Topic: [ANN] [ETC] Ethereum Classic: Immutable Smart Contracts - page 322. (Read 821107 times)

Maybe?  Maybe just young strong people and http://crowdjury.org/

 https://medium.com/the-crowdjury/the-crowdjury-a-crowdsourced-court-system-for-the-collaboration-era-66da002750d8#.d2j94p1a9

Like ChairmanDao?      Wrong coin bud!

 

Shouldn't there be a fifth pillar? Decentralized Army? How can any society be free if they don't have an army to defend that freedom?

 The ETC Comunity have 12 Devs working around the clock, over 100 volunteers and a strong 700 member slack channel from all around the world.
Please watch the video to try to begin to understand how you can help scale this project.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=8oeiOeDq_Nc

If you do not believe that article, it means the ETC has all been sold and the DAO holders will not receive the ETC.

Send with Replay Protection on the light wallet
https://elaineo.github.io/etherwallet/#replay-protection

And watch https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=8oeiOeDq_Nc

Wow! Thank you for the light client Elaine! You are the best. I love you!

A light client is needed to get ordinary people to download a wallet. I do not know why it is taking a lot of time for ETH to make it.

Do not even focus on Bity. Focus on how Alex and the Ethereum foundation are trying to cover their tracks. Only a stupid person will believe that article. The whole community should remain cynical.

Well said, what are the get forked ethereum project values now, transparency, immutability, decentralisation, the unstoppable computer code?  
They will dream up another insider hack and take more of their customers money before long, just you see.
This was an establishment project sent to disrupt crypto.  But its not going to work, decentralisation is here to stay.  
It's about how big you are, and how big are your friends ... same as the banking system worldwide, but the tide is turning!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=8oeiOeDq_Nc


======================================================================================================


Please give more info on the version you are using, these are the latest wallets

Ethereum Classic Mist Wallet - 0.8.1 (1.4.10 go-ethereum) by whatisgravity
https://github.com/ethereumproject/mist/releases/tag/5cbe0c0

New
Light Client-Side Wallet by elaine
So no need to download the blockchain
https://elaineo.github.io/etherwallet/#generate-wallet

That dude was involved as much as anybody, he was part of the group. And the reason he won't say shit is because the foundation are the rest of them. This not only needs to be punished by the community but also in the court system. Paycoin/garza ran a mining pyramid scam and they went after him. These crooks stole, they lied and everything in between. I think the smart people are putting their btc in etc. Eth isn't going to be around after all of this, seen it before these dicks are going down.

If you want to invest in ETC, better wait until early September. By then, we should know the action of big ETC holders.

mist wallet is giving error
'it seems like node could't be started, do you already one running? is it upgrading right now?'
what is this issue plz help

the need to add this reddit of alex


here the links

https://www.reddit.com/r/EthereumClassic/comments/4wnn3k/alex_van_de_sande_uavsa_and_the_rest_of_the_robin/d68wfen

quote:
Also, even the small part I did, I acted as an individual, not as part of the Ethereum Foundation. I never told Vitalik about my plans and when Ming, the Executive Director, asked me about it I refused to tell her, so that the Foundation wouldn’t be in any way implicated or active in this.

so ming did know something was going on. or suspected something. he sais here he talked aobut it with her. what exatly did she ask?
and why did she let him get away with not answering ? to avoid harm from the foundation ( and i guess thats the job of an executive director too) she should have called a meeting and stop alex?



Last time I spoke to the White Hat Group about the status they had told me the attacker was able to run off with a big part of the funds and while they had recently won some battles, the funds were far from secure as they were still aware of possible attacks – which is why I didn’t want to make any public comment on that matter, otherwise the attention could jeopardize this whole thing. IMHO part of the reason they were more successful now was because the DAO had less value and was under a lot less scrutiny since the fork, I doubt such attack would be successful had the fork not taken place.

so he speaks to them ! he knows how to contact them ? he knows there names ?

quote:
I do not know what they intend to do now and I learned that the recovery was successful via reddit like everyone else. While I believe they have the best intentions they are also at risk for a lot of legal troubles and costs. On a personal note I’ve lended them DAO tokens for the attack, which I haven’t seen since. I’ll be asking them for the eth-dao to be returned, but I’m donating the etc-dao to them.

he sais he wasnt involved but lending tokens to make the hack posible is being involved or am i in alice in wunderland where big is smal and crime is good ?

The actions of the White Hat Group (WHG) have been shrouded in mystery and it is time for this once-necessary precaution to come to an end. Transparency matters to all of us. Previously, it was deemed unwise for the WHG to elaborate on the details of the situation while the salvage operation was unfolding, to prevent new and old attackers from knowing their movements to better understand how to attack DAOs. Now that the community is questioning their actions and intentions, we, at Bity, feel it is necessary to share the details of what the WHG has been dealing and living with over the last few weeks.

Me too, this coin is weird, hard to explain my feelings actually. It is ETH whale's money party, can also be small fish's chance to be a big fish

I don't know what to think about ETC. At some points, I like it, and at some points, I don't.

Bity is biased and dishonest

It's a valiant attempt to justify the dumping after the fact but none of it makes sense.

Replay risks can be mitigated with one transfer and all of the concerns about the ETC value are meaningless because Bity were dumping it and destroying the value themselves.

Sounds like the same kind of "logic" that led to the botched fork - "we're smarter than everyone, fuck consequences, oops it didn't work out so let's just blame something or other".

Bity and the white hats

https://blog.bity.com/2016/08/13/the-white-hats-and-dao-wars-behind-the-scenes/