Topic: [ANN] FedoraCoin (TiPS) - New Dev team: Fedoracoin Foundation - page 72. (Read 111422 times)
Enabled on hash-to-coins.com
I think update codebase and change the difficulty algo will solve the problem, no need to switch to pow/pos
I agree. Making a POS coin will put it in the line of 100's of other POS coins. Also, doing a swap is a mess.
I think update codebase and change the difficulty algo will solve the problem, no need to switch to pow/pos
More security features are needed than just codebase and change in difficulty. The coin needs to be strengthened against attack.
Quote
I absolutely agree with the timeframe, however I think it will be way shorter, more in the few weeks than months. If we get commitment for nearly 1 BTC in the next days, I'll talk to ahmed and nail him on a timeframe, add some reserve and will personally guarantee that either the wallet comes out within that timeframe or the funds get sent back to the donators.
So, before I start collecting funds, I will publish this guarantee timeframe after consulting with ahmed.
Does that sound acceptable?
Yes
TiPS is back? Awesome! Was always one of my favourite coins back in the day 
I think update codebase and change the difficulty algo will solve the problem, no need to switch to pow/pos
The only question and problem is why this person who are robbing the network after 10 days still doing that.
So why Dev still didn't stopped him ? and why Bter still accepting his stolen coins ?
There is NO dev per say, only 1) original team and 2) some individuals attempting to take over the coin for their own purposes. Only "someone" with an "altered" wallet and some serious hash power could be disrupting the chain like has been happening. Any names come to mind???
Anyone who has any interest in keeping this coin from being taken over by a single entity, and we all know who that is, should only be using the official 1.1.0.0 wallet. I also suggest we rely less on the "larger" exchange and use the smaller exchanges.
P.S. To get things started, I'll pledge 1,000,000 TiPS and 2 LTC to the original "dev" team for programmer(s) who contribute to a real wallet update that includes some features that strengthen the security of the coin. Psychodad, give me a wallet address(s), and I'll deposit them today. (to be returned if the wallet isn't updated
)Cryptoid, I appreciate your trust, thank you.
OK, so lets try to get something rolling. I have talked to a reputable dev* (ahmed) and he estimated the cost for forking the source to a POW/POS hardfork to 1 BTC. While this sounds a lot at current BTC rate, I mind you folks, everybody willing to do it reliably and supporting the community during the hardfork should stand up now and post his offer, else please do not argue about the price.
I have asked the current dev-team around testbug what they think about it and I would like to ask here if this is an amount you guys think we could collect to pay ahmed for his work.
If you all think this should be done and i.e. 20 users are willing to donate 0.05 BTC to the cause we could get this done and defeat the malicious "Mallory" in this game.
Please note: I have no personal interest in this despite my love for TIPS as stated before, I will get no kickbacks from ahmed and if the community desires that I manage this fund collection I will manage this in the most transparent way possible (publishing all tx's etc.). I am more than happy though if another reputable member comes up for this task but I am ready to do it if the community wishes so.
As a little reward for those donating, I propose to mention everybody who donates (and wishes so) in the about dialog of the new wallet.
Please voice your opinions and if you want to donate, commit yourself to an amount. I'll make a start by committing myself to said 0.05BTC.
* In this place when people talk about a dev they mean a community a manager, I'd say that is testbug here. In my posting I mean a dev in an original sense, like a seasoned c/c++ developer.
Count me in for 0.05 BTC (that brings the total to 0.10 BTC)
Same here, I'm not mining TiPS, and have no other interest than to see this coin do well for the long term. Unless anyone objects, I'm fine with Psycodad holding the funds. I suggest a periodic list with the amount each person has donated.
Psycodad = 0.05 BTC
Cryptoid = 0.05 BTC
etc...
I think we need to stipulate the funds go back to the owners after a set time if the update doesn't come to fruition... 6 moths/1 year...? any thoughts on the time frame?
I absolutely agree with the timeframe, however I think it will be way shorter, more in the few weeks than months. If we get commitment for nearly 1 BTC in the next days, I'll talk to ahmed and nail him on a timeframe, add some reserve and will personally guarantee that either the wallet comes out within that timeframe or the funds get sent back to the donators.
So, before I start collecting funds, I will publish this guarantee timeframe after consulting with ahmed.
Does that sound acceptable?
I think multi-algo is a better choice than PoW/PoS.
The only question and problem is why this person who are robbing the network after 10 days still doing that.
So why Dev still didn't stopped him ? and why Bter still accepting his stolen coins ?
There is NO dev per say, only 1) original team and 2) some individuals attempting to take over the coin for their own purposes. Only "someone" with an "altered" wallet and some serious hash power could be disrupting the chain like has been happening. Any names come to mind???
Anyone who has any interest in keeping this coin from being taken over by a single entity, and we all know who that is, should only be using the official 1.1.0.0 wallet. I also suggest we rely less on the "larger" exchange and use the smaller exchanges.
P.S. To get things started, I'll pledge 1,000,000 TiPS and 2 LTC to the original "dev" team for programmer(s) who contribute to a real wallet update that includes some features that strengthen the security of the coin. Psychodad, give me a wallet address(s), and I'll deposit them today. (to be returned if the wallet isn't updated
)Cryptoid, I appreciate your trust, thank you.
OK, so lets try to get something rolling. I have talked to a reputable dev* (ahmed) and he estimated the cost for forking the source to a POW/POS hardfork to 1 BTC. While this sounds a lot at current BTC rate, I mind you folks, everybody willing to do it reliably and supporting the community during the hardfork should stand up now and post his offer, else please do not argue about the price.
I have asked the current dev-team around testbug what they think about it and I would like to ask here if this is an amount you guys think we could collect to pay ahmed for his work.
If you all think this should be done and i.e. 20 users are willing to donate 0.05 BTC to the cause we could get this done and defeat the malicious "Mallory" in this game.
Please note: I have no personal interest in this despite my love for TIPS as stated before, I will get no kickbacks from ahmed and if the community desires that I manage this fund collection I will manage this in the most transparent way possible (publishing all tx's etc.). I am more than happy though if another reputable member comes up for this task but I am ready to do it if the community wishes so.
As a little reward for those donating, I propose to mention everybody who donates (and wishes so) in the about dialog of the new wallet.
Please voice your opinions and if you want to donate, commit yourself to an amount. I'll make a start by committing myself to said 0.05BTC.
* In this place when people talk about a dev they mean a community a manager, I'd say that is testbug here. In my posting I mean a dev in an original sense, like a seasoned c/c++ developer.
Count me in for 0.05 BTC (that brings the total to 0.10 BTC)
Same here, I'm not mining TiPS, and have no other interest than to see this coin do well for the long term. Unless anyone objects, I'm fine with Psycodad holding the funds. I suggest a periodic list with the amount each person has donated.
Psycodad = 0.05 BTC
Cryptoid = 0.05 BTC
etc...
I think we need to stipulate the funds go back to the owners after a set time if the update doesn't come to fruition... 6 moths/1 year...? any thoughts on the time frame?
The only question and problem is why this person who are robbing the network after 10 days still doing that.
So why Dev still didn't stopped him ? and why Bter still accepting his stolen coins ?
There is NO dev per say, only 1) original team and 2) some individuals attempting to take over the coin for their own purposes. Only "someone" with an "altered" wallet and some serious hash power could be disrupting the chain like has been happening. Any names come to mind???
Anyone who has any interest in keeping this coin from being taken over by a single entity, and we all know who that is, should only be using the official 1.1.0.0 wallet. I also suggest we rely less on the "larger" exchange and use the smaller exchanges.
P.S. To get things started, I'll pledge 1,000,000 TiPS and 2 LTC to the original "dev" team for programmer(s) who contribute to a real wallet update that includes some features that strengthen the security of the coin. Psychodad, give me a wallet address(s), and I'll deposit them today. (to be returned if the wallet isn't updated
)Cryptoid, I appreciate your trust, thank you.
OK, so lets try to get something rolling. I have talked to a reputable dev* (ahmed) and he estimated the cost for forking the source to a POW/POS hardfork to 1 BTC. While this sounds a lot at current BTC rate, I mind you folks, everybody willing to do it reliably and supporting the community during the hardfork should stand up now and post his offer, else please do not argue about the price.
I have asked the current dev-team around testbug what they think about it and I would like to ask here if this is an amount you guys think we could collect to pay ahmed for his work.
If you all think this should be done and i.e. 20 users are willing to donate 0.05 BTC to the cause we could get this done and defeat the malicious "Mallory" in this game.
Please note: I have no personal interest in this despite my love for TIPS as stated before, I will get no kickbacks from ahmed and if the community desires that I manage this fund collection I will manage this in the most transparent way possible (publishing all tx's etc.). I am more than happy though if another reputable member comes up for this task but I am ready to do it if the community wishes so.
As a little reward for those donating, I propose to mention everybody who donates (and wishes so) in the about dialog of the new wallet.
Please voice your opinions and if you want to donate, commit yourself to an amount. I'll make a start by committing myself to said 0.05BTC.
* In this place when people talk about a dev they mean a community a manager, I'd say that is testbug here. In my posting I mean a dev in an original sense, like a seasoned c/c++ developer.
The only question and problem is why this person who are robbing the network after 10 days still doing that.
So why Dev still didn't stopped him ? and why Bter still accepting his stolen coins ?
There is NO dev per say, only 1) original team and 2) some individuals attempting to take over the coin for their own purposes. Only "someone" with an "altered" wallet and some serious hash power could be disrupting the chain like has been happening. Any names come to mind???
Anyone who has any interest in keeping this coin from being taken over by a single entity, and we all know who that is, should only be using the official 1.1.0.0 wallet. I also suggest we rely less on the "larger" exchange and use the smaller exchanges.
P.S. To get things started, I'll pledge 1,000,000 TiPS and 2 LTC to the original "dev" team for programmer(s) who contribute to a real wallet update that includes some features that strengthen the security of the coin. Psychodad, give me a wallet address(s), and I'll deposit them today. (to be returned if the wallet isn't updated
)Block 1282898 ,I think we must prevent the attacker immediately,Fork from block 12900000,It is hard to find DEV,But let tips blockchain explorer shop stop in 12900000,wait wallet updat,It will useful for tips.
The top 100 owners swap tip but remain tips,2 coin now
Shame on BTER for allowing this person to trade coins from 51% attack.
The only question and problem is why this person who are robbing the network after 10 days still doing that.
So why Dev still didn't stopped him ? and why Bter still accepting his stolen coins ?
There is NO dev per say, only 1) original team and 2) some individuals attempting to take over the coin for their own purposes. Only "someone" with an "altered" wallet and some serious hash power could be disrupting the chain like has been happening. Any names come to mind???
Anyone who has any interest in keeping this coin from being taken over by a single entity, and we all know who that is, should only be using the official 1.1.0.0 wallet. I also suggest we rely less on the "larger" exchange and use the smaller exchanges.
P.S. To get things started, I'll pledge 1,000,000 TiPS and 2 LTC to the original "dev" team for programmer(s) who contribute to a real wallet update that includes some features that strengthen the security of the coin. Psychodad, give me a wallet address(s), and I'll deposit them today. (to be returned if the wallet isn't updated
)Block 1282898 ,I think we must prevent the attacker immediately,Fork from block 12900000,It is hard to find DEV,But let tips blockchain explorer shop stop in 12900000,wait wallet updat,It will useful for tips.
The top 100 owners swap tip but remain tips,2 coin now
The only question and problem is why this person who are robbing the network after 10 days still doing that.
So why Dev still didn't stopped him ? and why Bter still accepting his stolen coins ?
There is NO dev per say, only 1) original team and 2) some individuals attempting to take over the coin for their own purposes. Only "someone" with an "altered" wallet and some serious hash power could be disrupting the chain like has been happening. Any names come to mind???
Anyone who has any interest in keeping this coin from being taken over by a single entity, and we all know who that is, should only be using the official 1.1.0.0 wallet. I also suggest we rely less on the "larger" exchange and use the smaller exchanges.
P.S. To get things started, I'll pledge 1,000,000 TiPS and 2 LTC to the original "dev" team for programmer(s) who contribute to a real wallet update that includes some features that strengthen the security of the coin. Psychodad, give me a wallet address(s), and I'll deposit them today. (to be returned if the wallet isn't updated
) 
The only question and problem is why this person who are robbing the network after 10 days still doing that.
So why Dev still didn't stopped him ? and why Bter still accepting his stolen coins ?
Could 2 different but compatible wallets be causing "some" of the issues we've been having with forks:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but we should NOT be running the 2.0 wallet from March of this year (2016).
This 2.0 wallet is from (https://fedoracoin_site/) the SHA256 takeover group...
We need to clear the air and root out some "posers" posting on this forum who are giving misleading information.
At this point, there are only 2 I trust, psycodad and testbug. There may be others who haven't posted for awhile.
Maybe I'm missing something here, if so, please correct me.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but we should NOT be running the 2.0 wallet from March of this year (2016).
This 2.0 wallet is from (https://fedoracoin_site/) the SHA256 takeover group...
We need to clear the air and root out some "posers" posting on this forum who are giving misleading information.
At this point, there are only 2 I trust, psycodad and testbug. There may be others who haven't posted for awhile.
Maybe I'm missing something here, if so, please correct me.
I believe thats possible but, I'm no expert. I can say however that I'm using the "v1.1.0.0-g80bd0e3-beta" wallet without problems for some time now. Until this gets sorted out, no one should be installing or using any newer releases. (my opinion)
EDIT: Just opened my wallet, the version listed above, which hasn't been opened for a while and synced up within 10 minutes showing 13 active connections. No problems here, still holding 400 M.
Could 2 different but compatible wallets be causing "some" of the issues we've been having with forks:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but we should NOT be running the 2.0 wallet from March of this year (2016).
This 2.0 wallet is from (https://fedoracoin_site/) the SHA256 takeover group...
We need to clear the air and root out some "posers" posting on this forum who are giving misleading information.
At this point, there are only 2 I trust, psycodad and testbug. There may be others who haven't posted for awhile.
Maybe I'm missing something here, if so, please correct me.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but we should NOT be running the 2.0 wallet from March of this year (2016).
This 2.0 wallet is from (https://fedoracoin_site/) the SHA256 takeover group...
We need to clear the air and root out some "posers" posting on this forum who are giving misleading information.
At this point, there are only 2 I trust, psycodad and testbug. There may be others who haven't posted for awhile.
Maybe I'm missing something here, if so, please correct me.
One miner monopolize tips mining,If other miners(pools) find block,He will 51% attack, Then the block will change to orphan,Bter know the miner,I think bter let he do!This is why bter no tips lost .the bter doposit address ,EXv7WRqupUvgX1oGxHck7Uu2kGmnPNYrhP,The miner deposite tip 13 May.
Block 1282898 ,I think we must prevent the attacker immediately,Fork from block 12900000,It is hard to find DEV,But let tips blockchain explorer shop stop in 12900000,wait wallet updat,It will useful for tips.
Block 1282898 ,I think we must prevent the attacker immediately,Fork from block 12900000,It is hard to find DEV,But let tips blockchain explorer shop stop in 12900000,wait wallet updat,It will useful for tips.
One miner monopolize tips mining,If other miners(pools) find block,He will 51% attack, Then the block will change to orphan,Bter know the miner,I think bter let he do!This is why bter no tips lost .
Didn't know that you can mining anything when you are disconnected from the network, but people learning while they alive...really sad, I'm mining this coin months and months, if you ask me, the best mining coin ever !!
If you run two nodes, for your two nodes you are not disconnected - your are the network in your own nodes view! Every wallet I've seen needs two nodes at least before it starts accepting blocks. By isolating your nodes you simulate a natural fork that happens when networks divide due to failures or outages in links etc.
yeah just teach me lool
for few days you will have one more attacker ... just kidding
Jump to: