[ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX] - page 1087.

Timelord2067

legendary

Activity: 3696

Merit: 2219

💲🏎️💨🚓

Quote from: ?? on ??

Note:
Autotuned for ten minutes, it kept auto tuning and not mining, 209 rounds of autotuning. Went back to using the no-autotune switch. GT520

Greetings, what does/did your command look like? I have a GT 525M and can't get it running at all ( --no-autotune makes it run at 0.00 for all values while a lack of that command crashes the program (12 months old laptop running Win7) ) ~ apologies if this has been covered elsewhere, I have 40+ pages of reading to go. Cheesy

Nemo1024

legendary

Activity: 1680

Merit: 1014

In case Mega still plays up, here is a mirror:

Quote from: Schleicher on July 18, 2013, 10:37:55 AM

If you have problems with mega.co.nz you could download it here:
http://sonstiges.org/cudaminer-2013-07-13.zip

Stoneysilence

member

Activity: 104

Merit: 10

Quote from: TheSwede75 on July 29, 2013, 10:53:33 PM

Is there a windows build to download and test without compiling?

On page 1 in the first post that rar file has a compiled build in it.

Stoneysilence

member

Activity: 104

Merit: 10

ESET NOD32 sees this new version as a PUP (Potentially Unwanted Program) and warns against its installation. This didn't occur with the 4-22 or 4-30 versions.

TheSwede75

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

Is there a windows build to download and test without compiling?

K1773R

legendary

Activity: 1792

Merit: 1008

/dev/null

Quote from: pbassjunk on July 29, 2013, 09:17:14 PM

Quote from: K1773R on July 27, 2013, 07:18:58 PM

Quote from: pbassjunk on July 27, 2013, 11:15:53 AM

Just wanted to post gtx760 info

-l 30x4, gets 155khash/s

Thanks again Cudaminer!

on winblows?

Yep, nothing but the best Cheesy

ok, was wondering why so low Wink

pbassjunk

newbie

Activity: 29

Merit: 0

Quote from: K1773R on July 27, 2013, 07:18:58 PM

Quote from: pbassjunk on July 27, 2013, 11:15:53 AM

Just wanted to post gtx760 info

-l 30x4, gets 155khash/s

Thanks again Cudaminer!

on winblows?

Yep, nothing but the best Cheesy

K1773R

legendary

Activity: 1792

Merit: 1008

/dev/null

Quote from: pbassjunk on July 27, 2013, 11:15:53 AM

Just wanted to post gtx760 info

-l 30x4, gets 155khash/s

Thanks again Cudaminer!

on winblows?

pbassjunk

newbie

Activity: 29

Merit: 0

Just wanted to post gtx760 info

-l 30x4, gets 155khash/s

Thanks again Cudaminer!

cbuchner1

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 502

> also what is up with stating copyright in the program ?
> it comes with a text file called license.txt explaining info about the GNU license used.

Because the authors have a copyright, they can LICENSE the code under GNU GPL V2 or whatever license they choose and ENFORCE the license using plain old lawsuits, if so required.

I had so stick with the GPL because I built upon already GPL licensed code.

Christian

Eli0t

sr. member

Activity: 252

Merit: 250

readme fix in >>> Additional Notes <<<

Quote

This does not support the Stratum protocol. To do stratum mining
you have to run a local proxy.

Eli0t

sr. member

Activity: 252

Merit: 250

if you run the full debug you can get a list of all the values that dont crash your card
but yeah then comes the hard part Wink

Eli0t

sr. member

Activity: 252

Merit: 250

yes the most promising values to try are on that list

for my 560ti iv found the best results all add up to 128
32x4 and 64x2 and 16x8

if you use the debug option you can see this output (--debug or -D)

03:44:40] x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8
03:44:40] 1: 1.5| 3.1| 6.2| 6.2| 7.7| 9.2| 10.8| 9.8 kh/s
03:44:41] 2: 4.1| 6.2| 9.2| 12.3| 15.4| 18.5| 21.5| 24.6 kh/s
03:44:41] 3: 4.6| 9.2| 13.8| 18.5| 23.1| 27.7| 32.3| 29.5 kh/s
03:44:42] 4: 6.2| 12.3| 24.6| 24.6| 30.8| 36.9| 34.5| 49.2 kh/s
03:44:42] 5: 7.7| 15.4| 23.1| 30.8| 38.5| 46.2| 53.8| 61.5 kh/s
03:44:43] 6: 9.2| 18.5| 27.7| 36.9| 46.2| 55.4| 51.7| 73.8 kh/s
03:44:43] 7: 10.8| 21.5| 32.3| 43.1| 53.8| 64.6| 75.4| 86.2 kh/s
03:44:44] 8: 12.3| 24.6| 36.9| 49.2| 61.5| 73.8| 68.9| 98.5 kh/s
03:44:44] 9: 13.8| 27.7| 41.5| 55.4| 69.2| 66.5| 77.5| 73.8 kh/s
03:44:45] 10: 15.4| 30.8| 46.2| 61.5| 76.9| 61.5| 86.2| 98.5 kh/s
ect

but the best values were not selected during autotune so i have to test promising results one at a time.
they often dont match the result in debug since the time taken to find them there is so short

Eli0t

sr. member

Activity: 252

Merit: 250

the auto-detect is a trade off between speed and accuracy. a long autotune option would be great for people who want to find the best setting to use (although the google docs list is a good place to start)

cbuchner1

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 502

my LTC donation address is in a printf statement in cudaminer.cpp (now cpuminer.c in the 07-13 version) and in the first posting in this thread, highlighted with smileys.

teslaman

member

Activity: 65

Merit: 15

Quote from: cbuchner1 on July 19, 2013, 02:22:13 AM

XP does have a whole different driver model, and on Compute 1.x cards this makes all the difference in hash rates.

Ahhh, thanks for the explanation Christian. Cool

I saw that mentioned in the readme, but I didn't think it could be the same thing since it was such a dramatic difference vs just being faster. That big of a potential difference is definitely worth highlighting then.

Awesome work man, when I saw the speed difference I was like Shocked

, lol.

cbuchner1

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 502

Quote from: teslaman on July 19, 2013, 12:22:04 AM

No one ever said, but I guess my using XP is the reason after all for me getting 2-3x the hashrate that others are getting on similar hardware? Surprised more people aren't setting up XP mining machines then. Tongue

XP does have a whole different driver model, and on Compute 1.x cards this makes all the difference in hash rates.

teslaman

member

Activity: 65

Merit: 15

Another option for anyone having trouble downloading from Mega is to get JDownloader and bypass the whole browser thing. Tongue

It will download from tons of filehosts, including Mega. Make sure you go to .org and not .com to get it though! The .com is a scam site. Personally, I recommend the universal Java version. Wink

No one ever said, but I guess my using XP is the reason after all for me getting 2-3x the hashrate that others are getting on similar hardware? Surprised more people aren't setting up XP mining machines then. Tongue

cbuchner1

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 502

Quote from: Nemo1024 on July 18, 2013, 11:53:01 AM

The promised report on 560Ti:

I have a regular 560Ti as well as the 560Ti 488 core edition. The latter one is way more
performant. Unfortunately they are also hard to get (new cards are nearly impossible to find,
but used ones may be available).

Christian

Nemo1024

legendary

Activity: 1680

Merit: 1014

The promised report on 560Ti:

Voltage/GPU Clock/Memory Clock:
1012/880/2100 ->

Code:

[2013-07-18 18:33:53] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://stratum.give-me-ltc.com:3333
[2013-07-18 18:33:53] 1 miner threads started, using 'scrypt' algorithm.
[2013-07-18 18:34:05] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 560 Ti with compute capability 2.1
[2013-07-18 18:34:05] GPU #0: interactive: 1, tex-cache: 0 , single-alloc: 0
[2013-07-18 18:34:05] GPU #0: Performing auto-tuning (Patience...)
[2013-07-18 18:34:45] GPU #0: 146.28 khash/s with configuration 16x8
[2013-07-18 18:34:45] GPU #0: using launch configuration 16x8
[2013-07-18 18:40:46] accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 135.61 khash/s (yay!!!)

1025/940/2300 ->

Code:

[2013-07-18 18:41:35] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://stratum.give-me-ltc.com:3333
[2013-07-18 18:41:35] 1 miner threads started, using 'scrypt' algorithm.
[2013-07-18 18:41:38] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 560 Ti with compute capability 2.1
[2013-07-18 18:41:38] GPU #0: interactive: 1, tex-cache: 0 , single-alloc: 0
[2013-07-18 18:41:38] GPU #0: Performing auto-tuning (Patience...)
[2013-07-18 18:42:18] GPU #0: 157.53 khash/s with configuration 16x8
[2013-07-18 18:42:18] GPU #0: using launch configuration 16x8
[2013-07-18 18:42:24] accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 144.97 khash/s (yay!!!)

1062/980/2400 ->

Code:

[2013-07-18 19:02:25] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://stratum.give-me-ltc.com:3333
[2013-07-18 19:02:25] 1 miner threads started, using 'scrypt' algorithm.
[2013-07-18 19:02:27] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 560 Ti with compute capability 2.1
[2013-07-18 19:02:27] GPU #0: interactive: 1, tex-cache: 0 , single-alloc: 0
[2013-07-18 19:02:28] GPU #0: Performing auto-tuning (Patience...)
[2013-07-18 19:03:07] GPU #0: 161.27 khash/s with configuration 63x2
[2013-07-18 19:03:07] GPU #0: using launch configuration 63x2
[2013-07-18 19:03:21] accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 146.76 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2013-07-18 19:03:44] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 146.83 khash/s (yay!!!)

1112/1000/2450 ->

Code:

[2013-07-18 19:05:24] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://stratum.give-me-ltc.com:3333
[2013-07-18 19:05:24] 1 miner threads started, using 'scrypt' algorithm.
[2013-07-18 19:05:26] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 560 Ti with compute capability 2.1
[2013-07-18 19:05:26] GPU #0: interactive: 1, tex-cache: 0 , single-alloc: 0
[2013-07-18 19:05:26] GPU #0: Performing auto-tuning (Patience...)
[2013-07-18 19:06:07] GPU #0: 166.05 khash/s with configuration 16x8
[2013-07-18 19:06:07] GPU #0: using launch configuration 16x8
[2013-07-18 19:06:08] accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 151.70 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2013-07-18 19:06:18] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 156.03 khash/s (yay!!!)

1150/1010/2300 (max on all) ->

Code:

[2013-07-18 19:08:51] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://stratum.give-me-ltc.com:3333
[2013-07-18 19:08:51] 1 miner threads started, using 'scrypt' algorithm.
[2013-07-18 19:08:52] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 560 Ti with compute capability 2.1
[2013-07-18 19:08:52] GPU #0: interactive: 1, tex-cache: 0 , single-alloc: 0
[2013-07-18 19:08:52] GPU #0: Performing auto-tuning (Patience...)
[2013-07-18 19:09:30] GPU #0: 163.83 khash/s with configuration 16x8
[2013-07-18 19:09:30] GPU #0: using launch configuration 16x8
[2013-07-18 19:10:46] Stratum detected new block
[2013-07-18 19:11:31] Stratum detected new block
[2013-07-18 19:11:32] accepted: 0/1 (0.00%), 150.18 khash/s (booooo)
[2013-07-18 19:12:12] accepted: 1/2 (50.00%), 155.28 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2013-07-18 19:12:54] accepted: 2/3 (66.67%), 154.59 khash/s (yay!!!)

Playing around with core and memory clock settings individually, I see that memory clock plays the most important role.
--texture-cache setting did not affect performance.
--interactive 0 gave me additional 10kh/s

I ended up using 1012/880/2350

I have tried out CudaMiner with my GUI front-end, Crypto Miners in Tray, and it is fully compatible.

Christian, I am sending 1 LTC your way as a thank-you token.

Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX] - page 1087. (Read 3426947 times)