If I got you right, then it means the final destination of all GOOD token will be shopomy app instead of exchange.
But only thing now puzzle me how the shopomy accounts are getting created with GOOD$. It means some token should be burned when a account is created. Otherwise creating a shopomy account/or rewards distribution/ bounty in shopomy app is just creating a additional wealth (i.e inflation).
There is no 'final destination' for our tokens, just as there is no final destination for an Ethereum token itself.
Burning tokens would actually hurt economic growth. This would be similar to burning Ethereum whenever someone wanted an Ethereum-based token. The Ethereum used to obtain Golem, for example, is sent back into circulation. If we burned Ethereum instead of re-circulating it, it would mean that the more popular Golem became the more Ethereum's economy was destroyed.
Being a utility token, it should not be burned (as that would convey that it is a convertible currency). The GOOD token's utiity is in its ability to be used as a license for GOOD dollars. The more tokens you have the more rights to GOOD dollars you could potentially obtain.
Imagine if Microsoft created only 888,000,000 Windows installation licenses and disks. People would purchase Windows not because they wanted the disk but the utility that it presents. But it doesn't mean that the disk should be burned after they're done installing it. In order for Windows to be on billions of computers, in this analogy, people would
keep the license and send back the disk so that others could use it for the same purpose.
One method allows for tremendous scale whereas another does not. We use this method because we cannot create an unlimited number of tokens like Windows can do with disks. Instead, we're using the token in order to scale exponentially within the 'operating system' we have created.
Inflation is good, as is additional 'wealth' in this respect. It allows economies to grow. But in this model, hyperinflation isn't possible. The value of a GOOD dollar is in its use
with the US dollar, not independent from it. One GOOD dollar will always be used with one USD. It could not possibly be used with $2 USD, for example.