Yes I agree, but to accomplish that we should "do" something. At least thinking (it never killed anyone
)
I report the link of an interesting article posted on cryptocoinnews:
http://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/news/charlie-lee-litecoins-five-steps-creating-successful-altcoin/2014/07/19I think guncoin has everything but a miner-attractive-thing.
Watching the going of others coins I'm starting to think: if you want to reach all the guns-enthusiasts you have to start to reach miners.
Apparently it's the way things works...first of all there is the miner, then everything else.
Miners make the coin live...and its worth becomes higher...and the value attracts people and they start to invest in it.
The problem, I think, it's that when you talk about guncoin to someone and you tell him its "actual value" you don't light interest.
When I speak about bitcoin and say "One bitcoin now is at 620 dollars" I can see the "flash" in other's eyes.
My personal opinion is not to keep going to work harder and harder like Ganrom. He's a fucking hero, no doubt about that. But I prefer a Ganrom at peace with his mind then having an angry hero who may will leave our community. He's a column and I'd prefer not to lose him. I'm not saying we shouldn't keep voting and other things (and Ganrom is right when he writes we...we should vote a little at least xD I work like everyone else but still in those few days I tried to help him...obviously not enough lol);
my personal opinion is a) attract miners or b) hard pushing and reaching "True Gun People" (VIP, associations, facebook fans, etc.)
With option "b" I mean that if, somehow, we can have a really good marketing campaign, we can ignore the miners-attractive-factor.
Without option "b" I think we need the miners-attractive-factor...or at least something else "tech-ish" (like the coin you can use to pay instead of bitcoin...I don't remember the name but the idea was cool)
Cryptoworld is made of "Crypto"...it's tech...algo...miners...electronic stuff
LOL
@Ganrom
I think...that crazy people of the free-masonry-Gcoin didn't vote.
I think complaining with askcoin is not something we should count on...I'm just trying to imagine the situation...I think that someone on Gcoin(the slot-machine coin) wrote to Askcoin to add their coin to voting-list. They did it but they did a stupid research (exactly like I did xD) and they put the wrong link...but we all know that the free-masonry-Gcoin wasn't launched yet...I think no mason voted just because I don't think there was any them who knew about that vote (how could they possibly imagine that their coin was listed even if it wasn't launched yet?
).
Now...maybe I'm wrong...but I think it would be really really strange even if ONE vote was from free-masonry-GCoin...but still...maybe I'm wrong and there are lots of crazy people out there who spend their time looking for voting-events even when their own devs don't know
(and free-masonry coin's Dev doesn't know a lot of things...he doesn't know the algo yet! buhuhauhahhaha xD xD xD)
Anyway, thanks for the huge support Gan!