Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] [INT] IntelliCoin | 2 WEEKS POW! | IntelliApp | InSign - page 37. (Read 113043 times)

sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
I really dont like the way this goes.

You guys are fools. Ok here is what I think about this
1. If you guys invest in altcoins for Pump and Dump  or getting scammed then this is not the coin for you.
2. If you guys understand a coin and its true value, only then you will realize the value of this coin.
I don't see why raising funds is a bad move. Coins like Greenbacks, and CLSTR raised more than 100 BTC and all of them had new devs. Just this Morning DEV of USE coin dumped his premine, and had an IPO without showing a development.
And here you have legit students, who have real identities, and people are backing out. Its funny the way altcoin world works.
I feel if the dev can show development before the ICO ends then they show they are serious and worth investing in.

I really had faith in that, but i can see already 2 way how this dev would have make money on us, and this next ICO seems weird.
13BTC of a 500 sat coin makes a lot of growth margin if product are delivered, complaining it's not enough is surrealistic.

I agree. Just buy your own coin then keep delivering what you promised. From there you can slowly sell off as the price increases.

They received 13 BTC  for their work, with this, they should buy their coin now and create a development fund.
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0

I really had faith in that, but i can see already 2 way how this dev would have make money on us, and this next ICO seems weird.
13BTC of a 500 sat coin makes a lot of growth margin if product are delivered, complaining it's not enough is surrealistic.

I agree. Just buy your own coin then keep delivering what you promised. From there you can slowly sell off as the price increases.

I am sorry if you guys think that way. I obviously cannot say anything to defend myself on this , but if we wanted to do this we could have simply invested Bitcoins in the previous presale we had.
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
So much butthurt, anger and unrealistic expectations in here. They're doing us a favor here boys and girls. You just have to be calm and intelligent enough to see it. You have guaranteed profit unless you bought over 800 sats in which case we weren't going to see that until the time of the ICO anyway. Plus, the second ICO will bring in much bigger fish with all the given info there is out there now. This will lead to the price dramatically increasing on launch and delivery of InSign. Plus, quit thinking of yourself and put yourself in their shoes for a minute. You want these busy intelligent kids to work their asses off to make you rich and not even have the support they need to do so? Get real people, get real.
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
MIT i dont give a fuck where they are studying the fact is that they are money donkeys and right now the investors/holders of INT got scammed by a bunch of so called ''MIT'' students.
member
Activity: 78
Merit: 10
I really dont like the way this goes.

You guys are fools. Ok here is what I think about this
1. If you guys invest in altcoins for Pump and Dump  or getting scammed then this is not the coin for you.
2. If you guys understand a coin and its true value, only then you will realize the value of this coin.
I don't see why raising funds is a bad move. Coins like Greenbacks, and CLSTR raised more than 100 BTC and all of them had new devs. Just this Morning DEV of USE coin dumped his premine, and had an IPO without showing a development.
And here you have legit students, who have real identities, and people are backing out. Its funny the way altcoin world works.
I feel if the dev can show development before the ICO ends then they show they are serious and worth investing in.

I really had faith in that, but i can see already 2 way how this dev would have make money on us, and this next ICO seems weird.
13BTC of a 500 sat coin makes a lot of growth margin if product are delivered, complaining it's not enough is surrealistic.

I agree. Just buy your own coin then keep delivering what you promised. From there you can slowly sell off as the price increases.
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
I really dont like the way this goes.

You guys are fools. Ok here is what I think about this
1. If you guys invest in altcoins for Pump and Dump  or getting scammed then this is not the coin for you.
2. If you guys understand a coin and its true value, only then you will realize the value of this coin.
I don't see why raising funds is a bad move. Coins like Greenbacks, and CLSTR raised more than 100 BTC and all of them had new devs. Just this Morning DEV of USE coin dumped his premine, and had an IPO without showing a development.
And here you have legit students, who have real identities, and people are backing out. Its funny the way altcoin world works.
I feel if the dev can show development before the ICO ends then they show they are serious and worth investing in.

I really had faith in that, but i can see already 2 way how this dev would have make money on us, and this next ICO seems weird.
13BTC of a 500 sat coin makes a lot of growth margin if product are delivered, complaining it's not enough is surrealistic.

Schild, I get your point. But its a growth margin for only investors. Not for developers and not for Altcoins in terms of development. In general after few days this will die as well, and be replaced by another coin. If you are out, then be out.
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
I really dont like the way this goes.

You guys are fools. Ok here is what I think about this
1. If you guys invest in altcoins for Pump and Dump  or getting scammed then this is not the coin for you.
2. If you guys understand a coin and its true value, only then you will realize the value of this coin.
I don't see why raising funds is a bad move. Coins like Greenbacks, and CLSTR raised more than 100 BTC and all of them had new devs. Just this Morning DEV of USE coin dumped his premine, and had an IPO without showing a development.
And here you have legit students, who have real identities, and people are backing out. Its funny the way altcoin world works.
I feel if the dev can show development before the ICO ends then they show they are serious and worth investing in.

I really had faith in that, but i can see already 2 way how this dev would have make money on us, and this next ICO seems weird.
13BTC of a 500 sat coin makes a lot of growth margin if product are delivered, complaining it's not enough is surrealistic.
sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
Super Smash Bros. Ultimate Available Now!
I didn't realize MIT had such a large Jewish student body.
member
Activity: 111
Merit: 10
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
I really dont like the way this goes.

You guys are fools. Ok here is what I think about this
1. If you guys invest in altcoins for Pump and Dump  or getting scammed then this is not the coin for you.
2. If you guys understand a coin and its true value, only then you will realize the value of this coin.
I don't see why raising funds is a bad move. Coins like Greenbacks, and CLSTR raised more than 100 BTC and all of them had new devs. Just this Morning DEV of USE coin dumped his premine, and had an IPO without showing a development.
And here you have legit students, who have real identities, and people are backing out. Its funny the way altcoin world works.
I feel if the dev can show development before the ICO ends then they show they are serious and worth investing in.
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
Basically what they are saying is the current price of INT is 800 sats, the relaunched coin INL will cost 9000 so you can trade 10 INT for 1 INL with the so called ''12.5%'' bonus. But the amount of coins stays the same? LIKE WTF!

This was NOT clear. The best way to make early investors lose faith and suspect this to be a scam.
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
A big FUCK YOU, and im out! Grin
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
These are proven MIT students with a long term plan who need funds to support the endeavor and motivate them to continue to contribute their time efforts towards it on top of their studies. Also, they have legal and civil repercussions looming over them if they don't follow through as promised. Holder's are getting a 12.5% increase because the INL price is set at .00009000 price and the market was currently at .00000800 when this info was posted. It is even less now. That means you can buy more and get an even bigger % increase if you believe in them and are willing to wait to trade them in and support them through their second ICO. I am impatient like many crypto traders, but I understand their logic and reasoning and think that the coin is much more likely to live and bring quicker innovation as well as yield us vastly bigger return on our investment if we go this route. Thanks for the upcoming whitepaper and roadmap guys!  
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
Basically what they are saying is the current price of INT is 800 sats, the relaunched coin INL will cost 9000 so you can trade 10 INT for 1 INL with the so called ''12.5%'' bonus. But the amount of coins stays the same? LIKE WTF!
legendary
Activity: 1884
Merit: 1005
I really dont like the way this goes.
hero member
Activity: 605
Merit: 500
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
Shouldn't there be some incentive for early adopters?  Sad


As an incentive all INT holders will be getting an extra 12.5% only by exchanging INT for INL.



Do you guys realize that there is not enough information on the new coin?

Yes. Tonight we will be drafting a proper white paper and will be releasing a detailed timeline.

Do you also realize that lately all the coins which were scam had an ICO and even provided screenshot?

This was not a good news.

We will not be providing screenshots, but a complete working website implementing it.


Ok, I'll buy in as soon as I see this working website. But for now, i'll just take my 50% loss . Too many mistake for today.
The coin would had flourish anyway with all the provided work. I just don't understand how come you don't hold a large amount of your own coin and pay yourself with cashing out later as the price is getting higher later.
ICO is the worse choice you could have make, cause it inspire no trust at all at the moment.
full member
Activity: 380
Merit: 100
Community Manager - Blockchain analyst
Sorry for the delay on posting this announcement. I wanted to make sure that everyone on the team reviewed the update before posting....


Before you start the ICO. Please prove that IntelliApp or InSign actually exists. Otherwise it will fail big time.


Yes, As promised, we will release InSign in the middle of the ICO(around the end  of the month), so people can decide.


One more question. You have

Symbol: INT/INL

in your ANN since ages. Was this ICO planned a long time ago?
member
Activity: 111
Merit: 10
Could have just bought some coins at this price. Then one announcement, sign of good work.
And there would be more money than they will get with this second IPO
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
Shouldn't there be some incentive for early adopters?  Sad


As an incentive all INT holders will be getting an extra 12.5% only by exchanging INT for INL.



Do you guys realize that there is not enough information on the new coin?

Yes. Tonight we will be drafting a proper white paper and will be releasing a detailed timeline.

Do you also realize that lately all the coins which were scam had an ICO and even provided screenshot?

This was not a good news.

We will not be providing screenshots, but a complete working website implementing it.
Pages:
Jump to: