It really gripes me how people throw around the word SCAM to make it seem they know something.
I guess they think it makes them look smart.
Does it ever dawn on some of these asshats that perhaps there is no scam?
Perhaps there never was a scam?
Maybe there are real people working hard to make something happen in the background and all ya`ll asshats are just asshats.
Perhaps YOU are a scam?
people using bad language on others that didnt give them a reason for it quite often have bad motives. so what is your motive here, that you cant discuss properly?
i dont care if something makes me look smart or dumb, i am posting my opinion, nothing else. everywhere, everytime. you are yelling and using bad language at me for no reason. as a neutral watcher, i would know which person i would rather believe and which person i would ask myself, why is he/she acting this way?
to add a little teaching here : a person CANT be scam. a person can be a SCAMMER, or SCUM. maybe you mixed something up there ... and while i am on it, learn to quote ... it aint that hard. maybe focus less on bad wording and more on "how to write and quote in a forum"
Do your research! Ronnie Moas is the man!
i know ronnie. i never said anything bad about him at all, did i?
but i can tell you a old story from my beginnings of trading (nemax times) and a friend i knew back then (i lost contact several years ago, but thats another story). this guy was a very good news/daytrader and had an own paid "report" as well (i dont know if he called it report, newsletter or whatever anymore, it is so many years ago). and i knew him irl, so we basically spoke man to man. he once told me that his good name in the business and the fact ppl were buying and using his report was the best thing that could ever happend, and with this, he raised his own profit
big times. even if he suggested rather mediocre investments (and even the best investor does misstakes here and there or can fall to a bad project), the people
paying still followed, jumped the train, pumped the price and the result was quite obvious :
1st, he hardly had bad suggestions. because due to subscribers following, the prices raised (some kind of self-fullfilling prophecy)
2nd, his name got better and better, as most of his suggestions raised
3rd, his profit got maximized too, cause he was able to push the prices with his mix of knowledge and many ppl behind him, buying what he suggested.
4th, if a project or suggestion failed, he was never blamed for it. because a good number of his subscribers (those acting fastest when buying themself at low prices) still made profits, and those who didnt, rather blamed themself then him
5th and last, he called his followers (but not in a "bad" meaning, more with some kind of "love") "my sheep" because they followed him just like sheeps follow their chief.
this is nothing bad at all. just as ronnie, my former friend didnt try to scam anyone or abuse his powers. what he sugested were stocks or trades that he believed in HIMSELF... but for himself, the situation was the best of all. while his followers were still buying and buying, he was out quite often already, and had done a double profit : for selling the informations and for selling the stocks themself.
anyway, time will tell on unity, but one thing mentioned in here was a bit wrong :
someone said that ronnie said this is his best pick in last 20 years. in fact he said "
MAY be my best idea in 20 years". additionally he mentioned that, with a 50/50 chance, it might even raise 1000% more till end of feb (later he changed that chance to 60/40 and month to end of march). and this might indeed be possible, but his recommendation is a BIG factor for the raise itself (and it was last time, when uny raised big, as well)
