Edit: I see the link to the original now. Wow. The only thing I could think is they want to remain unknown, like the Bitconnect team, but why would they put a fake development team at all? Wouldn't they expect people to google it? lol...
There was never any picture on the damn whitepaper! Stop being so stupid.
In the *PGN* FAKE file (photoshopped) the file is named "whitepapper" with the mispelling of paper.
In the *PDF* REAL file ( from website ) the file name is "whitepaper"
If you are too dumb to see details like this than GOODLUCK! You are gonna need it.
Sighhhh... straight to name calling
. I see that, but at the same time, yesterday when I looked on there website and clicked on the link to their Whitepaper it
WAS misspelled "Whitepapper." When I clicked on it, it took me to a broken link and I had to correct the spelling manually to get to their Whitepaper. Here is the link to what is claimed to be the "original"
(Note: I am still undecided, just copying this from the earlier thread!)http://www.datafilehost.com/d/0689c800Here's my question: Is their pdf read-only? Or could a shill/hater have created this fake whitepaper by adding in a slide with the same template?
Which leads to my other question,
why was their "whitepaper link" taking me to a broken link to https://ethconnect.net/WhitePapper_en.pdf ? (misspelling)
Now, it's not broken, and for some reason
you can find their whitepaper at both links: https://ethconnect.net/WhitePapper_en.pdf and
https://ethconnect.net/WhitePaper_en.pdf (both spellings???)
Needless to say, I am VERY confused lol... anyone have any (rational) insight on this?
. Thanks! 
You should use real links next time though it helps. LOL. Troll.
