Author

Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX] - page 930. (Read 3426922 times)

sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
I just got home from work and started compiling.
When will the coin starts?

7:30 GMT is the official start

and no im not close enough to him, currently i am answering questions so he can work instead
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
Hello everyone,

I was using Cudaminer 18-12 version, with a MSI GTX 560Ti and those parameters: -l F8x16 -i 0 -H 1 -C 1, my rates was about 180 kH/sec.

But now, with the 02-02 and 04-02 version, my rates can't even exceed 154, with all configurations I tried.

I tried with the last compiled sources also and the result is the same.

Any of you had the same probleme ? Or anyone know how to resolve it ?

Thanks

the latest versions have had an effect on scrypt and scrypt-jane which has caused a loss in performance
just stick with the old one that works

and yes -o is what you want for solomining still

Thank you ! And are you close enough to the dev to approximately know if the problem will be solve soon ?
legendary
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1051
ICO? Not even once.
bathrobe you all set? ive got config files ready, cudaminer ready, and their cpu miner ready :p

wallets are starting to be released, if anyone gets the password before its posted here, please post it
i have a feeling that someone is going to brute force their wallet

I just got home from work and started compiling.
When will the coin starts?
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
can someone just post what i should type for gtx670 ?

I am using cudaminer --algo=keccak -d 0 -C 2 -L 64 -H 2 -l K600x32, gets me around 98.5 mhps.

For when everything is up and working, is this how the batch for a solo mine should look?

./cudaminer --algo=keccak -d gtx780 -L 128 -l K1000x32 -o stratum+tcp://localhost:port -O user:pass

or would it be

./cudaminer --algo=keccak -d gtx780 -L 128 -l K1000x32 -o localhost:port -O user:pass

Thanks!

Use this: ./cudaminer --algo=keccak -d gtx780 -L 128 -l K1000x32 -o http://localhost:port -u user -p pass

-O method would work too.
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
-O and -u/-p both perform the same functionality, they are just a different format for the user/pass setup Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
Hello everyone,

I was using Cudaminer 18-12 version, with a MSI GTX 560Ti and those parameters: -l F8x16 -i 0 -H 1 -C 1, my rates was about 180 kH/sec.

But now, with the 02-02 and 04-02 version, my rates can't even exceed 154, with all configurations I tried.

I tried with the last compiled sources also and the result is the same.

Any of you had the same probleme ? Or anyone know how to resolve it ?

Thanks

the latest versions have had an effect on scrypt and scrypt-jane which has caused a loss in performance
just stick with the old one that works

and yes -o is what you want for solomining still
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
For when everything is up and working, is this how the batch for a solo mine should look?

./cudaminer --algo=keccak -d gtx780 -L 128 -l K1000x32 -o stratum+tcp://localhost:port -O user:pass

or would it be

./cudaminer --algo=keccak -d gtx780 -L 128 -l K1000x32 -o localhost:port -O user:pass

Thanks!

I think you should use -u at the end, instead of -O
But i'm not sure, does anyone know that?

Also, use the 2nd one.
alright thanks!

the -o always has worked for me with other pools, would it be diff for solo?


also any word on the compile? Everything going well?
member
Activity: 66
Merit: 10
For when everything is up and working, is this how the batch for a solo mine should look?

./cudaminer --algo=keccak -d gtx780 -L 128 -l K1000x32 -o stratum+tcp://localhost:port -O user:pass

or would it be

./cudaminer --algo=keccak -d gtx780 -L 128 -l K1000x32 -o localhost:port -O user:pass

Thanks!

I think you should use -u at the end, instead of -O
But i'm not sure, does anyone know that?

Also, use the 2nd one.
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
Hello everyone,

I was using Cudaminer 18-12 version, with a MSI GTX 560Ti and those parameters: -l F8x16 -i 0 -H 1 -C 1, my rates was about 180 kH/sec.

But now, with the 02-02 and 04-02 version, my rates can't even exceed 154, with all configurations I tried.

I tried with the last compiled sources also and the result is the same.

Any of you had the same probleme ? Or anyone know how to resolve it ?

Thanks
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
For when everything is up and working, is this how the batch for a solo mine should look?

./cudaminer --algo=keccak -d gtx780 -L 128 -l K1000x32 -o stratum+tcp://localhost:port -O user:pass

or would it be

./cudaminer --algo=keccak -d gtx780 -L 128 -l K1000x32 -o localhost:port -O user:pass

Thanks!
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
can someone just post what i should type for gtx670 ?


cudaminer --algo=keccak -L 64 -l K1024x32 -D -o 127.0.0.1:8332 -u x -p x

or something else? :} pls
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
the latest, its not out for windows yet
christian has there been any new commits to github i should be getting ready?
newbie
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
which version of cudaminer is needed for keccak?
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
yeh it seems like it has been rushing. christian you have really pulled it off this time
bathrobe you all set? ive got config files ready, cudaminer ready, and their cpu miner ready :p

wallets are starting to be released, fi anyone gets the password before its posted here, please post it

can u post what conf i should use to start mining with gtx670? i mean what conf for cudaminer
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
solo for sure, btw for anyone that wants it, they just posted the link to their cpu miner
https://github.com/Max-Coin/cpuminer

do you want to check its the same as you have been working off christian? you never know if they changed something after all the up raw from ATI

christian has said he is working on the code and an official release will be out at 7pm gmt, so he will most likely get it working where it can be tested, then fix the issues before the release time

You're going solo on this one? Doesn't Maxcoin retarget after every block? Wouldn' the difficulty go up really quickly?
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
yeh it seems like it has been rushing. christian you have really pulled it off this time
bathrobe you all set? ive got config files ready, cudaminer ready, and their cpu miner ready :p

wallets are starting to be released, if anyone gets the password before its posted here, please post it
i have a feeling that someone is going to brute force their wallet
legendary
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1051
ICO? Not even once.
Quote
Well damn me, I only got an AMD card Sad
Now - this makes the launch not fair at all anymore

From reddit - AMD user using the word "fair" when the competition is getting started. Hilarious.
full member
Activity: 162
Merit: 100
Looks like cudaMiner will have some competition at launch, they just posted a cgminer on the maxcoin github.

From their cgminer readme:
Quote
This is a work-in-progress version of cgminer for MaxCoin, including everything we have done so far. Feel free to continue development and push those changes in order to help create a working fork of cgminer.

Doesn't sound like too hard a competition, does it?
Jump to: