Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] DIGNITY (DIG) Official Page - Formerly Unity Ingot - page 35. (Read 47977 times)

newbie
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
I subscribe to Moas' newsletter -- $600 for a year.  Results have been mixed.  He did recommend UNY -- that's why I'm here trying to find out more -- but he warned that it's very risky.  He certainly did NOT say anything like "best opportunity in 20 years."  Moas also recommended UNY back in July when it was around the #30 coin on coinmarket cap.  The coin crashed after that, its developers left, and nothing happened with it until this new stuff.  Just a week to 10 days ago, it was trading very thinly at one-fifth of one cent.  Anyone who's held UNY from that $.002 has obviously done very well since Moas recommended it.

And BTW, Moas' last two picks were duds.  People who bought Binance Coin and Bread Wallet on his recommendation are underwater on those buys.

(Don't ask me to post excerpts from Moas' newsletter.  Per the subscriber agreement I will not.)

Are you stupid? The entire market experienced a correction and Binance Coin before the correction shot up from $9 to $25. Brd is a very underrated coin in my opinion because of it's utility.

Where's Binance Coin now, genius?  9.  Pumped on the recommendation then faded.  "Bread is underrated..."   Blah, blah... gone nowhere.  "Stupid"?  What's stupid on a forum like this is name-calling and drawing ignores.  Lighten up, buddy.

To the guy above who said Moas said this is (or could become) his best pick in his 25 year career... my apologies.  I see he did indeed say that on Twitter.  In his newsletter he told subscribers he hasn't yet written up the rest of his report on UNY/DIG, so I'm still wondering why he's so high on it.  Despite his last two picks going nowhere, I can't argue with his history of successful forecasting.  Binance and Bread may turn out to be good holds, and as far as UNY/DIG goes, even though I'm highly skeptical I'll let my smallish bet ride and see what happens.  I'm betting on Ronnie here, not on the info that's been made available about the project -- there's got to be more to this story than presently meets the eye.
newbie
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
I think it terrible that people are posting the information given to them by Ronnie, if this is true.  He does this as a paid service,which he deserves the money for the amount of time he spends putting together his information. The guy is a machine and very well trusted.

But whats even worse is that Ronnie gives most of his money to charity.  Dont screw with something that brings so much good karma to the world.  If you are a subscriber, you should feel lucky that there are guys like him around. 

Again I have no idea if any of this is true, but I think its in bad taste if you are spreading rumors like this.

If you have information and know there's a chance you can make money and help your friends make money too you're not going to share that information?  In my opinion helping others is the best indescribable feeling a person can experience in their life. But lets be real.  There is Risk with this.  Bold promises are being made.  But if they follow through.  The potential is exponential.    If DIG goes to the moon let's follow in Ronnie's footsteps and give some back !!

PLEASE UPDATE WHEN YOUR UNY SWAP TO DIG!!
newbie
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
now some newsletter guy is the argument why this coin is legit and recordbreaking, hmmm

you know how  this kind of newsletters work?

they recommend something, doesnt matter if it is a crypto or stocks or whatever, and before doing so, they are in, big, at low prices.
due to their subscribers and the rumor spread, ppl buy. result : the chart raises (logically). they can claim "my recommendation was good, it raised loads after i did" but this is happening BECAUSE of this rec and not because of the proof of quality.

i can only encourage anyone to trade/buy/sell based on own analysis and thoughts. newsletter or youtuber or whatever guys who recommend, should be watched and not forgotten, but look at this kind of informations carefully, always.


if i had 100k subscribers and i would recommend ANY random coin with some arguments, ppl would buy and it would raise, just by logics.

the fact that ronnie recommended uny in the past proofs this big time. it raised due to this, but dropped loads after, because it was a bullshit coin.

i still dont see anything behind it, and those things backed by arguments should make alarmbells ring. the things promised for uny are WAY to good (why would they back a token worth 0,002 in the start with 1 dollar each? it makes no sense. they  could have easier created a complete NEW one, instead of using an old token, that already was used for p 'n d / scam.

Do your research!  Ronnie Moas is the man!
newbie
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
now some newsletter guy is the argument why this coin is legit and recordbreaking, hmmm

you know how  this kind of newsletters work?

they recommend something, doesnt matter if it is a crypto or stocks or whatever, and before doing so, they are in, big, at low prices.
due to their subscribers and the rumor spread, ppl buy. result : the chart raises (logically). they can claim "my recommendation was good, it raised loads after i did" but this is happening BECAUSE of this rec and not because of the proof of quality.

i can only encourage anyone to trade/buy/sell based on own analysis and thoughts. newsletter or youtuber or whatever guys who recommend, should be watched and not forgotten, but look at this kind of informations carefully, always.


if i had 100k subscribers and i would recommend ANY random coin with some arguments, ppl would buy and it would raise, just by logics.

the fact that ronnie recommended uny in the past proofs this big time. it raised due to this, but dropped loads after, because it was a bullshit coin.

i still dont see anything behind it, and those things backed by arguments should make alarmbells ring. the things promised for uny are WAY to good (why would they back a token worth 0,002 in the start with 1 dollar each? it makes no sense. they  could have easier created a complete NEW one, instead of using an old token, that already was used for p 'n d / scam.
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
I subscribe to Moas' newsletter -- $600 for a year.  Results have been mixed.  He did recommend UNY -- that's why I'm here trying to find out more -- but he warned that it's very risky.  He certainly did NOT say anything like "best opportunity in 20 years."  Moas also recommended UNY back in July when it was around the #30 coin on coinmarket cap.  The coin crashed after that, its developers left, and nothing happened with it until this new stuff.  Just a week to 10 days ago, it was trading very thinly at one-fifth of one cent.  Anyone who's held UNY from that $.002 has obviously done very well since Moas recommended it.

And BTW, Moas' last two picks were duds.  People who bought Binance Coin and Bread Wallet on his recommendation are underwater on those buys.

(Don't ask me to post excerpts from Moas' newsletter.  Per the subscriber agreement I will not.)

Are you stupid? The entire market experienced a correction and Binance Coin before the correction shot up from $9 to $25. Brd is a very underrated coin in my opinion because of it's utility.
newbie
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
I think it terrible that people are posting the information given to them by Ronnie, if this is true.  He does this as a paid service,which he deserves the money for the amount of time he spends putting together his information. The guy is a machine and very well trusted.

But whats even worse is that Ronnie gives most of his money to charity.  Dont screw with something that brings so much good karma to the world.  If you are a subscriber, you should feel lucky that there are guys like him around.  

Again I have no idea if any of this is true, but I think its in bad taste if you are spreading rumors like this.

Moas has NEVER said he gives most of his money to charity.  And get a grip on the sanctity of paid newsletter recommendations.  He released the recommendation Friday.  Now, five days later, it's gotten around, and as with any sort of subscription service, there is nothing wrong with discussing something every single one of his subscribers, including myself, has had ample opportunity to act upon.  This further spreading of the recommendation, by now, is beneficial to anyone who's now bought the recommendation.  That's how these things work.  What bothers me -- a lot -- is all the front running prior to the release of the recommendation.
newbie
Activity: 237
Merit: 0
The whole "gold in the ground" thing is folly.  The only way to back an asset (DIG) 1 to 1 with a dollar's worth of gold is to have the gold -- period.

   
Reply with quote  Edit message  Delete message  #303
It really all depends on who the gold miners are , it could be someone like the guys on the tv show gold rush lol or litteraly a owner of a piece of land that has had a assay report done " drilling a bunch of holes and calculating inferred gold resources & I'm sure that's what the skeptics are expecting ... it could also be a top mining company  almost all of which sell future gold that is still in the ground to hedge their income.. many people will offer to buy at a certain time in the future at a certain price and pay now.  They do this because the best mining company's own some of the best gold claims that they have been working for decades with fairly steady amounts taken out of the ground year after year . Those guys have have been watching bitcoin and crypto just like everyone else & if the developers of this token have any connections to that world they could make a deal as described and it would be amazing .... so the question is who is this " mortgage " with ? A fortune 500 miner or the guy with the hole in the ground ?


If you're in crypto and on wall st and you know people in the mining industry they are saying to you f%%k you were right man , for the price of a fee bulldozers in 2015 I could have bought BTC  and made out better on that than all the extra pay dirt I was able to move with my new equipment.... and the someone says hey how about this,  I'll get you exposure to BTC and the crypto market as a whole and you can help me with a futures contract .... or its the guy with the hole again ... that's what we are waiting to find out . But you would be wrong to say that gold in the ground is not worth anything , THE LARGEST miners all sell good solid futures contracts to lock in sales in case the price of gold falls , 10% of next year's production or more depending on the mine owners view of the future . What if it's a guy who is really worried its going to fall and the dev is locked in at a great price and gold triples in 2019 ? Either way gold in the ground is not worthless do some fact checking



I also have a confession,  I'm not JUST Danish cheese . I'm also cryptotraderguy , I don't know why I do this . I guess I'm just lonely or it could have something to do with my failed career as a ventriloquist.  Thats what my therapist keeps suggesting . Pls if I keep posting to myself help me out just say hey Danish, its cool man everything is ok . But im going to try and stop ... good luck all you little buggers
newbie
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
I think it terrible that people are posting the information given to them by Ronnie, if this is true.  He does this as a paid service,which he deserves the money for the amount of time he spends putting together his information. The guy is a machine and very well trusted.

But whats even worse is that Ronnie gives most of his money to charity.  Dont screw with something that brings so much good karma to the world.  If you are a subscriber, you should feel lucky that there are guys like him around. 

Again I have no idea if any of this is true, but I think its in bad taste if you are spreading rumors like this.
newbie
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
The whole "gold in the ground" thing is folly.  The only way to back an asset (DIG) 1 to 1 with a dollar's worth of gold is to have the gold -- period.
newbie
Activity: 237
Merit: 0
It really all depends on who the gold miners are , it could be someone like the guys on the tv show gold rush lol or litteraly a owner of a piece of land that has had a assay report done " drilling a bunch of holes and calculating inferred gold resources & I'm sure that's what the skeptics are expecting ... it could also be a top mining company  almost all of which sell future gold that is still in the ground to hedge their income.. many people will offer to buy at a certain time in the future at a certain price and pay now.  They do this because the best mining company's own some of the best gold claims that they have been working for decades with fairly steady amounts taken out of the ground year after year . Those guys have have been watching bitcoin and crypto just like everyone else & if the developers of this token have any connections to that world they could make a deal as described and it would be amazing .... so the question is who is this " mortgage " with ? A fortune 500 miner or the guy with the hole in the ground ?
newbie
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
I've read the last several pages of this forum and I'm surprised no one has questioned the following:

The White Paper says that until they can earn enough money mining crypto to buy enough physical gold to back each token with $1 worth of gold, they will back the tokens with gold in the ground, by making deals with mining companies that control a sufficient quantity of proven reserves (gold in the ground).  This is ridiculous.

There is only one reason that located underground gold is still underground -- it takes a great deal of money to get it, to mine it.  Sure, there's value to the mining rights of proven gold reserves, but that value is the price of gold minus all mining costs (uncertain until totalled up after mining).  Profit margins are typically slim.  And by the way, many proven reserves will remain underground indefinitely, too costly to mine unless the price of gold increases a bit, or enormously, depending.

Bottom line, taking a lease on proven gold reserves isn't going to get anyone anywhere close to backing hundreds of millions or three billion "UNY" or "DID" tokens at $1 of worth of gold per token.  This will become apparent when the froth subsides and there's a normal state of price discovery.

This is a very interesting point.  Hopefully we will get more detailed information from the updated whitepaper after the swap.  What else do you know about mining precious metals?  Such as silver, platinum and palladium.  Does the same concept apply to these other metals too?  3 additional tokens are supposed to be released backed by these metals after the swap, you think there is a mining advantage with the other metals?  You mention that if the price were to increase it would make more financial sense to mine it.  Any guess on approx. %? a bit to enormous is a big and vague range.

Never mind about gold that's too expensive to mine.  Ramping up from discovery to production typically takes two or three years, and then production usually grows in stages.  Because mining is so expensive and time horizons long, there exist exploration-only companies who sell their interests in finds to production companies.  Such a sale price is probably never more than maybe 5% of what the proven reserves will eventually be worth when unearthed and extracted; still, that 5% will be good money to the explorer and ideally will more than make up for their unsuccessful projects.  (These deals aren't calculated by percentage; I'm just using what might be an end result of all considered factors.)  So... my point was that UNY or DIG cannot honestly state that gold (or platinum, or silver, or any mineral) in the ground represents the price of gold at market.  The White Paper actually says that every DIG token will from the start have $1 worth of gold backing it.  I'm saying that if they're going by proven and probable reserves they've secured, that it's more like 5 cents worth of gold backing each token, because gold in the hand is worth 20x, or 30x (whatever) than gold in the ground.

So what you're basically saying is that there is no way they can guarantee a dollar value of gold if it's in the ground?   Definitely going to be on the look out regarding the details of the overhead to mine the gold.  Just thinking... Is getting this loss exposure insured a possibility?  Is it a possibility for the mining companies to estimate potential operating costs + gold  and provide a loan to be paid in 15 yrs for 3 billions worth?  is cryptobontix calculating the mining overhead into their numbers?  seems to be such a large exposure that the team had to have thought of something right?  Great job picking this up!
newbie
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
I subscribe to Moas' newsletter -- $600 for a year.  Results have been mixed.  He did recommend UNY -- that's why I'm here trying to find out more -- but he warned that it's very risky.  He certainly did NOT say anything like "best opportunity in 20 years."  Moas also recommended UNY back in July when it was around the #30 coin on coinmarket cap.  The coin crashed after that, its developers left, and nothing happened with it until this new stuff.  Just a week to 10 days ago, it was trading very thinly at one-fifth of one cent.  Anyone who's held UNY from that $.002 has obviously done very well since Moas recommended it.

And BTW, Moas' last two picks were duds.  People who bought Binance Coin and Bread Wallet on his recommendation are underwater on those buys.

(Don't ask me to post excerpts from Moas' newsletter.  Per the subscriber agreement I will not.)
newbie
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
Ronnie Moas is backing this and has been an amazing stock picker for the last 20 years. He is in talks with the team too. Maybe don't concentrate on a physical address so much - seems a weird way of assessing viability of a project.

He's saying UNY might be his best pick in 20 yrs!!  I've been following for a year and can say he has hit massive gains on every pick so far.


PLEASE UPDATE WHEN YOUR UNY SWAP TO DIG!
newbie
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
Ronnie Moas is backing this and has been an amazing stock picker for the last 20 years. He is in talks with the team too. Maybe don't concentrate on a physical address so much - seems a weird way of assessing viability of a project.
jr. member
Activity: 182
Merit: 7
newbie
Activity: 237
Merit: 0
CRYPTO GUYS POST LOL

That person holds 94% of all UNY tokens which is 9,490,297,144.08 UNY tokens. Anyone with that large a share of a token can easily manipulate the price, especially after the supply is reduced from 10 billion to to 3 billion.  


THIS IS THE RED FLAG YOU FU%$##NG IDIOT !  You are on here telling people that one person owned 94% of the circulating supply and you can't even form a coherent thought ...i felt badly for you because you're acting all twisted up over this coin so I took the time to explain simple things to you . You are a true blue troll and dumb as a brick .. no common sense no trading skills no knowledge of how stocks are structured and pissing and bitching because honestly I wouldn't go in hard at this price either , now its a 10 bagger at best with a clear target of 1$  & that will most likely take time , but for those who bought last week it represents a 100 fold gain and you just want to see it burn because at least you will be right about something .... the flags were addressed,  now let's address why you give a sH#$ ? Oh yeah the need to be right about something . Go find a coin to make money on dude I actually handed you one already and you're still here.  How about this , go pick 5 random company's on the NAS and Google st view their given addresses! Maybe something will click in your thick friking head.  You are not investigator of the month , you're a paranoid looser who is staying up late at night for way to many nights in a row for someone who has nothing riding on this . And you're insulting everyone here including people who are trying to help you . ... I won't respond to you again because the quote at the top of this says it all , paranoid and senseless
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
I've read the last several pages of this forum and I'm surprised no one has questioned the following:

The White Paper says that until they can earn enough money mining crypto to buy enough physical gold to back each token with $1 worth of gold, they will back the tokens with gold in the ground, by making deals with mining companies that control a sufficient quantity of proven reserves (gold in the ground).  This is ridiculous.

There is only one reason that located underground gold is still underground -- it takes a great deal of money to get it, to mine it.  Sure, there's value to the mining rights of proven gold reserves, but that value is the price of gold minus all mining costs (uncertain until totalled up after mining).  Profit margins are typically slim.  And by the way, many proven reserves will remain underground indefinitely, too costly to mine unless the price of gold increases a bit, or enormously, depending.

Bottom line, taking a lease on proven gold reserves isn't going to get anyone anywhere close to backing hundreds of millions or three billion "UNY" or "DID" tokens at $1 of worth of gold per token.  This will become apparent when the froth subsides and there's a normal state of price discovery.

This is a very interesting point.  Hopefully we will get more detailed information from the updated whitepaper after the swap.  What else do you know about mining precious metals?  Such as silver, platinum and palladium.  Does the same concept apply to these other metals too?  3 additional tokens are supposed to be released backed by these metals after the swap, you think there is a mining advantage with the other metals?  You mention that if the price were to increase it would make more financial sense to mine it.  Any guess on approx. %? a bit to enormous is a big and vague range.

I am pretty sure they have spend the last couple of years getting all this together...
Never mind about gold that's too expensive to mine.  Ramping up from discovery to production typically takes two or three years, and then production usually grows in stages.  Because mining is so expensive and time horizons long, there exist exploration-only companies who sell their interests in finds to production companies.  Such a sale price is probably never more than maybe 5% of what the proven reserves will eventually be worth when unearthed and extracted; still, that 5% will be good money to the explorer and ideally will more than make up for their unsuccessful projects.  (These deals aren't calculated by percentage; I'm just using what might be an end result of all considered factors.)  So... my point was that UNY or DIG cannot honestly state that gold (or platinum, or silver, or any mineral) in the ground represents the price of gold at market.  The White Paper actually says that every DIG token will from the start have $1 worth of gold backing it.  I'm saying that if they're going by proven and probable reserves they've secured, that it's more like 5 cents worth of gold backing each token, because gold in the hand is worth 20x, or 30x (whatever) than gold in the ground.
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
Does anyone have a c-cex account?  I'm curious to know why there has always been such a huge discrepancy between livecoin and c-cex.  Noticed low volume but higher than average through the rise but consistent since the start of the rise.  to note* the volume for UNY has been ridiculous the past 5 days.  If this keeps up top 100 here we come!

I am trying to get a C-CEX account surely someone would sell one, the Arbitrage between livecoin and C-cex is massive!


Only 15k trading volume..you may get screwed due to the illiquidity of that platform...no volume means less trading pairs going through.
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
I've got 2 cents I want to throw into this discussion. First off, yes this is a brand new account. Just because I'm using a brand new account doesn't mean I don't know anything nor does it mean I'm a newb. So let's just get that out of the way now.

This CryptoTraderGuy......it's so apparent to all that he is disgruntled. His agenda is to spread FUD on UNY, DIG, Arbitrade, Crytpobontics, etc. Probably because instead of buying in at $0.0025 or lower he chose to begin a FUD agenda to try to stop this. It's also apparent that CryproTraderGuy has former ties to whomever is running UNY. I'm calling you out onto the red carpet. Why don't you reveal who you are? I know who you are. So do many others. You are pissed off and won't let go of the past, your past. What CryptoTraderGuy is doing is based on a personal vendetta. He wants to see the destruction of certain people and their related projects. What is hilarious to me is that he has absolutely NO IDEA what is really going on.

So go ahead, keep on your FUDing around. You ain't stopping anything. Too bad your ego has gotten in the way of making some great profits off of UNY.

UNY>>DIG is going to the moon.

Just watch what UNY does in the coming weeks along with Arbitrade and Cryptobontix. Get on board now else you too will become a sour grape like CryptoTraderGuy.


I love how you didn't refute any of the red flags I brought up in my past posts about Cryptobonix in your lame flamer post. Very revealing. Also, when did stating facts become FUD? I guess reality is warped in your mommy's basement where you live. Of course you didn't read my last posts to see if I have any valid points because you're a typical gullible shill who thinks that just because he thinks this coin's price will skyrocket it will. Reality check. For all you kids on here that think this coin is going to hit $25 you obviously know nothing about market cap. Even with a coin reduction down to 3 billion coins, at $25 per coin, the market cap of this coin would have to reach 75 billion. Not quite.

By the way, I have no affiliation with the original team of this crap token. Sorry to break it to you, little buddy, but I have never had any skin in the game when it comes to this token.

I do not need to address the red flags. You do not know what the facts are. You make many assumptions. Sure I can say that some of what you say has some truth to it. Also...I do know you have no coins. My comment earlier about you having prior connections to them has nothing to do with you having any coins. I am referring to the past things BEFORE the coin ever came out. You know EXACTLY what I am talking about. You can play it off in here like you don't know what I am talking about, but you do. Most in here won't understand, but I am not talking to them. I am talking to you.

Your facts are skewed, and they lack details that you have no clue about. Do you know what market cap is? Apparently not. Market cap can be $10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 and that means nothing. Market cap = number of coins X current price of coin. That number has NO BEARING on reality. Even the BTC market cap is fictional. Not every BTC can be sold for the market price. So your ignorance is truly showing. You have had a past affiliation with certain people involved with this coin and you are out to burn them and cause problems. Please keep your rants up and your insults. It provides many of us in here with laughable entertainment. You will soon be eating your words and all will know that you have ulterior motives. It is amazing to me that someone like yourself would spend so much time in here writing post after post unless you had an axe to grind. There are endless scams out there and countless forums and I don't see you blasting those scams. This one is personal to you because it pisses you off that the people you are targeting are actually succeeding. Again, you are known, and the affiliation I speak of has nothing to do with these coins. So go ahead, keep on pretending that you are just someone on the outside playing the "scam" card. You spend quite the effort and I have also analyzed your speech patterns and textual use to 100% verify your identity.

Sure there are inconsistencies with the white papers, sure the address is funny, not denying these things at all. What I am saying is that this is all preliminary and the reality of this will be made very clear in the near future. Still time to get in cheap while this coin is low. You and your FUD and ignorant facts cannot stop what is coming. So please continuing to make a fool of yourself in here.

No response you give to my remarks has any merit on the truth. The truth is you have an agenda to tear down and destroy. Go get a life.


LOL! OMG! And you guys are calling me a nut?!!! You actually made me laugh out loud, little buddy. You're analyzing my speech patterns, huh? Too bad I haven't said a word, moron. You have to speak, not type, to have a speech pattern. What are you, nine years old?

Oh, I see. So, you somehow know me, an anonymous stranger. You've completely lost touch with reality, retard. I love how you state that market cap can be $10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 and that means nothing all while telling me that I know nothing about market cap. HAHAHA! According to the World Gold Council, the total value of all gold ever mined is about $7.8 trillion.

The total size of the cryptocurrency market stands at about $161 billion and that market cap is split among 1,170 different cryptocurrencies. That's straight from Forbes magazine, which I am pretty sure is more knowledgeable about gold and crypto market caps than you are. I like how you are so delusional that you believe the market cap of this token could go higher than Bitcoin. Hilarious!

"So go ahead, keep on pretending that you are just someone on the outside playing the "scam" card. You spend quite the effort and I have also analyzed your speech patterns and textual use to 100% verify your identity. ". You want to talk about laughable entertainment. That REALLY had me rolling. LOL! I laughed so hard I actually kicked your mom out of my bed by accident. She'll be home later on to give you your evening bath, kid.  Wink

Oh good! Thanks for your intelligent response, ladened with yet more insults and your typical banter! Throw a stone into a group of dogs and the one it hits will yelp. I am glad that you are continuing your nonsense. It really proves my point. Thank you for that. Oh and did I say that this coin would exceed the BTC market cap? Man you flopping around like a fish on the deck of the fisherman's boat. Keep it up. Your ridiculous remarks are actually exposing how hateful and vindictive you really are, which damages your credibility. The more you post the more you are helping UNY, so I also appreciate that. Its funny how "an anonymous stranger" knows so much about you, like your past involvement with some of the people behind the company. Keep it up! You are doing a great job!
newbie
Activity: 70
Merit: 0
I've got 2 cents I want to throw into this discussion. First off, yes this is a brand new account. Just because I'm using a brand new account doesn't mean I don't know anything nor does it mean I'm a newb. So let's just get that out of the way now.

This CryptoTraderGuy......it's so apparent to all that he is disgruntled. His agenda is to spread FUD on UNY, DIG, Arbitrade, Crytpobontics, etc. Probably because instead of buying in at $0.0025 or lower he chose to begin a FUD agenda to try to stop this. It's also apparent that CryproTraderGuy has former ties to whomever is running UNY. I'm calling you out onto the red carpet. Why don't you reveal who you are? I know who you are. So do many others. You are pissed off and won't let go of the past, your past. What CryptoTraderGuy is doing is based on a personal vendetta. He wants to see the destruction of certain people and their related projects. What is hilarious to me is that he has absolutely NO IDEA what is really going on.

So go ahead, keep on your FUDing around. You ain't stopping anything. Too bad your ego has gotten in the way of making some great profits off of UNY.

UNY>>DIG is going to the moon.

Just watch what UNY does in the coming weeks along with Arbitrade and Cryptobontix. Get on board now else you too will become a sour grape like CryptoTraderGuy.


I love how you didn't refute any of the red flags I brought up in my past posts about Cryptobonix in your lame flamer post. Very revealing. Also, when did stating facts become FUD? I guess reality is warped in your mommy's basement where you live. Of course you didn't read my last posts to see if I have any valid points because you're a typical gullible shill who thinks that just because he thinks this coin's price will skyrocket it will. Reality check. For all you kids on here that think this coin is going to hit $25 you obviously know nothing about market cap. Even with a coin reduction down to 3 billion coins, at $25 per coin, the market cap of this coin would have to reach 75 billion. Not quite.

By the way, I have no affiliation with the original team of this crap token. Sorry to break it to you, little buddy, but I have never had any skin in the game when it comes to this token.

I do not need to address the red flags. You do not know what the facts are. You make many assumptions. Sure I can say that some of what you say has some truth to it. Also...I do know you have no coins. My comment earlier about you having prior connections to them has nothing to do with you having any coins. I am referring to the past things BEFORE the coin ever came out. You know EXACTLY what I am talking about. You can play it off in here like you don't know what I am talking about, but you do. Most in here won't understand, but I am not talking to them. I am talking to you.

Your facts are skewed, and they lack details that you have no clue about. Do you know what market cap is? Apparently not. Market cap can be $10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 and that means nothing. Market cap = number of coins X current price of coin. That number has NO BEARING on reality. Even the BTC market cap is fictional. Not every BTC can be sold for the market price. So your ignorance is truly showing. You have had a past affiliation with certain people involved with this coin and you are out to burn them and cause problems. Please keep your rants up and your insults. It provides many of us in here with laughable entertainment. You will soon be eating your words and all will know that you have ulterior motives. It is amazing to me that someone like yourself would spend so much time in here writing post after post unless you had an axe to grind. There are endless scams out there and countless forums and I don't see you blasting those scams. This one is personal to you because it pisses you off that the people you are targeting are actually succeeding. Again, you are known, and the affiliation I speak of has nothing to do with these coins. So go ahead, keep on pretending that you are just someone on the outside playing the "scam" card. You spend quite the effort and I have also analyzed your speech patterns and textual use to 100% verify your identity.

Sure there are inconsistencies with the white papers, sure the address is funny, not denying these things at all. What I am saying is that this is all preliminary and the reality of this will be made very clear in the near future. Still time to get in cheap while this coin is low. You and your FUD and ignorant facts cannot stop what is coming. So please continuing to make a fool of yourself in here.

No response you give to my remarks has any merit on the truth. The truth is you have an agenda to tear down and destroy. Go get a life.


LOL! OMG! And you guys are calling me a nut?!!! You actually made me laugh out loud, little buddy. You're analyzing my speech patterns, huh? Too bad I haven't said a word, moron. You have to speak, not type, to have a speech pattern. What are you, nine years old?

Oh, I see. So, you somehow know me, an anonymous stranger. You've completely lost touch with reality, retard. I love how you state that market cap can be $10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 and that means nothing all while telling me that I know nothing about market cap. HAHAHA! According to the World Gold Council, the total value of all gold ever mined is about $7.8 trillion.

The total size of the cryptocurrency market stands at about $161 billion and that market cap is split among 1,170 different cryptocurrencies. That's straight from Forbes magazine, which I am pretty sure is more knowledgeable about gold and crypto market caps than you are. I like how you are so delusional that you believe the market cap of this token could go higher than Bitcoin. Hilarious!

"So go ahead, keep on pretending that you are just someone on the outside playing the "scam" card. You spend quite the effort and I have also analyzed your speech patterns and textual use to 100% verify your identity. ". You want to talk about laughable entertainment. That REALLY had me rolling. LOL! I laughed so hard I actually kicked your mom out of my bed by accident. She'll be home later on to give you your evening bath, kid.  Wink
Pages:
Jump to: