don't see anything special in version2
Since there is no particular need, we didn't change the main specifications.
Please join the community of FujiCoin if you like.
Topic: [ANN] FujiCoin | Japan | Since 2014 | The Best Crypto Currency - page 84. (Read 152955 times)
August 27, 2014, 09:51:59 AM
Since there is no particular need, we didn't change the main specifications.
Please join the community of FujiCoin if you like.
August 27, 2014, 09:12:08 AM
don't see anything special in version2
August 27, 2014, 08:21:36 AM
Fact that was found so far:
・Even when hash rate is high, overload of the I / O is not necessarily occur immediately.
・When the overload of I / O occurs in some time, it leads to a vicious circle.
・There is no problem with the I / O of fujicoind daemon.
・The problem is I / O of NOMP.
I have added a FujiCoin daemon instance.
Then, I have separated Pool daemon and Genesis daemon.
I have also added a daemon of further backups.
I will wait and see for a while.
・Even when hash rate is high, overload of the I / O is not necessarily occur immediately.
・When the overload of I / O occurs in some time, it leads to a vicious circle.
・There is no problem with the I / O of fujicoind daemon.
・The problem is I / O of NOMP.
I have added a FujiCoin daemon instance.
Then, I have separated Pool daemon and Genesis daemon.
I have also added a daemon of further backups.
I will wait and see for a while.
August 26, 2014, 04:13:50 PM
Any idea who put up over 500,000 in Fuji on Fobcoin? lol, probably not a good idea trying to dump so much and sticking it in front of everyone else's reasonable amounts, and starting sell points on a new exchange... especially when we are trying to garner a reasonable ask price of around 90-100 and stabilize. All it will do is drive down the prices of Fuji to soon, as we will have a price war way to soon. 
Ok, just thought I would mention it
(that's not you is it Motty or Doug? lol)
THX
Ok, just thought I would mention it
(that's not you is it Motty or Doug? lol)
THX
No sir! Not me!!! That's friggin' suicide! Dang! Wow!
Ok - calming down now... think happy thoughts... lol!
August 26, 2014, 03:56:26 PM
Any idea who put up over 500,000 in Fuji on Fobcoin? lol, probably not a good idea trying to dump so much and sticking it in front of everyone else's reasonable amounts, and starting sell points on a new exchange... especially when we are trying to garner a reasonable ask price of around 90-100 and stabilize. All it will do is drive down the prices of Fuji to soon, as we will have a price war way to soon.
Ok, just thought I would mention it
(that's not you is it Motty or Doug? lol)
THX
Ok, just thought I would mention it
(that's not you is it Motty or Doug? lol)
THX
No sir! Not me!!! That's friggin' suicide! Dang! Wow!
Ok - calming down now... think happy thoughts... lol!
August 26, 2014, 03:30:18 PM
Any idea who put up over 500,000 in Fuji on Fobcoin? lol, probably not a good idea trying to dump so much and sticking it in front of everyone else's reasonable amounts, and starting sell points on a new exchange... especially when we are trying to garner a reasonable ask price of around 90-100 and stabilize. All it will do is drive down the prices of Fuji to soon, as we will have a price war way to soon.
Ok, just thought I would mention it
(that's not you is it Motty or Doug? lol)
THX
Ok, just thought I would mention it
(that's not you is it Motty or Doug? lol)
THX
August 26, 2014, 12:41:25 PM
I found the statement that "minimum difficulty. below 16 will cause problems" at the following site:
bitcointa.lk/threads/stratum-pool-server-node-js-supports-pos-pow-sha-scrypt-quark-x11-vardiff.266694/
So I changed minimum pool difficulty 8 to 16.
I will so far tonight.
Wow that interesting.... lets see how it goes and hashes at 16? maybe that's it, but seems to simple a fix lol but ya never know until you try bitcointa.lk/threads/stratum-pool-server-node-js-supports-pos-pow-sha-scrypt-quark-x11-vardiff.266694/
So I changed minimum pool difficulty 8 to 16.
I will so far tonight.
August 26, 2014, 10:24:09 AM
I found the statement that "minimum difficulty. below 16 will cause problems" at the following site:
bitcointa.lk/threads/stratum-pool-server-node-js-supports-pos-pow-sha-scrypt-quark-x11-vardiff.266694/
So I changed minimum pool difficulty 8 to 16.
I will so far tonight.
bitcointa.lk/threads/stratum-pool-server-node-js-supports-pos-pow-sha-scrypt-quark-x11-vardiff.266694/
So I changed minimum pool difficulty 8 to 16.
I will so far tonight.
August 26, 2014, 09:55:37 AM
There is still a problem.
I was looking at the screen of top command, then I/O problem has occurred.
It is necessary to consider further measures.
I was looking at the screen of top command, then I/O problem has occurred.
It is necessary to consider further measures.
August 26, 2014, 08:41:37 AM
Hi MinermanNC, DougB62
I made countermeasure of the bottleneck today.
I'm thinking the bottleneck is hard disk.
1) NOMP are using redis-server DB.
I have set redis-server does not use the HDD.
2) Coin daemon was outputting a huge log, so I disabled it.
I wait and see for a while.
Back to the redis server , that's what I was referring to, performing a redis-flush possibly? I only read of that as I own 2 dell servers I was looking at attempting to use for crypto... possibly a pool at one time lolI made countermeasure of the bottleneck today.
I'm thinking the bottleneck is hard disk.
1) NOMP are using redis-server DB.
I have set redis-server does not use the HDD.
2) Coin daemon was outputting a huge log, so I disabled it.
I wait and see for a while.
My dells:
Dell PowerEdge 1U Rack mount Server - Dual Intel Xeon Quad-Core L5410 2.33GHz, 16Gb memory
August 26, 2014, 08:28:35 AM
Motty, any word from Coin Game? I have been playing on the site using some old Coinyecoin I had laying around lol, ok lets keep asking them to list Fuji.
Hi MinermanNC,
There is no reply from the Coin Game.
Also I'll try to send an email.
August 26, 2014, 07:58:04 AM
Motty, any word from Coin Game? I have been playing on the site using some old Coinyecoin I had laying around lol, ok lets keep asking them to list Fuji.
August 26, 2014, 07:56:32 AM
Hi MinermanNC, DougB62
I made countermeasure of the bottleneck today.
I'm thinking the bottleneck is hard disk.
1) NOMP are using redis-server DB.
I have set redis-server does not use the HDD.
2) Coin daemon was outputting a huge log, so I disabled it.
I wait and see for a while.
That's sounds like a good place to start! Let us know how it goes. Thx Motty I made countermeasure of the bottleneck today.
I'm thinking the bottleneck is hard disk.
1) NOMP are using redis-server DB.
I have set redis-server does not use the HDD.
2) Coin daemon was outputting a huge log, so I disabled it.
I wait and see for a while.
August 26, 2014, 06:53:10 AM
Hi MinermanNC, DougB62
I made countermeasure of the bottleneck today.
I'm thinking the bottleneck is hard disk.
1) NOMP are using redis-server DB.
I have set redis-server does not use the HDD.
2) Coin daemon was outputting a huge log, so I disabled it.
I wait and see for a while.
I made countermeasure of the bottleneck today.
I'm thinking the bottleneck is hard disk.
1) NOMP are using redis-server DB.
I have set redis-server does not use the HDD.
2) Coin daemon was outputting a huge log, so I disabled it.
I wait and see for a while.
August 25, 2014, 04:24:37 PM
FYI
I emailed pool.mn today and ask if they would reconsider hosting FujiCoin again? I informed them that Fobcoin added us and still on Comkort and the potential to get on Coin Game. Also I linked him to bens website and the hits it is having already even though incomplete. Ok, Just a heads up.
Motty I love your NOMP pool, please let us know if its workable to have more miners hashing on it. I feel we could have more miners if pool.mn would open again too
THX!!
I emailed pool.mn today and ask if they would reconsider hosting FujiCoin again? I informed them that Fobcoin added us and still on Comkort and the potential to get on Coin Game. Also I linked him to bens website and the hits it is having already even though incomplete. Ok, Just a heads up.
Motty I love your NOMP pool, please let us know if its workable to have more miners hashing on it. I feel we could have more miners if pool.mn would open again too
THX!!
August 25, 2014, 02:05:53 PM
An error occurred again in 18:00 (JST) today.
CPU was consumed by I / O latency.
But, it is unknown what I / O was the problem.
It is likely to take several days to fundamental measures.
Balance of the wallet of NOMP was 267FJC.
It has decreased from the previous survey (~3000FJC).
It means that the payout was greater than mined coins.
http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2008/07/22/sql-server-clear-sql-server-memory-caches/
August 25, 2014, 09:20:19 AM
An error occurred again in 18:00 (JST) today.
CPU was consumed by I / O latency.
But, it is unknown what I / O was the problem.
It is likely to take several days to fundamental measures.
Balance of the wallet of NOMP was 267FJC.
It has decreased from the previous survey (~3000FJC).
It means that the payout was greater than mined coins.
August 24, 2014, 05:35:24 PM
Getting ready to jump back on pool... pool block count shows 60 is this correct?
August 24, 2014, 04:30:02 PM
DougB62 participated in the pool.
Hash rate of the pool much 580KH / s.
Still load on the CPU is less than 1%.
There is no problem now.
Hash rate of the pool much 580KH / s.
Still load on the CPU is less than 1%.
There is no problem now.
Good to hear.. waiting for MinermanNC to chime in.
August 24, 2014, 04:27:15 PM
DougB62 participated in the pool.
Hash rate of the pool much 580KH / s.
Still load on the CPU is less than 1%.
There is no problem now.
Hash rate of the pool much 580KH / s.
Still load on the CPU is less than 1%.
There is no problem now.
Jump to: