the live address of the website is http://www.the-node.net
i update on an offline version then push major changes to the site, i estimate i should have it up and running this weekend. its very scalable as well. will also do a specific sub page for each of the coins so you can link directly to them if scrolling. or something of this method if people would prefer to have it that way instead.
also plan on changing the loop animation when the next and previous buttons are pressed. i had someone else look at it and it made that person actually sick from the motion.
Topic: [ANN] ECC - page 93. (Read 259363 times)
didnt get much of a chance to work on the website today, will definitely have it done by friday night which is when i will upload a bunch of wallets and coin material in general so we can get this train rollin.
super was listed on some new exchanges, good to see that market coming back. MWC will also come back a lot when then website is done and ecc as well i hope.
super was listed on some new exchanges, good to see that market coming back. MWC will also come back a lot when then website is done and ecc as well i hope.
This looks pretty good so far. The hyperlinks could stand to lose the shadow box, but so far I appreciate the demo
working on the new webstie, its not live or done. but you can check progress using this link
http://37.60.234.146/~thenode7/
the animations are kinda working and i think it is too detailed and large scaled for a browser. i need to link the buttons to actual files i need to upload. the cycling is unlimited but doesnt reset in the range of items it shows. i need to clean up a lot of things in general. but im working on it.
http://37.60.234.146/~thenode7/
the animations are kinda working and i think it is too detailed and large scaled for a browser. i need to link the buttons to actual files i need to upload. the cycling is unlimited but doesnt reset in the range of items it shows. i need to clean up a lot of things in general. but im working on it.
is this coin still alive 
which exchange now?
which coin? which exchange now?is this coin still alive which exchange now?
which exchange now?Its on bittrex
https://bittrex.com/Market/Index?MarketName=BTC-MWC
You will note its a great price right now. Griffith is awesome and has been working on integration for some time now.
is this coin still alive which exchange now?
which exchange now?
site might take me a bit, trying to make it look good
i would also like to lol@ the fact that someone took cryptobank.com sometime between now and 48 hours ago
Actually , it looks like they have owned it since 2008.
But if they don't renew it on May 2nd, 2016 it will be up for grabs.
https://www.whois.net
Domain Name: CRYPTOBANK.COM
Registrar: EPIK, INC.
Sponsoring Registrar IANA ID: 617
Whois Server: whois.epik.com
Referral URL: http://epik.com
Name Server: NS1.ABOVE.COM
Name Server: NS2.ABOVE.COM
Status: clientTransferProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Updated Date: 23-apr-2015
Creation Date: 02-may-2008
Expiration Date: 02-may-2016
i believe that whois was a passing to a domain registration service, i checked 3 days ago on a webhosting query and the domain name was available, also yes i am doing a new name.com because of how i plan on continuing with the project
dont worry, i got a name i am happy with and can theme nicely
I can take the Twitter if you want to on me the info.
Good to see MWC rising again on Bittrex!
https://bittrex.com/Market/Index?MarketName=BTC-MWC
If anyone has serious interest then I will handover the MWC Twitter. PM me please.
Further if anyone wants to buy 1mill+ MWC for a good price, please let me know. I have at the moment less time for crypto world. If nobody want the coins then I will just hold them until the price is up again.
Cheers
https://bittrex.com/Market/Index?MarketName=BTC-MWC
If anyone has serious interest then I will handover the MWC Twitter. PM me please.
Further if anyone wants to buy 1mill+ MWC for a good price, please let me know. I have at the moment less time for crypto world. If nobody want the coins then I will just hold them until the price is up again.
Cheers
i would also like to lol@ the fact that someone took cryptobank.com sometime between now and 48 hours ago
Actually , it looks like they have owned it since 2008.
But if they don't renew it on May 2nd, 2016 it will be up for grabs.
https://www.whois.net
Domain Name: CRYPTOBANK.COM
Registrar: EPIK, INC.
Sponsoring Registrar IANA ID: 617
Whois Server: whois.epik.com
Referral URL: http://epik.com
Name Server: NS1.ABOVE.COM
Name Server: NS2.ABOVE.COM
Status: clientTransferProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Updated Date: 23-apr-2015
Creation Date: 02-may-2008
Expiration Date: 02-may-2016
If you wanted this domen why you not buy it before and now you can told only "lol."
And its popular combination words crypto + bank. Someone like your "cryptobank" words and took it first.
I saw before old www site with 3 coins I dont know you want make other new site with new name.com
And its popular combination words crypto + bank. Someone like your "cryptobank" words and took it first.
I saw before old www site with 3 coins I dont know you want make other new site with new name.com
i would also like to lol@ the fact that someone took cryptobank.com sometime between now and 48 hours ago
i am home and time to get some stuff done
Are there any pics of the gui to get a feels for what it roughly looks like?
to be honest right now it desnt look too much different from the checkpoint alpha in the op. i decided to delay until tomorrow so i can put in one more key feature before i start having people actually download it and start promoting it. also want to fix the gui up a bit cuz its complete shit right now
Are there any pics of the gui to get a feels for what it roughly looks like?
i am currently removing all the debug statements that spam the debug logs for the cryptobank application, once i get them all removed so all my extra things arent there and the wallet doesnt make 200 MB txt files after an hour i will post an update link. so probably tonight. you can send and recieve coins for all coin types fine, the only thing i am missing is that it doesnt prompt you for the fee when sending coins or tell you they couldnt be sent if you try to send more than you have. so i will need to add that. also i need to clean up the gui a bit because there is a lot of left over stuff atm. also there is no way to send to multiple people at the same time. so will add those things in.
i have finished the actual wallet code development itself. only making the gui show more information and adding features is left.
i have finished the actual wallet code development itself. only making the gui show more information and adding features is left.
Does developing three coins is a good idea? A single currency with good development would be better
Supercoin Pr Bitcointalk forum!
SUPERCOIN'S REVIVAL! -----> https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/supercoins-revival-1351548
Does developing three coins is a good idea? A single currency with good development would be better
possible reasons why the 4.0 wallet wont connect with as many peers as 3.1
-boost lib dep changed
-open ssl updated and a security issue causes less cons
-change with UPNP config which is a huge security issue anyway.
besides these three things there weren't any communication protocol changes / differences between the two wallets. im going to say the boost update has 0 reasons for it. the open ssl might actually leave issues open since the versions are both very old. the upnp config might have also had something to do with it. i noticed i had fixed something with it a while back but never compiled a new wallet as i didnt think it was that big of an issue. it might just be that big of an issue and i will recompile a new wallet tonight with the UPNP changes and test the config file that is posted.
if it is the UPNP config, then something needs to be addresses because someone found a larger security issue with UPNP in bitcoin a while back and those vulnerabilities might affect all of the coins here. i will be looking into the UPNP fix bitcoin did but if anyone has any additional information on that please let me know.
i will also be checking possible port collisions with popular software since i believe supercoin uses a IANA controlled registered port (will have to double check that though)
supercoin does not have any conflicting ports with other popular registered software
edit: if anyone has any desired features for supercoin. please feel free to request
Supercoin Pr Bitcointalk forum!-boost lib dep changed
-open ssl updated and a security issue causes less cons
-change with UPNP config which is a huge security issue anyway.
besides these three things there weren't any communication protocol changes / differences between the two wallets. im going to say the boost update has 0 reasons for it. the open ssl might actually leave issues open since the versions are both very old. the upnp config might have also had something to do with it. i noticed i had fixed something with it a while back but never compiled a new wallet as i didnt think it was that big of an issue. it might just be that big of an issue and i will recompile a new wallet tonight with the UPNP changes and test the config file that is posted.
if it is the UPNP config, then something needs to be addresses because someone found a larger security issue with UPNP in bitcoin a while back and those vulnerabilities might affect all of the coins here. i will be looking into the UPNP fix bitcoin did but if anyone has any additional information on that please let me know.
supercoin does not have any conflicting ports with other popular registered software
edit: if anyone has any desired features for supercoin. please feel free to request
SUPERCOIN'S REVIVAL! -----> https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/supercoins-revival-1351548
Supercoin Pr Bitcointalk forum!
SUPERCOIN'S REVIVAL! -----> https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/supercoins-revival-1351548
SUPERCOIN'S REVIVAL! -----> https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/supercoins-revival-1351548
SUPERCOIN'S REVIVAL! -----> https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/supercoins-revival-1351548
Does developing three coins is a good idea? A single currency with good development would be better
possible reasons why the 4.0 wallet wont connect with as many peers as 3.1
-boost lib dep changed
-open ssl updated and a security issue causes less cons
-change with UPNP config which is a huge security issue anyway.
besides these three things there weren't any communication protocol changes / differences between the two wallets. im going to say the boost update has 0 reasons for it. the open ssl might actually leave issues open since the versions are both very old. the upnp config might have also had something to do with it. i noticed i had fixed something with it a while back but never compiled a new wallet as i didnt think it was that big of an issue. it might just be that big of an issue and i will recompile a new wallet tonight with the UPNP changes and test the config file that is posted.
if it is the UPNP config, then something needs to be addresses because someone found a larger security issue with UPNP in bitcoin a while back and those vulnerabilities might affect all of the coins here. i will be looking into the UPNP fix bitcoin did but if anyone has any additional information on that please let me know.
i will also be checking possible port collisions with popular software since i believe supercoin uses a IANA controlled registered port (will have to double check that though)
supercoin does not have any conflicting ports with other popular registered software
edit: if anyone has any desired features for supercoin. please feel free to request
Supercoin Pr Bitcointalk forum!-boost lib dep changed
-open ssl updated and a security issue causes less cons
-change with UPNP config which is a huge security issue anyway.
besides these three things there weren't any communication protocol changes / differences between the two wallets. im going to say the boost update has 0 reasons for it. the open ssl might actually leave issues open since the versions are both very old. the upnp config might have also had something to do with it. i noticed i had fixed something with it a while back but never compiled a new wallet as i didnt think it was that big of an issue. it might just be that big of an issue and i will recompile a new wallet tonight with the UPNP changes and test the config file that is posted.
if it is the UPNP config, then something needs to be addresses because someone found a larger security issue with UPNP in bitcoin a while back and those vulnerabilities might affect all of the coins here. i will be looking into the UPNP fix bitcoin did but if anyone has any additional information on that please let me know.
supercoin does not have any conflicting ports with other popular registered software
edit: if anyone has any desired features for supercoin. please feel free to request
SUPERCOIN'S REVIVAL! -----> https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/supercoins-revival-1351548
Jump to: