Topic: [ANN] Grin | PoW Mining | Electronic transactions for all. Community driven. - page 55. (Read 73804 times)

Hi All ...

Who is the person responsible for your Grin Pool?

Please contact me directly on Skype or Discord. If anyone knows who they are, or who is responsible for it, please forward this message that I would personally like to chat.

Thanks.

#crysx

https://github.com/mimblewimble/grin/blob/master/doc/intro.md

Can anyone explaine me what is the technology "Mimblewimble"? As I know Beam coin using the same technology too...This is new private technology? 

Except I've already gotten multiple payments from there...  User error?

ATTENTION !!! POOL https://grinmint.com DOES NOT PAY A COIN. NO PAYMENTS ABOUT. TO MAIL DO NOT SEND TIXD ..COINS MISSING FROM POOL WITHOUT CONFIRMATION
 BE CAREFUL, DO NOT MINE THERE

This pool does not pay. Coins disappear from the balance and do not come to the exchange !!!

Just took a couple minutes to fully sync for me a few days ago.  I believe they've already trimmed first 5K blocks now too.

Seems fine for me as far as pool hash aligning w/ miner hash.  Minus a 2-3% reject/stale rate, which seems high, but apparently is caused by their increased min diff.

Believe you need to delete your chain data and resync.  Don't remember the exact structure of the node folders, and too lazy to log into my remote node atm...

A reinstall? Do you mean to delete everything in the ~./grin folder? I reckon deleting only the chain_data folder would be enough. However, there has to be another practical way without deleting anything.

I have a problem. A power failure caused my node to shutdown. If I start it up again it prints this on the screen

I failed to find one of the right cookies. Found 0
Segmentation fault (core dumped)

Also, grin --help does not help that much. What should I do?

trying to beat monero and zcash, right ? )

The "general consensus" is to keep trying...

I'm also on Grinmint, what's the general consensus? Good pool or not? What are most others using?

Yes give it a day. Maybe even two. And then try sparkpool. Sorry, but I also noticed lower graph rate reported on Grinmint last week.

Variance? Give it some time - and I mean 12-24h - and check the pool average then.

Any idea why i am getting an average 8 Gh/s on minerbabe and Greenmint reports only 4Gh/s?

29 Rx 570's with 8 GB vram & 2 Vegas

Please RT , hope we hit 20$ tomorrow 🤞
https://twitter.com/AlexKosa1/status/1089532123613155329

It's 14 tps.

It's scalable because it doesn't have ever-mounting costs. If you took Bitcoin and gave it 100 MB blocks, that'd be up to 5.2 TB of data added per year to the history that some subset of users would have to completely store and all full nodes would have to completely download. Altcoins get away with using large max block sizes and saying that they're "scalable" because their blocks are usually empty, so they don't actually have to face the costs.

Grin has a 15 MB bitcoin-equivalent max block size, and while this increases the bandwidth which nodes require (from an absolute minimum of 53 kbps on Bitcoin to 200 kbps on grin - note however that the network cannot function if most nodes have only this minimum), it largely does not increase the history which nodes must keep track of, since mimblewimble uniquely allows the entire network to forget old data.

Maybe in the future there will be a willingness to increase the minimum required bandwidth on grin substantially as global Internet speeds increase. At first glance 200 kbps seems conservative for grin, and since grin does not aim to be a store of value, it can afford to be somewhat reckless anyway. But as long as your network relies on every network participant taking a look at every transaction (ie. on-chain transactions in all decentralized block chain systems), you have no hope of competing with the throughput of eg. Visa, since you have to support ordinary people with less-than-optimized Internet connections running nodes. Global broadcast just doesn't scale well, which is why we're not all tapped into the same Ethernet network. LN can get Visa-level transaction volumes because it keeps most transactions local to the participants.

That is valid point how this could be possible to handle bulk transaction while some other projects already doing job very well than how Grin will provide this solution. I also interested to know about this.