[ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.6.2 (Linux / Windows) - page 98.

baga105

sr. member

Activity: 362

Merit: 250

So is this better than Ewbf for Zec mining?

lolmining

newbie

Activity: 15

Merit: 0

Code:

#  GPU1  server set difficulty to: 000787878780000000000000...
GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 769.8  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 770.9  I/s: 412.4  Sh: 5.21   0.99 110
>  GPU1  54C  Sol/s: 772.0  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 769.5  I/s: 412.1  Sh: 4.91   1.00 94
>  GPU2  54C  Sol/s: 765.0  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 771.9  I/s: 412.7  Sh: 5.41   1.00 125
>  GPU3  51C  Sol/s: 761.7  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 765.0  I/s: 410.2  Sh: 5.65   1.00 109
#  GPU0  server set difficulty to: 000f0f0f0f00000000000000...
>  GPU4  59C  Sol/s: 791.0  Sol/W: 3.01  Avg: 794.9  I/s: 425.8  Sh: 5.38   0.98 98
========== Sol/s: 3859.5 Sol/W: 3.21  Avg: 3872.1 I/s: 2073.2 Sh: 26.56  0.99 107
#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
#  GPU1  server set difficulty to: 000787878780000000000000...
#  GPU2  server set difficulty to: 000787878780000000000000...
#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
>  GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 765.2  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 770.8  I/s: 412.4  Sh: 5.32   0.97 94
>  GPU1  54C  Sol/s: 772.7  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 769.5  I/s: 412.1  Sh: 4.89   1.00 94
#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
>  GPU2  54C  Sol/s: 769.1  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 771.8  I/s: 413.1  Sh: 5.45   1.00 99
>  GPU3  51C  Sol/s: 774.0  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 765.1  I/s: 410.2  Sh: 5.62   1.00 110
>  GPU4  59C  Sol/s: 805.8  Sol/W: 3.01  Avg: 795.0  I/s: 425.8  Sh: 5.39   0.98 101
========== Sol/s: 3886.8 Sol/W: 3.21  Avg: 3872.2 I/s: 2073.6 Sh: 26.67  0.99 99
#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 756.6  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 770.6  I/s: 411.8  Sh: 5.40   0.96 85
GPU1  54C  Sol/s: 777.7  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 769.6  I/s: 411.5  Sh: 4.87   1.00 93
GPU2  54C  Sol/s: 771.4  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 771.8  I/s: 411.8  Sh: 5.46   1.00 93
GPU3  51C  Sol/s: 762.1  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 765.1  I/s: 408.9  Sh: 5.62   1.00 101
GPU4  59C  Sol/s: 802.3  Sol/W: 3.01  Avg: 795.1  I/s: 424.9  Sh: 5.36   0.98 109
========== Sol/s: 3870.1 Sol/W: 3.21  Avg: 3872.2 I/s: 2068.9 Sh: 26.70  0.99 96
#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 771.9  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 770.7  I/s: 412.4  Sh: 5.40   0.96 94
GPU1  54C  Sol/s: 771.7  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 769.7  I/s: 412.1  Sh: 4.84   1.00 109
GPU2  54C  Sol/s: 776.8  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 771.9  I/s: 412.8  Sh: 5.47   1.00 109
>  GPU3  51C  Sol/s: 755.8  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 765.0  I/s: 410.2  Sh: 5.63   1.00 109
>  GPU4  59C  Sol/s: 797.6  Sol/W: 3.01  Avg: 795.1  I/s: 425.5  Sh: 5.33   0.98 93
========== Sol/s: 3873.8 Sol/W: 3.21  Avg: 3872.2 I/s: 2073.0 Sh: 26.67  0.99 102
#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 771.3  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 770.7  I/s: 412.4  Sh: 5.44   0.95 109
GPU1  54C  Sol/s: 773.0  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 769.7  I/s: 411.8  Sh: 4.82   1.00 109
GPU2  54C  Sol/s: 783.0  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 772.0  I/s: 413.1  Sh: 5.57   1.00 88
>  GPU3  51C  Sol/s: 774.8  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 765.1  I/s: 409.6  Sh: 5.60   1.00 78
>  GPU4  59C  Sol/s: 796.3  Sol/W: 3.01  Avg: 795.1  I/s: 426.2  Sh: 5.31   0.98 110
========== Sol/s: 3898.4 Sol/W: 3.21  Avg: 3872.5 I/s: 2073.0 Sh: 26.74  0.99 98
#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 768.4  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 770.6  I/s: 411.5  Sh: 5.48   0.94 86
GPU1  54C  Sol/s: 769.5  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 769.7  I/s: 410.8  Sh: 4.81   1.00 94
GPU2  54C  Sol/s: 771.3  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 772.0  I/s: 411.8  Sh: 5.60   1.00 89
#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
GPU3  51C  Sol/s: 767.8  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 765.1  I/s: 408.6  Sh: 5.60   1.00 110
GPU4  59C  Sol/s: 789.2  Sol/W: 3.01  Avg: 795.0  I/s: 424.6  Sh: 5.25   0.98 110
========== Sol/s: 3866.2 Sol/W: 3.21  Avg: 3872.5 I/s: 2067.2 Sh: 26.74  0.98 97
#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 776.9  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 770.7  I/s: 412.8  Sh: 5.58   0.92 109
GPU1  54C  Sol/s: 774.4  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 769.7  I/s: 412.1  Sh: 4.82   1.00 101
GPU2  54C  Sol/s: 777.9  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 772.1  I/s: 412.8  Sh: 5.54   1.00 89
#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
>  GPU3  51C  Sol/s: 765.9  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 765.1  I/s: 410.2  Sh: 5.57   1.00 94
>  GPU4  60C  Sol/s: 797.5  Sol/W: 3.01  Avg: 795.1  I/s: 426.2  Sh: 5.23   0.98 110
========== Sol/s: 3892.5 Sol/W: 3.21  Avg: 3872.7 I/s: 2074.0 Sh: 26.74  0.98 100
GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 773.4  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 770.7  I/s: 412.1  Sh: 5.68   0.92 97
GPU1  54C  Sol/s: 768.1  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 769.7  I/s: 411.8  Sh: 4.83   1.00 78
GPU2  54C  Sol/s: 772.1  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 772.1  I/s: 413.0  Sh: 5.58   1.00 88
>  GPU3  51C  Sol/s: 765.2  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 765.1  I/s: 409.9  Sh: 5.58   1.00 86
>  GPU4  59C  Sol/s: 790.9  Sol/W: 3.01  Avg: 795.0  I/s: 425.8  Sh: 5.20   0.98 78
========== Sol/s: 3869.8 Sol/W: 3.21  Avg: 3872.6 I/s: 2072.7 Sh: 26.87  0.98 85
GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 769.1  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 770.7  I/s: 412.4  Sh: 5.68   0.92 78
#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
GPU1  54C  Sol/s: 774.9  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 769.8  I/s: 412.1  Sh: 4.78   1.00 78
GPU2  54C  Sol/s: 768.0  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 772.0  I/s: 412.7  Sh: 5.52   1.00 88
GPU3  50C  Sol/s: 763.2  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 765.1  I/s: 409.9  Sh: 5.55   1.00 94
GPU4  59C  Sol/s: 798.4  Sol/W: 3.01  Avg: 795.1  I/s: 424.6  Sh: 5.15   0.98 78
========== Sol/s: 3873.7 Sol/W: 3.21  Avg: 3872.6 I/s: 2071.7 Sh: 26.68  0.98 83
GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 764.8  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 770.7  I/s: 411.5  Sh: 5.65   0.91 94

# GPU0 rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]

whats that?

cTnko

member

Activity: 85

Merit: 10

@dstm Is there any reason why the process wouldn't exit on its own under such condition?

lolmining

newbie

Activity: 15

Merit: 0

Small, 2.6% improvement over EWBF.

Code:

   GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 773.2  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 767.5  I/s: 411.1  Sh: 5.37   1.00 104 ++
   GPU2  53C  Sol/s: 761.2  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 770.4  I/s: 412.8  Sh: 5.34   1.00 105 +
   GPU1  54C  Sol/s: 775.9  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 769.0  I/s: 411.8  Sh: 6.73   1.00 94  +
>  GPU3  51C  Sol/s: 763.2  Sol/W: 3.23  Avg: 762.8  I/s: 408.9  Sh: 7.12   1.00 95  +++
>  GPU4  58C  Sol/s: 715.0  Sol/W: 3.01  Avg: 794.3  I/s: 384.9  Sh: 7.15   1.00 82
   ========== Sol/s: 3788.6 Sol/W: 3.20  Avg: 3863.9 I/s: 2029.5 Sh: 31.72  1.00 96
>  GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 754.5  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 767.4  I/s: 410.2  Sh: 5.36   1.00 93  +
>  GPU2  53C  Sol/s: 774.4  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 770.4  I/s: 412.1  Sh: 5.36   1.00 99  +++
>  GPU1  54C  Sol/s: 767.6  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 769.0  I/s: 410.8  Sh: 6.72   1.00 109 +
   GPU3  52C  Sol/s: 759.5  Sol/W: 3.23  Avg: 762.8  I/s: 408.3  Sh: 7.13   1.00 103 +++
   GPU4  59C  Sol/s: 788.9  Sol/W: 3.01  Avg: 794.2  I/s: 424.2  Sh: 7.16   1.00 104 +++
   ========== Sol/s: 3844.9 Sol/W: 3.20  Avg: 3863.8 I/s: 2065.7 Sh: 31.72  1.00 101
>  GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 769.4  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 767.4  I/s: 410.8  Sh: 5.33   1.00 93
>  GPU2  53C  Sol/s: 767.3  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 770.4  I/s: 412.8  Sh: 5.36   1.00 94  ++
>  GPU1  54C  Sol/s: 772.1  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 769.0  I/s: 411.5  Sh: 6.70   1.00 110 +
>  GPU3  52C  Sol/s: 760.5  Sol/W: 3.23  Avg: 762.7  I/s: 408.9  Sh: 7.11   1.00 93  +
>  GPU4  59C  Sol/s: 807.5  Sol/W: 3.01  Avg: 794.3  I/s: 425.6  Sh: 7.14   1.00 94  +
   ========== Sol/s: 3876.8 Sol/W: 3.20  Avg: 3863.9 I/s: 2069.6 Sh: 31.64  1.00 96
   GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 752.8  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 767.4  I/s: 411.2  Sh: 5.32   1.00 94  +
   GPU2  53C  Sol/s: 770.6  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 770.4  I/s: 412.8  Sh: 5.39   1.00 101 ++++
   GPU1  54C  Sol/s: 767.0  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 769.0  I/s: 411.2  Sh: 6.69   1.00 102 ++
>  GPU3  52C  Sol/s: 755.2  Sol/W: 3.23  Avg: 762.7  I/s: 408.6  Sh: 7.12   1.00 96  +++
>  GPU4  59C  Sol/s: 796.0  Sol/W: 3.01  Avg: 794.3  I/s: 425.5  Sh: 7.19   1.00 90  ++++++
   ========== Sol/s: 3841.6 Sol/W: 3.20  Avg: 3863.8 I/s: 2069.3 Sh: 31.72  1.00 96

abudfv2008

full member

Activity: 728

Merit: 106

Quote from: Atexor on November 28, 2017, 01:22:16 PM

I was observing that thread since 0.3x version and your miner looks interesting.

Today finally I tested it. Unfortunately I noticed that I've a bit lower hashrate than on EWBF. ~520-525 vs 530-550 Sol/s. I've GTX 1080.

Temperatures and power use is similar (68C and 165-170W). 85% TDP. Memory +200mhz.
I set vcore to +80mhz. On EWBF maximum was +60mhz (it crashed even on 65mhz after 24h). I'm not testing your miner long time but looks more stable. On EWBF +80mhz gets me fast crash.

I hope that you will be able to increase performance for GTX 1080 too because as opposed to gtx 1060 and 1080ti, currently EWBF looks more efficient for me.

Also to my mind you could use some colors to make it more transparent to read and ability to run on background (--quiet/--background?). Thanks for your job

PS. Sol/W is great option. I'll be able to better OC my card with it.

----------
edit:
crash after 3-4 hours. I'll try with +75mhz..
---------

Quote

GPU0 67C Sol/s: 518.7 Sol/W: 3.13 Avg: 525.1 I/s: 280.5 Sh: 7.76 1.00 47 ++
   GPU0 68C Sol/s: 516.0 Sol/W: 3.13 Avg: 523.6 I/s: 280.3 Sh: 7.46 1.00 47 ++
# GPU0 server set difficulty to: 000a0a0a0a0a0a0a0a0a0a0a...
> GPU0 67C Sol/s: 503.6 Sol/W: 3.14 Avg: 520.7 I/s: 269.7 Sh: 7.67 1.00 46 +++
   GPU0 68C Sol/s: 525.4 Sol/W: 3.14 Avg: 521.3 I/s: 280.4 Sh: 6.71 1.00 46
   GPU0 68C Sol/s: 531.0 Sol/W: 3.14 Avg: 522.4 I/s: 280.5 Sh: 5.97 1.00 46
   GPU0 68C Sol/s: 526.5 Sol/W: 3.14 Avg: 522.8 I/s: 280.5 Sh: 6.57 1.00 39 ++++
   GPU0 67C Sol/s: 523.7 Sol/W: 3.14 Avg: 522.9 I/s: 280.4 Sh: 6.24 1.00 63 +
   GPU0 67C Sol/s: 524.0 Sol/W: 3.14 Avg: 523.0 I/s: 280.4 Sh: 5.72 1.00 63
> GPU0 68C Sol/s: 523.5 Sol/W: 3.14 Avg: 523.0 I/s: 280.4 Sh: 5.74 1.00 70 ++
   GPU0 68C Sol/s: 524.8 Sol/W: 3.13 Avg: 523.1 I/s: 280.5 Sh: 5.76 1.00 46 ++
   GPU0 68C Sol/s: 525.2 Sol/W: 3.13 Avg: 523.3 I/s: 280.3 Sh: 5.77 1.00 47 ++
   GPU0 68C Sol/s: 523.8 Sol/W: 3.13 Avg: 523.3 I/s: 280.4 Sh: 5.41 1.00 47
   GPU0 68C Sol/s: 524.0 Sol/W: 3.13 Avg: 523.4 I/s: 280.4 Sh: 5.44 1.00 55 ++
   GPU0 68C Sol/s: 529.8 Sol/W: 3.13 Avg: 523.7 I/s: 280.5 Sh: 5.64 1.00 57 +++
> GPU0 68C Sol/s: 523.8 Sol/W: 3.13 Avg: 523.7 I/s: 280.6 Sh: 5.34 1.00 57
   GPU0 68C Sol/s: 521.7 Sol/W: 3.13 Avg: 523.6 I/s: 280.3 Sh: 5.23 1.00 47 +
   GPU0 68C Sol/s: 525.1 Sol/W: 3.13 Avg: 523.7 I/s: 280.3 Sh: 5.26 1.00 46 ++
   GPU0 68C Sol/s: 519.0 Sol/W: 3.13 Avg: 523.5 I/s: 280.4 Sh: 5.02 1.00 46
   GPU0 68C Sol/s: 521.1 Sol/W: 3.13 Avg: 523.4 I/s: 280.5 Sh: 4.93 1.00 63 +
   GPU0 68C Sol/s: 523.9 Sol/W: 3.13 Avg: 523.4 I/s: 282.1 Sh: 5.23 1.00 47 ++++

Agree with some space for improvements with 1080. But for me dsmt is slighlty faster. (maybe because with the same settings GPU is running on higher frequency)

crazydane

full member

Activity: 558

Merit: 194

Quote from: dstm on November 29, 2017, 04:59:53 AM

Quote from: yurganov on November 28, 2017, 04:41:34 AM

Hi. Thx for the miner.

Small suggestion about API: can you please add GPU model to JSON-RPC responce? Thx!

This was requested already. It seems like this information isn't available on linux. It's on my notes, I'll take a closer look at it later.

You should be able to do something like this to at least get the vendor added:

Code:

#!/bin/bash

DEVICE_IDS=$(nvidia-smi --query-gpu=pci.sub_device_id --format=csv,noheader,nounits)
i=0

for ID in $DEVICE_IDS
do
   VENDOR_ID=${ID:6:5}
   
   # GPU Query, 3842=EVGA, 1462=MSI, 10DE=Nvidia, 19DA=Zotac, 807D=Asus, 1458=Gigabyte
   case $VENDOR_ID in
      3842) VENDOR_ID="EVGA";;
      1462) VENDOR_ID="MSI";;
      10DE) VENDOR_ID="NVIDIA";;
      19DA) VENDOR_ID="ZOTAC";;
      807D) VENDOR_ID="ASUS";;
      1458) VENDOR_ID="GIGABYTE";;
   esac
   
   MODEL=$(nvidia-smi -i $i --query-gpu=name --format=csv,noheader,nounits | tail -1)
   
   echo "$i,$VENDOR_ID,$MODEL"
   
   i=$(($i + 1))
done

k3rt

newbie

Activity: 18

Merit: 0

Quote from: shibob on November 29, 2017, 11:20:00 AM

So I think for most of us, we use MSI Afterburner or EVGA Precision XOC.

What if I have a plain Ubuntu without the GUI? Just a terminal Cheesy

Since I want to control everything via SSH, without any GUI.

shibob

full member

Activity: 672

Merit: 154

Blockchain Evangelist.

Quote from: k3rt on November 29, 2017, 11:12:32 AM

I am currently reading through all 73 pages of this thread. Does ZM have some tools for overclocking or do you all use some other tools (xorg.conf)?

Wow, you are so eager for learning. I dont think ZM integrates any overclocking function or tool.
So I think for most of us, we use MSI Afterburner or EVGA Precision XOC.

k3rt

newbie

Activity: 18

Merit: 0

I am currently reading through all 73 pages of this thread. Does ZM have some tools for overclocking or do you all use some other tools (xorg.conf)?

akuci

full member

Activity: 226

Merit: 100

You need to add some space betwen 2 groups of readings, like 2 line space in between after the total hash, and the first gpu stats in the next readout. I really have trouble to read the information from the miner quickly.
Also some colors will be nice. Temps green, yellow and red like in EWBF.

Some things to add also: fan precentage readout, power readout in W (in miner window, not in telemetry).

dstm

full member

Activity: 350

Merit: 126

Quote from: pilalove on November 28, 2017, 08:41:41 PM

Quote from: shubaduba on November 28, 2017, 05:27:23 AM

Quote from: pilalove on November 28, 2017, 05:22:19 AM

Dear envelopment team dstm ZM
Could you help me fix error follow this picture,
I cant mine ZM

............
Sever set difficulty to : .....

Any my PC lagging, need to be restart

Provide more information about your hardware and software
Launch config?

I take a pict faile when mining via ZM "I'm using Mikrotik router board".
It is ok when i used another modem "not mikrotik"
Can you help me fix this problem

Thanks - Pila

https://uphinhnhanh.com/images/2017/11/29/dstmfailse.png

There something wrong with the router, it sometimes even fails to resolve the dns name, sry can't help - you have to check what's going wrong on the router side.

dstm

full member

Activity: 350

Merit: 126

Quote from: r3lentleSs on November 28, 2017, 06:29:03 PM

I'm having issues with memory errors after 6 hours, is there a restart script i can use in my .bat ?

This might be helpful
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.25337530

dstm

full member

Activity: 350

Merit: 126

Quote from: Atexor on November 28, 2017, 01:22:16 PM

I was observing that thread since 0.3x version and your miner looks interesting.

Today finally I tested it. Unfortunately I noticed that I've a bit lower hashrate than on EWBF. ~520-525 vs 530-550 Sol/s. I've GTX 1080.

Temperatures and power use is similar (68C and 165-170W). 85% TDP. Memory +200mhz.
I set vcore to +80mhz. On EWBF maximum was +60mhz (it crashed even on 65mhz after 24h). I'm not testing your miner long time but looks more stable. On EWBF +80mhz gets me fast crash.

I hope that you will be able to increase performance for GTX 1080 too because as opposed to gtx 1060 and 1080ti, currently EWBF looks more efficient for me.

Also to my mind you could use some colors to make it more transparent to read and ability to run on background (--quiet/--background?). Thanks for your job

PS. Sol/W is great option. I'll be able to better OC my card with it.

----------
edit:
crash after 3-4 hours. I'll try with +75mhz..
---------

Quote

GPU0 67C Sol/s: 518.7 Sol/W: 3.13 Avg: 525.1 I/s: 280.5 Sh: 7.76 1.00 47 ++
   GPU0 68C Sol/s: 516.0 Sol/W: 3.13 Avg: 523.6 I/s: 280.3 Sh: 7.46 1.00 47 ++
# GPU0 server set difficulty to: 000a0a0a0a0a0a0a0a0a0a0a...
> GPU0 67C Sol/s: 503.6 Sol/W: 3.14 Avg: 520.7 I/s: 269.7 Sh: 7.67 1.00 46 +++
   GPU0 68C Sol/s: 525.4 Sol/W: 3.14 Avg: 521.3 I/s: 280.4 Sh: 6.71 1.00 46
   GPU0 68C Sol/s: 531.0 Sol/W: 3.14 Avg: 522.4 I/s: 280.5 Sh: 5.97 1.00 46
   GPU0 68C Sol/s: 526.5 Sol/W: 3.14 Avg: 522.8 I/s: 280.5 Sh: 6.57 1.00 39 ++++
   GPU0 67C Sol/s: 523.7 Sol/W: 3.14 Avg: 522.9 I/s: 280.4 Sh: 6.24 1.00 63 +
   GPU0 67C Sol/s: 524.0 Sol/W: 3.14 Avg: 523.0 I/s: 280.4 Sh: 5.72 1.00 63
> GPU0 68C Sol/s: 523.5 Sol/W: 3.14 Avg: 523.0 I/s: 280.4 Sh: 5.74 1.00 70 ++
   GPU0 68C Sol/s: 524.8 Sol/W: 3.13 Avg: 523.1 I/s: 280.5 Sh: 5.76 1.00 46 ++
   GPU0 68C Sol/s: 525.2 Sol/W: 3.13 Avg: 523.3 I/s: 280.3 Sh: 5.77 1.00 47 ++
   GPU0 68C Sol/s: 523.8 Sol/W: 3.13 Avg: 523.3 I/s: 280.4 Sh: 5.41 1.00 47
   GPU0 68C Sol/s: 524.0 Sol/W: 3.13 Avg: 523.4 I/s: 280.4 Sh: 5.44 1.00 55 ++
   GPU0 68C Sol/s: 529.8 Sol/W: 3.13 Avg: 523.7 I/s: 280.5 Sh: 5.64 1.00 57 +++
> GPU0 68C Sol/s: 523.8 Sol/W: 3.13 Avg: 523.7 I/s: 280.6 Sh: 5.34 1.00 57
   GPU0 68C Sol/s: 521.7 Sol/W: 3.13 Avg: 523.6 I/s: 280.3 Sh: 5.23 1.00 47 +
   GPU0 68C Sol/s: 525.1 Sol/W: 3.13 Avg: 523.7 I/s: 280.3 Sh: 5.26 1.00 46 ++
   GPU0 68C Sol/s: 519.0 Sol/W: 3.13 Avg: 523.5 I/s: 280.4 Sh: 5.02 1.00 46
   GPU0 68C Sol/s: 521.1 Sol/W: 3.13 Avg: 523.4 I/s: 280.5 Sh: 4.93 1.00 63 +
   GPU0 68C Sol/s: 523.9 Sol/W: 3.13 Avg: 523.4 I/s: 282.1 Sh: 5.23 1.00 47 ++++

Thx for the report.
Are you thinking about a unix daemon? This isn't available on windows, I don't want to diverge the versions without a good reason, I'll do ofc if there is one. If you're mainly interested in disabling the output you can redirect it to /dev/null or/and start it in your init system (e.g. using systemd).

What colors and where would improve readability?

dstm

full member

Activity: 350

Merit: 126

Quote from: yurganov on November 28, 2017, 04:41:34 AM

Hi. Thx for the miner.

Small suggestion about API: can you please add GPU model to JSON-RPC responce? Thx!

This was requested already. It seems like this information isn't available on linux. It's on my notes, I'll take a closer look at it later.

Biodom

legendary

Activity: 3892

Merit: 4331

Quote from: philipma1957 on November 28, 2017, 08:47:46 PM

does this mining software work for smos?

on linux

works on Ubuntu 16.04 and 14.04, which probably means that it would.
0.5.5 version crashed on my Nvidia rigs once in 2 days.
0.5.6 version did not crash yet (one day).
maybe it's just my setup, but cards seems to take their time to take (maybe a min or two), producing initiation stop message in the interim.
no biggie.

seems slightly faster than EWBF, but EWBF was working without a glitch for a month (or more) at the time.
I would give it a day or two and see.

philipma1957

legendary

Activity: 4256

Merit: 8551

'The right to privacy matters'

does this mining software work for smos?

on linux

pilalove

newbie

Activity: 16

Merit: 0

Quote from: shubaduba on November 28, 2017, 05:27:23 AM

Quote from: pilalove on November 28, 2017, 05:22:19 AM

Dear envelopment team dstm ZM
Could you help me fix error follow this picture,
I cant mine ZM

............
Sever set difficulty to : .....

Any my PC lagging, need to be restart

Provide more information about your hardware and software
Launch config?

I take a pict faile when mining via ZM "I'm using Mikrotik router board".
It is ok when i used another modem "not mikrotik"
Can you help me fix this problem

Thanks - Pila

https://uphinhnhanh.com/images/2017/11/29/dstmfailse.png

mountaintoy

newbie

Activity: 8

Merit: 0

Quote from: matovicv on November 28, 2017, 07:30:05 PM

Quote from: mountaintoy on November 28, 2017, 06:59:12 PM

Quote from: matovicv on November 28, 2017, 05:54:31 PM

Quote from: mountaintoy on November 27, 2017, 09:58:56 PM

The new version is working great after reworking my overclock. The oc I had been using with previous versions was causing the miner to crash. Reducing the oc managed to keep about the same rate while slightly increasing efficiency from about 3.3 Sol/W to about 3.5.

Code:

ID	DEVICE NAME		°C	∅ Sol/s		∅ Sol/W		∅ Watt
0	GeForce GTX 1070	55	498.70		3.53		141.56

Keep up the good work. Grin

What settings are you using and what card is it?

MSI Gaming X
+150 clock +610 mem 60% power

Efficiency is a little better at 60%, rate is closer to 510 Sol/s at 70% power.

What drivers are you using. My card is Gigabyte G1 and with this settings i get 470 sols max. Drivers 388.13.

Tnx

I'm using the same drivers. 388.13
Is it possible your card has a lower base speed?
Afterburner displays my memory as 4428MHz (+625) and GPU bounces around from 1848-1886MHz (+150) and voltage is around .889mV

mountaintoy

newbie

Activity: 8

Merit: 0

Quote from: m1n1ngP4d4w4n on November 28, 2017, 07:13:31 PM

Quote from: r3lentleSs on November 28, 2017, 06:29:03 PM

I'm having issues with memory errors after 6 hours, is there a restart script i can use in my .bat ?

Look at previous pages, there is alot of scripts examples.

Quote from: mountaintoy on November 28, 2017, 06:59:12 PM

Quote from: matovicv on November 28, 2017, 05:54:31 PM

Quote from: mountaintoy on November 27, 2017, 09:58:56 PM

The new version is working great after reworking my overclock. The oc I had been using with previous versions was causing the miner to crash. Reducing the oc managed to keep about the same rate while slightly increasing efficiency from about 3.3 Sol/W to about 3.5.

Code:

ID	DEVICE NAME		°C	∅ Sol/s		∅ Sol/W		∅ Watt
0	GeForce GTX 1070	55	498.70		3.53		141.56

Keep up the good work. Grin

What settings are you using and what card is it?

MSI Gaming X
+150 clock +610 mem 60% power

Efficiency is a little better at 60%, rate is closer to 510 Sol/s at 70% power.

3.53sols/w is pretty low tbh, except if you have great electricity price, my rigs have between 4.2 and 4.3s/w efficiency.

You're right, it's not the most efficient. You've definitely been working on efficiency more than I have. I can get to 3.9 s/w by dropping the clock speed and lowering the power a bit more, but electricity is pretty cheap here and I've been using it to heat the room it's in. I turn the power up when it gets cool and turn it down when it's warm unless I'm testing. Tongue

I'm only running a single card for now. When I pick up a few more cards heat and power consumption will be a bigger issue.

matovicv

newbie

Activity: 49

Merit: 0

Quote from: mountaintoy on November 28, 2017, 06:59:12 PM

Quote from: matovicv on November 28, 2017, 05:54:31 PM

Quote from: mountaintoy on November 27, 2017, 09:58:56 PM

The new version is working great after reworking my overclock. The oc I had been using with previous versions was causing the miner to crash. Reducing the oc managed to keep about the same rate while slightly increasing efficiency from about 3.3 Sol/W to about 3.5.

Code:

ID	DEVICE NAME		°C	∅ Sol/s		∅ Sol/W		∅ Watt
0	GeForce GTX 1070	55	498.70		3.53		141.56

Keep up the good work. Grin

What settings are you using and what card is it?

MSI Gaming X
+150 clock +610 mem 60% power

Efficiency is a little better at 60%, rate is closer to 510 Sol/s at 70% power.

What drivers are you using. My card is Gigabyte G1 and with this settings i get 470 sols max. Drivers 388.13.

Tnx

Topic: [ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.6.2 (Linux / Windows) - page 98. (Read 224961 times)