--telemetry=0.0.0.0:42000
It can not work
Topic: [ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.6.2 (Linux / Windows) - page 134. (Read 224961 times)
October 24, 2017, 11:14:22 AM
October 24, 2017, 10:56:39 AM
October 24, 2017, 10:46:16 AM
is there any --log command? don't find on first page
October 24, 2017, 09:39:52 AM
Hi.
Tried out your miner. It is, in fact, about 10% faster than EWBF. However, it has a nasty bug that forced me to go back to EWBF.
I mine ZEC on nanopool, recently they've had some service disruptions. So, if pool drops connection, EWBF simply tries to reconnect and succeeds finally, while dstm's ZM miner goes into "0 connection closed by server - reconnecting..." infinite loop, scrolling text very fast and never actually resumes mining.
Using Linux version under Ubuntu 16.04 LTS.
Thanks!
Tried out your miner. It is, in fact, about 10% faster than EWBF. However, it has a nasty bug that forced me to go back to EWBF.
I mine ZEC on nanopool, recently they've had some service disruptions. So, if pool drops connection, EWBF simply tries to reconnect and succeeds finally, while dstm's ZM miner goes into "0 connection closed by server - reconnecting..." infinite loop, scrolling text very fast and never actually resumes mining.
Using Linux version under Ubuntu 16.04 LTS.
Thanks!
Hi,
I got the same problem with suprnova pool. I am using 0.5.2 on windows.
Infinite loop.
I just looked if I can had a list of pools but it seems impossible...
Could you pls post the suprnava server and port you're using, I'll test the current dev branch against it.
October 24, 2017, 09:29:22 AM
Hi.
Tried out your miner. It is, in fact, about 10% faster than EWBF. However, it has a nasty bug that forced me to go back to EWBF.
I mine ZEC on nanopool, recently they've had some service disruptions. So, if pool drops connection, EWBF simply tries to reconnect and succeeds finally, while dstm's ZM miner goes into "0 connection closed by server - reconnecting..." infinite loop, scrolling text very fast and never actually resumes mining.
Using Linux version under Ubuntu 16.04 LTS.
Thanks!
Tried out your miner. It is, in fact, about 10% faster than EWBF. However, it has a nasty bug that forced me to go back to EWBF.
I mine ZEC on nanopool, recently they've had some service disruptions. So, if pool drops connection, EWBF simply tries to reconnect and succeeds finally, while dstm's ZM miner goes into "0 connection closed by server - reconnecting..." infinite loop, scrolling text very fast and never actually resumes mining.
Using Linux version under Ubuntu 16.04 LTS.
Thanks!
Hi,
I got the same problem with suprnova pool. I am using 0.5.2 on windows.
Infinite loop.
I just looked if I can had a list of pools but it seems impossible...
October 24, 2017, 09:13:15 AM
Hi.
Tried out your miner. It is, in fact, about 10% faster than EWBF. However, it has a nasty bug that forced me to go back to EWBF.
I mine ZEC on nanopool, recently they've had some service disruptions. So, if pool drops connection, EWBF simply tries to reconnect and succeeds finally, while dstm's ZM miner goes into "0 connection closed by server - reconnecting..." infinite loop, scrolling text very fast and never actually resumes mining.
Using Linux version under Ubuntu 16.04 LTS.
Thanks!
Tried out your miner. It is, in fact, about 10% faster than EWBF. However, it has a nasty bug that forced me to go back to EWBF.
I mine ZEC on nanopool, recently they've had some service disruptions. So, if pool drops connection, EWBF simply tries to reconnect and succeeds finally, while dstm's ZM miner goes into "0 connection closed by server - reconnecting..." infinite loop, scrolling text very fast and never actually resumes mining.
Using Linux version under Ubuntu 16.04 LTS.
Thanks!
Thx for reporting, this is a know bug, NameTaken had similar issues.
It will be fixed in the next release - this path is unlikely to hit, zm 0.5.2 should reconnect properly in almost all cases.
October 24, 2017, 08:42:13 AM
Hi.
Tried out your miner. It is, in fact, about 10% faster than EWBF. However, it has a nasty bug that forced me to go back to EWBF.
I mine ZEC on nanopool, recently they've had some service disruptions. So, if pool drops connection, EWBF simply tries to reconnect and succeeds finally, while dstm's ZM miner goes into "0 connection closed by server - reconnecting..." infinite loop, scrolling text very fast and never actually resumes mining.
Using Linux version under Ubuntu 16.04 LTS.
Thanks!
Tried out your miner. It is, in fact, about 10% faster than EWBF. However, it has a nasty bug that forced me to go back to EWBF.
I mine ZEC on nanopool, recently they've had some service disruptions. So, if pool drops connection, EWBF simply tries to reconnect and succeeds finally, while dstm's ZM miner goes into "0 connection closed by server - reconnecting..." infinite loop, scrolling text very fast and never actually resumes mining.
Using Linux version under Ubuntu 16.04 LTS.
Thanks!
October 24, 2017, 06:43:11 AM
Whats the speed on 1060?
October 23, 2017, 07:16:23 PM
Pretty good performance here with 4x 1080Ti in 16x PCIe slots:
October 23, 2017, 04:55:41 PM
I have problems when i try miner with HUSH on pool.miningspeed.com with my 1070 rigs.
When i start the miner it says [20, "invalid solution XX"] as XX is number between 28-32.
Funny thing is that it works great on suprnova when i try it there.
Maybe its something with the pool config or its the miner, but i want to report it anyway.
When i start the miner it says [20, "invalid solution XX"] as XX is number between 28-32.
Funny thing is that it works great on suprnova when i try it there.
Maybe its something with the pool config or its the miner, but i want to report it anyway.
Same problem here with ZEN on miningspeed.com
October 23, 2017, 03:49:14 PM
The latest version on Lin:
Code:
$ ./zcash-zm.sh
./zm: /usr/lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0: no version information available (required by ./zm)
./zm: /usr/lib64/libssl.so.1.0.0: no version information available (required by ./zm)
Could not resolve hostname eu1.zcash-flypool.org
There is no dns entry for 'eu1.zcash-flypool.org'
Try 'eu1-zcash.flypool.org'
It works now.
Compared to EWFB, your Linux version outputs about 10 sols more on my single 1060 3Gb.
Thanks!
October 23, 2017, 03:40:58 PM
so has this become the Best and most stable miner for 1080 ti as well or just some for earlier versions ?..
It's good, probably better than EWBF besides stability because that's something that comes and goes at this stage. But dstm is working on it which is good. 
October 23, 2017, 03:29:55 PM
so has this become the Best and most stable miner for 1080 ti as well or just some for earlier versions ?..
October 23, 2017, 03:29:44 PM
Is it possible for next version get more from 1080ti?
Did you check that you are not cpu bound?
Also try using an 1080Ti on a 16x pcie-bus.
October 23, 2017, 03:27:57 PM
Hi there, is there a way to turn off 1 card when miner is working, or some cmd option to run only specific cards?
Tnx.
Tnx.
Yes, you can use the "--list-devices" option the get available devices and the '--dev' option to select them.
To get help just lauch zm.exe without any parameters.
October 23, 2017, 03:09:48 PM
Giving this a try. Even 5 or 6% improvement helps.
October 23, 2017, 02:19:16 PM
Hi there, is there a way to turn off 1 card when miner is working, or some cmd option to run only specific cards?
Tnx.
Tnx.
October 23, 2017, 01:38:54 PM
Well I'm sold on this miner, 3 days and very stable once I got my 'clocks adjusted and right.
Would love to see this as an available miner on SimpleMining OS
Can you share your core - mem settings? Thanks
October 23, 2017, 01:22:27 PM
Well I'm sold on this miner, 3 days and very stable once I got my 'clocks adjusted and right.
Would love to see this as an available miner on SimpleMining OS
Jump to: