Author

Topic: [ANN] [ICO] [WGR] | Wagerr | The Betting Blockchain | Bounties - page 143. (Read 237360 times)

newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
Getting on a decent exchange is still going to help with marketing and getting the word out, one of the stated objectives. Not only that, but it is, or should be, an obligation to the investors to provide them with a good option for liquidating their investment should they choose it is no longer for them or if personal situation calls for it.

Liquidation is not an obligation. Have a look at Tezos for example. They have no buy-back plans and wont be on an exchange for 4 months minimum.
Investment in an ICO is a long process. Just because some have allowed pumping and dumping this should not be the model
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 251

Thats actually quite funny. Thanks for clearing it up, but it looks like it worked as Wagerr dropped to 0.02 at the time.... Someone picked up some cheap coins
Maybe that's why they did it.
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 251
Getting on a decent exchange is still going to help with marketing and getting the word out, one of the stated objectives. Not only that, but it is, or should be, an obligation to the investors to provide them with a good option for liquidating their investment should they choose it is no longer for them or if personal situation calls for it.
full member
Activity: 167
Merit: 100
Wait wasn't Mandiago part of the team ?

I came across his profile and had sent him a message few days back. Just logged in to see this:



WTF?  

Hello guys,

Here I am laughing at this FUD because these individuals went through the hassle of looking into my life, found a photo of me that is an actual headshot and then plastered a fake message pretending to be me. However, the fake linked in account they made for me only matches my lastname and they chose any possible initials for JM and decided to go with Jorge Martinez ? Makes me laugh pretty hard actually. Whoever you are, you took time to learn about my life but couldn't even find my real name..do a better job next time before you try to impersonate me. Huge fail bud.

This is my real Linked In account that I barely use to begin with: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jm-maradiaga-95a988141/

Here I am putting this joke to rest.



Thats actually quite funny. Thanks for clearing it up, but it looks like it worked as Wagerr dropped to 0.02 at the time.... Someone picked up some cheap coins
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
Any plan to list this on a bigger exchange with decent trading volume that Waves Dex, Cling ICO finish around thesame time with Wagerr ICO, and now on bigger exchange. Wagerr team need to look to put this on bigger exchange for exposure

We dont need a fucking exchange.
You morons dont have what it takes to participate into an ICO like wagerr.
Sell your bags on waves or maybe it's too complicated for you ?
Just sell and let this thread, After you people ask 50x the same questions during ici now it's when polo?? When bittrex ?? when can I get 50000000% return ??

Tell me why not you moron?
Will it be bad for Wagerr to get more publicity? Because it will once it hits a major exchange.
Do you want wagerr's price to go below ICOs price? Because it will if it stays only on Waves' DEX.

Check out my previous post. I've tried to clear up the exchange issue.
There's a quote in there from the dev as well.
sr. member
Activity: 532
Merit: 327
Any plan to list this on a bigger exchange with decent trading volume that Waves Dex, Cling ICO finish around thesame time with Wagerr ICO, and now on bigger exchange. Wagerr team need to look to put this on bigger exchange for exposure

We dont need a fucking exchange.
You morons dont have what it takes to participate into an ICO like wagerr.
Sell your bags on waves or maybe it's too complicated for you ?
Just sell and let this thread, After you people ask 50x the same questions during ici now it's when polo?? When bittrex ?? when can I get 50000000% return ??

Tell me why not you moron?
Will it be bad for Wagerr to get more publicity? Because it will once it hits a major exchange.
Do you want wagerr's price to go below ICOs price? Because it will if it stays only on Waves' DEX.
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
Morning all,

After reading some of the FUD posts and the general questions being posted on here I thought I'd write a quick article explaining some of the details of Wagerr as I see them.

https://steemit.com/cryptocurrency/@durbin/wagerr-the-story-so-far-an-opinion-piece

I hope some people might find this useful.

Thanks
member
Activity: 117
Merit: 10
Co-Founder at AlphaTradeZone.com
At this stage we don't actually need an exchange at all. We need to give the team time and support in what they are doing and build a helpful and constructive community here.

Exchange will be needed after we have something valuable to deliver to the public.
full member
Activity: 342
Merit: 100
Any plan to list this on a bigger exchange with decent trading volume that Waves Dex, Cling ICO finish around thesame time with Wagerr ICO, and now on bigger exchange. Wagerr team need to look to put this on bigger exchange for exposure

We dont need a fucking exchange.
You morons dont have what it takes to participate into an ICO like wagerr.
Sell your bags on waves or maybe it's too complicated for you ?
Just sell and let this thread, After you people ask 50x the same questions during ici now it's when polo?? When bittrex ?? when can I get 50000000% return ??
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 500
Any plan to list this on a bigger exchange with decent trading volume that Waves Dex, Cling ICO finish around thesame time with Wagerr ICO, and now on bigger exchange. Wagerr team need to look to put this on bigger exchange for exposure
newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
Wait wasn't Mandiago part of the team ?

I came across his profile and had sent him a message few days back. Just logged in to see this:

https://i.imgur.com/J4Tyv9i.png

WTF?  

Hello guys,

Here I am laughing at this FUD because these individuals went through the hassle of looking into my life, found a photo of me that is an actual headshot and then plastered a fake message pretending to be me. However, the fake linked in account they made for me only matches my lastname and they chose any possible initials for JM and decided to go with Jorge Martinez ? Makes me laugh pretty hard actually. Whoever you are, you took time to learn about my life but couldn't even find my real name..do a better job next time before you try to impersonate me. Huge fail bud.

This is my real Linked In account that I barely use to begin with: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jm-maradiaga-95a988141/

Here I am putting this joke to rest.

full member
Activity: 336
Merit: 101
Eth has plans for scaling too so they are going to stay.  I see them resolving their issues faster than BTC at the current rate with the entire Bitcoin political sausagefest fiesta.  They been trying to fix the scaling issue for 2 years but due to infighting it never got resolved.

For Eth, everyone rallies behind Vitalik so what he says pretty much goes.

In any case, the top blockchain platform I see are:

1.  BTC
2.  ETH
3.  IOTA (huge future potential)

No reason why Waves/Lisk/Antshare, etc., can't be 4th.  Don't see Waves overthrowing ETH, however -- due to first to market for smart contracts.

Man... your 3 coins already are at the top!!
Not a huge gain forward, besides the market (in this case,why not put 100% in BTC?)

The higher the risk, the higher the gain. It's a good rule of thumb.
Mitigate risk with coins which seem to show a broad acceptance (LTC, STRATIS, WAVES).

Pick some with low MK to maximize potential.

I know they are top...it wasn't investment advice.  I am saying that Waves can be possibly 4th after these guys, which I don't see Waves dethroning.

Waves definitely has the potential to be a multi-billion dollar coin.
Maybe not at the $20 billion ETH is today, but sure close.

Let's say $10Billion: That is a x30 increase
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
Eth has plans for scaling too so they are going to stay.  I see them resolving their issues faster than BTC at the current rate with the entire Bitcoin political sausagefest fiesta.  They been trying to fix the scaling issue for 2 years but due to infighting it never got resolved.

For Eth, everyone rallies behind Vitalik so what he says pretty much goes.

In any case, the top blockchain platform I see are:

1.  BTC
2.  ETH
3.  IOTA (huge future potential)

No reason why Waves/Lisk/Antshare, etc., can't be 4th.  Don't see Waves overthrowing ETH, however -- due to first to market for smart contracts.

Man... your 3 coins already are at the top!!
Not a huge gain forward, besides the market (in this case,why not put 100% in BTC?)

The higher the risk, the higher the gain. It's a good rule of thumb.
Mitigate risk with coins which seem to show a broad acceptance (LTC, STRATIS, WAVES).

Pick some with low MK to maximize potential.

I know they are top...it wasn't investment advice.  I am saying that Waves can be possibly 4th after these guys, which I don't see Waves dethroning.
full member
Activity: 336
Merit: 101
Eth has plans for scaling too so they are going to stay.  I see them resolving their issues faster than BTC at the current rate with the entire Bitcoin political sausagefest fiesta.  They been trying to fix the scaling issue for 2 years but due to infighting it never got resolved.

For Eth, everyone rallies behind Vitalik so what he says pretty much goes.

In any case, the top blockchain platform I see are:

1.  BTC
2.  ETH
3.  IOTA (huge future potential)

No reason why Waves/Lisk/Antshare, etc., can't be 4th.  Don't see Waves overthrowing ETH, however -- due to first to market for smart contracts.

Man... your 3 coins already are at the top!!
Not a huge gain forward, besides the market (in this case,why not put 100% in BTC?)

The higher the risk, the higher the gain. It's a good rule of thumb.
Mitigate risk with coins which seem to show a broad acceptance (LTC, STRATIS, WAVES).

Pick some with low MK to maximize potential.
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
IDK, a lot of the businesses that do ICOs on Ethereum seem strange to me. 

Aren't there a lot of barriers for traditional real world businesses to use Ethereum?  Don't they have to learn an entirely new programming language called Solidarity?  Don't turning complete smart contracts present a lot of security risks?  Also, it's my understanding that Ethereum won't be able to scale really until the sharding tech is developed and that seems to be at least a year away.  A lot can happen in a year!

Waves, to my understanding, is built from scratch on Scala.  It's proof-of-stake already from the beginning, and regular users can actually earn rewards through leasing without having to download the entire blockchain.

Plus, from what I'm reading, Waves will have non-turing complete smart contracts in a couple of months that won't require any programming knowledge to implement.

In my opinion, the real winner in the blockchain space will be the one who reaches the traditional brick-and-mortar type buisnesses who already have a valid customer base.  Waves seems to be smarter in this regard.

of course i could be wrong......after all......this is crypto!
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
Eth has plans for scaling too so they are going to stay.  I see them resolving their issues faster than BTC at the current rate with the entire Bitcoin political sausagefest fiesta.  They been trying to fix the scaling issue for 2 years but due to infighting it never got resolved.

For Eth, everyone rallies behind Vitalik so what he says pretty much goes.

In any case, the top blockchain platform I see are:

1.  BTC
2.  ETH
3.  IOTA (huge future potential)

No reason why Waves/Lisk/Antshare, etc., can't be 4th.  Don't see Waves overthrowing ETH, however -- due to first to market for smart contracts.
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
I've noticed that too.  A lot of really interesting startups seem to be choosing Waves as their platform.

Why is that?

I read something somewhere about how they plan to implement bitcoin-ng scaling this year to handle up to 1,000 tx/second.  Is this true?  And ethereum, if I'm not mistaken can do what.....17 per second?

I also read they are opening an eth gateway soon, so hopefully that will add more pairings and liquidity for wagerr!

I was in digibyte slack, and i noticed the community there was wanting to switch over to Waves platform.  Pretty cool!

Yeah, the dex seems very young (launched in April this year I believe), but overall it looks very promising.  I'd rather play the long game anyways.  That's what winners do.  Only losers sit around complaining.  I'm sure you guys agree!
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
I actually see potential in Waves DEX in the future.  Just need traction becomes more popular.  Until then need more exchanges.

I been noticing a lot of ICO startups been picking Waves platform so might be a good thing in the future.
newbie
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
Go to the Wagerr/wBTC pairing to trade there instead of the Wagerr/Waves pairing if your order hasn't been filled.  You'll have most of your volume  there.  Cancel other open orders by clicking the little "x" to the right of the open order, and move it to the bitcoin pairing if you can't trade it at the Waves pairing at that moment.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
Quote
If you can't sell your WGR there, you are either listing the price too high for anyone to want to buy it, and need to cancel that order, and adjust the price closer to real time market prices, because other people are trading about $60k worth there today.  
Thank you for correcting me on that.  Not use to the Waves DEX.  But point still stands.  DEX Waves doesn't have much action at $57k.

Or I don't know.  Maybe the price is depressed because the supply overwhelmed demands due to the shitty amount of buyers that signed up for DEX Waves?
Jump to: