Author

Topic: [ANN] ccminer 2.3 - opensource - GPL (tpruvot) - page 170. (Read 500193 times)

full member
Activity: 137
Merit: 100
hmm... no... one 750Ti card do 10MH

That would be a 100% boost compared to ccminer 1.2, either you're a wizard or there's something funky with your rate calculations. Not to say you and sp_ haven't done a good job on optimizing various algos, but I do find the latter a lot more likely Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
hmm... no... one 750Ti card do 10MH
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
Epsylon3  1.4.8  still gives readout of 40mh/s, 4 750ti, when cards are doing 20mh/s quark.
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 501
Not sure if Epsylon3 has asked but I'll will for him

PLEASE DONATE  to him for his work he has been putting in and improving his miner.

We should donate to all these devs that put out these miners and enhancements. Without them we would have nothing.
+1 on that
Look at all these people reading and are they donating.
3743
PLEASE DONATE to ALL involved in cuda and ccminer.

Even at a fraction of a BTC per user it would all add up rather fast.
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
Not sure if Epsylon3 has asked but I'll will for him

PLEASE DONATE  to him for his work he has been putting in and improving his miner.

We should donate to all these devs that put out these miners and enhancements. Without them we would have nothing.
+1 on that
Look at all these people reading and are they donating?
3743
PLEASE DONATE to ALL involved in cuda and ccminer.
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
did i compile wrong?
4 750ti  cards hashing at10mh/s      total 10mh ?

fixed in 1.4.8 (else on git since this morning) release in a few minutes
Epsylon3 there is an improvement in hash.  on 1.4.7. waiting for 1.4.8.  Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
Not sure if Epsylon3 has asked but I'll will for him

PLEASE DONATE  to him for his work he has been putting in and improving his miner.

We should donate to all these devs that put out these miners and enhancements. Without them we would have nothing.
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
did i compile wrong?
4 750ti  cards hashing at10mh/s      total 10mh ?

fixed in 1.4.8 (else on git since this morning) release in a few minutes
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
2 algos hashrates were divided by 2... quark and jackpot, i dont really know why... I removed the divider

sample api output of php api-example.php :
Code:
{
"summary":{"NAME":"ccminer","VER":"1.4.8","API":"1.0","ALGO":"blake","KHS":"216674.14","ACC":"4","REJ":"0","ACCMN":"3.429","UPTIME":"70"},
"stats":{"GPU0":{"GPU":"0","TEMP":"0.0","FAN":"0","FANP":"0","KHS":"216674.15","HWF":"0","I":"0"}}
}

you can copy/paste that in http://json.parser.online.fr/

will change some keys... adding UP (uptime), ACM (accepted/minute)

v1.4.8 will be released today (to fix the multi gpu displayed hashrate)
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
is there any real advantage to downloading and installing the 1 GB large CUDA 6.5 SDK. I figure if the miner runs, then I have everything in place already

no indeed, i dont think so...

API is almost ready (limited to localhost for the moment, will add the config key to change that)
my read out for quark



did i compile wrong?
4 750ti  cards hashing at10mh/s      total 10mh ?
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
is there any real advantage to downloading and installing the 1 GB large CUDA 6.5 SDK. I figure if the miner runs, then I have everything in place already

no indeed, i dont think so...

API is almost ready (limited to localhost for the moment, will add the config key to change that)
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
epsylon, i have a gtx 970 (5.2 right?)

but for some reason when i use ccminer50 instead of 52, i ALWAYS get better hashrate, less out of range errors, and just more accepts in general. This was the same case with SPminers betas etc..

any ideas why this happens?
registers... for some reason 5.2 doesn't like to allocate too much register...
sr. member
Activity: 285
Merit: 250
is there any real advantage to downloading and installing the 1 GB large CUDA 6.5 SDK. I figure if the miner runs, then I have everything in place already
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
yes its 5.2, hmm i'm not sure about that for the moment Wink maybe the right cuda sdk is required ? on windows ?
sr. member
Activity: 285
Merit: 250
epsylon, i have a gtx 970 (5.2 right?)

but for some reason when i use ccminer50 instead of 52, i ALWAYS get better hashrate, less out of range errors, and just more accepts in general. This was the same case with SPminers betas etc..

any ideas why this happens?
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
no indeed Wink i just fixed it (will be in next version, or git)
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
Good work on the intensity parameter. Did you fix the reported average rate bug? It looked like the beta version reported the average rate per card, and not the average rate on the whole rig.
member
Activity: 81
Merit: 1002
It was only the wind.
Got over 2x the speed for Neoscrypt on AMD, and patiently waiting for Lyra2.
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
I need some reports for the preview of the 1.4.7 :

Here is a shared spreadsheet to be completed by 970/980 users. To be able to tune the default values for these cards :

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1dI1Cc3JhhsA-UdIRlndvQ9huX8FmoJT2TXFDB0wdp54/edit?usp=sharing

1.4.7 windows test version : https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/31689596/ccminer/ccminer-rel1.4.7-test-x86.7z


Final 1.4.7 still need fixes :
- heavy/mjollnir on linux are broken

I will maybe do (or maybe in 1.4.8 )
- i will try to detect the gpu model to set optimal default intensity per card
- average hashrate based on 50 last values (displayed on Total lines only)
 
Jump to: