Topic: ⚡[ANN]⚡ ▐░Espers [ESP]░▌▐░PoW/PoS░▌▐░HMQ1725 Algo░▌ ▐░New Features░▌ - page 96. (Read 924040 times)
October 24, 2017, 07:44:57 AM
Dev owns more than 10% of the total supply, get out before the final dump comes.
October 24, 2017, 07:33:41 AM
I advise all to dump this shit coin, core dev and his friends have been responsible for many pump and dump coins in the past with hidden premines that they don't disclose to investors. Core dev made this coin to manipulate and profit off investors he has over 2billion coins staking on the network constantly which is the reason why the staking system seems "broken" (because of unfair distribution) and why he does not release posw fix. He cannot write a white paper because the code is so similar to nova coin with hardly any of his own code. He is also constantly censoring anyone who speaks the truth about this by telling mods to mute them. Not just that, he also kicked out a team member called raudi that worked so hard for him by developing a new website because raudi wanted to find a second developer but core dev knew the second developer would uncover all his lies and manipulation. He runs the project purely centralized with every decision going through him. I am crypto detective, please never fall for scams such as this and always do your own research I have proof to back up every claim. Thank you, good night.
PoSW was OK last time i've checked!
If you know such amount of inside info why don't you come in here with something we don't know? Anyway waithing for the proof that back up every claim. Good night too, there in the land of trolls! October 24, 2017, 02:13:20 AM
I advise all to dump this shit coin, core dev and his friends have been responsible for many pump and dump coins in the past with hidden premines that they don't disclose to investors. Core dev made this coin to manipulate and profit off investors he has over 2billion coins staking on the network constantly which is the reason why the staking system seems "broken" (because of unfair distribution) and why he does not release posw fix. He cannot write a white paper because the code is so similar to nova coin with hardly any of his own code. He is also constantly censoring anyone who speaks the truth about this by telling mods to mute them. Not just that, he also kicked out a team member called raudi that worked so hard for him by developing a new website because raudi wanted to find a second developer but core dev knew the second developer would uncover all his lies and manipulation. He runs the project purely centralized with every decision going through him. I am crypto detective, please never fall for scams such as this and always do your own research I have proof to back up every claim. Thank you, good night.
Right! Brand new account just registered today just to make one post! Looks very legitimate..!
Are you trying to buy in cheap?
October 24, 2017, 12:25:12 AM
Anyone has Node list that we need to ADD to config file?
Try adding these:
seednode=198.50.180.192
addnode=198.50.180.192
and here is a link to nodelist: https://stats.espers.io/download/addnodes.txt
October 24, 2017, 12:20:26 AM
I advise all to dump this shit coin, core dev and his friends have been responsible for many pump and dump coins in the past with hidden premines that they don't disclose to investors. Core dev made this coin to manipulate and profit off investors he has over 2billion coins staking on the network constantly which is the reason why the staking system seems "broken" (because of unfair distribution) and why he does not release posw fix. He cannot write a white paper because the code is so similar to nova coin with hardly any of his own code. He is also constantly censoring anyone who speaks the truth about this by telling mods to mute them. Not just that, he also kicked out a team member called raudi that worked so hard for him by developing a new website because raudi wanted to find a second developer but core dev knew the second developer would uncover all his lies and manipulation. He runs the project purely centralized with every decision going through him. I am crypto detective, please never fall for scams such as this and always do your own research I have proof to back up every claim. Thank you, good night.
So you are Fudding here too? You have no proof for your accusations. Maybe you just try to accumulate more ESP for yourself...
October 23, 2017, 11:08:00 PM
I advise all to dump this shit coin, core dev and his friends have been responsible for many pump and dump coins in the past with hidden premines that they don't disclose to investors. Core dev made this coin to manipulate and profit off investors he has over 2billion coins staking on the network constantly which is the reason why the staking system seems "broken" (because of unfair distribution) and why he does not release posw fix. He cannot write a white paper because the code is so similar to nova coin with hardly any of his own code. He is also constantly censoring anyone who speaks the truth about this by telling mods to mute them. Not just that, he also kicked out a team member called raudi that worked so hard for him by developing a new website because raudi wanted to find a second developer but core dev knew the second developer would uncover all his lies and manipulation. He runs the project purely centralized with every decision going through him. I am crypto detective, please never fall for scams such as this and always do your own research I have proof to back up every claim. Thank you, good night.
October 23, 2017, 10:25:05 PM
Anyone has Node list that we need to ADD to config file?
October 23, 2017, 06:30:27 PM
add this to version.h right under "include
#include
Edit:
I wanted to add since some people are having issues compiling with newer openssl dependencies, libssl-dev-1.1.0 or openssl versions 1.1.x are not currently compatible. To build, install libssl-dev-1.0.1 or the correct corresponding package for your current linux distro. If your distro's package manager no longer has those packages available you will have to build openssl from source and link the libraries and headers manually when building.
The include solved my problem. Wallet is up and running!
Thanks for the help!
October 23, 2017, 02:51:17 AM
The amount of espers coins are not ridiculous high...the only reason people request for a burn is because they think it will automatically increase price....thats not how it works.
And about the wallet question, exchanges usually upgrade quite fast to the new wallet if there is one available for a coin so you dont have to do anything
And about the wallet question, exchanges usually upgrade quite fast to the new wallet if there is one available for a coin so you dont have to do anything
October 23, 2017, 12:23:32 AM
Hey dev, I have downloaded new wallet for upcoming softfork. Where can I get new nodes list for that? also, how much coins we are going to burn? sorry it has already been answered. Thanks.
if we have coins on exchanges will they automatically be swapped? no need to worry about softfork?
There is not going to be any burning of coins or swap.
October 23, 2017, 12:16:29 AM
if we have coins on exchanges will they automatically be swapped? no need to worry about softfork?
October 22, 2017, 10:11:58 PM
Supply is 50 Billion. Okay
October 22, 2017, 10:01:00 PM
Hey dev, I have downloaded new wallet for upcoming softfork. Where can I get new nodes list for that? also, how much coins we are going to burn? sorry it has already been answered. Thanks.
October 22, 2017, 03:47:48 PM
I had no idea why the supply was so high. Just thought it was during the wave of ridiculously high coin supply coin launches. At least there was some logic behind it, though I think it needs to stay in a realm where the value can be measured in multiple sats.. otherwise, any coin doubles and halve in price every day, which is difficult to put a real price on... yes, I know there are other markets for better granularity (LTC, etc), but BTC rules the roost for now and the foreseeable future for giving a coin it's 'worth'.
And what if the price of Bitcoin rises? You should not make yourself depend on other blockchains. We can't reduce the coin supply by a tenfold each time Bitcoin increases by a tenfold. Even if Bitcoin is the base market, it is still unpredictable. I don't see any reason why people wouldn't use the Litecoin market.
October 22, 2017, 03:13:16 PM
What about the other updates and fixes according to the schedule? I hope that in the next corrections the currency reaches a considerable value
October 22, 2017, 03:09:28 PM
Very excited about a new release. Any fixes are movement in the right direction for this coin.
The supply has already been decreased from 500 billion. There's a reason for having that many coins, which is having a very small minimum unity that can be used for paying for micro-services, e.g. forwarding a single data packet. (That's my interpretation of it.) I've always been of the opinion that reducing the coin supply to 50 billion was already a mistake (albeit a rather small one.)
Yes, this seems to be the next item on the todo list, according to what Monoxide said in Discord.
I had no idea why the supply was so high. Just thought it was during the wave of ridiculously high coin supply coin launches. At least there was some logic behind it, though I think it needs to stay in a realm where the value can be measured in multiple sats.. otherwise, any coin doubles and halve in price every day, which is difficult to put a real price on... yes, I know there are other markets for better granularity (LTC, etc), but BTC rules the roost for now and the foreseeable future for giving a coin it's 'worth'.
is there a plan to decrease the amount of coins? there seem to be an awful lot of them 
The supply has already been decreased from 500 billion. There's a reason for having that many coins, which is having a very small minimum unity that can be used for paying for micro-services, e.g. forwarding a single data packet. (That's my interpretation of it.) I've always been of the opinion that reducing the coin supply to 50 billion was already a mistake (albeit a rather small one.
)Great to see the update which fixes Pow. Is Cryptocoderz now working on the PoS "fix", which let people with low amount of espers stake more often?.
Yes, this seems to be the next item on the todo list, according to what Monoxide said in Discord.
I had no idea why the supply was so high. Just thought it was during the wave of ridiculously high coin supply coin launches. At least there was some logic behind it, though I think it needs to stay in a realm where the value can be measured in multiple sats.. otherwise, any coin doubles and halve in price every day, which is difficult to put a real price on... yes, I know there are other markets for better granularity (LTC, etc), but BTC rules the roost for now and the foreseeable future for giving a coin it's 'worth'.
October 22, 2017, 03:02:53 PM
add this to version.h right under "include
#include
Edit:
I wanted to add since some people are having issues compiling with newer openssl dependencies, libssl-dev-1.1.0 or openssl versions 1.1.x are not currently compatible. To build, install libssl-dev-1.0.1 or the correct corresponding package for your current linux distro. If your distro's package manager no longer has those packages available you will have to build openssl from source and link the libraries and headers manually when building.
thx, no errors
wallet works fine 
October 22, 2017, 01:51:52 PM
thx dev for Update
i have a compile error
In file included from version.cpp:6:0:
version.h:49:14: error: ‘int64_t’ does not name a type
static const int64_t HRD_LEGACY_CUTOFF = 1509537600; // ON (TOGGLED 11/01/2017)
^
version.h:52:14: error: ‘int64_t’ does not name a type
static const int64_t HRD_FUTURE_CUTOFF = 9993058800; // OFF (NOT TOGGLED)
^
makefile.unix:202: recipe for target 'obj/version.o' failed
make: *** [obj/version.o] Error 1
please fix that ...
thx
espers still has a very good future ahead, very good team, continues to do so ...
i have a compile error
In file included from version.cpp:6:0:
version.h:49:14: error: ‘int64_t’ does not name a type
static const int64_t HRD_LEGACY_CUTOFF = 1509537600; // ON (TOGGLED 11/01/2017)
^
version.h:52:14: error: ‘int64_t’ does not name a type
static const int64_t HRD_FUTURE_CUTOFF = 9993058800; // OFF (NOT TOGGLED)
^
makefile.unix:202: recipe for target 'obj/version.o' failed
make: *** [obj/version.o] Error 1
please fix that ...
thx
espers still has a very good future ahead, very good team, continues to do so ...
0.8.6.8 is running again
when I MAKE 0.8.6.9 I get this error
:when I MAKE 0.8.6.9 I get this error
Code:
In file included from src/version.cpp:6:0:
src/version.h:49:14: error: ‘int64_t’ does not name a type
static const int64_t HRD_LEGACY_CUTOFF = 1509537600; // ON (TOGGLED 11/01/2017)
^
src/version.h:52:14: error: ‘int64_t’ does not name a type
static const int64_t HRD_FUTURE_CUTOFF = 9993058800; // OFF (NOT TOGGLED)
^
Makefile:2322: recipe for target 'build/version.o' failed
make: *** [build/version.o] Error 1
src/version.h:49:14: error: ‘int64_t’ does not name a type
static const int64_t HRD_LEGACY_CUTOFF = 1509537600; // ON (TOGGLED 11/01/2017)
^
src/version.h:52:14: error: ‘int64_t’ does not name a type
static const int64_t HRD_FUTURE_CUTOFF = 9993058800; // OFF (NOT TOGGLED)
^
Makefile:2322: recipe for target 'build/version.o' failed
make: *** [build/version.o] Error 1
add this to version.h right under "include
#include
Edit:
I wanted to add since some people are having issues compiling with newer openssl dependencies, libssl-dev-1.1.0 or openssl versions 1.1.x are not currently compatible. To build, install libssl-dev-1.0.1 or the correct corresponding package for your current linux distro. If your distro's package manager no longer has those packages available you will have to build openssl from source and link the libraries and headers manually when building.
Works ! thanks.
October 22, 2017, 07:26:32 AM
thx dev for Update
i have a compile error
In file included from version.cpp:6:0:
version.h:49:14: error: ‘int64_t’ does not name a type
static const int64_t HRD_LEGACY_CUTOFF = 1509537600; // ON (TOGGLED 11/01/2017)
^
version.h:52:14: error: ‘int64_t’ does not name a type
static const int64_t HRD_FUTURE_CUTOFF = 9993058800; // OFF (NOT TOGGLED)
^
makefile.unix:202: recipe for target 'obj/version.o' failed
make: *** [obj/version.o] Error 1
please fix that ...
thx
espers still has a very good future ahead, very good team, continues to do so ...
i have a compile error
In file included from version.cpp:6:0:
version.h:49:14: error: ‘int64_t’ does not name a type
static const int64_t HRD_LEGACY_CUTOFF = 1509537600; // ON (TOGGLED 11/01/2017)
^
version.h:52:14: error: ‘int64_t’ does not name a type
static const int64_t HRD_FUTURE_CUTOFF = 9993058800; // OFF (NOT TOGGLED)
^
makefile.unix:202: recipe for target 'obj/version.o' failed
make: *** [obj/version.o] Error 1
please fix that ...
thx
espers still has a very good future ahead, very good team, continues to do so ...
0.8.6.8 is running again
when I MAKE 0.8.6.9 I get this error
:when I MAKE 0.8.6.9 I get this error
Code:
In file included from src/version.cpp:6:0:
src/version.h:49:14: error: ‘int64_t’ does not name a type
static const int64_t HRD_LEGACY_CUTOFF = 1509537600; // ON (TOGGLED 11/01/2017)
^
src/version.h:52:14: error: ‘int64_t’ does not name a type
static const int64_t HRD_FUTURE_CUTOFF = 9993058800; // OFF (NOT TOGGLED)
^
Makefile:2322: recipe for target 'build/version.o' failed
make: *** [build/version.o] Error 1
src/version.h:49:14: error: ‘int64_t’ does not name a type
static const int64_t HRD_LEGACY_CUTOFF = 1509537600; // ON (TOGGLED 11/01/2017)
^
src/version.h:52:14: error: ‘int64_t’ does not name a type
static const int64_t HRD_FUTURE_CUTOFF = 9993058800; // OFF (NOT TOGGLED)
^
Makefile:2322: recipe for target 'build/version.o' failed
make: *** [build/version.o] Error 1
add this to version.h right under "include
#include
Edit:
I wanted to add since some people are having issues compiling with newer openssl dependencies, libssl-dev-1.1.0 or openssl versions 1.1.x are not currently compatible. To build, install libssl-dev-1.0.1 or the correct corresponding package for your current linux distro. If your distro's package manager no longer has those packages available you will have to build openssl from source and link the libraries and headers manually when building.
you are a GENIUS , did it that way and no compile errors!
October 22, 2017, 07:03:33 AM
DO we know when masternodes are coming and the coins required?
From what I understand, masternodes are not coming before the end of 2018. It needs a lot of coding.
But there is progress with the POW algorithm now, which is good
Jump to: