the blake2s tweeks with ccminer 1.8.4.
Feels like one bought a brand new Nvidia.
Great stuff @Epsylon3 just awesome. Since there arent many blake2s coins out there i am kinda honoured that the algo was included in the optimizations with the latest release.
Sent you a beer and burger tip just now. Not much but its from the heart. Have a great 2k17. Keep the faith and CryptoOn.
Cheers from Slovenia.
how many coins are out there for blake2s? ...
we are looking at adding this algo to the cwi-pool system as well - but have been slightly apprehensive about the coins that are available ...
#crysx
Hi chris.
Unfortunately nothing at all. Tajcoin and another useless one, 0 marketcap
I gotta say WOW just WOW on the blake2s tweeks with ccminer 1.8.4.
With this new version I'm having lower performance for intensities 20 and lower.
For example, at intensity 17 (I set this value when I'm using the computer), hashrate is 20% the one I get with v1.8.3.
Card is an oldie GTX570.
EDIT: when allowing intensity to be automatic, v1.8.3 sets intensity to 22 whereas v1.8.4 sets it to 28. I wonder if there is a different base for intensity in the new version (say, shifted by 6?).
First happy NY to all the Cuda miners out there.
I gotta say WOW just WOW on the blake2s tweeks with ccminer 1.8.4.
Feels like one bought a brand new Nvidia.
Great stuff @Epsylon3 just awesome. Since there arent many blake2s coins out there i am kinda honoured that the algo was included in the optimizations with the latest release.
Sent you a beer and burger tip just now. Not much but its from the heart. Have a great 2k17. Keep the faith and CryptoOn.
Cheers from Slovenia.
I gotta say WOW just WOW on the blake2s tweeks with ccminer 1.8.4.
Feels like one bought a brand new Nvidia.
Great stuff @Epsylon3 just awesome. Since there arent many blake2s coins out there i am kinda honoured that the algo was included in the optimizations with the latest release.
Sent you a beer and burger tip just now. Not much but its from the heart. Have a great 2k17. Keep the faith and CryptoOn.
Cheers from Slovenia.
how many coins are out there for blake2s? ...
we are looking at adding this algo to the cwi-pool system as well - but have been slightly apprehensive about the coins that are available ...
#crysx
Thanks and happy new year. Will share that with alexis 
Good job guys, and a happy new year to you too
ps: tpruvot, I've sent you a pm some days ago
Thanks and happy new year. Will share that with alexis
First happy NY to all the Cuda miners out there.
I gotta say WOW just WOW on the blake2s tweeks with ccminer 1.8.4.
Feels like one bought a brand new Nvidia.
Great stuff @Epsylon3 just awesome. Since there arent many blake2s coins out there i am kinda honoured that the algo was included in the optimizations with the latest release.
Sent you a beer and burger tip just now. Not much but its from the heart. Have a great 2k17. Keep the faith and CryptoOn.
Cheers from Slovenia.
I gotta say WOW just WOW on the blake2s tweeks with ccminer 1.8.4.
Feels like one bought a brand new Nvidia.
Great stuff @Epsylon3 just awesome. Since there arent many blake2s coins out there i am kinda honoured that the algo was included in the optimizations with the latest release.
Sent you a beer and burger tip just now. Not much but its from the heart. Have a great 2k17. Keep the faith and CryptoOn.
Cheers from Slovenia.
I'm having trouble mining a p2pool vs a standard pool. For some reason the in the p2pool im only getting 46% accepted shares vs the regular pool near 100% accepted using the same settings. Is there something i need to add to the config special for a p2pool. I'm mining vertcoin btw
I'm having trouble mining decred on NiceHash:
Use this fork: https://github.com/nicehash/ccminer-tpruvot - it has the full needed stratum support.
Thanks!
I'm having trouble mining decred on NiceHash:
Do you know what is this extranonce2 bug? People mention it several times in my searches:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6503265
Code:
*** ccminer 1.8.3 for nVidia GPUs by tpruvot@github ***
Built with VC++ 2013 and nVidia CUDA SDK 6.5
Originally based on Christian Buchner and Christian H. project
Include some of the work of djm34, sp, tsiv and klausT.
BTC donation address: 1AJdfCpLWPNoAMDfHF1wD5y8VgKSSTHxPo (tpruvot)
[2016-11-30 18:36:28] POOL 0: decred.eu.nicehash.com:3354 USER ********************** -s 10
[2016-11-30 18:36:28] Starting on stratum+tcp://decred.eu.nicehash.com:3354
[2016-11-30 18:36:28] CUDA GPU 0 matches NVAPI GPU 0 by busId 1
[2016-11-30 18:36:28] 1 miner thread started, using 'decred' algorithm.
[2016-11-30 18:36:28] Stratum difficulty set to 4
[2016-11-30 18:36:29] GPU #0: no data
[2016-11-30 18:36:29] job 83f1c15 00000042aa1b4bcd target change: 3fffc000 (4.0)
[2016-11-30 18:36:29] GPU #0: start=00000000 end=3fffffff range=3fffffff
[2016-11-30 18:36:29] GPU #0: Intensity set to 17, 131072 cuda threads
[2016-11-30 18:36:33] GPU #0: start=00000000 end=ffffffff range=ffffffff
[2016-11-30 18:36:51] GPU #0: start=00000000 end=ffffffff range=ffffffff
[2016-11-30 18:37:05] job 83f1c51 00000042aa1b4bf0 target change: 3fffc000 (4.0)
[2016-11-30 18:37:05] GPU #0: start=00000000 end=ffffffff range=ffffffff
[2016-11-30 18:37:22] GPU #0: start=00000000 end=ffffffff range=ffffffff
[2016-11-30 18:37:32] found => 87227183 83712287
[2016-11-30 18:37:32] GPU #0: start=00000000 end=ffffffff range=ffffffff
[2016-11-30 18:37:32] accepted: 0/1 (diff 5.362), 243.98 MH/s booooo
[2016-11-30 18:37:32] reject reason: Invalid extranonce2 size.
[2016-11-30 18:37:49] GPU #0: start=00000000 end=ffffffff range=ffffffff
[2016-11-30 18:38:05] GPU #0: start=00000000 end=ffffffff range=ffffffff
Do you know what is this extranonce2 bug? People mention it several times in my searches:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6503265
I have the same issue with cpuminer-opt. Nicehash probably has a custom tweak to the protocol, I just never
bothered to follow up with them. It was a long time ago, I don't recall whether I tried with extranonce disabled.
I'm having trouble mining decred on NiceHash:
Do you know what is this extranonce2 bug? People mention it several times in my searches:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6503265
EDIT: I tried with the --no-extranonce switch with the same result
Code:
*** ccminer 1.8.3 for nVidia GPUs by tpruvot@github ***
Built with VC++ 2013 and nVidia CUDA SDK 6.5
Originally based on Christian Buchner and Christian H. project
Include some of the work of djm34, sp, tsiv and klausT.
BTC donation address: 1AJdfCpLWPNoAMDfHF1wD5y8VgKSSTHxPo (tpruvot)
[2016-11-30 18:36:28] POOL 0: decred.eu.nicehash.com:3354 USER ********************** -s 10
[2016-11-30 18:36:28] Starting on stratum+tcp://decred.eu.nicehash.com:3354
[2016-11-30 18:36:28] CUDA GPU 0 matches NVAPI GPU 0 by busId 1
[2016-11-30 18:36:28] 1 miner thread started, using 'decred' algorithm.
[2016-11-30 18:36:28] Stratum difficulty set to 4
[2016-11-30 18:36:29] GPU #0: no data
[2016-11-30 18:36:29] job 83f1c15 00000042aa1b4bcd target change: 3fffc000 (4.0)
[2016-11-30 18:36:29] GPU #0: start=00000000 end=3fffffff range=3fffffff
[2016-11-30 18:36:29] GPU #0: Intensity set to 17, 131072 cuda threads
[2016-11-30 18:36:33] GPU #0: start=00000000 end=ffffffff range=ffffffff
[2016-11-30 18:36:51] GPU #0: start=00000000 end=ffffffff range=ffffffff
[2016-11-30 18:37:05] job 83f1c51 00000042aa1b4bf0 target change: 3fffc000 (4.0)
[2016-11-30 18:37:05] GPU #0: start=00000000 end=ffffffff range=ffffffff
[2016-11-30 18:37:22] GPU #0: start=00000000 end=ffffffff range=ffffffff
[2016-11-30 18:37:32] found => 87227183 83712287
[2016-11-30 18:37:32] GPU #0: start=00000000 end=ffffffff range=ffffffff
[2016-11-30 18:37:32] accepted: 0/1 (diff 5.362), 243.98 MH/s booooo
[2016-11-30 18:37:32] reject reason: Invalid extranonce2 size.
[2016-11-30 18:37:49] GPU #0: start=00000000 end=ffffffff range=ffffffff
[2016-11-30 18:38:05] GPU #0: start=00000000 end=ffffffff range=ffffffff
Do you know what is this extranonce2 bug? People mention it several times in my searches:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6503265
EDIT: I tried with the --no-extranonce switch with the same result
What does the "-m " do ?
-m, --diff-multiplier Multiply difficulty by this value (default 1.0)
What does the "-m " do ?
-m, --diff-multiplier Multiply difficulty by this value (default 1.0)
Try adding" --diff-factor 05". No rejects but hashrate poolside is about 10mh/s less than it is locally
Testing on ccminer-1-8-3-git-tpruvot 32 bits.
Removed "-m 2" and added " --diff-factor 05".
Getting 60-70% of rejects instead of 100% accepts with "-m 2".
Reject reason: Low difficulty share.
What does the "-m " do ?
I've encountered the problem with all later versions of ccminer(tpruvot), which came out after ~April-May, 2016.
That's around the time he switched to using Cuda 8.0. You are probably better off with
Cuda 6.5 for older algos that haven't been optimized for Cuda 8.
Try adding" --diff-factor 05". No rejects but hashrate poolside is about 10mh/s less than it is locally
Testing on ccminer-1-8-3-git-tpruvot 32 bits.
Removed "-m 2" and added " --diff-factor 05".
Getting 60-70% of rejects instead of 100% accepts with "-m 2".
Reject reason: Low difficulty share.
I've encountered the problem with all later versions of ccminer(tpruvot), which came out after ~April-May, 2016.
When I try to mine using myr-gr algo, I get very good hashrate on the miner side (46 Mh).
All shares are accepted 100%, but they appear way rarer than normal and pool reports hashrate near 10 Mh.
I've tried to change the difficulty using -m parameter with no success.
Also I have tried different pools and seen no difference.
The early revisions of ccminer(tpruvot) work way better, having poolside hashrate close to the miner reported hashrate.
Also I tried the classical ccminer 1.2. It gives the 100% identical hashrates on a pool and in the miner, but has only 40 Mh on my config.
What can be the problem with newer tpruvot ccminer? I've tested the GTX1060 GPU on Win7 x64.
When I try to mine using myr-gr algo, I get very good hashrate on the miner side (46 Mh).
All shares are accepted 100%, but they appear way rarer than normal and pool reports hashrate near 10 Mh.
I've tried to change the difficulty using -m parameter with no success.
Also I have tried different pools and seen no difference.
The early revisions of ccminer(tpruvot) work way better, having poolside hashrate close to the miner reported hashrate.
Also I tried the classical ccminer 1.2. It gives the 100% identical hashrates on a pool and in the miner, but has only 40 Mh on my config.
What can be the problem with newer tpruvot ccminer? I've tested the GTX1060 GPU on Win7 x64.
Try adding" --diff-factor 05". No rejects but hashrate poolside is about 10mh/s less than it is locally
I've encountered the problem with all later versions of ccminer(tpruvot), which came out after ~April-May, 2016.
When I try to mine using myr-gr algo, I get very good hashrate on the miner side (46 Mh).
All shares are accepted 100%, but they appear way rarer than normal and pool reports hashrate near 10 Mh.
I've tried to change the difficulty using -m parameter with no success.
Also I have tried different pools and seen no difference.
The early revisions of ccminer(tpruvot) work way better, having poolside hashrate close to the miner reported hashrate.
Also I tried the classical ccminer 1.2. It gives the 100% identical hashrates on a pool and in the miner, but has only 40 Mh on my config.
What can be the problem with newer tpruvot ccminer? I've tested the GTX1060 GPU on Win7 x64.
When I try to mine using myr-gr algo, I get very good hashrate on the miner side (46 Mh).
All shares are accepted 100%, but they appear way rarer than normal and pool reports hashrate near 10 Mh.
I've tried to change the difficulty using -m parameter with no success.
Also I have tried different pools and seen no difference.
The early revisions of ccminer(tpruvot) work way better, having poolside hashrate close to the miner reported hashrate.
Also I tried the classical ccminer 1.2. It gives the 100% identical hashrates on a pool and in the miner, but has only 40 Mh on my config.
What can be the problem with newer tpruvot ccminer? I've tested the GTX1060 GPU on Win7 x64.
Anyone have a compiled version for Windows 10 that works with the 1050 ti ? I'm getting reject reason high hash on every version I try
Jump to: