As I said, I am a long time supporter of the Ethereum project, but the pathetic shilling in this thread does no good for Ethereum.
Regarding IBM's ADEPT, that subject is quite frequently appears in this thread, especially the under 16 community members like to quote that when they envision the $5 price, go to the GadgetCoin thread and you can get a better picture what Internet of Things and ADEPT is, what is feasible terms of the blockchain, smart contracts and IoT, etc.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12155725
And you think you are better?
Maybe you should show me one post of yours without your gadget/tile-shitcoins shilling.
There is no shilling from my part - I enthusiastically support innovative projects. I am one of the most vocal supporters of Ethereum for a year and nobody promoted more Gavin Wood's white paper, nobody said more complementary comments about Gavin's and Vitalik's work than me as well as I support other innovative projects like Skycoin and GadgetCoin.
As for your shitcoin comment, the three coins (Ethereum, Skycoin, GadgetCoin) I support are original developments, these coins haven't forked/copied any code from Bitcoin, and therefore they aren't shitcoins. Regardless of that, my pointer about IBM's ADEPT is quite spot on, anyone knows that who understand what IoT software is. My point was that Ethereum is a fantastic project, and the meaningless and baseless hype about IBM does more harm than good for Ethereum by creating unnecessary disappointments (as there is nothing happening with ADEPT).