[ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX] - page 620.

@msteramned

newbie

Activity: 22

Merit: 0

Quote from: cvax on March 01, 2014, 02:34:36 PM

Quote from: Severaz on March 01, 2014, 02:32:26 PM

would the 4x slots be enough to keep stable rates on 750ti's?

I did try a 1x-16x riser inside a 4x slot. That yielded 5-6% decreased performance in hashrates, but as far as stability, it is rock solid on +135 core +600 mem overclocking.

Just curious if this same issue can affect the card in the 16x slot? I have two 750ti's. My mobo is PCI gen2 so I have the a Gigabyte 750ti in the 16x slot and a Gainward 750ti in the 1x slot via a PCI riser. I can get 300khs easy on the card in the riser but the card in the 16x slot won't ramp beyond 215kh/s no matter what I try. If I disconnect the riser, the internal card scales to 300khs easy.

So I know most people experience a hashrate hit to cards running via external risers but I'm experiencing the opposite where the riser card will ramp up nicely but the card in the 16x slot won't go beyond 215khs when the riser card is connected.

lagur

full member

Activity: 199

Merit: 100

Quote from: zelante on April 01, 2014, 02:50:25 PM

Quote from: coinits on April 01, 2014, 01:25:46 PM

Here is my hashpower on HVC with two 660TI's

Code:

[2014-04-01 15:17:49]
[2014-04-01 15:20:33] accepted: 3798/3799 (99.97%), 20303 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:20:34] thread 0: 80886912 hashes, 10511 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:20:34] accepted: 3799/3800 (99.97%), 21317 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:20:34] thread 1: 14671833 hashes, 10202 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:20:34] accepted: 3800/3801 (99.97%), 20713 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:20:35] thread 1: 9452806 hashes, 10219 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:20:35] accepted: 3801/3802 (99.97%), 20730 khash/s (yay!!!)

If you have MSI 660Ti than you can add 1Mh/s and get ~11500 khash/s from 1 card. If you have open case then can add (+150 core, +114 power) in AfterBurner.
Total profit for 2x660ti will be 2Mh/s -> ~23000 khash/s.

My result for 1xMSI 660Ti and 2xMSI 750Ti:

What's the clock setting of your 750ti?

Nice hashrate btw.

sin242

sr. member

Activity: 280

Merit: 250

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-twecoin-twe-cpugpu-4-op-new-hash-no-premine-launched-553593

Look Christian! It's a "CPU ONLY" coin... go get 'em!

flysats

full member

Activity: 329

Merit: 100

Buy, sell and store real cryptocurrencies

to cbuchner1

may be close this forum thread? RO mode and anonce redirect to new cool forum?
this thread slightly dirty and many unactual post... IMHO no... no... no...

p.s.
any post for new forum ending:
Akismet has detected that this is a spam message and will not be processed.
If you find this is in error please contact your forum administrator.

p.s.
Just SUPER. Grin

Your forum account is currently banned. Ban Reason: Automatically banned by the Akismet system for spamming.
Ban will be lifted: Never

jk_14

legendary

Activity: 1292

Merit: 1000

Quote from: cbuchner1 on March 30, 2014, 04:24:32 AM

Quote from: jk_14 on March 29, 2014, 04:47:56 PM

The only thing I had to tweak was: util.c
And my modification allows for syslog logging and normal cudaminer logging at the same time.
(normally, -S option switch off the cudaminer app logging)

noted...

Christian

Hi, Christian!

If it's not a problem to have normal message stream inside cudaminer application, when -S flag is used for streaming messages to /var/log/syslog ....

I kindly ask you to modify applog function in util.c (it's really gentle modification)

Code:

void applog(int prio, const char *fmt, ...)
{
        va_list ap;

        va_start(ap, fmt);

#ifdef HAVE_SYSLOG_H
        if (use_syslog) {
                va_list ap2, ap3;
                char *buf;
                int len;

                va_copy(ap2, ap);
                va_copy(ap3, ap);
                len = vsnprintf(NULL, 0, fmt, ap2) + 1;
                va_end(ap2);
                buf = alloca(len);
                if (vsnprintf(buf, len, fmt, ap3) >= 0)
                        syslog(prio, "%s", buf);
                va_end(ap3);
        }
#else
        if (0) {}
#endif
        if (1) {
                char *f;
                int len;
                time_t now;
                struct tm tm, *tm_p;

                time(&now);

                pthread_mutex_lock(&applog_lock);
                tm_p = localtime(&now);
                memcpy(&tm, tm_p, sizeof(tm));
                pthread_mutex_unlock(&applog_lock);

                len = 40 + strlen(fmt) + 2;
                f = (char*)alloca(len);
                sprintf(f, "[%d-%02d-%02d %02d:%02d:%02d] %s\n",
                        tm.tm_year + 1900,
                        tm.tm_mon + 1,
                        tm.tm_mday,
                        tm.tm_hour,
                        tm.tm_min,
                        tm.tm_sec,
                        fmt);
                pthread_mutex_lock(&applog_lock);
                vfprintf(stderr, f, ap);        /* atomic write to stderr */
                fflush(stderr);
                pthread_mutex_unlock(&applog_lock);
        }
        va_end(ap);
}

or you can add for example: -S2 flag (--syslog2, like two message streams)

it seems, you could answer then, that failover feature and statistics ("API") are supported for cudaminer externally, by linux distro KopiemTu

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

Quote from: jack80 on April 01, 2014, 03:29:50 PM

Kimocoin is a good coin for Nvidia https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annscryptadaptive-kmc-kimocoin-kimotocoin-5-exchanges-524216

Use this .bat with Nvidia 750ti its 150 kh/s for card ( i have 4 card and run at 600 kh/s )

Code:

cudaminer --algo=scrypt:2048 -l T5x20 -i 0 -C 2 -H 2 -o stratum+tcp://kimo.internetarena.it:3341 -O workername:passname

Use this pool kimo.internetarena.it

.

I am not doing "serious" coin on first of april (seriously... 9 launches in the middle of the week... what's wrong with those people...)
Better to go for the joke coin which assumes its status: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-comedygold-lel-new-currency-for-awarding-to-people-for-jokes-april-1st-549303

edit: actually scrypt N is a bad coin for all gpus... asics can have them Grin

jack80

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 250

Kimocoin is a good coin for Nvidia https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annscryptadaptive-kmc-kimocoin-kimotocoin-5-exchanges-524216

Use this .bat with Nvidia 750ti its 150 kh/s for card ( i have 4 card and run at 600 kh/s )

Code:

cudaminer --algo=scrypt:2048 -l T5x20 -i 0 -C 2 -H 2 -o stratum+tcp://kimo.internetarena.it:3341 -O workername:passname

Use this pool kimo.internetarena.it

.

zelante

full member

Activity: 263

Merit: 100

Quote from: coinits on April 01, 2014, 01:25:46 PM

Here is my hashpower on HVC with two 660TI's

Code:

[2014-04-01 15:17:49]
[2014-04-01 15:20:33] accepted: 3798/3799 (99.97%), 20303 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:20:34] thread 0: 80886912 hashes, 10511 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:20:34] accepted: 3799/3800 (99.97%), 21317 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:20:34] thread 1: 14671833 hashes, 10202 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:20:34] accepted: 3800/3801 (99.97%), 20713 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:20:35] thread 1: 9452806 hashes, 10219 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:20:35] accepted: 3801/3802 (99.97%), 20730 khash/s (yay!!!)

If you have MSI 660Ti than you can add 1Mh/s and get ~11500 khash/s from 1 card. If you have open case then can add (+150 core, +114 power) in AfterBurner.
Total profit for 2x660ti will be 2Mh/s -> ~23000 khash/s.

My result for 1xMSI 660Ti and 2xMSI 750Ti:

cryptomines

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Quote from: cbuchner1 on April 01, 2014, 02:14:19 PM

Quote from: ltcnim on April 01, 2014, 01:40:56 PM

Quote from: cbuchner1 on February 28, 2014, 06:23:21 PM

Here's my tentative roadmap for continued development. Note the lack of a time table Wink

1) fix the issue with PCIe bandwidth, so people with 1x risers are more happy. CUDA can do all the
hash evaluation so we save a LOT of bus bandwidth.

2) Add blake256 for blakecoin and related coins.

3) look at implementing some failover options

4) see if I can get a monitoring API included

@cbuchner1: what do you think would be the expected increase in hashing power if 1.) is optimized? It would really be great if there would be a performance boost without tweaking cards (and increasing power consumption ^^)

10-20% depending on PCI express gen 1, 2, or 3...

That would be awesome!!!

ltcnim

legendary

Activity: 914

Merit: 1001

Quote from: cbuchner1 on April 01, 2014, 02:14:19 PM

Quote from: ltcnim on April 01, 2014, 01:40:56 PM

Quote from: cbuchner1 on February 28, 2014, 06:23:21 PM

Here's my tentative roadmap for continued development. Note the lack of a time table Wink

1) fix the issue with PCIe bandwidth, so people with 1x risers are more happy. CUDA can do all the
hash evaluation so we save a LOT of bus bandwidth.

2) Add blake256 for blakecoin and related coins.

3) look at implementing some failover options

4) see if I can get a monitoring API included

@cbuchner1: what do you think would be the expected increase in hashing power if 1.) is optimized? It would really be great if there would be a performance boost without tweaking cards (and increasing power consumption ^^)

10-20% depending on PCI express gen 1, 2, or 3...

wow...that would be really impressive! I would have thought of 5% max Oo

cbuchner1

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 502

Quote from: ltcnim on April 01, 2014, 01:40:56 PM

Quote from: cbuchner1 on February 28, 2014, 06:23:21 PM

Here's my tentative roadmap for continued development. Note the lack of a time table Wink

1) fix the issue with PCIe bandwidth, so people with 1x risers are more happy. CUDA can do all the
hash evaluation so we save a LOT of bus bandwidth.

2) Add blake256 for blakecoin and related coins.

3) look at implementing some failover options

4) see if I can get a monitoring API included

@cbuchner1: what do you think would be the expected increase in hashing power if 1.) is optimized? It would really be great if there would be a performance boost without tweaking cards (and increasing power consumption ^^)

10-20% depending on PCI express gen 1, 2, or 3...

ltcnim

legendary

Activity: 914

Merit: 1001

Quote from: cbuchner1 on February 28, 2014, 06:23:21 PM

Here's my tentative roadmap for continued development. Note the lack of a time table Wink

1) fix the issue with PCIe bandwidth, so people with 1x risers are more happy. CUDA can do all the
hash evaluation so we save a LOT of bus bandwidth.

2) Add blake256 for blakecoin and related coins.

3) look at implementing some failover options

4) see if I can get a monitoring API included

@cbuchner1: what do you think would be the expected increase in hashing power if 1.) is optimized? It would really be great if there would be a performance boost without tweaking cards (and increasing power consumption ^^)

coinits

legendary

Activity: 1582

Merit: 1019

011110000110110101110010

Here is my hashpower on HVC with two 660TI's

Code:

[2014-04-01 15:17:49] thread 0: 49686361 hashes, 10370 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:17:49] accepted: 3657/3658 (99.97%), 20857 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:17:49] thread 0: 3725027 hashes, 9174 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:17:49] accepted: 3658/3659 (99.97%), 19661 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:17:55] thread 0: 61512580 hashes, 10609 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:17:55] accepted: 3659/3660 (99.97%), 21095 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:17:57] thread 0: 17040624 hashes, 10499 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:17:57] accepted: 3660/3661 (99.97%), 20985 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:17:58] thread 0: 17918009 hashes, 10521 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:17:58] accepted: 3661/3662 (99.97%), 21007 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:00] thread 1: 159291340 hashes, 10671 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:00] accepted: 3662/3663 (99.97%), 21192 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:01] thread 0: 29609780 hashes, 10567 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:01] thread 1: 6926489 hashes, 10009 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:01] accepted: 3663/3664 (99.97%), 20576 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:01] accepted: 3664/3665 (99.97%), 20576 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:02] thread 1: 13400705 hashes, 10159 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:02] accepted: 3665/3666 (99.97%), 20726 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:04] thread 1: 17720063 hashes, 10713 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:04] accepted: 3666/3667 (99.97%), 21280 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:07] thread 1: 28758461 hashes, 10843 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:07] accepted: 3667/3668 (99.97%), 21410 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:08] thread 0: 76955089 hashes, 10640 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:08] accepted: 3668/3669 (99.97%), 21484 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:10] thread 0: 17640618 hashes, 10652 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:10] thread 1: 35166926 hashes, 10770 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:10] accepted: 3669/3670 (99.97%), 21422 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:10] accepted: 3670/3671 (99.97%), 21422 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:12] thread 1: 23859240 hashes, 10604 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:12] accepted: 3671/3672 (99.97%), 21255 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:15] thread 0: 50413040 hashes, 10472 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:15] accepted: 3672/3673 (99.97%), 21075 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:15] thread 0: 993684 hashes, 9741 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:15] accepted: 3673/3674 (99.97%), 20345 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:15] thread 0: 5122351 hashes, 10583 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:15] accepted: 3674/3675 (99.97%), 21186 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:17] thread 1: 46171988 hashes, 10700 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:17] accepted: 3675/3676 (99.97%), 21282 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:18] thread 0: 32703024 hashes, 10488 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:18] accepted: 3676/3677 (99.97%), 21188 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:19] thread 0: 852889 hashes, 8528 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:19] accepted: 3677/3678 (99.97%), 19228 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:19] thread 0: 1227413 hashes, 7868 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:19] accepted: 3678/3679 (99.97%), 18567 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:19] thread 0: 3217837 hashes, 9273 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:19] accepted: 3679/3680 (99.97%), 19973 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:19] thread 1: 31333245 hashes, 10610 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:20] accepted: 3680/3681 (99.97%), 19883 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:20] thread 1: 3801211 hashes, 9746 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:20] accepted: 3681/3682 (99.97%), 19019 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:20] thread 1: 5132820 hashes, 10604 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:20] accepted: 3682/3683 (99.97%), 19877 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:23] thread 0: 40594769 hashes, 10416 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:23] accepted: 3683/3684 (99.97%), 21021 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:23] thread 0: 5250589 hashes, 9723 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:24] accepted: 3684/3685 (99.97%), 20327 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:24] thread 0: 1207437 hashes, 7996 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:24] accepted: 3685/3686 (99.97%), 18600 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:24] thread 0: 5391982 hashes, 9732 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:24] accepted: 3686/3687 (99.97%), 20337 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:24] thread 0: 2346357 hashes, 9616 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:24] accepted: 3687/3688 (99.97%), 20220 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:25] thread 0: 4674653 hashes, 10672 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:25] accepted: 3688/3689 (99.97%), 21277 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:26] thread 0: 8541133 hashes, 10024 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:26] accepted: 3689/3690 (99.97%), 20629 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:26] thread 0: 1551629 hashes, 10413 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:26] accepted: 3690/3691 (99.97%), 21017 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:28] thread 1: 76502566 hashes, 10699 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:28] accepted: 3691/3692 (99.97%), 21112 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:28] thread 1: 966784 hashes, 9478 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:28] accepted: 3692/3693 (99.97%), 19891 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:28] thread 0: 23404624 hashes, 10518 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:28] accepted: 3693/3694 (99.97%), 19996 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:28] thread 0: 742881 hashes, 7355 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:28] accepted: 3694/3695 (99.97%), 16833 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:31] thread 1: 35317193 hashes, 10492 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:31] accepted: 3695/3696 (99.97%), 17847 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:32] thread 1: 7543626 hashes, 10180 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:32] accepted: 3696/3697 (99.97%), 17535 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:33] thread 1: 9132323 hashes, 10249 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:33] accepted: 3697/3698 (99.97%), 17604 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:33] thread 0: 46658426 hashes, 10428 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:33] accepted: 3698/3699 (99.97%), 20677 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:33] thread 0: 1700074 hashes, 8629 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:33] accepted: 3699/3700 (99.97%), 18878 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:35] thread 0: 22384047 hashes, 10244 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:35] accepted: 3700/3701 (99.97%), 20493 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:35] thread 0: 1355724 hashes, 8860 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:35] accepted: 3701/3702 (99.97%), 19109 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:36] thread 0: 10908966 hashes, 9863 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:36] accepted: 3702/3703 (99.97%), 20112 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:37] thread 1: 40971129 hashes, 10401 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:37] accepted: 3703/3704 (99.97%), 20264 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:38] Stratum detected new block
[2014-04-01 15:18:38] thread 1: 16777216 hashes, 10706 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:38] thread 0: 19398656 hashes, 10717 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:40] thread 0: 22674832 hashes, 10453 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:40] accepted: 3704/3705 (99.97%), 21159 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:40] thread 0: 1192223 hashes, 7314 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:41] accepted: 3705/3706 (99.97%), 18020 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:41] thread 1: 27569796 hashes, 10710 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:41] accepted: 3706/3707 (99.97%), 18024 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:42] thread 1: 10555485 hashes, 10419 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:42] accepted: 3707/3708 (99.97%), 17733 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:44] thread 1: 27978037 hashes, 10416 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:44] accepted: 3708/3709 (99.97%), 17729 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:46] thread 1: 22330198 hashes, 10684 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:47] accepted: 3709/3710 (99.97%), 17998 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:47] thread 1: 4042287 hashes, 10338 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:47] accepted: 3710/3711 (99.97%), 17652 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:47] thread 1: 5460056 hashes, 10073 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:47] accepted: 3711/3712 (99.97%), 17387 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:50] thread 1: 23364591 hashes, 10529 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:50] accepted: 3712/3713 (99.97%), 17843 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:53] thread 1: 36997848 hashes, 10808 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:53] accepted: 3713/3714 (99.97%), 18122 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:54] thread 0: 143733229 hashes, 10587 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:54] accepted: 3714/3715 (99.97%), 21395 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:54] thread 0: 1858769 hashes, 9247 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:54] accepted: 3715/3716 (99.97%), 20055 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:55] thread 1: 15065548 hashes, 10462 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:55] accepted: 3716/3717 (99.97%), 19709 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:55] thread 1: 5763584 hashes, 10614 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:55] accepted: 3717/3718 (99.97%), 19861 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:56] thread 0: 21512925 hashes, 10176 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:18:56] accepted: 3718/3719 (99.97%), 20790 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:18:59] thread 0: 31985231 hashes, 10327 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:00] accepted: 3719/3720 (99.97%), 20941 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:01] thread 0: 14793207 hashes, 10265 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:01] accepted: 3720/3721 (99.97%), 20879 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:01] thread 1: 63479910 hashes, 10599 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:01] accepted: 3721/3722 (99.97%), 20864 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:02] thread 1: 8815625 hashes, 10595 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:02] accepted: 3722/3723 (99.97%), 20860 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:04] thread 1: 21176567 hashes, 10604 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:04] accepted: 3723/3724 (99.97%), 20869 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:04] thread 1: 1232245 hashes, 8440 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:04] accepted: 3724/3725 (99.97%), 18705 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:06] thread 1: 20599007 hashes, 10429 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:06] accepted: 3725/3726 (99.97%), 20695 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:06] thread 0: 58770745 hashes, 10496 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:07] accepted: 3726/3727 (99.97%), 20925 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:07] thread 0: 2305005 hashes, 9331 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:07] accepted: 3727/3728 (99.97%), 19761 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:09] thread 1: 36516001 hashes, 10755 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:09] accepted: 3728/3729 (99.97%), 20087 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:10] thread 0: 36653348 hashes, 10667 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:10] accepted: 3729/3730 (99.97%), 21422 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:12] thread 1: 25654260 hashes, 10783 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:12] accepted: 3730/3731 (99.97%), 21450 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:13] thread 0: 32131563 hashes, 10388 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:13] accepted: 3731/3732 (99.97%), 21171 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:15] thread 1: 30576051 hashes, 10590 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:15] accepted: 3732/3733 (99.97%), 20978 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:17] thread 0: 44454384 hashes, 10686 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:17] accepted: 3733/3734 (99.97%), 21276 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:18] thread 1: 33796979 hashes, 10839 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:18] accepted: 3734/3735 (99.97%), 21524 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:20] thread 1: 19634625 hashes, 10665 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:20] accepted: 3735/3736 (99.97%), 21350 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:24] thread 0: 73831472 hashes, 10556 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:24] accepted: 3736/3737 (99.97%), 21220 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:25] thread 0: 1994290 hashes, 10123 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:25] accepted: 3737/3738 (99.97%), 20787 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:27] thread 0: 24525864 hashes, 10010 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:27] accepted: 3738/3739 (99.97%), 20675 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:28] thread 0: 11964890 hashes, 10635 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:28] accepted: 3739/3740 (99.97%), 21299 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:29] thread 0: 6973072 hashes, 10091 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:29] accepted: 3740/3741 (99.97%), 20755 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:29] thread 0: 1702623 hashes, 8513 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:29] accepted: 3741/3742 (99.97%), 19177 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:30] thread 1: 111869464 hashes, 10647 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:30] accepted: 3742/3743 (99.97%), 19159 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:31] thread 1: 11436320 hashes, 10284 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:31] accepted: 3743/3744 (99.97%), 18797 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:32] thread 0: 28386872 hashes, 10141 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:32] accepted: 3744/3745 (99.97%), 20425 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:33] thread 0: 9315564 hashes, 10327 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:33] accepted: 3745/3746 (99.97%), 20611 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:33] Stratum detected new block
[2014-04-01 15:19:33] thread 1: 20971520 hashes, 10815 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:33] thread 0: 4194304 hashes, 10564 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:34] thread 1: 12443842 hashes, 10783 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:34] accepted: 3746/3747 (99.97%), 21347 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:37] thread 0: 36712110 hashes, 10462 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:37] accepted: 3747/3748 (99.97%), 21244 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:37] thread 0: 1756362 hashes, 8652 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:37] accepted: 3748/3749 (99.97%), 19434 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:38] thread 0: 12926664 hashes, 10475 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:38] accepted: 3749/3750 (99.97%), 21257 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:39] thread 0: 4639762 hashes, 10641 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:39] accepted: 3750/3751 (99.97%), 21424 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:39] thread 1: 47593277 hashes, 10750 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:39] accepted: 3751/3752 (99.97%), 21391 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:39] thread 0: 6455961 hashes, 9947 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:39] accepted: 3752/3753 (99.97%), 20697 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:39] thread 0: 287973 hashes, 5333 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:39] accepted: 3753/3754 (99.97%), 16083 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:40] thread 1: 14400652 hashes, 10612 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:40] accepted: 3754/3755 (99.97%), 15944 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:42] thread 1: 19792021 hashes, 10669 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:42] accepted: 3755/3756 (99.97%), 16001 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:44] thread 0: 55207955 hashes, 10655 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:45] thread 1: 27587624 hashes, 10873 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:45] accepted: 3756/3757 (99.97%), 21529 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:45] accepted: 3757/3758 (99.97%), 21529 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:45] thread 0: 528288 hashes, 5179 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:45] accepted: 3758/3759 (99.97%), 16052 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:45] thread 0: 6223667 hashes, 10038 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:45] accepted: 3759/3760 (99.97%), 20911 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:45] thread 0: 36621 hashes, 678.12 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:45] accepted: 3760/3761 (99.97%), 11552 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:45] thread 0: 2067142 hashes, 9353 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:46] accepted: 3761/3762 (99.97%), 20227 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:46] thread 0: 7163332 hashes, 10032 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:46] accepted: 3762/3763 (99.97%), 20906 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:48] thread 1: 32886873 hashes, 10496 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:48] accepted: 3763/3764 (99.97%), 20528 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:49] thread 0: 31315893 hashes, 10540 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:49] accepted: 3764/3765 (99.97%), 21036 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:50] thread 1: 21324239 hashes, 10780 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:50] accepted: 3765/3766 (99.97%), 21320 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:52] thread 1: 24935708 hashes, 10606 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:52] accepted: 3766/3767 (99.97%), 21146 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:52] thread 1: 2244057 hashes, 9085 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:52] accepted: 3767/3768 (99.97%), 19625 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:53] thread 0: 37299167 hashes, 10444 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:53] accepted: 3768/3769 (99.97%), 19529 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:53] thread 0: 2907989 hashes, 9891 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:53] accepted: 3769/3770 (99.97%), 18975 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:54] thread 0: 9874586 hashes, 9984 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:54] accepted: 3770/3771 (99.97%), 19069 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:56] thread 1: 38377089 hashes, 10419 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:56] accepted: 3771/3772 (99.97%), 20403 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:19:57] thread 1: 6597092 hashes, 9861 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:19:57] accepted: 3772/3773 (99.97%), 19844 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:20:01] thread 0: 72839265 hashes, 10548 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:20:01] accepted: 3773/3774 (99.97%), 20409 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:20:01] thread 0: 3147446 hashes, 9123 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:20:01] accepted: 3774/3775 (99.97%), 18983 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:20:03] thread 1: 73929022 hashes, 10743 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:20:04] accepted: 3775/3776 (99.97%), 19866 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:20:04] thread 0: 28300205 hashes, 10611 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:20:04] accepted: 3776/3777 (99.97%), 21354 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:20:05] thread 0: 12076186 hashes, 9553 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:20:05] accepted: 3777/3778 (99.97%), 20297 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:20:05] thread 0: 2367303 hashes, 9283 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:20:06] accepted: 3778/3779 (99.97%), 20026 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:20:07] thread 1: 33076986 hashes, 10381 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:20:07] accepted: 3779/3780 (99.97%), 19664 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:20:09] thread 0: 33038039 hashes, 10333 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:20:09] accepted: 3780/3781 (99.97%), 20715 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:20:09] thread 1: 26376023 hashes, 10665 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:20:09] accepted: 3781/3782 (99.97%), 20998 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:20:10] thread 1: 4673899 hashes, 10744 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:20:10] accepted: 3782/3783 (99.97%), 21077 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:20:10] thread 0: 13163953 hashes, 9912 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:20:10] accepted: 3783/3784 (99.97%), 20656 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:20:13] Stratum detected new block
[2014-04-01 15:20:13] thread 1: 38797312 hashes, 10432 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:20:13] thread 0: 34603008 hashes, 10453 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:20:14] thread 1: 7367004 hashes, 9185 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:20:14] accepted: 3784/3785 (99.97%), 19639 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:20:15] thread 0: 13714886 hashes, 9685 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:20:15] thread 1: 6347286 hashes, 9544 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:20:15] accepted: 3785/3786 (99.97%), 19229 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:20:15] accepted: 3786/3787 (99.97%), 19229 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:20:16] thread 1: 13557025 hashes, 10836 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:20:16] accepted: 3787/3788 (99.97%), 20521 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:20:17] thread 1: 13983809 hashes, 10577 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:20:17] accepted: 3788/3789 (99.97%), 20262 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:20:19] thread 1: 17690406 hashes, 10225 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:20:19] accepted: 3789/3790 (99.97%), 19910 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:20:19] thread 0: 46813353 hashes, 10515 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:20:19] accepted: 3790/3791 (99.97%), 20740 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:20:19] thread 1: 3182075 hashes, 9196 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:20:19] accepted: 3791/3792 (99.97%), 19711 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:20:21] thread 1: 18982971 hashes, 10238 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:20:21] accepted: 3792/3793 (99.97%), 20753 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:20:22] thread 0: 33800224 hashes, 10217 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:20:23] accepted: 3793/3794 (99.97%), 20455 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:20:25] thread 1: 33189123 hashes, 10224 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:20:25] accepted: 3794/3795 (99.97%), 20441 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:20:25] thread 0: 27056408 hashes, 10307 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:20:25] accepted: 3795/3796 (99.97%), 20531 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:20:26] thread 0: 7854835 hashes, 9497 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:20:26] accepted: 3796/3797 (99.97%), 19721 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:20:28] thread 1: 37012506 hashes, 10455 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:20:28] accepted: 3797/3798 (99.97%), 19952 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:20:33] thread 1: 51805358 hashes, 10806 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:20:33] accepted: 3798/3799 (99.97%), 20303 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:20:34] thread 0: 80886912 hashes, 10511 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:20:34] accepted: 3799/3800 (99.97%), 21317 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:20:34] thread 1: 14671833 hashes, 10202 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:20:34] accepted: 3800/3801 (99.97%), 20713 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-04-01 15:20:35] thread 1: 9452806 hashes, 10219 khash/s
[2014-04-01 15:20:35] accepted: 3801/3802 (99.97%), 20730 khash/s (yay!!!)

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

My 780ti is clocked at 1270MHz and the 290x at 1070MHz.
Might explain the difference (I'll need to try that stilt bios...)

Croak

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

Quote from: djm34 on April 01, 2014, 12:15:37 PM

Quote from: cryptomines on April 01, 2014, 11:14:19 AM

Sent some HVC motivation. You really got the attention of the AMD guys!

"Nvidia guys had a better hashrate with their top cards than even 290, this cannot be tolerated"

"And at least we can fuck back all those 750ti noobs Cool Just for note - hashrate incrase is +30% but power consumtion rised just by tiny 4%, so no big deal, here are results for my rig of 4* R9 280x at 1100 / 1500 (various brands, no voltage / BIOS optimalization at all): cgminer v6 - 80MHs / 880W" So 11 watts per MH, versus 4 watts per MH on the 750ti's. We are still destroying them in terms of efficiency, unless I'm missing something....

small update with a better tuning over the AMD and fixdif (which doesn't make any difference on the nvidia side):
R9 290x 28.5MHash/s
Gtx780ti ~30MHash (2instances : 1instance: 14.7MHash/s 2nd: 15.6MHash/s)

The totally inaccurate hasrate reported by 1GH: 60.8MHash/s

Latest April 1 HVC CGminer fork is a big improvement. My SLI 780ti main/gaming rig WAS my third best HVC mining rig, barely behind my quad 280 rigs, and card for card much faster than my 290 rigs. Not any more. Now it's my worst, below my quad 270 rigs.

HVC with watercooled 780ti with Skyn3t BIOS @1200mhz=27mh each, one instance ccminer .5

CGminer Heavy 04-01 release:

HVC with reference 290 at 1150, Stilt BIOS=28mh, I8 1 thread
HVC with reference 290x at 1150, Stilt BIOS=31mh I8 1 thread
HVC with 280x at 1170, stock BIOS=22mh, 1 thread
HVC with MSI 270 (non x) at 1150, stock BIOS=14.5mh, 1 thread

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

Quote from: cryptomines on April 01, 2014, 11:14:19 AM

Sent some HVC motivation. You really got the attention of the AMD guys!

"Nvidia guys had a better hashrate with their top cards than even 290, this cannot be tolerated"

"And at least we can fuck back all those 750ti noobs Cool Just for note - hashrate incrase is +30% but power consumtion rised just by tiny 4%, so no big deal, here are results for my rig of 4* R9 280x at 1100 / 1500 (various brands, no voltage / BIOS optimalization at all): cgminer v6 - 80MHs / 880W" So 11 watts per MH, versus 4 watts per MH on the 750ti's. We are still destroying them in terms of efficiency, unless I'm missing something....

small update with a better tuning over the AMD and fixdif (which doesn't make any difference on the nvidia side):
R9 290x 28.5MHash/s
Gtx780ti ~30MHash (2instances : 1instance: 14.7MHash/s 2nd: 15.6MHash/s)

The totally inaccurate hasrate reported by 1GH: 60.8MHash/s

and all this leads to an impressive 0.5HVC/block

cbuchner1

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 502

Quote from: Faith on April 01, 2014, 11:37:54 AM

Any ways to improve the heavycoin hashrate? I'm using ccminer 0.5 with 2x 780's and I'm only getting 45Mh/s

4 780's would improve your hash rate *snicker*

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

Quote from: Faith on April 01, 2014, 11:37:54 AM

Any ways to improve the heavycoin hashrate? I'm using ccminer 0.5 with 2x 780's and I'm only getting 45Mh/s

two ccminer instance per cards might help.

Faith

newbie

Activity: 1

Merit: 0

Any ways to improve the heavycoin hashrate? I'm using ccminer 0.5 with 2x 780's and I'm only getting 45Mh/s

RavenX

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

Quote from: cryptomines on April 01, 2014, 11:14:19 AM

Sent some HVC motivation. You really got the attention of the AMD guys!

"Nvidia guys had a better hashrate with their top cards than even 290, this cannot be tolerated"

"And at least we can fuck back all those 750ti noobs Cool Just for note - hashrate incrase is +30% but power consumtion rised just by tiny 4%, so no big deal, here are results for my rig of 4* R9 280x at 1100 / 1500 (various brands, no voltage / BIOS optimalization at all): cgminer v6 - 80MHs / 880W" So 11 watts per MH, versus 4 watts per MH on the 750ti's. We are still destroying them in terms of efficiency, unless I'm missing something....

I read that. Cheesy

Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX] - page 620. (Read 3426975 times)