Topic: [ANN] GARLICOIN - Reddit's Garlic Bread Worshiping Currency - page 24. (Read 35732 times)
Now Garlicoin officially dead - dev dump their coins on exchanges instead of airdrop.
Does anyone know how to mine in smos I have tried both ccminers with no success.thank you
Can you post your configuration please? Perhaps edit the above message to include it. Garlicoin needs to be mined on a miner that's compatible with scrypt-n and have it set to the right value and so default settings on most miners won't do. Also, scrypt ASICs can't mine Garlicoin.
Does anyone know how to mine in smos I have tried both ccminers with no success. I have been mining it on windows but struggling with SMOS
-a scrypt:10 -o stratum+tcp://pool.grlc-bakery.fun:3333 -u walletaddress -p x
same error as this https://imgur.com/OL9j5RV
and same issue as this guy
https://www.reddit.com/r/garlicoin/comments/7uxuaj/anyone_mining_with_smos/
-a scrypt:10 -o stratum+tcp://pool.grlc-bakery.fun:3333 -u walletaddress -p x
same error as this https://imgur.com/OL9j5RV
and same issue as this guy
https://www.reddit.com/r/garlicoin/comments/7uxuaj/anyone_mining_with_smos/
Thanks man. Is that the skunkhash one? I tried it but nothing happens, it just sits. Using the other miner I did what you said and got t55x12, but with it hash is 450 even with 1 gpu. Yeah when I do them all, the threads and warps are different, but the hashes are all about the same at 441-450. 590's would be ok with me, that's a good step up.
using this miner: https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer/releases/tag/2.0-bitcore.v3
Think it might be the miner. I can try boosting the ram if it comes to it, would take a few days. with all 8 running it shows 2.6 out of 7.9 usage, virtual mem at 43101.
Maybe it's the intensity? It always sets to around 14 and the program ignores any -i flags that I put in there.
**edit, added --lookup-gap 2 and getting all 590's now, much better, forgot about that. still room to improve. got T56x16 now, whatever those numbers mean.
The ccminer from palginpav version doesn't matter, there have been no commits or updates for Nscrypt for years either way use the most recent if it does for you.
I know that all RAM is not showing as utilised, nor was mine. Showing 400mb usage at 4GB in the system and 400mb with 8GB in but wildly better performance.
Excellent news, for 1080ti you should try lookup-gap 3.6 maybe a bit more extra.
I have seen many people claiming 700/720/750khz with a 1080ti so I know my config must be whack.
Either way, profitability is nearly on par wth nicehash now so might be time to move on for now
I've updated pools in the OP and also included the very comprehensive list that can be found at http://pools.garlicoin.fun/
If any pool admin can contact me on here you can be sure that I'll include your pool in the OP. Just PM me or post with a response to the thread.
If any pool admin can contact me on here you can be sure that I'll include your pool in the OP. Just PM me or post with a response to the thread.
I will stop mine grlc
Price downed to 0.00006
Price downed to 0.00006
Listing on CoinFalcon (February 02)
https://coindar.org/en/event/garlicoin-grlc-listing-on-coinfalcon-2905
https://coindar.org/en/event/garlicoin-grlc-listing-on-coinfalcon-2905
Anyone can test this pool?
http://yaslokpool.gq
ccminer config
--------------------------------------------------------
setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
ccminer -L 2 -l T30x20 -R 15 -a scrypt --lookup-gap=2 -o stratum+tcp://yaslokpool.gq:4433 -u YOURWALLETADDRESS -p=GRLC
pause
-----------------------------------------------------
Thanks
http://yaslokpool.gq
ccminer config
--------------------------------------------------------
setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
ccminer -L 2 -l T30x20 -R 15 -a scrypt --lookup-gap=2 -o stratum+tcp://yaslokpool.gq:4433 -u YOURWALLETADDRESS -p=GRLC
pause
-----------------------------------------------------
Thanks
That's pretty good man, do you mind if I ask your settings? I can't seem to get more than 450 per 1080ti. Running i7 8600 with 8 gpu, win10x64 ltsb, 8GB ram, 120GB SSD, 60GB virtual mem space. CPU clock is at 4.26 on all cores, 8 threads fully maxed. GPU clock at 1898, ram at 5005, undervolted to 900mv. That's the timetravel miner right?
