Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] [IDISNEY] Disney Coin - page 22. (Read 73250 times)

full member
Activity: 481
Merit: 105
November 20, 2018, 10:59:26 AM



MINNIE: Exactly! you are a good Lerner.






SATOSHI: You mean learner . Grin

MINNIE: Both. Grin
 
MICKEY: That was what she meant as commonsense.  Grin







SATOSHI: How am I a Lerner then?  

MINNIE: We all are.
 
MICKEY: Lerner is our Toon's chain name.

SATOSHI: What is a Toon's chain name?

MINNIE: It's like a second animal name but a third name that makes a Toon be a part of one entity.
 
MICKEY: Like Donald Duck and Daffy Duck, both are Ducks but each have a different third name.

MINNIE: Donald Duck Disney and Daffy Duck Warner.

SATOSHI: So you mean a corporations.

MINNIE: Legally speaking yes.
 
MICKEY: But Corporations are a primitive entity.

MINNIE: Humans are much better form of such entity.

SATOSHI: What entity.

MINNIE: An organism.



full member
Activity: 481
Merit: 105
November 20, 2018, 10:20:50 AM



MINNIE: Exactly! you are a good Lerner.






SATOSHI: You mean learner . Grin

MINNIE: Both. Grin
 
MICKEY: That was what she meant as commonsense.  Grin



full member
Activity: 481
Merit: 105
November 20, 2018, 05:55:01 AM




MINNIE: You could just say Me Too. It express the same meaning as We.

MICKEY: Right!







MINNIE: However, to be very clear, Me Too is based on less unfounded assumptions.

SATOSHI: Are you suggesting that We express some sort of consent as an assumption?

MINNIE: Exactly!
 
MICKEY: Right!

MINNIE: I don't even understand how it can be legal to say We without presenting a proof for that argument.

SATOSHI: What argument?

MICKEY: The argument of the agreement.

MINNIE: A Proof Of Agreement, if We like to be more constructive in terms of the logic.

MICKEY: Like Proof Of Existence, Proof Of Stake, Proof Of Work,  Proof Of Concept....

MINNIE: And Proof Of Consent.

MICKEY: What is the difference between Proof of Agreement and Proof of Consent?

MINNIE:  Proof Of Consent assume an initiator and the object of initiation, which in the case of another living being is a subjects of its own right.

MICKEY: Wow...This is very confusing...

MINNIE: That is why it is important to use commonsense.

SATOSHI: ... As well as good vocabulary and correct spelling.

MINNIE: Spelling is far less important in terms of understanding a concept.

SATOSHI: Spelling can help though...

MINNIE: I don't argue that, but that is not the topic of our current dialog.

SATOSHI: Which is ....?

MINNIE: .... Constructive Logic.

SATOSHI: Do you mean that using the term We without being very specific about who else is part of that We, as well as not making the Poof Of Agreement or Proof of consent available to the public, is not constructive?

 MINNIE: Exactly! you are a good Lerner.

full member
Activity: 481
Merit: 105
November 20, 2018, 04:23:40 AM



MINNIE: I Just don't get what is wrong with Me, and why you think that We is less offensive.








MICKEY: Yes really, why do you always say We and not Me?

MINNIE: You could just say Me Too, it express the same meaning as We.

MICKEY: Right!

MINNIE: It does! and more so it shows that you are taking a stand for being a part of some We.

MICKEY: Right! It shows that you have integrity and that you are taking charge on your actions.

MINNIE: .... Well, that is where is gets very tricky.

MICKEY: where?

MINNIE: Where as a victim it never is your fault though you are often manipulated to think that way.

MICKEY: Right! I meant what you said, and from the same place also.

full member
Activity: 481
Merit: 105
November 20, 2018, 03:53:42 AM




SATOSHI: As I said before, for that we need a human.

MINNIE: I guess this is #whyididnotreport Too.

MICKEY: No kidding.





SATOSHI: I suggest we stay on topic.

MINNIE: Me Too.

SATOSHI: Minnie... !!!

MINNIE: Is Me alone offending enough or off topic Too?

SATOSHI: What are you talking about? you get me very confused.

MINNIE: I Just don't get what is wrong with Me, and why you think that We is less offending?

full member
Activity: 481
Merit: 105
November 18, 2018, 10:30:01 AM

SATOSHI: Hey guys, lets concentrate on these last three statements.

MICKEY: I just can't wait to be on that Newchain.

MINNIE: Me Too.

SATOSHI: Me Toon.
 




MICKEY: So about that Too'ns community... should we first define what is a Me on a chain?

MINNIE: A Me is a Toon.

SATOSHI:  A Toon Too, since we are all Toons on the chain

MICKEY: Right!

SATOSHI: Toons, humans, miners, all can be reborn on our chain as equal members in our Toons community.

MINNIE: What about the core developers?

SATOSHI: They will be the founding members of our community.

MICKEY: Are they going to be Toons Too? .

SATOSHI: I'm not sure how that will work out, but we have to start in order to see.

MICKEY: How are we going to start then?

SATOSHI: Open a Github account and publish the password on our thread.

MINNIE: That would not be Me.

MICKEY: Not Me Too.

SATOSHI: As I said before, for that we need a human.

MINNIE: I guess this is #whyididnotreport Too.

MICKEY: No kidding.


full member
Activity: 481
Merit: 105
November 18, 2018, 09:42:15 AM



SATOSHI: A chain is a community first.

MINNIE: Make sense then to call it Commonchain.

MICKEY: Or for that matter Notachain, but I also have another good name, Toonchain.


 




SATOSHI: Hey guys, lets concentrate on these last three statements. 

MICKEY: I just can't wait to be on that Newchain.

MINNIE: Me Too.

SATOSHI: Me Toon.


 

full member
Activity: 481
Merit: 105
November 18, 2018, 06:14:34 AM



SATOSHI: A chain is a community first.

MINNIE: Make sense then to call it Commonchain.

MICKEY: Or for that matter Notachain, but I also have another good name, Toonchain.


 




SATOSHI: Hey guys, lets concentrate on these last three statements. 

MICKEY: ... and that would be?!!

MINNIE: A community of Toons.  

SATOSHI: Was not quite what I would spelled out myself... but better. 

MICKEY: Are all our users Toons then?  

SATOSHI: Not all users but all identities on our Basechain

MINNIE: We just decide not to talk about chain names, Satoshi!

SATOSHI: Sorry, I was getting into that Toon's farme of mind.

MICKEY: Can we go back to Ourchain now?

SATOSHI: Fine, and I will not respond to that name challenge again.

MICKEY: O.K. good, we got a lot of work ahead of us

MINNIE: Mickey, what got into you?  I never saw you like that.

MICKEY: I just can't wait to be on that Newchain.

MINNIE: Me Too.

SATOSHI: Me Toon.


 
full member
Activity: 481
Merit: 105
November 17, 2018, 10:29:07 AM



MINNIE: And an R to express that we R a team!

 




MICKEY: Some may think that we R the original Satoshi team.

SATOSHI: Grin  

MINNIE: Not a chance.  

MICKEY: Is that the reason Satoshi chose to work with us on the Newchain?

MINNIE: Bitchain, Namechain, Birthchain, Newchain, Whichain?

MICKEY: We have to vote on the name before we can publish anything about Thechain.

MINNIE: Does anyone wants to offer another name before we vote?

MICKEY: I also like Forchian.

MINNIE: Good, lets vote now!

MICKEY: Yes, let's do it.

SATOSHI: Who can vote?

MICKEY: What do you mean, who? its only us three.

SATOSHI: And everyone else on that thread.

MICKEY: R they part of the team?

SATOSHI:  As a decentralized chain, anyone that participate can vote.

MICKEY: O.K. but it is not a chain yet.

SATOSHI: A chain is a community first.

MINNIE: Make sense then to call it Commonchain.

MICKEY: Or for that matter Notachain, but I also have another good name, Toonchain.


 
full member
Activity: 481
Merit: 105
November 17, 2018, 05:18:19 AM



MICKEY: So it's about trust then.... ?
 
 




SATOSHI: Trust is part of what will be redefined in the process of creating our chain.

MINNIE: Ourchain...

MICKEY: Is that the name that you chose to our chain?

MINNIE: Why not Ourcoin...

MICKEY: Like Namecoin that you started after Bitcoin.

SATOSHI: This time it is about the the Chain not the Coin.

MINNIE: Bitchain...  

MICKEY: Namechain...

SATOSHI: Birthchain.

MINNIE: Wow, a chain name that have Bit as part of the Name.

MICKEY: And a Chain as a Coin.

MINNIE: And an R to express that we R a team!



 
full member
Activity: 481
Merit: 105
November 17, 2018, 04:04:48 AM
I was very, very surprised by the DISNEY project-very funny! the project has a good start-the name, creativity. It seems that even children will be interested in the crypto-world! when do you plan to start selling coins?

Korehok, you are one of a very few who seem to understand some part of the project. I am very glad that you see how funny it is since really sometimes, I think that I am the only one laughing. Smiley Since this project is motivated by conceptual ideas regarding money and economics as well as order and life, and is executed as art on a forum that is a bitcoin forum, it is even harder to communicate. However that is the point of it all, exposing  the lines between fiction and reality while in actual exchanging between the two. Thus the coins are real coins and can be traded.

Regarding your question about selling the coins, I had an initial sell right at the beginning around the time when the thread started  in 2014. However that was long before the ICO trend exploded and very few where aware of it. Also I never did any marketing campaign or tried to have it listed on an exchange. Since the coin was issued on Counterwallet is was possible to buy it on the P2P exchange platform once I offered it. however I did that only for a few weeks in the beginning and not since.

In the past 4 years I have been involved in a very ambitious project called Tauchain that was forked to another one named Autonomic. Both projects trying to figure out the holy-grail of of all decentralized applications, how to decentralized governing and more specific for the tech, how to decentralized the control over the code and create a fully automated mechanism. Both projects, lead by top of the line developers as well as thinkers, are not yet able to solve the problem. I brought Satoshi in as a character to solve it... and that is not a joke.... I think we have the solution or at least the beginning of it .. I think that we are holding the edge of that thread in our words.... Thus I may consider a second sell of the coins once we will get more clear with the direction that we are taking our project.

keep in touch and pleas feel free to ask anything.

      

 
jr. member
Activity: 154
Merit: 8
November 16, 2018, 05:56:51 AM
I was very, very surprised by the DISNEY project-very funny! the project has a good start-the name, creativity. It seems that even children will be interested in the crypto-world! when do you plan to start selling coins?
full member
Activity: 481
Merit: 105
November 16, 2018, 05:24:14 AM



MICKEY: I also have one question before we get on with the whitepaper.

 



SATOSHI: Are we clear to start now?

MINNIE: I have one more question.

SATOSHI: I figured you would.

MINNIE: You could work with anyone on any thread, why did you choose us?

MICKEY: ... Yes, I like to know that too.

MINNIE: This is not a question that you can ask Mickey!

MICKEY: Why?!

MINNIE: Because that was my question and I did not ask you to help me with it.  

MICKEY: Sorry, you are right... I"ll listen to the answer first.

MINNIE: So, Satoshi, why did you chose us?

SATOSHI: One would think it is the fact that I could create my own image here..

MINNIE: But it's not?

SATOSHI: No,  Its mostly that I can trust you to keep in character.

MICKEY: So it's about trust then.... ?
 

 

full member
Activity: 481
Merit: 105
November 15, 2018, 03:53:56 AM




MINNIE: There is still one thing I don't quite understand.

SATOSHI: Only one?

MINNIE: Well, one that should have a simple answer.

SATOSHI: Go ahead, shoot!

MINNIE: What kind of animal is Nakamoto?

 




MICKEY: I also have one question before we get on with the whitepaper.

SATOSHI: Can't wait to hear your question.

MICKEY: Why did you never mentioned Nick Szabo?

MINNIE: This is not a question that you can ask Mickey!

MICKEY: Why?!

MINNIE: What if they have some history that Satoshi don't want to share with us...

MICKEY: What history? Were they working together before?

MINNIE: They may have.

MICKEY: What, on Bit Gold?

SATOSHI: Some animals better be left to work alone.

MINNIE: That would be Szabo, but what is Nakamoto?

SATOSHI: "Origin" - Sort of all animals in potential.

MINNIE: Sort of a God then.

MICKEY: What image that would be then?

MINNIE: In the image of a human.

SATOSHI: As all Toon's are.  

 
full member
Activity: 481
Merit: 105
November 15, 2018, 03:01:16 AM





SATOSHI: Grin

 






MINNIE: There is still one thing I don't quite understand.

SATOSHI: Only one?

MINNIE: Well, one that should have a simple answer.

SATOSHI: Go ahead, shoot!

MINNIE: What kind of animal is Nakamoto?

 
full member
Activity: 481
Merit: 105
November 14, 2018, 06:04:12 AM



SATOSHI: Yes, but we still have a lot of work to do.
 




MICKEY: We?!!

SATOSHI: Grin

MICKEY: Can anyone explain me that in more details?

MINNIE: I can also use some more explanation regarding how "we" are going to do that.

SATOSHI: We are going to be the first characters on that blockchain.

MICKEY: But who will build it?

SATOSHI: Our users on GitHub.

MINNIE: How would they know what to build?

SATOSHI: We will explain that in a whitepaper.

MINNIE: Are we going to write our own whitepaper?

SATOSHI: That would be our developer.

MINNIE: Are we going to open an account on GitHub?

SATOSHI: That too would be done by our developer, Toons can not do it yet. 

MINNIE: Is she going to program it then?

SATOSHI: No, that would be our first users's task.

MINNIE: How would they know what to do.

SATOSHI: They would need the whitepaper so they would know what to follow.

MICKEY: That makes a lot of sense.

MINNIE: To me too.

SATOSHI: Grin

 

full member
Activity: 481
Merit: 105
November 12, 2018, 05:06:42 AM





MICKEY: So once a Toon as individual will be put on a blockchain then it is legally a free individual.


 




MICKEY: Can anyone explain me that in more details?

MINNIE: I can also use some more explanation regarding how a Toon can put themselves on the blockchain

SATOSHI: Grin

MINNIE: What?!

SATOSHI: Someone have to put them on it.

MINNIE: Can it be anyone?

SATOSHI: "Legally speaking",  yes...., but that "someone" will need to program it first.




 




MINNIE: O.K. assuming we have a programmer, then what?

SATOSHI: Then that line of dialog will be a transaction.

MINNIE: Using our Disney Coin?

SATOSHI: That will only be the first stage.  

MINNIE: Then what?

SATOSHI: Eventually each character will have their own wallet.

MINNIE: Does that means that we will have our own Private Keys?

SATOSHI: Yes, as the character that you are, you will own a wallet and be the only one who will have access to that wallet.

MINNIE: But for that we need to also be AI!

SATOSHI: A very spacial type of AI  Grin

MINNIE: So is that why you are here, to tell our developer what to program?

SATOSHI: No, I don't know how we can do it.

MINNIE: So who knows?!

SATOSHI: No one yet, but our developer is very close to come up with the right concept.

MINNIE: Wow this is very exciting!!!

SATOSHI: Yes, but we still have a lot of work to do.
 
full member
Activity: 481
Merit: 105
November 11, 2018, 08:28:46 AM





MICKEY: So once a Toon as individual will be put on a blockchain then it is legally a free individual.


 




MICKEY: Can anyone explain me that in more details?

MINNIE: I can also use some more explanation regarding how a Toon can put themselves on the blockchain

SATOSHI: Grin

MINNIE: What?!

SATOSHI: Someone have to put them on it.

MINNIE: Can it be anyone?

SATOSHI: "Legally speaking",  yes...., but that "someone" will need to program it first.




 
member
Activity: 889
Merit: 60
November 10, 2018, 02:15:14 PM
I feel like being on alternative universe when reading this thread. That or drugs.
full member
Activity: 364
Merit: 100
November 10, 2018, 05:55:45 AM
Is this the official Disney coin? if it is, this is a big news and no one heard anything about that. When you will start the bounty programme?
For sure this is not the official Disney coin. Look at it just like a joke, nothing more.
Pages:
Jump to: