Topic: [ANN] [ICB] IcebergCoin ❄︎ Big Update 27.11.❄︎ In-Wallet Tradebot❄︎ [MALWARE?] - page 113. (Read 225910 times)

Quote from: CryptoHobo on July 13, 2014, 11:35:14 AM

Quote from: ktmracing03 on July 13, 2014, 11:09:31 AM

Quote from: CryptoHobo on July 13, 2014, 09:37:48 AM

Quote from: Revelation on July 13, 2014, 01:21:53 PM

I have a radeon r9 290. At a test on a nist5 pool it gives me 7.9 mh on the talkcoinminer (sgminer).
Can I expect more with an other miner or different settings?
powertune 20, engine 1043, mem 1500, threadconcurency 8512, g 1, w 512, i 20, lookup gap 0

Try this
http://www.reddit.com/r/vertcoin/comments/298gqc/greenpool_x11_amd_144146_drivers_trick_for_extra/

Got my r9 270x from 5mh to 8.6!!!

I´ve tried this. But which kernel to use for icebergcoin? nist5 wasn´t in so I copied it to the folder but I only
get errors (share is above target) and rejected shares

Im having the same problem....any help?

sorry peeps was at work use algo talkcoin-mod

I'm using this sgminer https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-sgminer-v5-optimized-x11x13neoscryptlyra2reetc-kernel-switch-miner-632503

yeah 15.3 mh Cheesy

super tipp. thanks a lot. Settings same as above, but sgminer 5.0 pre release. I love it

So what the heck is wrong with mine....talkcoin sgminer I am getting 8.3 mhs with my 290x with same settings on sgminer 5 i get <3.

Post your conf/bat settings

minus pools....
"intensity" : "22",
"xintensity" : "0",
"rawintensity" : "0",
"worksize" : "256",
"kernel" : "talkcoin-mod",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"thread-concurrency" : "0",
"shaders" : "0",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"gpu-engine" : "0",
"gpu-fan" : "0-85",
"gpu-memclock" : "0",
"gpu-memdiff" : "0",
"gpu-powertune" : "0",
"gpu-vddc" : "0.000",
"temp-cutoff" : "95",
"temp-overheat" : "85",
"temp-target" : "75",
"api-mcast-port" : "4028",
"api-port" : "4028",
"expiry" : "28",
"failover-switch-delay" : "60",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"gpu-platform" : "0",
"log" : "5",
"no-pool-disable" : true,
"queue" : "1",
"scan-time" : "7",
"tcp-keepalive" : "30",
"temp-hysteresis" : "3",
"shares" : "0",
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin"
}

Have you tried lower intensities? One of my rigs has a R9 290 (I know, not the same as your card), but unlike Scrypt where higher intensity = higher hashes, I've found that there's a sweet spot around I=17 for my R9 290 on NIST5. Worth a try on your 290X.

Lower intensity dropped hash further...I guess I will have to be happy with 8mhs even though everyone else get 16 with this card.... Huh

sorry, a bit too slow in writing... I copy my post from the previous site:
I took sgminer from here https://nicehash.com/software/#sgminer . Change threadconcurency to 15552 (if it not works start with 8192 and add 64 each time till it don´t starts, then 1 step back. lookup gap for me is 0. Powertune +20. Intensity for me highest is 20. But the 290x is different, try 20 first and then rise. The rest in your config seems ok to me.
edit
oh, i forgot memory 1500mhz and engine 1054. I don´t know exactly what you need for the 2 gpus in your 290x. You have to test (watch temprature)
2nd edit
I just tried the new 14.7rc1. Seems to work good with this miner Grin

bitspender

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

And? This just means that there will be a launch otherwise dev will not get his 100 BTC. The dev will be gone after this launch. Obviously, he doesn't care about anything else. If Bittrex were to keep his 100 BTC premine for 1 year I would see the point otherwise this is just laughable.
When other devs sell their 1-5% premine after actually trying to achieve something the coin is ready for the grave, yet somehow Icebergcoin dev managed to pull 100 BTC premine sale and people still hope for the best. This is true magic!

+1

All the losers spending all there BTC on rentals will be the scam of the year once this dev gets his 100BTC for doing nothing at all, just posting messages every now and then.

Revelation

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

Quote from: Pelk on July 13, 2014, 01:18:10 PM

Quote from: Revelation on July 13, 2014, 01:12:16 PM

Quote from: JuanHungLo on July 13, 2014, 01:09:13 PM

Quote from: Revelation on July 13, 2014, 01:07:06 PM

People, I am missing something?
First 7200 blocks have ZERO reward. Block time is 60 seconds, that means first 5 days of mining with zero reward?
Total POW block count is 17000 but this is more than 7 days of POW as stated in the OP. If POS starts before this block then the total number of POW coins will be lass than 5mln.
On top of that crap the dev sold his 20% premine already for 100BTC and everybody is happy?

Quote from: Revelation on July 13, 2014, 01:12:16 PM

The question is at what block will be the blockchain at launch. Block 1000, 5000, 7000? If anything but close to 7000 this is a joke. Regardless, 100 BTC to scam the people

Bittrex will open the wallet for the dev after a successful start

And? This just means that there will be a launch otherwise dev will not get his 100 BTC. The dev will be gone after this launch. Obviously, he doesn't care about anything else. If Bittrex were to keep his 100 BTC premine for 1 year I would see the point otherwise this is just laughable.
When other devs sell their 1-5% premine after actually trying to achieve something the coin is ready for the grave, yet somehow Icebergcoin dev managed to pull 100 BTC premine sale and people still hope for the best. This is true magic!

Pelk

full member

Activity: 132

Merit: 100

Quote from: JuanHungLo on July 13, 2014, 01:09:13 PM

Quote from: Revelation on July 13, 2014, 01:07:06 PM

People, I am missing something?
First 7200 blocks have ZERO reward. Block time is 60 seconds, that means first 5 days of mining with zero reward?
Total POW block count is 17000 but this is more than 7 days of POW as stated in the OP. If POS starts before this block then the total number of POW coins will be lass than 5mln.
On top of that crap the dev sold his 20% premine already for 100BTC and everybody is happy?

Quote from: juanbond on July 13, 2014, 01:09:05 PM

The question is at what block will be the blockchain at launch. Block 1000, 5000, 7000? If anything but close to 7000 this is a joke. Regardless, 100 BTC to scam the people

Bittrex will open the wallet for the dev after a successful start

ktmracing03

full member

Activity: 148

Merit: 100

Quote from: ktmracing03 on July 13, 2014, 01:00:18 PM

Quote from: nanoprobe on July 13, 2014, 12:55:53 PM

Quote from: ktmracing03 on July 13, 2014, 12:50:07 PM

Quote from: CryptoHobo on July 13, 2014, 11:35:14 AM

Quote from: ktmracing03 on July 13, 2014, 11:09:31 AM

Quote from: CryptoHobo on July 13, 2014, 09:37:48 AM

Quote from: ktmracing03 on July 13, 2014, 01:00:18 PM

I have a radeon r9 290. At a test on a nist5 pool it gives me 7.9 mh on the talkcoinminer (sgminer).
Can I expect more with an other miner or different settings?
powertune 20, engine 1043, mem 1500, threadconcurency 8512, g 1, w 512, i 20, lookup gap 0

Try this
http://www.reddit.com/r/vertcoin/comments/298gqc/greenpool_x11_amd_144146_drivers_trick_for_extra/

Got my r9 270x from 5mh to 8.6!!!

I´ve tried this. But which kernel to use for icebergcoin? nist5 wasn´t in so I copied it to the folder but I only
get errors (share is above target) and rejected shares

Im having the same problem....any help?

sorry peeps was at work use algo talkcoin-mod

I'm using this sgminer https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-sgminer-v5-optimized-x11x13neoscryptlyra2reetc-kernel-switch-miner-632503

yeah 15.3 mh Cheesy

super tipp. thanks a lot. Settings same as above, but sgminer 5.0 pre release. I love it

So what the heck is wrong with mine....talkcoin sgminer I am getting 8.3 mhs with my 290x with same settings on sgminer 5 i get <3.

Post your conf/bat settings

minus pools....
"intensity" : "22",
"xintensity" : "0",
"rawintensity" : "0",
"worksize" : "256",
"kernel" : "talkcoin-mod",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"thread-concurrency" : "0",
"shaders" : "0",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"gpu-engine" : "0",
"gpu-fan" : "0-85",
"gpu-memclock" : "0",
"gpu-memdiff" : "0",
"gpu-powertune" : "0",
"gpu-vddc" : "0.000",
"temp-cutoff" : "95",
"temp-overheat" : "85",
"temp-target" : "75",
"api-mcast-port" : "4028",
"api-port" : "4028",
"expiry" : "28",
"failover-switch-delay" : "60",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"gpu-platform" : "0",
"log" : "5",
"no-pool-disable" : true,
"queue" : "1",
"scan-time" : "7",
"tcp-keepalive" : "30",
"temp-hysteresis" : "3",
"shares" : "0",
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin"
}

Have you tried lower intensities? One of my rigs has a R9 290 (I know, not the same as your card), but unlike Scrypt where higher intensity = higher hashes, I've found that there's a sweet spot around I=17 for my R9 290 on NIST5. Worth a try on your 290X.

Lower intensity dropped hash further...I guess I will have to be happy with 8mhs even though everyone else get 16 with this card.... Huh

ratohe

member

Activity: 66

Merit: 10

Quote from: nanoprobe on July 13, 2014, 12:55:53 PM

Quote from: ktmracing03 on July 13, 2014, 12:50:07 PM

Quote from: CryptoHobo on July 13, 2014, 11:35:14 AM

Quote from: ktmracing03 on July 13, 2014, 11:09:31 AM

Quote from: CryptoHobo on July 13, 2014, 09:37:48 AM

Quote from: ocminer on July 13, 2014, 12:54:22 PM

I have a radeon r9 290. At a test on a nist5 pool it gives me 7.9 mh on the talkcoinminer (sgminer).
Can I expect more with an other miner or different settings?
powertune 20, engine 1043, mem 1500, threadconcurency 8512, g 1, w 512, i 20, lookup gap 0

Try this
http://www.reddit.com/r/vertcoin/comments/298gqc/greenpool_x11_amd_144146_drivers_trick_for_extra/

Got my r9 270x from 5mh to 8.6!!!

I´ve tried this. But which kernel to use for icebergcoin? nist5 wasn´t in so I copied it to the folder but I only
get errors (share is above target) and rejected shares

Im having the same problem....any help?

sorry peeps was at work use algo talkcoin-mod

I'm using this sgminer https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-sgminer-v5-optimized-x11x13neoscryptlyra2reetc-kernel-switch-miner-632503

yeah 15.3 mh Cheesy

super tipp. thanks a lot. Settings same as above, but sgminer 5.0 pre release. I love it

So what the heck is wrong with mine....talkcoin sgminer I am getting 8.3 mhs with my 290x with same settings on sgminer 5 i get <3.

Post your conf/bat settings

minus pools....
"intensity" : "22",
"xintensity" : "0",
"rawintensity" : "0",
"worksize" : "256",
"kernel" : "talkcoin-mod",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"thread-concurrency" : "0",
"shaders" : "0",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"gpu-engine" : "0",
"gpu-fan" : "0-85",
"gpu-memclock" : "0",
"gpu-memdiff" : "0",
"gpu-powertune" : "0",
"gpu-vddc" : "0.000",
"temp-cutoff" : "95",
"temp-overheat" : "85",
"temp-target" : "75",
"api-mcast-port" : "4028",
"api-port" : "4028",
"expiry" : "28",
"failover-switch-delay" : "60",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"gpu-platform" : "0",
"log" : "5",
"no-pool-disable" : true,
"queue" : "1",
"scan-time" : "7",
"tcp-keepalive" : "30",
"temp-hysteresis" : "3",
"shares" : "0",
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin"
}

I took sgminer from here https://nicehash.com/software/#sgminer . Change threadconcurency to 15552 (if it not works start with 8192 and add 64 each time till it don´t starts, then 1 step back. lookup gap for me is 0. Powertune +20. Intensity for me highest is 20. But the 290x is different, try 20 first and then rise. The rest in your config seems ok to me.
edit
oh, i forgot memory 1500mhz and engine 1054. I don´t know exactly what you need for the 2 gpus in your 290x. You have to test (watch temprature)
2nd edit
I just tried the new 14.7rc1. Seems to work good with this miner Grin

CryptoHobo

legendary

Activity: 1050

Merit: 1000

as far as i know only works with 14.6 drivers .

does it work on windows only ? or also on linux ?

honestly i dont know whenever i install linux on my rig i end up with 1 card giving nothing but hardware errors, but it'd be worth a try Wink

Pool Op2

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 100

A Profit Seeking Auto Switching Multiport Multipool

Help us celebrate our opening with 0.05% fees on IcebergCoin!
This is the pool to be on! Wicked fast and 0.05% fees. What could be better?

Mining Information :
Pure NOMP Back End for Incredible Mining and Payout Speed
We use a lightning fast node.js stratum. All coins use Vardiff
Instant Pay to Your Wallet. We Do Not Hold Your Coins
Unique Mining Key System. One Key for All Coins!
No Usernames, Passwords, Logins or Pins
lightninghash.com

Servers :
Our Clustered Servers are Located in the USA in an Enterprise Level Data Center
Each Server has 16 Cores with 72 GB Ram and are Fully Redundant
Our Servers are on a DDOS Resistant Network
lightninghash.com

Revelation

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

Quote from: JuanHungLo on July 13, 2014, 01:09:13 PM

Quote from: Revelation on July 13, 2014, 01:07:06 PM

People, I am missing something?
First 7200 blocks have ZERO reward. Block time is 60 seconds, that means first 5 days of mining with zero reward?
Total POW block count is 17000 but this is more than 7 days of POW as stated in the OP. If POS starts before this block then the total number of POW coins will be lass than 5mln.
On top of that crap the dev sold his 20% premine already for 100BTC and everybody is happy?

Quote from: Revelation on July 13, 2014, 01:07:06 PM

The question is at what block will be the blockchain at launch. Block 1000, 5000, 7000? If anything but close to 7000 this is a joke. Regardless, 100 BTC to scam the people

100 BTC

JuanHungLo

hero member

Activity: 935

Merit: 1001

I don't always drink...

People, I am missing something?
First 7200 blocks have ZERO reward. Block time is 60 seconds, that means first 5 days of mining with zero reward?
Total POW block count is 17000 but this is more than 7 days of POW as stated in the OP. If POS starts before this block then the total number of POW coins will be lass than 5mln.
On top of that crap the dev sold his 20% premine already for 100BTC and everybody is happy?

Quote from: ktmracing03 on July 13, 2014, 01:00:18 PM

juanbond

member

Activity: 96

Merit: 17

Quote from: nanoprobe on July 13, 2014, 12:55:53 PM

Quote from: ktmracing03 on July 13, 2014, 12:50:07 PM

Quote from: CryptoHobo on July 13, 2014, 11:35:14 AM

Quote from: ktmracing03 on July 13, 2014, 11:09:31 AM

Quote from: CryptoHobo on July 13, 2014, 09:37:48 AM