"Fair" would be to roll back everything to block 386228, wouldn't you say? That would be best for the community at large by rewarding everyone who was troubleshooting for the good of all, wouldn't it?
everyone had his chance to mine noone got any advantage
after like 30 mined blocks the wallet was posted for everyone to be used
a few minutes later diff did raise and show people where joining the mining
if someone cant set up solomine
if someone have no access to a windows pc
if someones wallet crashed more that the other ones
is that unfair?
what did others gain
what he lost?
if u didnt mine diamonds last few weeks and months
when diamond difficulty was low as hell
should we rollback because u lost something?
if u didnt mine last day where difficulty was very high after a short time already
should we rollback?
what u expect from a rollback?
easy diamonds from beeing one of the first miner?
diamond is not that kind of coin
after restart network it needed like 3 blocks until diff was adjusted to be at 1 dmd per minute there was no unfair fast mining
the mining rewards will stay for sure at least 1 1/2 years at the same 1 dmd each block until 1500000 total coins reached
that i call fair
network stay running in current blockchain
i post a crashfixed wallet in a few minutes
ui glitch (white mouseovers) isnt fixed will follow in later wallet
for now stability wallet release is more important that wait a lot more hours
as announced by pit_DMD linux wallet and source and some support to compile own linux wallets will follow
I'm surprised by that response.
First, because my suggestion was so far fetched to begin with such that a smiley face would have been enough to put it down (and any implementation would have been truly revolutionary from the community ethic standpoint).
Second, because no-one would have even thought to include anything outside of this specific launch period in their counter-argument (what does anything about whether someone mined or not prior to block 386228 have to do with it? what does anything about the future have to do with it? we're talking about a specific period of time where only the selfish have benefited).
Third, because, at the end of the day, it is a response that ultimately defends (albeit poorly argued with irrelevant arguments) the position of the selfish miner who did not think of the community, and it ignores those who put the community first (think about it, who would benefit from your logic if such a revolutionary idea were indeed to be seriously contemplated? the selfish miner or the community contributor? - again, during this period of time from block 386228 to now, or whenever we do get the DMD network up and running)
None of that is to say that those are/were your intentions, but a very serious inference can be taken from your words.
As I said, I'm very surprised by that reply. It's very out of character for you.
And it's just not true that everyone had his chance to mine and that none got any advantage. To say that suggests a complete disconnect with the reality behind the current issue and situation.
the other wallet worked for a few hours. 