Use https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer/releases?after=1.4.3-tpruvot
If your system is multigpu i think you will need to bump your RAM. This actually goes for many miners I think
If you see when ccminer starts it says about max warps then allocs the max threads your system can handle, are they uneven numbers with like GPU's? (also runs at uneven hashrate)
After a while when the miner thread begins you will see T50x20 or something.
You can manually change this is ccminer with -l argument e.g. -l T50x20 and the miner will start much faster on that static setting.
Run 1 GPU using -d 0 and let the miner run on default to check the max threads it can handle.
Then copy that value given by 1 GPU e.g. T40x21 then add that to your bat file trying to run all your GPU.
I get errors about memory, I just upped 4GB to 8GB because I saw this and now I see the same again.
I have 5 1080ti in 1 rig. With -d 0 argument 1 1080ti runs at 660khs and all together about 590khs average
I think this issue is affecting a lot of multi GPU miners as RAM and CPU don't matter with 2.0 coins like Daggerhash or equihash so nobody bothers anymore.
GJ5BtWQgufQv8xiuKeuTHTCypJhubD3okD Thanks man. Is that the skunkhash one? I tried it but nothing happens, it just sits. Using the other miner I did what you said and got t55x12, but with it hash is 450 even with 1 gpu. Yeah when I do them all, the threads and warps are different, but the hashes are all about the same at 441-450. 590's would be ok with me, that's a good step up.
using this miner: https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer/releases/tag/2.0-bitcore.v3
Think it might be the miner. I can try boosting the ram if it comes to it, would take a few days. with all 8 running it shows 2.6 out of 7.9 usage, virtual mem at 43101.
Maybe it's the intensity? It always sets to around 14 and the program ignores any -i flags that I put in there.
**edit, added --lookup-gap 2 and getting all 590's now, much better, forgot about that. still room to improve. got T56x16 now, whatever those numbers mean.
This looks interesting, but as long as it doesn't hit a more used exchange or two it will get forgotten and discarded aside just like that. It's now at coinfalcon but I don't know that exchange and with the way exchanges are going I will not be going on it either.
hahahah this looks tastey
I know right? I really find this one funny and wonder how many coins will be created and named after vegetables/condiments in the next coming years! Since this one is mineable, I'll really check this one.
If I upgrade the CPU, do I need more MHz or more cores?
For exmple, which will fit more GPUs, i5-6400 or i3-6320?
For exmple, which will fit more GPUs, i5-6400 or i3-6320?
You need more cores.
That's pretty good man, do you mind if I ask your settings? I can't seem to get more than 450 per 1080ti. Running i7 8600 with 8 gpu, win10x64 ltsb, 8GB ram, 120GB SSD, 60GB virtual mem space. CPU clock is at 4.26 on all cores, 8 threads fully maxed. GPU clock at 1898, ram at 5005, undervolted to 900mv. That's the timetravel miner right?
Use https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer/releases?after=1.4.3-tpruvot
If your system is multigpu i think you will need to bump your RAM. This actually goes for many miners I think
If you see when ccminer starts it says about max warps then allocs the max threads your system can handle, are they uneven numbers with like GPU's? (also runs at uneven hashrate)
After a while when the miner thread begins you will see T50x20 or something.
You can manually change this is ccminer with -l argument e.g. -l T50x20 and the miner will start much faster on that static setting.
Run 1 GPU using -d 0 and let the miner run on default to check the max threads it can handle.
Then copy that value given by 1 GPU e.g. T40x21 then add that to your bat file trying to run all your GPU.
I get errors about memory, I just upped 4GB to 8GB because I saw this and now I see the same again.
I have 5 1080ti in 1 rig. With -d 0 argument 1 1080ti runs at 660khs and all together about 590khs average
I think this issue is affecting a lot of multi GPU miners as RAM and CPU don't matter with 2.0 coins like Daggerhash or equihash so nobody bothers anymore.
GJ5BtWQgufQv8xiuKeuTHTCypJhubD3okD I fixed all my issues.
I got an i7 7700k and my cards are doing very well now.
Also I am using https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer/releases/ this version that improves my hashrate a lot!
And I followed this instructions on how to setup script to auto restart stuck miner http://jkcrypto.com/automatically-restart-mining-if-stopped/
Very happy now.
This is the best I can do.. I wish I had my problems solved earlier I would have prob mined double of what I have now.
I got an i7 7700k and my cards are doing very well now.
Also I am using https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer/releases/ this version that improves my hashrate a lot!
And I followed this instructions on how to setup script to auto restart stuck miner http://jkcrypto.com/automatically-restart-mining-if-stopped/
Very happy now.
This is the best I can do.. I wish I had my problems solved earlier I would have prob mined double of what I have now.
That's pretty good man, do you mind if I ask your settings? I can't seem to get more than 450 per 1080ti. Running i7 8600 with 8 gpu, win10x64 ltsb, 8GB ram, 120GB SSD, 60GB virtual mem space. CPU clock is at 4.26 on all cores, 8 threads fully maxed. GPU clock at 1898, ram at 5005, undervolted to 900mv. That's the timetravel miner right?
If I upgrade the CPU, do I need more MHz or more cores?
For exmple, which will fit more GPUs, i5-6400 or i3-6320?
For exmple, which will fit more GPUs, i5-6400 or i3-6320?
Garlicon is now listed on Coinfalcon exchange: https://coinfalcon.com/trading_view/GRLC-BTC
Got two i7 8700's arriving today, got a good deal and didn't need the k since it's not for main rig. I'm excited to get two 8 card rigs going on this coin. only been able to mine with 1 gpu per rig atm, that way I could at least dual mine the others with another coin. even if profits only last a short while, they'll pay for themselves then I'll have two good chips to use as distributed encoding servers.
only been able to mine with 1 gpu per rig atm, that way I could at least dual mine the others with another coin. even if profits only last a short while, they'll pay for themselves then I'll have two good chips to use as distributed encoding servers.Yes, I have 5 1080 TI's for only one 8700k, working great !
I tried mining with a rig of 1060 x2 and 1070 x1 using ccminer 2.2.3 and 2.2.4.
Both ways the miner starts slowering the system and crashes in 4-5 minutes.
With other algos I mined the system is very stable.
What can be the problem?
Both ways the miner starts slowering the system and crashes in 4-5 minutes.
With other algos I mined the system is very stable.
What can be the problem?
your CPU if not high end enough
What CPU is enough?
Is it possible to reduce the CPU usage?
For this coin, with more than 3 gpus, need an i7 7700k
Even 2 1080TI will underperform on a Celeron G1850 due to bottlenecking at 99% CPU Utilisation
I brought a i7 4770 as of the sky high profitability and now running 5 1080ti's with about 78% CPU Utilisation, probably one or two more cards would throttle the i7.
The 4 that I have on a riser are also slower. I don't know how much data is being transferred between the CPU and GPU on Nscrypt that it would bottleneck USB3, however, I doubt this. Anybody notice anything similar?
Got two i7 8700's arriving today, got a good deal and didn't need the k since it's not for main rig. I'm excited to get two 8 card rigs going on this coin. only been able to mine with 1 gpu per rig atm, that way I could at least dual mine the others with another coin. even if profits only last a short while, they'll pay for themselves then I'll have two good chips to use as distributed encoding servers.
only been able to mine with 1 gpu per rig atm, that way I could at least dual mine the others with another coin. even if profits only last a short while, they'll pay for themselves then I'll have two good chips to use as distributed encoding servers. Hello. Do you have Windows qt wallet?
Ofc. they have. All info here: https://pandawanfr.github.io/GarlicRecipes/
Wallet ( very good ) https://xske.github.io/garlium/
Thanks!
Can confirm that Garlium is working perfectly!
I tried mining with a rig of 1060 x2 and 1070 x1 using ccminer 2.2.3 and 2.2.4.
Both ways the miner starts slowering the system and crashes in 4-5 minutes.
With other algos I mined the system is very stable.
What can be the problem?
Both ways the miner starts slowering the system and crashes in 4-5 minutes.
With other algos I mined the system is very stable.
What can be the problem?
your CPU if not high end enough
What CPU is enough?
Is it possible to reduce the CPU usage?
For this coin, with more than 3 gpus, need an i7 7700k
Jump to: