[ANN] DIGNITY (DIG) Official Page - Formerly Unity Ingot - page 36.

CryptoTraderGuy

newbie

Activity: 70

Merit: 0

Quote from: crypto.classroom on February 13, 2018, 10:09:08 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: CryptoTraderGuy on February 13, 2018, 03:15:34 PM

Quote from: danishcheese on February 13, 2018, 11:40:27 AM

You keep saying that , can you post a screed shot ? Is it 9.4 billion ? Or 94% of the circulating supply? 188million ? Because there seems to be more than 16 million trading on livecoin , there are 4 pairs on live coin and btc pair had like 20m for sale yesterday 16m now ltc has 500,000 eth has 2m usd has 500,000 and it's on another exchange and there are the 110 wallets noted ... so 94% of what how many are in that wallet ?

Just go to this link and look at the first wallet: https://etherscan.io/token/0x1a986F1659e11E2AE7CC6543F307bAE5cDe1C761#balances

That person holds 94% of all UNY tokens which is 9,490,297,144.08 UNY tokens. Anyone with that large a share of a token can easily manipulate the price, especially after the supply is reduced from 10 billion to to 3 billion. I'm not saying they will, I'm just saying they can. It's called a whale. Notice that the second wallet holds 4% of all UNY tokens and then everyone else holds less than 1%. This is exactly what the developer of E-Coin did over the last week. He holds 98% of all e-coins so he just sold and bought his own coins a ton of times on the markets which drove the price from $6.23 to $215 in a matter of hours. People started buying up e-coins after the price was already up exponentially and then the dev sold all his e-coins back to himself and the price plummeted and he made a killing while most of the other buyers got creamed. That's how a pump and dump works with some of these coins.

what are you not understanding about what you are saying it looking at ? You are seeing the boards wallet , THAT CONTSINS ALL THE TOKENS THAT ARE NOT IN CIRCULATION. GO LOOK AT APPL OR IBM , I'm not sure if you are fu%#ing with people here or really don't understand so I'm responding even tho you're being kinda mean to folks but if you don't know what you're seeing that can be frustrating, along with expecting the dev to be more transparent, that's also frustrating.. these tokens are not being mined right ? Therr are no pools no opportunity to mine uny, they have been mined and are acting as a stock pretty much even to the extent of getting registered as a asset like that" so they say" ... so the tokens are all here now. Every company registers their stock to be listed on the nyse or dax or wherever , they state the full amount & they state the circulating supply . With stocks that is referred to as the FLOAT the market cap of a company is the FLOAT X the share price... they also register shares that will one day be added to the float , these are listed as restricted & they include bonuses that will either be given if a certain benchmark is achieved or just yearly to the CEO and such . Just because Apple holds all these extra shares doesn't mean they can just do whatever with them , they are not in play . But that is one thing that company's can do, issue extra shares thru a vote and dilute their stock to raise money for all sorts of reasons .. you are seeing the boards wallet with everything in it , the 2.8 billion that you can consider RESTRICTED and the 7 billion that will be burned this week at some point . Coin market cap has the " float " at 202 million and there are obviously many people who are keeping them off the exchanges 110 YOU SAY , look at what is for sale on live , less than 30m last I looked , and then people have coins in livecoin wallet ,that should be the next biggest wallet on that list . I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHEN OR HOW THE OTHER 2.8B come into play and if anyone knows fill me in . But it does not seem like they are in play now. This looks like it is trading exactly as 202mill tokens should be , as in we see about 25-30% on live coin up for sale ... the only thing that wallet is doing is holding coins , of which 70% will be burnt. You haven't seen that # change have you ? This is structured a little diff than most cryptos & look at what you said , you just posted that the wallet hold 9.49 billion coins . There are only 10 billion . Then you say this " whale" will really be able to manipulate things if the reduce to 3 billion tokens? Now think ......... hmmm I guess that whale is going to be really upset because he is going to get all his coins burnt ? No because there is no whale , you are looking at the boards wallet Sad

and like I said the next wallet doesn't have 4% ITS the livecoin wallet and it has a big chunk of the 202million that make up the circulating supply ...

Brother this guy is a nut. A crack case. Probably smokes crack too..

there is no reason ever to have to respond to this ass...

He is only subverting anything he can and for whatever reason it does not matter.

Does not matter what you say or what I say or what anybody says about anything
this guy thinks he is the gatekeeper of all thoughts so he may subvert anything said if he wishes..!

His only goal is to make everything as negative as his idiotic brain may muster and he is not even very convincing.

This man CryptoTraderGuy has probably never traded anything especially Crypto in his entire life!

No reason to respond the Great Jerkoff (CryptoTraderGuy) or anything this ass has to say..

I'm still waiting for you to show proof that the red flags I've brought up are baseless. You still haven't done that. All you did so far was list the members of the board of Arbitrade. It's hilarious that you say, "Does not matter what you say or what I say or what anybody says about anything this guy thinks he is the gatekeeper of all thoughts so he may subvert anything said if he wishes..!", because I can say the exact same thing about you, douchetard. LOL. I'm not very convincing. Okay.I've done more research into the merits of Cryptobontix than you have, including actually contacting people and asking them questions. What kind of research have you done? "Durrr, I read the Cryptobontix whitepaper and the Arbitrade whitepaper and I believe every single word they say because I want this token to moon!" LOL! Get real, ass clown. Only a crackhead like yourself would take the words coming from some unknown company they just discovered on the internet as gospel truth.

cryptobolix

newbie

Activity: 14

Merit: 0

Quote from: CryptoTraderGuy on February 13, 2018, 06:24:49 PM

Quote from: cryptobolix on February 13, 2018, 05:34:36 PM

I've got 2 cents I want to throw into this discussion. First off, yes this is a brand new account. Just because I'm using a brand new account doesn't mean I don't know anything nor does it mean I'm a newb. So let's just get that out of the way now.

This CryptoTraderGuy......it's so apparent to all that he is disgruntled. His agenda is to spread FUD on UNY, DIG, Arbitrade, Crytpobontics, etc. Probably because instead of buying in at $0.0025 or lower he chose to begin a FUD agenda to try to stop this. It's also apparent that CryproTraderGuy has former ties to whomever is running UNY. I'm calling you out onto the red carpet. Why don't you reveal who you are? I know who you are. So do many others. You are pissed off and won't let go of the past, your past. What CryptoTraderGuy is doing is based on a personal vendetta. He wants to see the destruction of certain people and their related projects. What is hilarious to me is that he has absolutely NO IDEA what is really going on.

So go ahead, keep on your FUDing around. You ain't stopping anything. Too bad your ego has gotten in the way of making some great profits off of UNY.

UNY>>DIG is going to the moon.

Just watch what UNY does in the coming weeks along with Arbitrade and Cryptobontix. Get on board now else you too will become a sour grape like CryptoTraderGuy.

I love how you didn't refute any of the red flags I brought up in my past posts about Cryptobonix in your lame flamer post. Very revealing. Also, when did stating facts become FUD? I guess reality is warped in your mommy's basement where you live. Of course you didn't read my last posts to see if I have any valid points because you're a typical gullible shill who thinks that just because he thinks this coin's price will skyrocket it will. Reality check. For all you kids on here that think this coin is going to hit $25 you obviously know nothing about market cap. Even with a coin reduction down to 3 billion coins, at $25 per coin, the market cap of this coin would have to reach 75 billion. Not quite.

By the way, I have no affiliation with the original team of this crap token. Sorry to break it to you, little buddy, but I have never had any skin in the game when it comes to this token.

I do not need to address the red flags. You do not know what the facts are. You make many assumptions. Sure I can say that some of what you say has some truth to it. Also...I do know you have no coins. My comment earlier about you having prior connections to them has nothing to do with you having any coins. I am referring to the past things BEFORE the coin ever came out. You know EXACTLY what I am talking about. You can play it off in here like you don't know what I am talking about, but you do. Most in here won't understand, but I am not talking to them. I am talking to you.

Your facts are skewed, and they lack details that you have no clue about. Do you know what market cap is? Apparently not. Market cap can be $10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 and that means nothing. Market cap = number of coins X current price of coin. That number has NO BEARING on reality. Even the BTC market cap is fictional. Not every BTC can be sold for the market price. So your ignorance is truly showing. You have had a past affiliation with certain people involved with this coin and you are out to burn them and cause problems. Please keep your rants up and your insults. It provides many of us in here with laughable entertainment. You will soon be eating your words and all will know that you have ulterior motives. It is amazing to me that someone like yourself would spend so much time in here writing post after post unless you had an axe to grind. There are endless scams out there and countless forums and I don't see you blasting those scams. This one is personal to you because it pisses you off that the people you are targeting are actually succeeding. Again, you are known, and the affiliation I speak of has nothing to do with these coins. So go ahead, keep on pretending that you are just someone on the outside playing the "scam" card. You spend quite the effort and I have also analyzed your speech patterns and textual use to 100% verify your identity.

Sure there are inconsistencies with the white papers, sure the address is funny, not denying these things at all. What I am saying is that this is all preliminary and the reality of this will be made very clear in the near future. Still time to get in cheap while this coin is low. You and your FUD and ignorant facts cannot stop what is coming. So please continuing to make a fool of yourself in here.

No response you give to my remarks has any merit on the truth. The truth is you have an agenda to tear down and destroy. Go get a life.

CryptoTraderGuy

newbie

Activity: 70

Merit: 0

Quote from: Zerotosixty on February 13, 2018, 10:07:04 PM

I've read the last several pages of this forum and I'm surprised no one has questioned the following:

The White Paper says that until they can earn enough money mining crypto to buy enough physical gold to back each token with $1 worth of gold, they will back the tokens with gold in the ground, by making deals with mining companies that control a sufficient quantity of proven reserves (gold in the ground). This is ridiculous.

There is only one reason that located underground gold is still underground -- it takes a great deal of money to get it, to mine it. Sure, there's value to the mining rights of proven gold reserves, but that value is the price of gold minus all mining costs (uncertain until totalled up after mining). Profit margins are typically slim. And by the way, many proven reserves will remain underground indefinitely, too costly to mine unless the price of gold increases a bit, or enormously, depending.

Bottom line, taking a lease on proven gold reserves isn't going to get anyone anywhere close to backing hundreds of millions or three billion "UNY" or "DID" tokens at $1 of worth of gold per token. This will become apparent when the froth subsides and there's a normal state of price discovery.

Unfortunately, your wasting your energy typing what you just typed because these fools will read it and come up with some lame excuse to refute what you just stated, which by the way, is a very valid point. I thought that sounded a little strange when I read that myself. But, hey, it doesn't matter because "to the moon, guys!". Right, UNY shills? Roll Eyes

BTW, I bet Cryptobonix is going to try and convince everyone that they have palladium reserves in the ground somewhere, too, even though palladium is one of the rarest metals on earth, about 15 times more rare than platinum and 30 times more rare than gold.

Qtrez

sr. member

Activity: 588

Merit: 250

Quote from: ?? on ??

i will be watching and perhaps participating with anticipation and interest of this project Wink

i think it will feel the loss later if you delay as you do
participants must be confident about the project and wholeheartedly contribute to the success of the project
developers and project teams also don't want make participants are disappoint

danishcheese

newbie

Activity: 237

Merit: 0

Quote from: crypto.classroom on February 13, 2018, 10:09:08 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: CryptoTraderGuy on February 13, 2018, 03:15:34 PM

Quote from: danishcheese on February 13, 2018, 11:40:27 AM

You keep saying that , can you post a screed shot ? Is it 9.4 billion ? Or 94% of the circulating supply? 188million ? Because there seems to be more than 16 million trading on livecoin , there are 4 pairs on live coin and btc pair had like 20m for sale yesterday 16m now ltc has 500,000 eth has 2m usd has 500,000 and it's on another exchange and there are the 110 wallets noted ... so 94% of what how many are in that wallet ?

Just go to this link and look at the first wallet: https://etherscan.io/token/0x1a986F1659e11E2AE7CC6543F307bAE5cDe1C761#balances

That person holds 94% of all UNY tokens which is 9,490,297,144.08 UNY tokens. Anyone with that large a share of a token can easily manipulate the price, especially after the supply is reduced from 10 billion to to 3 billion. I'm not saying they will, I'm just saying they can. It's called a whale. Notice that the second wallet holds 4% of all UNY tokens and then everyone else holds less than 1%. This is exactly what the developer of E-Coin did over the last week. He holds 98% of all e-coins so he just sold and bought his own coins a ton of times on the markets which drove the price from $6.23 to $215 in a matter of hours. People started buying up e-coins after the price was already up exponentially and then the dev sold all his e-coins back to himself and the price plummeted and he made a killing while most of the other buyers got creamed. That's how a pump and dump works with some of these coins.

what are you not understanding about what you are saying it looking at ? You are seeing the boards wallet , THAT CONTSINS ALL THE TOKENS THAT ARE NOT IN CIRCULATION. GO LOOK AT APPL OR IBM , I'm not sure if you are fu%#ing with people here or really don't understand so I'm responding even tho you're being kinda mean to folks but if you don't know what you're seeing that can be frustrating, along with expecting the dev to be more transparent, that's also frustrating.. these tokens are not being mined right ? Therr are no pools no opportunity to mine uny, they have been mined and are acting as a stock pretty much even to the extent of getting registered as a asset like that" so they say" ... so the tokens are all here now. Every company registers their stock to be listed on the nyse or dax or wherever , they state the full amount & they state the circulating supply . With stocks that is referred to as the FLOAT the market cap of a company is the FLOAT X the share price... they also register shares that will one day be added to the float , these are listed as restricted & they include bonuses that will either be given if a certain benchmark is achieved or just yearly to the CEO and such . Just because Apple holds all these extra shares doesn't mean they can just do whatever with them , they are not in play . But that is one thing that company's can do, issue extra shares thru a vote and dilute their stock to raise money for all sorts of reasons .. you are seeing the boards wallet with everything in it , the 2.8 billion that you can consider RESTRICTED and the 7 billion that will be burned this week at some point . Coin market cap has the " float " at 202 million and there are obviously many people who are keeping them off the exchanges 110 YOU SAY , look at what is for sale on live , less than 30m last I looked , and then people have coins in livecoin wallet ,that should be the next biggest wallet on that list . I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHEN OR HOW THE OTHER 2.8B come into play and if anyone knows fill me in . But it does not seem like they are in play now. This looks like it is trading exactly as 202mill tokens should be , as in we see about 25-30% on live coin up for sale ... the only thing that wallet is doing is holding coins , of which 70% will be burnt. You haven't seen that # change have you ? This is structured a little diff than most cryptos & look at what you said , you just posted that the wallet hold 9.49 billion coins . There are only 10 billion . Then you say this " whale" will really be able to manipulate things if the reduce to 3 billion tokens? Now think ......... hmmm I guess that whale is going to be really upset because he is going to get all his coins burnt ? No because there is no whale , you are looking at the boards wallet Sad

and like I said the next wallet doesn't have 4% ITS the livecoin wallet and it has a big chunk of the 202million that make up the circulating supply ...

Brother this guy is a nut. A crack case. Probably smokes crack too..

there is no reason ever to have to respond to this ass...

He is only subverting anything he can and for whatever reason it does not matter.

Does not matter what you say or what I say or what anybody says about anything
this guy thinks he is the gatekeeper of all thoughts so he may subvert anything said if he wishes..!

His only goal is to make everything as negative as his idiotic brain may muster and he is not even very convincing.

This man CryptoTraderGuy has probably never traded anything especially Crypto in his entire life!

No reason to respond the Great Jerkoff (CryptoTraderGuy) or anything this ass has to say..

Yeah idk , I was going to pm him that note . I know I'm wasting my time but I'm board as fudge ... he actually posted 9.4bill lol and then said the whale can really manipulate things if the supply is limited to 3bill? And thinks that is someone's wallet ? I know I'm a idiot for responding but I fell for it out of totall lack of entertainment .

Zerotosixty

newbie

Activity: 30

Merit: 0

Quote from: P-UNIT on February 13, 2018, 10:23:45 PM

Quote from: Zerotosixty on February 13, 2018, 10:07:04 PM

I've read the last several pages of this forum and I'm surprised no one has questioned the following:

The White Paper says that until they can earn enough money mining crypto to buy enough physical gold to back each token with $1 worth of gold, they will back the tokens with gold in the ground, by making deals with mining companies that control a sufficient quantity of proven reserves (gold in the ground). This is ridiculous.

There is only one reason that located underground gold is still underground -- it takes a great deal of money to get it, to mine it. Sure, there's value to the mining rights of proven gold reserves, but that value is the price of gold minus all mining costs (uncertain until totalled up after mining). Profit margins are typically slim. And by the way, many proven reserves will remain underground indefinitely, too costly to mine unless the price of gold increases a bit, or enormously, depending.

Bottom line, taking a lease on proven gold reserves isn't going to get anyone anywhere close to backing hundreds of millions or three billion "UNY" or "DID" tokens at $1 of worth of gold per token. This will become apparent when the froth subsides and there's a normal state of price discovery.

This is a very interesting point. Hopefully we will get more detailed information from the updated whitepaper after the swap. What else do you know about mining precious metals? Such as silver, platinum and palladium. Does the same concept apply to these other metals too? 3 additional tokens are supposed to be released backed by these metals after the swap, you think there is a mining advantage with the other metals? You mention that if the price were to increase it would make more financial sense to mine it. Any guess on approx. %? a bit to enormous is a big and vague range.

Never mind about gold that's too expensive to mine. Ramping up from discovery to production typically takes two or three years, and then production usually grows in stages. Because mining is so expensive and time horizons long, there exist exploration-only companies who sell their interests in finds to production companies. Such a sale price is probably never more than maybe 5% of what the proven reserves will eventually be worth when unearthed and extracted; still, that 5% will be good money to the explorer and ideally will more than make up for their unsuccessful projects. (These deals aren't calculated by percentage; I'm just using what might be an end result of all considered factors.) So... my point was that UNY or DIG cannot honestly state that gold (or platinum, or silver, or any mineral) in the ground represents the price of gold at market. The White Paper actually says that every DIG token will from the start have $1 worth of gold backing it. I'm saying that if they're going by proven and probable reserves they've secured, that it's more like 5 cents worth of gold backing each token, because gold in the hand is worth 20x, or 30x (whatever) than gold in the ground.

P-UNIT

newbie

Activity: 23

Merit: 0

Quote from: Zerotosixty on February 13, 2018, 10:07:04 PM

I've read the last several pages of this forum and I'm surprised no one has questioned the following:

The White Paper says that until they can earn enough money mining crypto to buy enough physical gold to back each token with $1 worth of gold, they will back the tokens with gold in the ground, by making deals with mining companies that control a sufficient quantity of proven reserves (gold in the ground). This is ridiculous.

There is only one reason that located underground gold is still underground -- it takes a great deal of money to get it, to mine it. Sure, there's value to the mining rights of proven gold reserves, but that value is the price of gold minus all mining costs (uncertain until totalled up after mining). Profit margins are typically slim. And by the way, many proven reserves will remain underground indefinitely, too costly to mine unless the price of gold increases a bit, or enormously, depending.

Bottom line, taking a lease on proven gold reserves isn't going to get anyone anywhere close to backing hundreds of millions or three billion "UNY" or "DID" tokens at $1 of worth of gold per token. This will become apparent when the froth subsides and there's a normal state of price discovery.

This is a very interesting point. Hopefully we will get more detailed information from the updated whitepaper after the swap. What else do you know about mining precious metals? Such as silver, platinum and palladium. Does the same concept apply to these other metals too? 3 additional tokens are supposed to be released backed by these metals after the swap, you think there is a mining advantage with the other metals? You mention that if the price were to increase it would make more financial sense to mine it. Any guess on approx. %? a bit to enormous is a big and vague range.

P-UNIT

newbie

Activity: 23

Merit: 0

Quote from: cryptolovett on February 13, 2018, 10:09:26 PM

Quote from: P-UNIT on February 13, 2018, 08:18:27 PM

Does anyone have a c-cex account? I'm curious to know why there has always been such a huge discrepancy between livecoin and c-cex. Noticed low volume but higher than average through the rise but consistent since the start of the rise. to note* the volume for UNY has been ridiculous the past 5 days. If this keeps up top 100 here we come!

I am trying to get a C-CEX account surely someone would sell one, the Arbitrage between livecoin and C-cex is massive!

I don't know if that would be a good idea. Read on forums about withdrawals getting lost or taking longer than expected between c-cex and livecoin. Also Livecoin is doing a auto 1:1 swap to dig and advised to transfer any UNY back into Livecoin for the swap. Don't know if c-cex is following suit. Wouldn't risk it, just my opinion.

cryptolovett

newbie

Activity: 39

Merit: 0

Quote from: P-UNIT on February 13, 2018, 08:18:27 PM

Does anyone have a c-cex account? I'm curious to know why there has always been such a huge discrepancy between livecoin and c-cex. Noticed low volume but higher than average through the rise but consistent since the start of the rise. to note* the volume for UNY has been ridiculous the past 5 days. If this keeps up top 100 here we come!

I am trying to get a C-CEX account surely someone would sell one, the Arbitrage between livecoin and C-cex is massive!

crypto.classroom

newbie

Activity: 79

Merit: 0

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: CryptoTraderGuy on February 13, 2018, 03:15:34 PM

Quote from: danishcheese on February 13, 2018, 11:40:27 AM

You keep saying that , can you post a screed shot ? Is it 9.4 billion ? Or 94% of the circulating supply? 188million ? Because there seems to be more than 16 million trading on livecoin , there are 4 pairs on live coin and btc pair had like 20m for sale yesterday 16m now ltc has 500,000 eth has 2m usd has 500,000 and it's on another exchange and there are the 110 wallets noted ... so 94% of what how many are in that wallet ?

Just go to this link and look at the first wallet: https://etherscan.io/token/0x1a986F1659e11E2AE7CC6543F307bAE5cDe1C761#balances

That person holds 94% of all UNY tokens which is 9,490,297,144.08 UNY tokens. Anyone with that large a share of a token can easily manipulate the price, especially after the supply is reduced from 10 billion to to 3 billion. I'm not saying they will, I'm just saying they can. It's called a whale. Notice that the second wallet holds 4% of all UNY tokens and then everyone else holds less than 1%. This is exactly what the developer of E-Coin did over the last week. He holds 98% of all e-coins so he just sold and bought his own coins a ton of times on the markets which drove the price from $6.23 to $215 in a matter of hours. People started buying up e-coins after the price was already up exponentially and then the dev sold all his e-coins back to himself and the price plummeted and he made a killing while most of the other buyers got creamed. That's how a pump and dump works with some of these coins.

what are you not understanding about what you are saying it looking at ? You are seeing the boards wallet , THAT CONTSINS ALL THE TOKENS THAT ARE NOT IN CIRCULATION. GO LOOK AT APPL OR IBM , I'm not sure if you are fu%#ing with people here or really don't understand so I'm responding even tho you're being kinda mean to folks but if you don't know what you're seeing that can be frustrating, along with expecting the dev to be more transparent, that's also frustrating.. these tokens are not being mined right ? Therr are no pools no opportunity to mine uny, they have been mined and are acting as a stock pretty much even to the extent of getting registered as a asset like that" so they say" ... so the tokens are all here now. Every company registers their stock to be listed on the nyse or dax or wherever , they state the full amount & they state the circulating supply . With stocks that is referred to as the FLOAT the market cap of a company is the FLOAT X the share price... they also register shares that will one day be added to the float , these are listed as restricted & they include bonuses that will either be given if a certain benchmark is achieved or just yearly to the CEO and such . Just because Apple holds all these extra shares doesn't mean they can just do whatever with them , they are not in play . But that is one thing that company's can do, issue extra shares thru a vote and dilute their stock to raise money for all sorts of reasons .. you are seeing the boards wallet with everything in it , the 2.8 billion that you can consider RESTRICTED and the 7 billion that will be burned this week at some point . Coin market cap has the " float " at 202 million and there are obviously many people who are keeping them off the exchanges 110 YOU SAY , look at what is for sale on live , less than 30m last I looked , and then people have coins in livecoin wallet ,that should be the next biggest wallet on that list . I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHEN OR HOW THE OTHER 2.8B come into play and if anyone knows fill me in . But it does not seem like they are in play now. This looks like it is trading exactly as 202mill tokens should be , as in we see about 25-30% on live coin up for sale ... the only thing that wallet is doing is holding coins , of which 70% will be burnt. You haven't seen that # change have you ? This is structured a little diff than most cryptos & look at what you said , you just posted that the wallet hold 9.49 billion coins . There are only 10 billion . Then you say this " whale" will really be able to manipulate things if the reduce to 3 billion tokens? Now think ......... hmmm I guess that whale is going to be really upset because he is going to get all his coins burnt ? No because there is no whale , you are looking at the boards wallet Sad

and like I said the next wallet doesn't have 4% ITS the livecoin wallet and it has a big chunk of the 202million that make up the circulating supply ...

Brother this guy is a nut. A crack case. Probably smokes crack too..

there is no reason ever to have to respond to this ass...

He is only subverting anything he can and for whatever reason it does not matter.

Does not matter what you say or what I say or what anybody says about anything
this guy thinks he is the gatekeeper of all thoughts so he may subvert anything said if he wishes..!

His only goal is to make everything as negative as his idiotic brain may muster and he is not even very convincing.

This man CryptoTraderGuy has probably never traded anything especially Crypto in his entire life!

No reason to respond the Great Jerkoff (CryptoTraderGuy) or anything this ass has to say..

Zerotosixty

newbie

Activity: 30

Merit: 0

I've read the last several pages of this forum and I'm surprised no one has questioned the following:

The White Paper says that until they can earn enough money mining crypto to buy enough physical gold to back each token with $1 worth of gold, they will back the tokens with gold in the ground, by making deals with mining companies that control a sufficient quantity of proven reserves (gold in the ground). This is ridiculous.

There is only one reason that located underground gold is still underground -- it takes a great deal of money to get it, to mine it. Sure, there's value to the mining rights of proven gold reserves, but that value is the price of gold minus all mining costs (uncertain until totalled up after mining). Profit margins are typically slim. And by the way, many proven reserves will remain underground indefinitely, too costly to mine unless the price of gold increases a bit, or enormously, depending.

Bottom line, taking a lease on proven gold reserves isn't going to get anyone anywhere close to backing hundreds of millions or three billion "UNY" or "DID" tokens at $1 of worth of gold per token. This will become apparent when the froth subsides and there's a normal state of price discovery.

P-UNIT

newbie

Activity: 23

Merit: 0

Does anyone have a c-cex account? I'm curious to know why there has always been such a huge discrepancy between livecoin and c-cex. Noticed low volume but higher than average through the rise but consistent since the start of the rise. to note* the volume for UNY has been ridiculous the past 5 days. If this keeps up top 100 here we come!

nmaru

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: cryptobolix on February 13, 2018, 05:34:36 PM

I've got 2 cents I want to throw into this discussion. First off, yes this is a brand new account. Just because I'm using a brand new account doesn't mean I don't know anything nor does it mean I'm a newb. So let's just get that out of the way now.

This CryptoTraderGuy......it's so apparent to all that he is disgruntled. His agenda is to spread FUD on UNY, DIG, Arbitrade, Crytpobontics, etc. Probably because instead of buying in at $0.0025 or lower he chose to begin a FUD agenda to try to stop this. It's also apparent that CryproTraderGuy has former ties to whomever is running UNY. I'm calling you out onto the red carpet. Why don't you reveal who you are? I know who you are. So do many others. You are pissed off and won't let go of the past, your past. What CryptoTraderGuy is doing is based on a personal vendetta. He wants to see the destruction of certain people and their related projects. What is hilarious to me is that he has absolutely NO IDEA what is really going on.

So go ahead, keep on your FUDing around. You ain't stopping anything. Too bad your ego has gotten in the way of making some great profits off of UNY.

UNY>>DIG is going to the moon.

Just watch what UNY does in the coming weeks along with Arbitrade and Cryptobontix. Get on board now else you too will become a sour grape like CryptoTraderGuy.

How do you know who this guy is?

CryptoTraderGuy

newbie

Activity: 70

Merit: 0

Quote from: nmaru on February 13, 2018, 05:57:01 PM

I will say that CryptoTraderGuy did do a good job digging with the address, but I think that in this unregulated space one needs to look into more than just one variable. You can fool anyone with a fancy white paper and nice looking website.

Thank you. But, isn't a "fancy white paper and nice looking website" all Cryptobonix has right now? Actually they don't even have the nice website because it's not finished yet. They only have a fancy whitepaper, which I admit, is more than a lot of crypto coin projects have. At least you're willing to admit that the seemingly bogus address is a red flag.

CryptoTraderGuy

newbie

Activity: 70

Merit: 0

Quote from: cryptobolix on February 13, 2018, 05:34:36 PM

I've got 2 cents I want to throw into this discussion. First off, yes this is a brand new account. Just because I'm using a brand new account doesn't mean I don't know anything nor does it mean I'm a newb. So let's just get that out of the way now.

This CryptoTraderGuy......it's so apparent to all that he is disgruntled. His agenda is to spread FUD on UNY, DIG, Arbitrade, Crytpobontics, etc. Probably because instead of buying in at $0.0025 or lower he chose to begin a FUD agenda to try to stop this. It's also apparent that CryproTraderGuy has former ties to whomever is running UNY. I'm calling you out onto the red carpet. Why don't you reveal who you are? I know who you are. So do many others. You are pissed off and won't let go of the past, your past. What CryptoTraderGuy is doing is based on a personal vendetta. He wants to see the destruction of certain people and their related projects. What is hilarious to me is that he has absolutely NO IDEA what is really going on.

So go ahead, keep on your FUDing around. You ain't stopping anything. Too bad your ego has gotten in the way of making some great profits off of UNY.

UNY>>DIG is going to the moon.

Just watch what UNY does in the coming weeks along with Arbitrade and Cryptobontix. Get on board now else you too will become a sour grape like CryptoTraderGuy.

I love how you didn't refute any of the red flags I brought up in my past posts about Cryptobonix in your lame flamer post. Very revealing. Also, when did stating facts become FUD? I guess reality is warped in your mommy's basement where you live. Of course you didn't read my last posts to see if I have any valid points because you're a typical gullible shill who thinks that just because he thinks this coin's price will skyrocket it will. Reality check. For all you kids on here that think this coin is going to hit $25 you obviously know nothing about market cap. Even with a coin reduction down to 3 billion coins, at $25 per coin, the market cap of this coin would have to reach 75 billion. Not quite.

By the way, I have no affiliation with the original team of this crap token. Sorry to break it to you, little buddy, but I have never had any skin in the game when it comes to this token.

P-UNIT

newbie

Activity: 23

Merit: 0

Quote from: nmaru on February 13, 2018, 05:57:01 PM

I will say that CryptoTraderGuy did do a good job digging with the address, but I think that in this unregulated space one needs to look into more than just one variable. You can fool anyone with a fancy white paper and nice looking website.

Agreed, he is skeptical and has every right to be. There are alot of questions that need to be answered. But the thing is this idea is phenomenal. Too good to be true phenomenal. Yet as I try to stay level headed I have faith because of the potential growth and research. You miss 100% of the shots you don't take! Invest only what you can afford to lose!!

PLEASE UPDATE WHEN YOUR UNY SWAPS TO DIG!

nmaru

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

I will say that CryptoTraderGuy did do a good job digging with the address, but I think that in this unregulated space one needs to look into more than just one variable. You can fool anyone with a fancy white paper and nice looking website.

nmaru

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: crypto.classroom on February 13, 2018, 05:13:12 PM

Quote from: P-UNIT on February 13, 2018, 04:55:05 PM

Quote from: CryptoTraderGuy on February 13, 2018, 04:25:50 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Really happy with this coin. The members of the board are in fact some of the creme of Wall street. Fortune 50 execs.. I know for a fact their names would not be on this endeavour if it were not something they regard as serious business. We have a lot of questions of course but these guys obviously don`t even care about us or anybody's opinion about this coin or they would be in here. What I surmise from all that is after the changeover to DIG and other announcements are made as is referred to on the Crypotobintix site there will be no way to ever get in the coin again for under a dollar.

Whatever anybody has to say there is going to be some huge money made by those who intelligently ignore the negative crap being thrown in our faces. Anybody wants to say anything about anything and some idiot thinks he owns this page and we got to go through him before we make our opinions. He is really a troll of the worst sort (CryptoTraderGuy) and should be banned from this thread as his obvious only intention is to be a thorn in the side of this coin launch for whatever reason.

It is plain to see the potential. These are real fortune 50 execs on the Arbitrade whitepaper..

Leonard Schutzman
NonExecutive Chairman
Len Schutzman joined Arbitrade as Senior Advisor and Non-Executive
Chairman of the Board in July 2017. He retired from PepsiCo in 2011, after
serving as part of the company’s leadership team for more than thirty
years. He served as Senior Vice President & Treasurer of PepsiCo, where he
directed global financing, tax strategies and Mergers & Acquisitions. Len
also held positions as Chief Financial Officer of Pepsi Cola International,
Frito Lay, and Taco Bell.
Mr. Schutzman earned a BA degree in Accounting from Queens College, an
MBA from the University of Rochester, and is a CPA.

Dr. Timothy J. McGarvey
Director
Dr. McGarvey currently runs his own physical and electronic training
operation in London. On the electronic side, he built a cutting-edge
electronic trading platform for futures (with a focus on commodities)
which he calls Agora and he co-develops AI-mediated event-driven, price-
based, and fundamentals-based trading signals. On the physical trading
side, he sets up trades involving crude oil, jet fuel, LPG, ULSD, and marine
fuels primarily and has strategic partners in the USA, Europe, the Middle
East, and Asia and is engaged by Koch Industries in this regard. Previously,
he managed the nuclear operations of a nuclear submarine, was a natural
gas and electricity trader at EGL-UK and worked at Lehman Brothers with a
mortgage portfolio. Dr. McGarvey earned a BS degree in Engineering at the
US Naval Academy, a PhD in Physics at the California Institute of
Technology, and a Masters in Human Psychology and Philosophy of Mind at
the University of Toronto.

John F. MacNeil
Director
Mr. MacNeil is currently Managing Director at ACI Projects, LLC, where he
consults and partners on cross-border business development in
technology and renewable energy industries. He has held senior positions
as Portfolio Manager & Senior Analyst at Schroder Investment
Management North America Inc., Equity Strategist at Salomon Smith
Barney Inc., and Investment Strategist at Paine Webber Inc.
Mr. MacNeil earned a BS degree in Computer Science and Engineering
from the University of Connecticut and an MBA from the Columbia
School of Business.

Daniel F. Sweet
Director
Daniel Sweet has more than a decade of experience as Chief Compliance
Officer and Series 24 Principal responsible for overseeing trading ADR’s
and currencies for major Wall Street firms. During that period, he has held
positions as Managing Director & Principal – Head Equity Trader at BGC
Partners, and Series 24 Principal at both Direct Access Partners and Walter
J. Dowd. He currently serves as an Executive Consultant in the Finance
arena. Mr. Sweet earned a BS degree in finance from the California State
University.

Charles H. Woodworth
Director
Charles Woodworth has spent his entire 45 year career in the Financial
Services sector, as builder of successful enterprises over a broad spectrum
of the industry. Beginning in 1972, Charles built successful businesses for
major firms including a Life TPA (The Fulenwider Organization, Denver,
CO), two national scale branch offices (Smith Barney and Harris Upham,
New York), a general securities subsidiary (Lincoln Trust Securities, Lincoln
Trust Co., Denver, CO), CEO of Trust Company of America, Boulder, CO, two
top producing specialty sales teams (Kidder Peabody & Co. and
Montgomery Securities, and as an investor in and key advisor to two
private equity / merchant banking boutiques, SCG Madison Company, LLC.
and WhitePaper Capital Partners, LLC.
Charles is a graduate of Dartmouth College and attended The National
Law Center at George Washington University and The University of
Colorado Business School.

I am in and holding and good luck to all of you because I don`t see a lot of coins coming available to buy in on. People will be holding unless they see some quick bucks from trading and due to the nature of this launch you will have to entice them a bit more than is usual with your Bitcoin if you want in..

Okay. I stand corrected. Thank you for posting the names of the board. I downloaded the Arbitrade whitepaper myself and I do have some legit questions, and I'm not just trolling here.

I'm curious why the whitepaper says that Len Shutzman worked for PepsiCo for 30 years, but if you go to his Linkedin profile, he shows that he stopped working for them in 1995 and started his own consultancy firm. What's up with that?

Everyone else's bio on the whitepaper seems to match their Linkedin profile.

Don't know, maybe he consulted them once he started his own company? I'm not very concerned with that detail. The thing is a good idea is nothing if there's nobody to execute it. The team is imperative to the potential success of the token. Right now there are no announcements of the new board for cryptobontix. There are strong assumptions that some of the members of arbitrade will sit on the board for cryptobontix. However it isn't confirmed. But once it's all confirmed and in writing. how much do you think a dig token will be by then?

Definitely will be a dollar at least and not a penny lower. Thing is being that the innate value of this coin cannot go below a dollar since it will be backed by a dollar in gold it is likley to go as high as the markets demand of such a unique prospect. I expect much higher than a dollar. Ten at least and maybe 25 dollars a coin depending on the strength of what we have not heard about yet.

Cant wait till the coin changeover is through!

The reason they cannot disclose anything is due to the legality of the situation. The scope of their project requires countries and regulatory bodies that actually have rules governing them compared to simply starting an ICO. I believe we will get an updated white paper and announcements on the board of supervisors after the coin burn and rebrand which will happen anytime from now to the 20th. The white paper makes it clear that the token value will be backed by the equivalent of $1 gold bullion - but it can be traded higher since they will continuously be purchasing more mining rigs, thus increasing the price exponentially.

cryptobolix

newbie

Activity: 14

Merit: 0

I've got 2 cents I want to throw into this discussion. First off, yes this is a brand new account. Just because I'm using a brand new account doesn't mean I don't know anything nor does it mean I'm a newb. So let's just get that out of the way now.

This CryptoTraderGuy......it's so apparent to all that he is disgruntled. His agenda is to spread FUD on UNY, DIG, Arbitrade, Crytpobontics, etc. Probably because instead of buying in at $0.0025 or lower he chose to begin a FUD agenda to try to stop this. It's also apparent that CryproTraderGuy has former ties to whomever is running UNY. I'm calling you out onto the red carpet. Why don't you reveal who you are? I know who you are. So do many others. You are pissed off and won't let go of the past, your past. What CryptoTraderGuy is doing is based on a personal vendetta. He wants to see the destruction of certain people and their related projects. What is hilarious to me is that he has absolutely NO IDEA what is really going on.

So go ahead, keep on your FUDing around. You ain't stopping anything. Too bad your ego has gotten in the way of making some great profits off of UNY.

UNY>>DIG is going to the moon.

Just watch what UNY does in the coming weeks along with Arbitrade and Cryptobontix. Get on board now else you too will become a sour grape like CryptoTraderGuy.

crypto.classroom

newbie

Activity: 79

Merit: 0

Quote from: P-UNIT on February 13, 2018, 04:55:05 PM

Quote from: CryptoTraderGuy on February 13, 2018, 04:25:50 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Really happy with this coin. The members of the board are in fact some of the creme of Wall street. Fortune 50 execs.. I know for a fact their names would not be on this endeavour if it were not something they regard as serious business. We have a lot of questions of course but these guys obviously don`t even care about us or anybody's opinion about this coin or they would be in here. What I surmise from all that is after the changeover to DIG and other announcements are made as is referred to on the Crypotobintix site there will be no way to ever get in the coin again for under a dollar.

Whatever anybody has to say there is going to be some huge money made by those who intelligently ignore the negative crap being thrown in our faces. Anybody wants to say anything about anything and some idiot thinks he owns this page and we got to go through him before we make our opinions. He is really a troll of the worst sort (CryptoTraderGuy) and should be banned from this thread as his obvious only intention is to be a thorn in the side of this coin launch for whatever reason.

It is plain to see the potential. These are real fortune 50 execs on the Arbitrade whitepaper..

Leonard Schutzman
NonExecutive Chairman
Len Schutzman joined Arbitrade as Senior Advisor and Non-Executive
Chairman of the Board in July 2017. He retired from PepsiCo in 2011, after
serving as part of the company’s leadership team for more than thirty
years. He served as Senior Vice President & Treasurer of PepsiCo, where he
directed global financing, tax strategies and Mergers & Acquisitions. Len
also held positions as Chief Financial Officer of Pepsi Cola International,
Frito Lay, and Taco Bell.
Mr. Schutzman earned a BA degree in Accounting from Queens College, an
MBA from the University of Rochester, and is a CPA.

Dr. Timothy J. McGarvey
Director
Dr. McGarvey currently runs his own physical and electronic training
operation in London. On the electronic side, he built a cutting-edge
electronic trading platform for futures (with a focus on commodities)
which he calls Agora and he co-develops AI-mediated event-driven, price-
based, and fundamentals-based trading signals. On the physical trading
side, he sets up trades involving crude oil, jet fuel, LPG, ULSD, and marine
fuels primarily and has strategic partners in the USA, Europe, the Middle
East, and Asia and is engaged by Koch Industries in this regard. Previously,
he managed the nuclear operations of a nuclear submarine, was a natural
gas and electricity trader at EGL-UK and worked at Lehman Brothers with a
mortgage portfolio. Dr. McGarvey earned a BS degree in Engineering at the
US Naval Academy, a PhD in Physics at the California Institute of
Technology, and a Masters in Human Psychology and Philosophy of Mind at
the University of Toronto.

John F. MacNeil
Director
Mr. MacNeil is currently Managing Director at ACI Projects, LLC, where he
consults and partners on cross-border business development in
technology and renewable energy industries. He has held senior positions
as Portfolio Manager & Senior Analyst at Schroder Investment
Management North America Inc., Equity Strategist at Salomon Smith
Barney Inc., and Investment Strategist at Paine Webber Inc.
Mr. MacNeil earned a BS degree in Computer Science and Engineering
from the University of Connecticut and an MBA from the Columbia
School of Business.

Daniel F. Sweet
Director
Daniel Sweet has more than a decade of experience as Chief Compliance
Officer and Series 24 Principal responsible for overseeing trading ADR’s
and currencies for major Wall Street firms. During that period, he has held
positions as Managing Director & Principal – Head Equity Trader at BGC
Partners, and Series 24 Principal at both Direct Access Partners and Walter
J. Dowd. He currently serves as an Executive Consultant in the Finance
arena. Mr. Sweet earned a BS degree in finance from the California State
University.

Charles H. Woodworth
Director
Charles Woodworth has spent his entire 45 year career in the Financial
Services sector, as builder of successful enterprises over a broad spectrum
of the industry. Beginning in 1972, Charles built successful businesses for
major firms including a Life TPA (The Fulenwider Organization, Denver,
CO), two national scale branch offices (Smith Barney and Harris Upham,
New York), a general securities subsidiary (Lincoln Trust Securities, Lincoln
Trust Co., Denver, CO), CEO of Trust Company of America, Boulder, CO, two
top producing specialty sales teams (Kidder Peabody & Co. and
Montgomery Securities, and as an investor in and key advisor to two
private equity / merchant banking boutiques, SCG Madison Company, LLC.
and WhitePaper Capital Partners, LLC.
Charles is a graduate of Dartmouth College and attended The National
Law Center at George Washington University and The University of
Colorado Business School.

I am in and holding and good luck to all of you because I don`t see a lot of coins coming available to buy in on. People will be holding unless they see some quick bucks from trading and due to the nature of this launch you will have to entice them a bit more than is usual with your Bitcoin if you want in..

Okay. I stand corrected. Thank you for posting the names of the board. I downloaded the Arbitrade whitepaper myself and I do have some legit questions, and I'm not just trolling here.

I'm curious why the whitepaper says that Len Shutzman worked for PepsiCo for 30 years, but if you go to his Linkedin profile, he shows that he stopped working for them in 1995 and started his own consultancy firm. What's up with that?

Everyone else's bio on the whitepaper seems to match their Linkedin profile.

Don't know, maybe he consulted them once he started his own company? I'm not very concerned with that detail. The thing is a good idea is nothing if there's nobody to execute it. The team is imperative to the potential success of the token. Right now there are no announcements of the new board for cryptobontix. There are strong assumptions that some of the members of arbitrade will sit on the board for cryptobontix. However it isn't confirmed. But once it's all confirmed and in writing. how much do you think a dig token will be by then?

Definitely will be a dollar at least and not a penny lower. Thing is being that the innate value of this coin cannot go below a dollar since it will be backed by a dollar in gold it is likley to go as high as the markets demand of such a unique prospect. I expect much higher than a dollar. Ten at least and maybe 25 dollars a coin is possible depending on the strength of what we have not heard about yet. Having a decentralized exchange along with the coins too could mean a company with a potential in the 10`s of billions in this market that cannot be shut down by governments afraid of the competition..

Cant wait till the coin changeover is through!

Topic: [ANN] DIGNITY (DIG) Official Page - Formerly Unity Ingot - page 36. (Read 47997 times)