I'll contribute .1 btc as long as the coin stays scrypt/pow
and I could get the coin listed on Alcurex.com
perhaps we start a new block chain - with all coins in circulation made worthless.
The only viable defence that we have on the table is adding POS (additional to POW) right now. If somebody knows which part of i.e. the latest litecoin source could help defend against this attack, please tell us. If we do not now what that fix is, it is pointless to update the sources just to find out that TIPS is still vulnerable to the same attack. So if you know about a check or function in i.e. latest litecoin or bitcoin sources that can effectively battle this attack, please let us know!
Elsewise POW/POS is the solution on the table right now that certainly would make the attack harder.
I think update codebase and change the difficulty algo will solve the problem, no need to switch to pow/pos
I agree. Making a POS coin will put it in the line of 100's of other POS coins. Also, doing a swap is a mess.
We are talking about POW/POS hybrid, also the POS rewards could be rather low compared to the POW rewards. It is all about the network of honest miners (and stakers) being able to produce a longer valid chain than the attacker in the hidden can. I agree with you that most coins going POS dwindle in value. But given the POS reward is relatively small and the POW reward much higher, it might make a difference. Also the current attack could drive the price down in the long run way more than POS could ever be able to.
Whatever will be done, I would strongly suggest to go for static block rewards with a regular halving, i.e. 40k, halving annually, the POS reward could be 1/8 of the POW reward, just to throw up some figures. The unpredictable total supply is a PITA.
The diff algo is fine IMHO, it deals perfectly fine with multipools jumping on and off but I am open to hear
which diff algo would change
what exactly with regards to the current situation.
As it looks we now have the following commitments:
psycodad: 0.05BTC
cryptoid: 0.05BTC
smarterhash: 0.1BTC
I think the donators should be able to vote for things like reward structure, halving etc. proportional to their donation. Does that sound fair? (Not that it really matters as I think we will never come close to 1BTC)