Ah here, why bitcoin went down yesterday: http://www.businessinsider.com/mtgox-statement-on-withdrawals-2014-2
[edit]
I see a LOT of wallet updates coming in the next weeks.
Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX] - page 816. (Read 3426922 times)
February 11, 2014, 03:45:41 AM
February 11, 2014, 02:42:53 AM
https://cryptocointalk.com/topic/3835-tittiecoin-ttc-information/
I can't help myself... Who doesn't like Titties?
Going to mine this when Vert goes back to normal.
I can't help myself... Who doesn't like Titties?
Going to mine this when Vert goes back to normal.
February 11, 2014, 12:07:11 AM
I am loving me some Vertcoin 
February 10, 2014, 11:00:11 PM
Doesn't work, only booo... with the same configuration i mine doge, i can't mine VTC, why?
did it ever occur to you that Vertcoin isn't doge?
No paws, no fur, no wow!
seriously, you need --algo=scrypt:2048 and later on 4096, 8192, etc...
I am not entirely sure about their N-factor schedule. The original wallet had this schedule:
| N | Memory | Timestamp | Date/Time | |
|----------|--------|-------------|-------------------------------|---|
| 2048 | 256 kB | 1389430800 | Sat, 11 Jan 2014 09:00:00 GMT | |
| 4096 | 512 kB | 1422985232 | Tue, 03 Feb 2015 17:40:32 GMT | |
| 8192 | 1 MB | 1448151056 | Sat, 22 Nov 2015 00:10:56 GMT | |
...
but apparently they have decided to relax the aggressiveness and change it to this more relaxed schedule:
| N | Memory | Timestamp | Date/Time | |
|----------|--------|-------------|-------------------------------|---|
| 2048 | 256 kB | 1389306217 | Thu, 09 Jan 2014 22:23:37 GMT | |
| 4096 | 512 kB | 1456415081 | Thu, 25 Feb 2016 15:44:41 GMT | |
| 8192 | 1 MB | 1506746729 | Sat, 30 Sep 2017 04:45:29 GMT | |
...
but I am not aware of any wallet update having been pushed out recently, so the code may still run on the old schedule at the moment.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Aj3vcsuY-JFNdC1ITWJrSG9VeWp6QXppbVgxcm0tbGc&usp=sharing#gid=0
Huh? So we gotta use 4096 now??
Christian: Can it be that --benchmark shows the correct hashrate and whilst mining I see lower figures, yet the pool perceives it as the hash the bench showed?
I mine at 333kh/s now, stable, when using --benchmark with your settings and my clocks.
When mining at the pool I see cudaminer reports 183-190-174kh/s and numbers all over the place but shares appear one after the other, pretty fast, faster than before. Pool reports 318kh/s.
Edit: dammit, no, pool reports 160kh/s (confused shares with kh/s) hmmm
February 10, 2014, 10:35:14 PM
Doesn't work, only booo... with the same configuration i mine doge, i can't mine VTC, why?
did it ever occur to you that Vertcoin isn't doge?
No paws, no fur, no wow!
seriously, you need --algo=scrypt:2048 and later on 4096, 8192, etc...
I am not entirely sure about their N-factor schedule. The original wallet had this schedule:
| N | Memory | Timestamp | Date/Time | |
|----------|--------|-------------|-------------------------------|---|
| 2048 | 256 kB | 1389430800 | Sat, 11 Jan 2014 09:00:00 GMT | |
| 4096 | 512 kB | 1422985232 | Tue, 03 Feb 2015 17:40:32 GMT | |
| 8192 | 1 MB | 1448151056 | Sat, 22 Nov 2015 00:10:56 GMT | |
...
but apparently they have decided to relax the aggressiveness and change it to this more relaxed schedule:
| N | Memory | Timestamp | Date/Time | |
|----------|--------|-------------|-------------------------------|---|
| 2048 | 256 kB | 1389306217 | Thu, 09 Jan 2014 22:23:37 GMT | |
| 4096 | 512 kB | 1456415081 | Thu, 25 Feb 2016 15:44:41 GMT | |
| 8192 | 1 MB | 1506746729 | Sat, 30 Sep 2017 04:45:29 GMT | |
...
but I am not aware of any wallet update having been pushed out recently, so the code may still run on the old schedule at the moment.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Aj3vcsuY-JFNdC1ITWJrSG9VeWp6QXppbVgxcm0tbGc&usp=sharing#gid=0
February 10, 2014, 10:16:10 PM
I have set up my desktop PC for VertCoin mining using p2pool today
here's one advanced command line for you
note how I chose T12x20 instead of T12x24 for my gtx780 because somehow performance dropped sharply for any number of warps above x20
the +0.00029103 behind my wallet address is a difficulty modifier for the p2pool.
Christian
here's one advanced command line for you
note how I chose T12x20 instead of T12x24 for my gtx780 because somehow performance dropped sharply for any number of warps above x20
the +0.00029103 behind my wallet address is a difficulty modifier for the p2pool.
Code:
@echo off
cd ..\cudaminer-2014-02-09\x86
cudaminer.exe -q --algo=scrypt:2048 -d gtx780,gtx660ti,gt640 -l T12x20,K7x32,T4x24 -C 0,1,0 -b 512,2048,2048 -i 1,0,0 -m 1 -H 2 -o http://q30.qhor.net:9171 -u ViTWB96tJXSR4YwUdJCURiPtKpegtVRFif+0.00009155 -p x
Christian
I got to 318kh/s with those settings...seems stable so far. 80% tdp 1267mhz core and 1100mv :p (+325 mem offset for 3301mhz)
Crossing fingers...If I can get to 400 I'll be a happy camper :p (264w...skynet bios)
EDIT: Memory seems to affect speed more than core speed...core still at 1267mhz but raised mem to +351 offset and got to 337kh/s stable (so far).
Edit2: and it also seems to make my miner crash xD Downclocked mem by 13mhz...let's see how that goes.
February 10, 2014, 10:13:16 PM
I had trouble getting good performance from Ubuntu 64 bit and problems with cuda 5.5 
I switched to Debian Jessie 32 bit which had Cuda 5.5 in non-free repository and now get hash rate equal to google spreadsheet.
I wish I could compile 32 cudaminer on debian 64 bit system. Does anyone have experience with this?
Best regards,
Ken
The best way to install cuda 5.5, is to download the source from nvidia and compile it on the computer. I switched to Debian Jessie 32 bit which had Cuda 5.5 in non-free repository and now get hash rate equal to google spreadsheet.
I wish I could compile 32 cudaminer on debian 64 bit system. Does anyone have experience with this?
Best regards,
Ken
I did it on ubuntu without any problem (had more problem with the driver though...) and even on fedora (on a laptop)
Even though, I have it installed right now on ubuntu, I wish I had installed fedora... I think I hate ubuntu... hugly, and a completely clueless package management system... (have to search for hours to find where is hidden xterm)
February 10, 2014, 10:05:18 PM
Is any one mining VERT On a GTX 650 TI and getting more than 95 kh/s 
K4x24 in the bat
GPU Settings:
Cudaminer 2014.2.9 Results:
Thanks in advance!
K4x24 in the bat
GPU Settings:
Cudaminer 2014.2.9 Results:
Thanks in advance!
February 10, 2014, 09:29:56 PM
I had trouble getting good performance from Ubuntu 64 bit and problems with cuda 5.5
I switched to Debian Jessie 32 bit which had Cuda 5.5 in non-free repository and now get hash rate equal to google spreadsheet.
I wish I could compile 32 cudaminer on debian 64 bit system. Does anyone have experience with this?
Best regards,
Ken
I switched to Debian Jessie 32 bit which had Cuda 5.5 in non-free repository and now get hash rate equal to google spreadsheet.
I wish I could compile 32 cudaminer on debian 64 bit system. Does anyone have experience with this?
Best regards,
Ken
February 10, 2014, 09:00:04 PM
the p2pool's stats page suggested the modifier.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annp2poolvtc-vertcoin-p2pool-public-node-scanner-438194
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annp2poolvtc-vertcoin-p2pool-public-node-scanner-438194
Code:
Worker Tracker
Hash Rate
Worker Rate: 393kH/s (Stale: 1.19%)
Effective Rate: 388kH/s
Estimated Payouts
Next Block: 0 VTC
Day Average: 0.0478 VTC
Day Total: 3.19 VTC
Suggested Difficulties
Local Share: +0.00009155
February 10, 2014, 08:59:05 PM
I have set up my desktop PC for VertCoin mining using p2pool today
here's one advanced command line for you
note how I chose T12x20 instead of T12x24 for my gtx780 because somehow performance dropped sharply for any number of warps above x20
the +0.00029103 behind my wallet address is a difficulty modifier for the p2pool.
Christian
Can you explain a bit the difficulty modifier ? Is this something that p2pool requires or is this something you can set up ? here's one advanced command line for you
note how I chose T12x20 instead of T12x24 for my gtx780 because somehow performance dropped sharply for any number of warps above x20
the +0.00029103 behind my wallet address is a difficulty modifier for the p2pool.
Code:
@echo off
cd ..\cudaminer-2014-02-09\x86
cudaminer.exe -q --algo=scrypt:2048 -d gtx780,gtx660ti,gt640 -l T12x20,K7x32,T4x24 -C 0,1,0 -b 512,2048,2048 -i 1,0,0 -m 1 -H 2 -o http://q30.qhor.net:9171 -u ViTWB96tJXSR4YwUdJCURiPtKpegtVRFif+0.00029103 -p x
Christian
February 10, 2014, 08:54:04 PM
I have set up my desktop PC for VertCoin mining using p2pool today
here's one advanced command line for you
note how I chose T12x20 instead of T12x24 for my gtx780 because somehow performance dropped sharply for any number of warps above x20
the +0.00029103 behind my wallet address is a difficulty modifier for the p2pool.
Christian
here's one advanced command line for you
note how I chose T12x20 instead of T12x24 for my gtx780 because somehow performance dropped sharply for any number of warps above x20
the +0.00029103 behind my wallet address is a difficulty modifier for the p2pool.
Code:
@echo off
cd ..\cudaminer-2014-02-09\x86
cudaminer.exe -q --algo=scrypt:2048 -d gtx780,gtx660ti,gt640 -l T12x20,K7x32,T4x24 -C 0,1,0 -b 512,2048,2048 -i 1,0,0 -m 1 -H 2 -o http://q30.qhor.net:9171 -u ViTWB96tJXSR4YwUdJCURiPtKpegtVRFif+0.00009155 -p x
Christian
February 10, 2014, 08:07:44 PM
How do I setup CUDAMINER for Solomining?
Pretty much like every mining software is configured for solo mining.
I will have to refer you to some other online sources or other forum members for help.
Christian
February 10, 2014, 07:52:22 PM
"x16" is what?
"1024" is what?
16 warps (one warp is a group of 32 threads) per thread block. And to understand this, you need to know the CUDA programming model in some detail. 16 is the upper limit for Fermi.
the -L 1024 means to shrink the scrypt scratchpad buffer by a factor of 1024.
Thx cbuchner1
How do I setup CUDAMINER for Solomining?
February 10, 2014, 07:31:21 PM
"x16" is what?
"1024" is what?
16 warps (one warp is a group of 32 threads) per thread block. And to understand this, you need to know the CUDA programming model in some detail. 16 is the upper limit for Fermi.
the -L 1024 means to shrink the scrypt scratchpad buffer by a factor of 1024.
February 10, 2014, 07:27:34 PM
What stands this "-L" for? Is this the amount of RAM?
-L makes the scrypt scratchpad buffers smaller. These buffers aren't actually needed for keccak hashing, and to prevent an out of memory situation we have to shrink them to fit the card at least. This keccak feature was implemented in a hurry and I haven't cleaned up the initialization of the memory buffers and the autotune yet.
Christian
Ok, thx. And what does the number behind this -L mean? cudaminer.exe --algo=keccak -d gtx560ti -i 0 -m 1 -l F896x16 -L 1024 -o 192.168.2.2:9999 -O cbuchner1.1:x
"F" is for the Fermi chip
"896" are the cuda-cores doubled
"x16" is what?
"1024" is what?
February 10, 2014, 07:22:45 PM
What stands this "-L" for? Is this the amount of RAM?
-L makes the scrypt scratchpad buffers smaller. These buffers aren't actually needed for keccak hashing, and to prevent an out of memory situation we have to shrink them to fit the card at least. This keccak feature was implemented in a hurry and I haven't cleaned up the initialization of the memory buffers and the autotune yet.
Christian
February 10, 2014, 07:19:45 PM
My GTX570 has 480 Cuda-Cores, same MHz (732 MHz) as yours and the same amout of RAM (1280 MB). Which would be the best configuration?
try -l F960x16
with keccak, the differences between various configurations are rather small. I suppose you won't be getting much extra speed.
Some people reported that keeping a web browser window with some flash playing in it open to boosted the GPU speeds somewhat.
Christian
What stands this "-L" for? Is this the amount of RAM?
February 10, 2014, 07:10:27 PM
February 10, 2014, 07:08:18 PM
My GTX570 has 480 Cuda-Cores, same MHz (732 MHz) as yours and the same amout of RAM (1280 MB). Which would be the best configuration?
try -l F960x16
with keccak, the differences between various configurations are rather small. I suppose you won't be getting much extra speed.
Some people reported that keeping a web browser window with some flash playing in it open to boosted the GPU speeds somewhat.
Christian
Jump to: