Topic: |ANN| DAS - Decentralized and Secure. Private Send. Masternodes. - page 60. (Read 153983 times)

oh.. externalip= and masternodeaddr= has to be the same EXTERNAL IP

ok i give that a try

How much currency does a master node need? Is there a tutorial for the main node of WIN2008?

What exactly happens when all the total supply is ate up? Do prices rise? Do people lose interest because there is nothing to mine? What will masternodes get if there are no more coins available? Part of the fees?

I want to run the masternode in Barcelona.

The DAS has the lowest circulating supply and the lowest total cycle of all principal COINS.This is a good HODL coin.Please stop listening to people post BS about me, but we are now a "buy and hodl" group, not a pump and hodl group.As long as more players buy this coin, we can go to MOON!Let's get it on bittrex.

Like I said, what I see doesn't make me comfortable to invest but the point you are missing is that instead of hanging onto something you dislike and continuing to put money in to, why not just move on to greener pastures. Its not worth getting upset over

externalip=[EXTERNALIP]
masternodeaddr=[EXTERNALIP:9399]

Make sure BOTH these calls have your current and correct external IP. Hope this helps.

This is my own personal das.conf copy/paste after a LOT of tweaking per references/help that I have had for over 2 weeks without a hitch along with daily payments when up/ENABLED 23+hours/day:

(Enter info in [] with correct info needed. NO spaces after=. # to ignore lines/command. addnode info from NovaExchange/updated often. exclude the begin/end lines on copy/paste info)

das.conf
------begin-----
rpcuser=[USER]
rpcpassword=[PASSWORD]
#rpcallowip=127.0.0.1
externalip=[EXTERNALIP]
rpcport=9399
#listen=1
port=9399
server=1
daemon=1
#staking=0
logips=1
maxconnections=50
masternode=1
masternodeaddr=[EXTERNALIP]:9399
masternodeprivkey=[MASTERNODEPRIVKEY]
#
addnode=107.174.69.220:9399
addnode=141.134.124.215:9399
addnode=142.217.120.113:9399
addnode=146.0.47.22:9399
addnode=154.16.7.191:9399
addnode=185.137.97.15:9399
addnode=185.209.20.97:9399
addnode=185.41.187.170:9399
addnode=193.71.119.49:9399
addnode=195.181.243.208:9399
addnode=212.47.243.63:9399
addnode=24.91.171.132:9399
addnode=35.184.44.214:9399
addnode=45.32.158.2:9399
addnode=45.32.169.164:9399
addnode=45.63.7.229:9399
addnode=45.76.245.31:9399
addnode=50.3.86.241:9399
addnode=51.15.37.50:9399
addnode=51.15.46.181:9399
addnode=52.161.110.178:9399
addnode=85.214.153.21:9399
addnode=93.206.113.45:9399
addnode=98.172.83.52:9399
addnode=98.226.11.139:9399
#
#
#addnode=94.19.244.216:9399
#addnode=185.51.247.100:9399
#addnode=93.206.113.45:9399
-----end-----


masternode.conf:
-------begin----
[MNalias] [EXTERNALIP:PORT] [masternodeprivkey] [collateral_output_txid] [collateral_output_index]
-----end-----


Regards,

c_p

this coin seems to have alot of issues?

You obviously do not know about his last project do you? Everyone was like lets give him another chance, and look what we got. . .  

how freaking hard is it to fork a DASH code base and change around some code? It's about time you guys get real.

That been said, I got in twice and made some profit. So in a way, the volatility of DAS is a good thing. I will buy back at 0.06 cents again.

after another 24 hours and still no payment.. same old problem!

DAS has the lowest circulating supply and also lowest total circulating supply of all masternode coins.  This is a great HODL coin.  Please stop listening to people posting BS about me though, we are now a "buy and hodl" group, not a pump and hodl group.  So long as more hodlers buy and hodl this coin, we can goto MOON!  And let's get it on bittrex soon.

Best Max

I keep 'bumping into' this thread and I have to agree with this sentiment, if you have a query or some information whether it be for or against the project, post it but if you're just going to sling s*** without taking the time to find something to back it up just find something better to do.

I just felt like posting that because the same thing applies to any coins thread, I see so many pages of just rubbish in these forums it gets tiring after a while, personally what I see here doesn't make me comfortable to invest and I have my opinions but I'm not going to throw any accusations around without anything to back them up... on the other hand after reading pages of bipolar ranting from sunny(something) I kinda feel like pumping this just to piss him off

Why are you even posting on here. What is you point? If its a scam then who cares. That shouldn't concern you.

Yea and how funny all the positive comments are from a "NEWBIE" account. 

I agree. I am getting sick of checking this daily and seeing negative comments always from the same people. If you don't like the coin, sell what you have and go away.

vergegod and others with similar statements without proof,

If you make a statement like that, PLEASE show the proof. What wallet(s)? Amount(s)? Dates? Not converting some DAS at high from dev fund/premine to BTC for site and exchange expansion? Paying bounties or donations for contributions? Are you making statements based on opinion or FACT? Proof please. Do you have some unique insight and information to justify such a statement?

I've reviewed the Explorers and richlist/wallet distribution and have found no activity in the past few weeks to justify your statement. OR prior ones like yours that have intentionally manipulated the DAS market to lows so day traders & shorts can buy, pump, dump and repeat. Opinions are fine (ie, IMHO). But statements like that require FACTS and PROOF.

Thank you.

Regards,

c_p

PS: Feel free to PM me if you have info that you don't want to make public for privacy/security reasons.

Has MAX the Guru completed his pump? 
DAS Masternode working well.

As I can see in das.explorer at the http://das.explorerz.top:3002/block/0000000000089ac18dd60904abddf2345fbe7632b94b8a243646124a656a0055 the Height of this block 0000000000089ac18dd60904abddf2345fbe7632b94b8a243646124a656a0055 is 16281.

So, I think this fix ( http://telegra.ph/compile-DAS-wallet-on-clear-Ubuntu-1704-08-06 ) should be applied:

But if we look at the source in chainparams.cpp at the string number 157 we can see the following:


So, if we should change 20282 to 16281 in the string
I think we should change 20282 to 16281 in the string
also.

But in the instruction at the http://telegra.ph/compile-DAS-wallet-on-clear-Ubuntu-1704-08-06 there is nothing about this fix. It is very strange.

You have the same problem? How did you fix it? And what you mean "Previous wallet hadn't such issue"? I got DAS source from git clone https://github.com/Truckman83/DAS-source

Source from https://github.com/hexpool/DAS-source/releases/tag/DAS-v0.12.2 ( https://github.com/hexpool/DAS-source/archive/DAS-v0.12.2.tar.gz ) the same.
The difference only in one file I fixed:

I still did not understand should I apply this fix or not?

My debug file was 7 GB, but MN works fine. Previous wallet hadn't such issue.