~snip~
Look, I know you see this as different. Yes, they started asking to trade their tokens before we even thought they would. But now, they have a few ways they can transfer them and on a cell phone is not one. This is different then any other coin because they can't directly hold it. It needs to be a third party or a third party verification.
We are working with 3 prisons who have really shown a good deal of interest in the coin to install a computer system they can use to transfer their coins.
Again, we are still in the early stages, the prison said they cant have internet access but we can have logins and under each inmate login will be their wallet. Almost like logging into a different account on your computer. There will also be a screen with current pricing of the coin.
I don't expect everyone to understand this because it is different, but that does not mean different is bad.
Now you made it much more interesting. Now you are saying that they are trading real physical coins. Why would they trust this instead of real dollar bills? If they were really allowed to use some kind of currency, then probably prisons have already allowed the use of money inside prison. Practically, there is still no way this coin will be useful to them. How do you create a coin that is funded? Will you make every one of them? Like create an address on each and every coin with a specific amount of
scamcoinconcoins? So what is stopping the creator from just stealing everything if the inmates did get a physical coin without having the private key to move stuff? Really stupid, I can't even comprehend how you plan to do that physical coins you are taking about.
Get back to the program, you are offering a digital currency not physical coins. This is a cryptocurrency you are creating. One that is impossible to even be used by your intended users. Crypto needs technology, without it you are just proposing another fiat currency which is only catered to users inside prison which does not have value outside. Don't you think dollar bills are quite better?
. FAIL
